I’m trying to use a REST API call to find all envelopes with subjects that are either {{cSubject_1}} OR {{cSubject_2}}.
I’m using "search_text" for filtering but I’m not sure how I should use the logical operator for “OR” for this purpose.
I would appreciate if you could help me with this.
Thanks,
Kathy
There's currently no support for this type of complex query in the search_text for The Envelopes:listStatusChanges endpoint.
The search_text allows you to have a single text item that is search across the board (recipients, subject, etc.) and is not limited to a specific meta-data. You can use other filters to filter by other means.
I would recommend storing envelope's meta-data in your application storage (or database) and using your own code to query this information if possible.
Related
GraphQL's principle aim is to solve overfetching problem as faced by many REST APIs and it does that by querying for only specific fields as mentioned in the query.
But in REST APIs, if we use the fields parameter, it also does the same thing. So why need GraphQL if REST can solve overfetching like this?
The option to fetch partial fields is only one of the key features of GraphQL, but not the only one.
One other important advantage is the 'graphic' nature of the model. By treating your schema as a graph (that is, several resources tied together by fields), it allows you to fetch a complex response, constructed of several data types in a single API call. This is a flexibility that you don't have in a standard REST API
Both these features can obviously be done by rest as well, but GraphQL gives it in a much simpler and more intuitive way.
Take a look at this post, there's a fairly good explanation there of the advantages (and disadvantages) of GraphQL.
https://www.altexsoft.com/blog/engineering/graphql-core-features-architecture-pros-and-cons/
When you have a REST setup, you're typically returning a whole JSON representation for each endpoint. This includes all fields that you may or may not need which leads to more data usage or more HTTP calls (if you divide your RESTful API up, that is).
GraphQL on the other hand gives you exactly what you're asking for when you query with a single POST/GET request.
I wanted to provide functionality to clients from my service to get the data based on different fields or sometimes combination of fields. Eg.
getByA
getByB
getByC
getByAandB
getByAandC
In domain driven design, while designing the GET APIs, what should I do out of the following 2:
Should I create individual get api for all such functionalities I wanted to provide?
Should I create one get API with all the possible gets by using all these fields in query parameter. Eg.
get?A=?&B=?&C=?
Which one is the better way to do this? Any suggestions on best practice?
There is a middle path between using individual GET APIs for each of these queries and creating one GET API.
You could use the Specification pattern to expose one GET API, but translate it into a Domain Specification Object before passing it on to the Domain layer for querying. You typically do this transformation in your View Controller, before invoking the Application Service.
Martin Fowler and Eric Evans have published a great paper on using Specifications: https://martinfowler.com/apsupp/spec.pdf
As the paper states, The central idea of Specification is to separate the statement of how to match a candidate, from the candidate object that it is matched against.
Note:
You are fine if you are using this pattern for the Query side as you have outlined in your question, and avoid reusing it in different contexts. For ex., DO NOT use a specification object on both the query side and command side, if you are using (or plan to use) CQRS. You will be creating a central dependency between two parts, that NEED to be kept separate.
Specifications are handy when you want to represent a domain concept. Evaluate your queries (getByAandB and getByAandC) to draw out the question you are asking to the domain (For ex., ask your domain expert to describe the data he is trying to fetch).
This is sort of a follow-up to someone else's question about filtering/querying a list of cars. There the recommendation for a RESTful filtering request was to put filter expressions in the query of the URI, like this:
/cars?color=blue&type=sedan&doors=4
That's fine. But what if my filtering query becomes more complicated and I need to use Boolean operators, such as:
((color=blue OR type=sedan) AND doors=4) OR color=red
That is, I want to find a four-door blue car or a four-door sedan, but if the car is red I'll take it without caring about any of the other properties.
Is there any sort of convention for providing Boolean expressions in a RESTful URI's query parameters? I suppose I could by create some new querying expression language and put it in a POST, but that seems like a heavy and proprietary approach. How are others solving this?
It is perfectly okay to use
/cars/color:blue/type:sedan/doors:4
instead of
/cars?color=blue&type=sedan&doors=4
The URL standard says only that the path should contain the hierarchical part, and the query should contain the non-hierarchical. Since this is a map-reduce, using / is perfectly valid.
In your case you need a query language to describe your filters. If I were you I would copy an already existing solution, for example the query language of a noSQL database which has a REST API.
I think resource query language is what you need. I think you could use it like this:
/sthg?q="(foo=3|foo=bar)&price=lt=10"
or forget the default queryString parser, and like this:
/sthg?(foo=3|foo=bar)&price=lt=10
I suggest you to read the manual for further details.
Since I found no other URL compatible query language (yet), I think the only other option to serialize another query language and send it in a param, like SparSQL
http://localhost:8003/v1/graphs/sparql?query=your-urlencoded-query
by marklogic7. Hydra defines a freeTextQuery in its vocab, so they follow the same approach. But I'll ask Markus about this. It's a complicated topic, since according to the self-descriptive messages constraint you should describe somewhere what type of query language you use in the URL. I am not sure about this. :S
conclusion:
In order to support ad-hoc search queries we need a standard way to describe them in the link meta-data. Currently there are only a few standards about this. The most widely used standard is URI templates which does not support nested statements, operators, etc... for what I know. There is a draft called link descriptions which tries to fill the gap, but it is incomplete.
One possible workaround to define an URI template with a single q parameter which has rdf:type of x:SearchQuery and rdfs:range of xsd:string, and create another vocab about how to describe such a x:SearchQuery. After that the description could be used to build search forms, and validate queries sent to the server. Already existing queries could be supported too with this approach, so we don't need a new one.
So this problem can be solved with vocabs or new URI template standards.
I have seen many use a query string as you have provided - much like a SQL query string.
Here are just two examples:
Socrata (Open Data Portal company)'s SoQL (SQL variant): http://dev.socrata.com/consumers/cookbooks/querying-block-ranges.html
openFDA (API from fda.gov for open data) uses a similar string-based query parameter which maps to ElasticSearch queries, I believe: https://open.fda.gov/api/reference/#query-syntax
Try using 1 for true, 0 for false.
/_api/web/lists/getbytitle('XYZ')/items?$filter=Active eq 1
I have already gone through this
How best to design a REST API with multiple filters?
This does help when you have say 3 or 4 filtering criteria and you can accomodate that in the query String.
However let's take this example
You want to get call details about 20 telephone numbers, between a certain startdate and enddate.
Now I do agree ideally one should be advised to make individual queries for each number and then on the client side collate all data.
However for certain Live systems that would mean 20 rounds of queries on the switches or cdr databases. That is 20 request-response cycles plus the client having to collate and order them again based on time. While in the database level it would have been a simple single query that can return an ordered data and transformed back into a REST xml response that the client can embed on their system.
If we are to use GET the query string will get really confusing and has a limit as well.
Any suggestions to get around this issue.
Of course we can send a POST request with an xml having all numbers in it but that is against REST Get principles.
In case of GET use OData queries. For example when your start and end dates represented as numbers (unix time) URI could look like:
GET http://operatorcalls.com/Calls/Details?$filter=Date le 1342699200 and Date gt 1342526400
What you seem to be missing is an important concept of REST, caching. This can be done, as an example, in the browser, for a single client. Or it can be done as a shared cache between all the clients and the live production system (whatever it may be). Thus reducing queries against a live production system, or in your example, actual switches.
You should really take some time to read Fieldings thesis, and understand that REST is an architectural style.
I found a solution here Handling multiple parameters in a URI (RESTfully) in Java
but not quite happy with it.
So in effect we will end up using /cdr?numbers=number1,number2,number3 ...
However not too pleased with it as there is a limit to Query String in the url and also doesn't really seem to be an elegant solution. Anyone found any solution to this in their own implementation?
Basically not using POST for this kind of Fetch requests and also not using cumbresome and lengthy Query Strings.
We are using Jersey but also open to using CXF or Spring REST
I am connecting to Salesforce.com as a data-store and accessing their REST API's.
Currently, to do a query, have to use SOQL, which is a query language.
How can I use ActiveRecord type 'where' queries instead?
You don't have to use SOQL to retrieve records via the Salesforce.com REST API, if you are retrieving by the Id of the record. To do this, you can just use the following syntax:
/vXX.X/sobjects/SObjectName/id/
To retrieve records that meet a specific clause other than ID, I don't believe there is an alternative to SOQL at this point directly in the REST API.
However, if you are using Ruby, there is a Ruby Toolkit for salesforce that does support using active record style syntax. This is an open source project and you can find out more about it here:
http://quintonwall.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/RubyToolkit-gettingstarted.pdf
Here are a couple of examples from the above document:
There are toolkits for other languages, but I am not sure of their support for Active Record style record access.