None of the bind examples in the documentation work - https://fancyapps.com/docs/ui/fancybox/api
The standard constructor examples work great, but anything that requires binding does not work. There is no error, but the gallery lightbox doesn't work - clicking an image just opens the image as a link. Here is the exact example code with markup:
<div id="gallery">
<a href="https://lipsum.app/id/1/800x600">
<img src="https://lipsum.app/id/1/300x225" />
</a>
<a href="https://lipsum.app/id/2/800x600">
<img src="https://lipsum.app/id/2/300x225" />
</a>
</div>
<script>
Fancybox.bind("#gallery a", {
on : {
ready : (fancybox) => {
console.log(`fancybox #${fancybox.id} is ready!`);
}
}
});
</script>
That console log never fires.
I'm importing FancyBox like this:
import { Fancybox } from '#fancyapps/ui';
I've tried searching around, but very little info on FancyBox 4 other than official docs and it's frustrating as they don't work. I've tried some of the examples in showcase also, and the same deal. If it's binding, it won't work and no errors are shown. Anyone have any insight into this?
Thanks,
Tom
It works perfectly fine. Since you did not provide a live demo (or at least a full HTML code), then it just not possible to help you.
It is so frustrating to read comments like this, no demo, no useful info, nothing. Maybe you did not include JS file, I do not know ... I would love to help you and to improve documentation, but, sorry, your comment is not helpful at all.
Fancybox is designed to be as easy to use as possible, all you have to do is:
Include two files - CSS and JS file (to get Fancybox object).
Add data-fancybox attribute to your links (or to call Fancybox.bind("YOUR_SELECTOR");)
Thats it! It can not be any simpler.
Sorry, it should have been a much clearer question. I didn't include a demo because it's a big wordpress site in production. It was giving me no useful feedback or errors or anything like that. I build websites day in and day out, so assumed it wasn't just me making some incredibly stupid mistake like a typo or something. I genuinely spent a lot of time on this, it wasn't me being lazy and just posting on stack overflow straight away...
It was me being stupid though.
In the process of making a demo to show you, I found the problem and (as you already know!) it's my mistake. I was able to make fancybox work by instantiating it straight away in my js, but binding (and therefore galleries etc) was not working.
The reason was the javascript was included in the head of the html document before the markup instead of at the bottom of the html document before the closing body. There was nothing for the js to bind to when it was executed.
I wouldn't normally include javascript in the head either but it's a wordpress project and because of some plugin, it's required there. Fancybox 3 worked with js in the head, but I suspect it might be jquery being more forgiving than native js with it's binding to DOM elements?
So, yes, entirely my fault. I was following the steps of the installation and startup guide almost exactly, but that inclusion of the js file in a slightly unusual (or bad practice at least) place was what caused all the issues.
Related
I'm running a site with umbraco version 4.11.1 and is trying to render the info of a macro within a tinyMCE richtext-editor without any success.
In version 4.11.1 (and perhaps some other versions before this) Umbraco has a button for rendering macros within tinyMCE. If you click this button it will show all the macros that you have been able to render. If I add a macro, it will render out the stuff I've entered in the macro, within an orange-dotted border, which means that the editor understands that I've added the macro.
However, after I save and publish and enter the page where I've added the macro, it doesn't render anything. I came across some posts when I googled the problem and found out that I could trace the problem using a querystring (?umbDebugShowTrace=true) and look through the HTML and see what has been rendered. I found the following HTML:
<?UMBRACO_MACRO macroAlias="Testmacro" />
...which should render, if you ask the people in these posts.
If anyone had this problem, or know how to solve it. Please feel free to participate.
Thanks in advance.
David
Try
string macro = umbraco.library.RenderMacroContent("<?UMBRACO_MACRO macroAlias=\"Testmacro\" ReusableText=\"1112\" ></?UMBRACO_MACRO>", 1112);
string result = paragraph.Replace("<?UMBRACO_MACRO macroAlias=\"Testmacro\" ReusableText=\"1112\" />",macro);
Best regrads
For example I am editing index.html or index.php in VIM and I have the following code in there:
<div id="header">
// some code
</div>
When I move my cursor to the word header I want to jump to the position in my CSS-file where the tag (id/class) is defined. ctags doesnt work with this. Thx for advise!
You could try to patch ctags so that it supports CSS. This guy explains how but I have no idea if it works or not. I'll probably give this solution a try very soon as I think this feature would kick ass.
Also, I should add that I didn't pull this old blog post from my magic bookmarks hat. It was one of the first results of a very simple Google query, did you look around before asking here? And, if you did, what did you found/try?
See also there and there.
edit
This solution doesn't require patching/compiling and works very well.
This might sound like a silly question, but yesterday none of our sites would load. After contacting the hosting company they said that
In this instance, it would appear that your site is hanging waiting for a response from an external component / website (looking at your code, I see references to Facebook, Google and online apps at a glance).
We've never had this problem before and the sites have been using the social plugins for months so I wondered if anybody else experienced this problem yesterday?
Thanks
Without knowing the details, I can tell you that when you load Javascript via <script></script> tags the browser waits for the request to finish before moving on. So, if you load JS files in the <head></head> section, nothing will render on-screen until they load successfully. 404s here will kill you, as will slow connections.
If you have in-line JS, it's best to put it at the very bottom of your <body></body> section so that it does not interrupt browser rendering. Do this for JS files in your <head></head> section if your code architecture allows it.
Just a random stab in the dark but I wonder if this was related in any way to the anonymous threats on Facebook. I have experienced similar problems before with a twitter plugin, it could take a few seconds for the plugin to ping back the tweets and the rest of the page was hanging while twitter was doing their thing.
To ensure this doesn't happen again you could call your social plugin's on page load if its a viable solution. At the end of the day do you want your page load time to depend on other services outside of your control or not?
edit: #Jason McClellan 's answer is spot on. I believe the combo of out answers sort out your question. I Never include script in the head if I don't control the resource! That can indefinitely hang your page.
edit2: Don't know why I'm getting down rated for this answer was just trying to relate it to an experience of mine. I'm not extremely experienced with Facebook plugins but when I was noticing an issue with my twitter plugin, I did exactly what #Jason McClellan has said with his answer to make sure that all your html gets rendered before the scripts are even requested, then ensured that the page could display correctly with or without the twitter content so the user experience was not dependant on an external resource. The twitter plugin I was using had an initiation function which I had to call to fire up the script. The simplest way to call this would be with:
<body onload='init()'>
if you have another script you are loading with the page you could use something along the lines of
window.onload = function() {
init();
}
from within your external script.
Sorry I can't give an answer specific to the Facebook plugin. Maybe someone with more experience in the Facebook plugins could elaborate in the comments :D
edit3: also this community based tool suggests that quiet a few people where seeing a bit of facebook downtime when you experienced it - Facebook status at DownRightNow
edit4: I dont have the "Privelages" to comment on Jason's q as im pretty new here ... but in answer to your comment there, the stuff in the head that you describe is what loads in the schema for facebook mark-up language (fbml) , so a mark-up language like html, but geared up for you to use the facebook api. So you can do stuff like:
<fb:comments xid="titans_comments" canpost="true" candelete="false" returnurl="http://apps.facebook.com/myapp/titans/">
<fb:title>Talk about the Titans</fb:title>
</fb:comments>
To wack some comments straight into your page - fbml developers guide
Your comment there also suggests you are not including a script for your page to load so it renders our previous answers not as important, you need to include the fbml stuff in the head before you use fbml in your page so don't move it :D
but #jason McClellan's answer is something that everyone should do on their project (unless there is a reason not to) as it allows for the user to see something before the browser fires off requests for the scripts. At the end of the day we're in this game to make pretty stuff for our users!
Good luck
I searched high and low and cannot a button tag in any of the javaScript that is generated that referred to step 7 of the tutorial. I must be looking in the wrong places, or I'm generating the code incorrectly. I generated the code in the three different levels of detail. Can anyone point me in the right direction who's completed the tutorial or is more experience with the GWT? Looked in every file inside of the war directory. Of course I could have missed one! :-/ Would definitely like to be able to find this stuff on my own when I begin development.
Here's the link:
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/tutorial/style.html
Look under 3. Associating style rules with GWT-generated HTML elements. What I'm specifically trying to find is the tag.
<button class="gwt-Button" tabindex="0" type="button">Add</button>
Of course you don't have to do the tutorial any project you've worked on should have similiar tags to be found I just can't find the file containing them...
I did find some stuff containing gwt-Button class name on line 3078 of one of those "unique" file names, but the way the author stated it made me think this process would be "easier". This was generated using the pretty compile.
function $Button(this$static, html){
$ButtonBase(this$static, ($clinit_21() , $doc).createElement("<BUTTON type='button'><\/BUTTON>"));
this$static.element['className'] = 'gwt-Button';
this$static.element.innerHTML = html || '';
return this$static;
}
This looks like it could be used to generate the tag. Is this a combination of some javaScript and some javaScript library code like JQuery or Prototype?
Thanks
The best way I know to see the javascript generated by GWT is to use the Brain.jar DOM Viewer http://www.brainjar.com/dhtml/domviewer/
It's not the most user friendly, but if you click around, you can generally find the InnerHTML of some element that corresponds to the whole web page, and then search for "button" or the relevant keyword.
I've currently got TinyMCE incorporated into the backend editor of a simple blogging/page-editing app, but I'm extremely unhappy with the HTML code it creates. It does all sorts of messy things like:
Adding inline style information to span tags that you can't ever find to get rid of without editing the HTML directly.
Nesting tags in nonsense ways (e.g. <p><strong><p><span>some text</span></p><strong></p> just to make something bold.)
Adding empty <p> </p> lines where they don't belong and I'm not trying to create blank lines.
EDIT: I've looked at lists of the other editors out there (including on SO), but I want to know if people firsthand have had better luck getting clean code out of their wysiwyg editors.
Any recommendations for one that outputs better code behind the scenes?
How about a rather drastic alternative, and using a WYMIWYG (What You Mean is What You Get) editor rather that another WYSIWYG editor. That way the author is in full control of the schematic markup as well as the content he/she is entering.
Unfortunately I haven't found one that is as feature rich and usable as tinyMCE, but it seems to have come a long way - see http://www.wymeditor.org/demo/
Use HTML purifier before saving the content into the database.
HTML Purifier
I found JoomlaFCK to be a very good alternative to Tiny MCE.
Hope you like it.
bye
BTW I know it is an old thread but someone might use it. ;)