I have noticed a new lint issue in my project.
Long story short:
I need to use BuildContext in my custom classes
flutter lint tool is not happy when this being used with aysnc method.
Example:
MyCustomClass{
final buildContext context;
const MyCustomClass({required this.context});
myAsyncMethod() async {
await someFuture();
# if (!mounted) return; << has no effect even if i pass state to constructor
Navigator.of(context).pop(); # << example
}
}
UPDATE: 17/September/2022
It appears that BuildContext will soon have a "mounted" property
So you can do:
if (context.mounted)
It basically allows StatelessWidgets to check "mounted" too.
Reference: Remi Rousselet Tweet
Update Flutter 3.7+ :
mounted property is now officially added to BuildContext, so you can check it from everywhere, whether it comes from a StatefulWidget State, or from a Stateless widget.
While storing context into external classes stays a bad practice, you can now check it safely after an async call like this :
class MyCustomClass {
const MyCustomClass();
Future<void> myAsyncMethod(BuildContext context) async {
Navigator.of(context).push(/*waiting dialog */);
await Future.delayed(const Duration(seconds: 2));
if (context.mounted) Navigator.of(context).pop();
}
}
// Into widget
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return IconButton(
onPressed: () => const MyCustomClass().myAsyncMethod(context),
icon: const Icon(Icons.bug_report),
);
}
// Into widget
Original answer
Don't stock context directly into custom classes, and don't use context after async if you're not sure your widget is mounted.
Do something like this:
class MyCustomClass {
const MyCustomClass();
Future<void> myAsyncMethod(BuildContext context, VoidCallback onSuccess) async {
await Future.delayed(const Duration(seconds: 2));
onSuccess.call();
}
}
class MyWidget extends StatefulWidget {
#override
_MyWidgetState createState() => _MyWidgetState();
}
class _MyWidgetState extends State<MyWidget> {
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return IconButton(
onPressed: () => const MyCustomClass().myAsyncMethod(context, () {
if (!mounted) return;
Navigator.of(context).pop();
}),
icon: const Icon(Icons.bug_report),
);
}
}
Use context.mounted*
In StatefulWidget/StatelessWidget or in any class that has BuildContext:
void foo(BuildContext context) async {
await someFuture();
if (!context.mounted) return;
Navigator.pop(context); // No warnings now
}
* If you're in a StatefulWidget, you can also use just mounted instead of context.mounted
If your class can extend from StatefulWidget then adding
if (!mounted) return;
would work!
EDIT
I had this issue again and again and here's the trick - use or declare variables using context before using async methods like so:
MyCustomClass{
const MyCustomClass({ required this.context });
final buildContext context;
myAsyncMethod() async {
// Declare navigator instance (or other context using methods/classes)
// before async method is called to use it later in code
final navigator = Navigator.of(context);
await someFuture();
// Now use the navigator without the warning
navigator.pop();
}
}
EDIT END
As per Guildem's answer, he still uses
if (!mounted) return;
so what's the point of adding more spaghetti code with callbacks? What if this async method will have to pass some data to the methods you're also passing context? Then my friend, you will have even more spaghetti on the table and another extra issue.
The core concept is to not use context after async bloc is triggered ;)
If you want to use mounted check in a stateless widget its possible by making an extension on BuildContext
extension ContextExtensions on BuildContext {
bool get mounted {
try {
widget;
return true;
} catch (e) {
return false;
}
}
}
and then you can use it like this
if (context.mounted)
Inspiration taken from GitHub PR for this feature and it passes the same tests in the merged PR
you can use this approach
myAsyncMethod() async {
await someFuture().then((_){
if (!mounted) return;
Navigator.of(context).pop();
}
});
In Flutter 3.7.0 BuildContext has the property mounted. It can be used both in StatelessWidget and StatefulWidgets like this:
void bar(BuildContext context) async {
await yourFuture();
if (!context.mounted) return;
Navigator.pop(context);
}
Just simpliy creat a function to call the navigation
void onButtonTapped(BuildContext context) {
Navigator.of(context).pop();
}
To avoid this in StatelessWidget you can refer to this example
class ButtonWidget extends StatelessWidget {
final String title;
final Future<String>? onPressed;
final bool mounted;
const ButtonWidget({
super.key,
required this.title,
required this.mounted,
this.onPressed,
});
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return Row(
children: [
const SizedBox(height: 20),
Expanded(
child: ElevatedButton(
onPressed: () async {
final errorMessage = await onPressed;
if (errorMessage != null) {
// This to fix: 'Do not use BuildContexts across async gaps'
if (!mounted) return;
snackBar(context, errorMessage);
}
},
child: Text(title),
))
],
);
}
}
I handle it with converting the function become not async and using then
Future<void> myAsyncMethod(BuildContext context) {
Navigator.of(context).push(/*waiting dialog */);
Future.delayed(const Duration(seconds: 2)).then(_) {
Navigator.of(context).pop();
});
}
just save your navigator or whatever needs a context to a variable at the beginning of the function
myAsyncMethod() async {
final navigator = Navigator.of(context); // 1
await someFuture();
navigator.pop(); // 2
}
DO NOT use BuildContext across asynchronous gaps.
Storing BuildContext for later usage can easily lead to difficult to diagnose crashes. Asynchronous gaps are implicitly storing BuildContext and are some of the easiest to overlook when writing code.
When a BuildContext is used from a StatefulWidget, the mounted property must be checked after an asynchronous gap.
So, I think, you can use like this:
GOOD:
class _MyWidgetState extends State<MyWidget> {
...
void onButtonTapped() async {
await Future.delayed(const Duration(seconds: 1));
if (!mounted) return;
Navigator.of(context).pop();
}
}
BAD:
void onButtonTapped(BuildContext context) async {
await Future.delayed(const Duration(seconds: 1));
Navigator.of(context).pop();
}
Related
I'm studying flutter_hooks library. My aim is to fetch data into model and be able to refresh it any time. Also I'd like to refresh data from different screens. Currently I do it this way:
Page class:
class NewPage extends HookWidget{
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
final holder=useState<ModelHolder>(ModelHolder()).value;
final notifier=useListenable(holder.notifier);
final model=notifier.value;
final refresh=useState<bool>(false);
useEffect(() {
print('refetching');
holder.fetch();
},[refresh.value]);
print('model:$model, ${model.hashCode}');
return Scaffold(
appBar: AppBar(
title: Text('Page 2'),
),
floatingActionButton: FloatingActionButton(
onPressed: () {
refresh.value=!refresh.value;//trigger refresh
},
child: const Icon(Icons.add),
),
);
}
}
ModelHolder class:
class ModelHolder {
final ValueNotifier<Model?> notifier = ValueNotifier<Model?>(null);
void fetch() async {
await Future.delayed(const Duration(seconds: 2));//do server call
notifier.value=Model('data');
}
}
Model class:
class Model{
final String value;
Model(this.value);
}
Basically this code works as expected. The only thing I'm confused is refresh variable in the NewPage. Due to this I can't extract hook's logic into custom hook. This is a typical task. I suspect that I'm inventing a wheel. What is the right way of fetching/updating data with flutter_hooks?
UPD: I moved refresh property into ModelHolder and now able to isolate everything in a custom hook.
holder:
class ModelHolder {
final ValueNotifier<bool> refresher;
final ValueNotifier<Model?> notifier = ValueNotifier<Model?>(null);
ModelHolder(this.refresher);
void fetch() async {
await Future.delayed(const Duration(seconds: 2));//do server call
notifier.value=Model('data');
}
}
Custom hook:
ModelHolder useModel(){
final refresh=useState<bool>(false);
final holder=useState(ModelHolder(refresh)).value;
useListenable(holder.notifier);
useEffect(() {
print('refetching');
holder.fetch();
},[refresh.value]);
return holder;
}
Usage:
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
final holder=useModel();
...
}
And I can pass holder to other routes to update it from there.
I am using provider for the state management on Flutter. I'm making async await function and have warning that Do not use BuildContexts across async gaps. So I tried to put 'if(!mounted)' code and I got warning that Undefined name 'mounted'.
How can I fix this problem? Thank you!
Provider codes
signIn(BuildContext context) async{
try {
final navigator = Navigator.of(context);
!isSignupValid ? isSignupValid = true : null;
await authentication.signInWithEmailAndPassword(
email: userEmail.trim(), password: userPassword.trim()
);
navigator.pop();
} on FirebaseAuthException catch (errorCode) {
isSignupValid = false;
print('isSignupValid : $isSignupValid');
print('SignIn FirebaseAuthException : $errorCode');
ScaffoldMessenger.of(context).showSnackBar(
returnSnackBar(context, errorCode)
);
}
await Future.delayed(const Duration(seconds: 0));
if (!mounted) return;
context.watch<ProfileData>().profileImage = null;
notifyListeners();
}
The mounted property is only available in a StatefulWidget. If you are not in a stateful widget you have no way of knowing whether the context you are using still references the state of a widget which is still in the widget tree.
I'm not sure exactly what you do. You can either change your widget to a StatefulWidget or simply do a final profileData = context.read<ProfileData>() at the beginning of you method, and never access context after your first async call.
If you want to check whether the widget is mounted in a StatelessWidget, you can try using a GlobalKey to obtain a reference to the widget and then check its mounted property:
class MyStatelessWidget extends StatelessWidget {
final _globalKey = GlobalKey();
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return Container(
key: _globalKey,
child: Text('Hello, world!'),
);
}
bool get isMounted => _globalKey.currentState != null && _globalKey.currentState!.mounted;
}
I am developing a Flutter application using Bloc pattern. After success authentication, UserSate has User object. In all other Blocs, I need to access User object in UserState. I tried with getting UserBloc on other Bloc's constructor parameters and accessing User object. But it shows that User object is null. Anyone have a better solution?
class SectorHomeBloc extends Bloc<SectorHomeEvent, SectorHomeState> {
final OutletRepository outletRepository;
UserBloc userBloc;
final ProductRepository productRepository;
final ProductSubCategoryRepository productSubCategoryRepository;
final PromotionRepository promotionRepository;
final ProductMainCategoryRepository mainCategoryRepository;
SectorHomeBloc({
#required this.outletRepository,
#required this.userBloc,
#required this.productSubCategoryRepository,
#required this.productRepository,
#required this.promotionRepository,
#required this.mainCategoryRepository,
});
#override
SectorHomeState get initialState => SectorHomeLoadingState();
#override
Stream<SectorHomeState> mapEventToState(SectorHomeEvent event) async* {
try {
print(userBloc.state.toString());
LatLng _location = LatLng(
userBloc.state.user.defaultLocation.coordinate.latitude,
userBloc.state.user.defaultLocation.coordinate.longitude);
String _token = userBloc.state.user.token;
if (event is GetAllDataEvent) {
yield SectorHomeLoadingState();
List<Outlet> _previousOrderedOutlets =
await outletRepository.getPreviousOrderedOutlets(
_token, _location, event.orderType, event.sectorId);
List<Outlet> _featuredOutlets =
await outletRepository.getFeaturedOutlets(
_token, _location, event.orderType, event.sectorId);
List<Outlet> _nearestOutlets = await outletRepository.getOutletsNearYou(
_token, _location, event.orderType, event.sectorId);
List<Product> _newProducts = await productRepository.getNewItems(
_token, _location, event.orderType, event.sectorId);
List<Product> _trendingProducts =
await productRepository.getTrendingItems(
_token, _location, event.orderType, event.sectorId);
List<Promotion> _promotions = await promotionRepository
.getVendorPromotions(_token, event.sectorId);
yield SectorHomeState(
previousOrderedOutlets: _previousOrderedOutlets,
featuredOutlets: _featuredOutlets,
nearByOutlets: _nearestOutlets,
newItems: _newProducts,
trendingItems: _trendingProducts,
promotions: _promotions,
);
}
} on SocketException {
yield SectorHomeLoadingErrorState('could not connect to server');
} catch (e) {
print(e);
yield SectorHomeLoadingErrorState('Error');
}
}
}
The print statement [print(userBloc.state.toString());] in mapEventToState method shows the initial state of UserSate.
But, at the time of this code executing UserState is in UserLoggedInState.
UPDATE (Best Practice):
please refer to the answer here enter link description here
so the best way for that is to hear the changes of another bloc inside the widget you are in, and fire the event based on that.
so what you will do is wrap your widget in a bloc listener and listen to the bloc you want.
class SecondPage extends StatelessWidget {
const SecondPage({Key? key}) : super(key: key);
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return BlocListener<FirstBloc, FirstBlocState>(
listener: (context, state) {
if(state is StateFromFirstBloc){
BlocProvider.of<SecondBloc>(context).add(SecondBlocEvent());}//or whatever you want
},
child: ElevatedButton(
child: Text('THIS IS NEW SCREEN'),
onPressed: () {
BlocProvider.of<SecondBloC>(context).add(SecondBloCEvent());
},
),
);
}
}
the lovely thing about listener is that you can listen anywhere to any bloc and do whatever you want
here is the official documentation for it
OLD WAY (NOT Recommended)
there is an official way to do this as in the documentation, called Bloc-to-Bloc Communication
and here is the example for this as in the documentation
class MyBloc extends Bloc {
final OtherBloc otherBloc;
StreamSubscription otherBlocSubscription;
MyBloc(this.otherBloc) {
otherBlocSubscription = otherBloc.listen((state) {
// React to state changes here.
// Add events here to trigger changes in MyBloc.
});
}
#override
Future<void> close() {
otherBlocSubscription.cancel();
return super.close();
}
}
sorry for the late update for this answer and thanks to #MJ studio
The accepted answer actually has a comment in the above example in the official docs saying "No matter how much you are tempted to do this, you should not do this! Keep reading for better alternatives!"!!!
Here's the official doc link, ultimately one bloc should not know about any other blocs, add methods to update your bloc and these can be triggered from blocListeners which listen to changes in your other blocs: https://bloclibrary.dev/#/architecture?id=connecting-blocs-through-domain
class MyWidget extends StatelessWidget {
const MyWidget({Key? key}) : super(key: key);
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return BlocListener<WeatherCubit, WeatherState>(
listener: (context, state) {
// When the first bloc's state changes, this will be called.
//
// Now we can add an event to the second bloc without it having
// to know about the first bloc.
BlocProvider.of<SecondBloc>(context).add(SecondBlocEvent());
},
child: TextButton(
child: const Text('Hello'),
onPressed: () {
BlocProvider.of<FirstBloc>(context).add(FirstBlocEvent());
},
),
);
}
}
I have an InkWell which uses onTap to perform some actions. When the button is tapped, I like an indicator to be shown (in case the action is long-running). However, the setState in the InkWell does not trigger its children to be re-rendered. The code is as follows:
class PrimaryButtonState extends State<PrimaryButton> {
bool _apiCall;
Widget getWidget() {
if(_apiCall) {
return new CircularProgressIndicator();
} else {
return Text(
widget.label,
);
}
}
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
final List<Color> colors = //omitted
return InkWell(
child: Container(
decoration: // omitted
child: getWidget(), // not updated when _apiCall changes !!!!!
),
onTap: () {
setState(() {
_apiCall = true;
});
widget.onTab(context);
setState(() {
_apiCall = false;
});
}
);
}
}
How can I solve this that getWidget returns the correct widget dependent on _apiCall?
EDIT:
The widget.onTap contains the following:
void performLogin(BuildContext context) {
final String userName = _userName.text.trim();
final String password = _password.text.trim();
UserService.get().loginUser(userName, password).then((val) {
Navigator.push(
context, MaterialPageRoute(builder: (context) => MainLayout()));
}).catchError((e) {
// omitted
});
}
it is passed with the widget:
class PrimaryButton extends StatefulWidget {
final bool isPrimary;
final String label;
final Function(BuildContext context) onTab;
PrimaryButton(this.label, this.isPrimary, this.onTab);
#override
State<StatefulWidget> createState() => PrimaryButtonState();
}
My main concern is, that the given onTap method should not know it is "bound" to a UI widget and therefore should not setState. Also, as this is a general button implementation I like it to be interchangeable (therefore, onTap is not hardcoded)
It looks like your problem is because you are calling setState() twice in your onTap() function. Since onTap() is not an async function it will set _apiCall = true in the first setState, then immediately run widget.onTab(context) and then immediately perform the second setState() to set _apiCall = false so you never see the loading widget.
To fix this you will need to make your onTab function an async function and await for a value in your onTap function for your InkWell:
onTap: () async {
setState(() {
_apiCall = true;
});
await widget.onTab(context);
setState(() {
_apiCall = false;
});
}
This will also let you use the results of your onTab function to show errors or other functionality if needed.
If you are unsure how to use async functions and futures here is a good guide on it that goes over this exact kind of use case.
When I click the raised button, the timepicker is showing up. Now, if I wait 5 seconds, for example, and then confirm the time, this error will occur:
setState() called after dispose()
I literally see in the console how flutter is updating the parent widgets, but why? I don't do anything - I just wait 5 seconds?!
The example below will work in a normal project, however in my project which is quite more complex it won't work because Flutter is updating the states while I am waiting... What am I doing wrong? Does anyone have a guess at what it could be that Flutter is updating randomly in my more complex project and not in a simple project?
[UPDATE]
I took a second look at it and found out it is updating from the level on where my TabBar and TabBarView are.
Could it have to do something with the "with TickerProviderStateMixin" which I need for the TabBarView? Could it be that it causes the app to refresh regularly and randomly?
class DateTimeButton extends State<DateTimeButtonWidget> {
DateTime selectedDate = new DateTime.now();
Future initTimePicker() async {
final TimeOfDay picked = await showTimePicker(
context: context,
initialTime: new TimeOfDay(hour: selectedDate.hour, minute: selectedDate.minute),
);
if (picked != null) {
setState(() {
selectedDate = new DateTime(selectedDate.year, selectedDate.month, selectedDate.day, picked.hour, picked.minute);
});
}
}
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return new RaisedButton(
child: new Text("${selectedDate.hour} ${selectedDate.minute}"),
onPressed: () {
initTimePicker();
}
);
}
}
Just check boolean property mounted of the state class of your widget before calling setState().
if (this.mounted) {
setState(() {
// Your state change code goes here
});
}
Or even more clean approach
Override setState method in your StatelfulWidget class.
class DateTimeButton extends StatefulWidget {
#override
void setState(fn) {
if(mounted) {
super.setState(fn);
}
}
}
If it is an expected behavior that the Future completes when the widget already got disposed you can use
if (mounted) {
setState(() {
selectedDate = new DateTime(selectedDate.year, selectedDate.month, selectedDate.day, picked.hour, picked.minute);
});
}
Just write one line before setState()
if (!mounted) return;
and then
setState(() {
//Your code
});
I had the same problem and i solved changing the super constructor call order on initState():
Wrong code:
#override
void initState() {
foo_bar(); // call setState();
super.initState(); // then foo_bar()
}
Right code:
#override
void initState() {
super.initState();
foo_bar(); // first call super constructor then foo_bar that contains setState() call
}
To prevent the error from occurring, one can make use of the mounted property of the State class to ensure that a widget is mounted before settings its state:
// First Update data
if (!mounted) {
return;
}
setState(() { }
Try this
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return new RaisedButton(
child: new Text("${selectedDate.hour} ${selectedDate.minute}"),
onPressed: () async {
await initTimePicker();
}
);
}
class MountedState<T extends StatefulWidget> extends State<T> {
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return null;
}
#override
void setState(VoidCallback fn) {
if (mounted) {
super.setState(fn);
}
}
}
Example
To prevent the error,Instead of using State use MountedState
class ExampleStatefulWidget extends StatefulWidget {
const ExampleStatefulWidget({Key key}) : super(key: key);
#override
_ExampleStatefulWidgetState createState() => _ExampleStatefulWidgetState();
}
class _ExampleStatefulWidgetState extends MountedState<ExampleStatefulWidget> {
....
}
I had this error when I mistakenly called super.initState before the variable. Check this:
#override
void initState() {
super.initState();
bloc = MainBloc();
}
Should be fixed as
#override
void initState() {
bloc = MainBloc();
super.initState();
}
The problem could occur when you have long asynchronous operation in stateful widget that could be closed/disposed before the operation finished.
Futures in Dart are not preemptive, so the only way is to check if a widget mounted before calling setState.
If you have a lot of widgets with asynchrony, adding ton of if (mounted) checks is tedious and an extension method might be useful
extension FlutterStateExt<T extends StatefulWidget> on State<T> {
void setStateIfMounted(VoidCallback fn) {
if (mounted) {
// ignore: invalid_use_of_protected_member
setState(fn);
}
}
}