I have a table with the records:
ID | Value
1 | 999
1 | 005
1 | 001
2 | 003
2 | 999
3 | 999
3 | 999
I need to get the max value if different of 999 else get the 999, example of result:
ID | Value
1 | 005
2 | 003
3 | 999
According to your requirement, create a table
Create Table dbo.tblMaxVal(id int,value int)
Insert your data into table and here an example
Select m.id,min(m.value) as value from (
Select distinct t.id,Max(t.value) as Value from dbo.tblMaxVal t where t.value < (
Select v.val as value from (
Select id,Max(value) as val from dbo.tblMaxVal group by id order by id ) as v where v.id=t.id ) group by t.id
union
Select id, Max(value) from dbo.tblMaxVal group by id ) m group by m.id
I know this is not ideal query but maybe this query helpful for you to understand what you need.
Result -
id | value
1 | 005
2 | 003
3 | 999
Related
I have a table called example that looks as follows:
ID | MIN | MAX |
1 | 1 | 5 |
2 | 34 | 38 |
I need to take each ID and loop from it's min to max, incrementing by 2 and thus get the following WITHOUT using INSERT statements, thus in a SELECT:
ID | INDEX | VALUE
1 | 1 | 1
1 | 2 | 3
1 | 3 | 5
2 | 1 | 34
2 | 2 | 36
2 | 3 | 38
Any ideas of how to do this?
The set-returning function generate_series does exactly that:
SELECT
id,
generate_series(1, (max-min)/2+1) AS index,
generate_series(min, max, 2) AS value
FROM
example;
(online demo)
The index can alternatively be generated with RANK() (example, see also #a_horse_with_no_name's answer) if you don't want to rely on the parallel sets.
Use generate_series() to generate the numbers and a window function to calculate the index:
select e.id,
row_number() over (partition by e.id order by g.value) as index,
g.value
from example e
cross join generate_series(e.min, e.max, 2) as g(value);
I have a table with a list of names and indices. For example like this:
ID | Name | Index
1 | Value 1 | 3
2 | Value 2 | 4
...
N | Value N | NN
I need to create a new table, where every value from field "Name" will be repeat repeated as many times as the "Index" field is specified. For example like this:
ID | Name_2 | ID_2
1 | Value 1 | 1
2 | Value 1 | 2
3 | Value 1 | 3
4 | Value 2 | 1
5 | Value 2 | 2
6 | Value 2 | 3
7 | Value 2 | 4
...
N | Value N | 1
N+1| Value N | 2
...
I have no idea how to write a cycle to get such result. Please, give me an advice.
Here is solution to repeat the rows based on a column value
declare #order table ( Id int, name varchar(20), indx int)
Insert into #order
(Id, name, indx)
VALUES
(1,'Value1',3),
(2,'Value2',4),
(3,'Value3',2)
;WITH cte AS
(
SELECT * FROM #order
UNION ALL
SELECT cte.[ID], cte.name, (cte.indx - 1) indx
FROM cte INNER JOIN #order t
ON cte.[ID] = t.[ID]
WHERE cte.indx > 1
)
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY name ASC) AS Id, name as [name_2], 1 as [Id_2]
FROM cte
ORDER BY 1
Given the following table:
id | value
---+---------
1 | 1
1 | 0
1 | 3
2 | 1
2 | 3
2 | 5
3 | 2
3 | 1
3 | 0
3 | 1
I want the following table:
id | value
---+---------
1 | 1
1 | 0
1 | 3
3 | 2
3 | 1
3 | 0
3 | 1
The table contains ids that have a minimum value of 0.
I have tried using exist and having but to no success.
try this :
select * from foo where id in (SELECT id FROM foo GROUP BY id HAVING MIN(value) = 0)
or that ( with window functions)
select * from
(select *,min(value) over (PARTITION BY id) min_by_id from foo) a
where min_by_id=0
If I'm understanding correctly, it's a fairly simple having clause:
=# SELECT id, MIN(value), MAX(value) FROM foo GROUP BY id HAVING MIN(value) = 0;
id | min | max
----+-----+-----
1 | 0 | 3
3 | 0 | 2
(2 rows)
Did I miss something that is making it more complicated?
It looks it is not possible to use window function in WHERE or HAVING. Below is solution based on JOINs.
JOIN every row with all rows of the same id.
Filter based on second set.
Show result from first set.
The SQL looks like this.
SELECT a.*
FROM a_table AS a
INNER JOIN a_table AS value ON a.id = b.id
WHERE b.value = 0;
I have a table in SQL Server 2008 R2 which contains product orders. For the most part, it is one entry per product
ID | Prod | Qty
------------
1 | A | 1
4 | B | 1
7 | A | 1
8 | A | 1
9 | A | 1
12 | C | 1
15 | A | 1
16 | A | 1
21 | B | 1
I want to create a view based on the table which looks like this
ID | Prod | Qty
------------------
1 | A | 1
4 | B | 1
9 | A | 3
12 | C | 1
16 | A | 2
21 | B | 1
I've written a query using a table expression, but I am stumped on how to make it work. The sql below does not actually work, but is a sample of what I am trying to do. I've written this query multiple different ways, but cannot figure out how to get the right results. I am using row_number to generate a sequential id. From that, I can order and compare consecutive rows to see if the next row has the same product as the previous row since ReleaseId is sequential, but not necessarily contiguous.
;with myData AS
(
SELECT
row_number() over (order by a.ReleaseId) as 'Item',
a.ReleaseId,
a.ProductId,
a.Qty
FROM OrdersReleased a
UNION ALL
SELECT
row_number() over (order by b.ReleaseId) as 'Item',
b.ReleaseId,
b.ProductId,
b.Qty
FROM OrdersReleased b
INNER JOIN myData c ON b.Item = c.Item + 1 and b.ProductId = c.ProductId
)
SELECT * from myData
Usually you drop the ID out of something like this, since it is a summary.
SELECT a.ProductId,
SUM(a.Qty) AS Qty
FROM OrdersReleased a
GROUP BY a.ProductId
ORDER BY a.ProductId
-- if you want to do sub query you can do it as a column (if you don't have a very large dataset).
SELECT a.ProductId,
SUM(a.Qty) AS Qty,
(SELECT COUNT(1)
FROM OrdersReleased b
WHERE b.ReleasedID - 1 = a.ReleasedID
AND b.ProductId = b.ProductId) as NumberBackToBack
FROM OrdersReleased a
GROUP BY a.ProductId
ORDER BY a.ProductId
I have a table [ContactCallDetail] which stores call data for each leg of a call from our phone system. The data is stored with a 4 part primary key: ([SessionID], [SessionSeqNum], [NodeID], [ProfileID]). The [NodeID], [ProfileID] , and [SessionID] together make up a call, and the [SessionSeqNum] defines each leg of the call as the caller is transferred from one department/rep to the next.
I need to look at each leg of a call and, if a transfer occured, find the next leg of the call so I can report on where the transfered call went.
The problems I am facing are 1) the session sequence does not always start with the same number 2) there can be gaps in the sequence number 3) The table has 15,000,000 rows and is added to via data import every night, so I need a non cursor based solution.
Sample data
| sessionid | sessionseqnum | nodeid | profileid |
| 170000459184 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 170000459184 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 170000459184 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| 170000229594 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 170000229594 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 170000229598 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 170000229598 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 170000229600 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 170000229600 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 170000229600 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| 170000229600 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
I think what I need to do is create a lookup table using an identity column or rownum() or the like to get a new sequence number for the call legs that will have no gaps. How would I do this? Or if there is a different, best practices solution you could point me to that would be great.
You can use the lead() analytic function to identify the next session sequence number.
SELECT sessionid ,
nodeid ,
profileid ,
sessionseqnum ,
lead(sessionseqnum) OVER ( PARTITION BY sessionid, nodeid, profileid ORDER BY sessionseqnum ) AS next_seq_num
FROM ContactCallDetail
ORDER BY sessionid ,
nodeid ,
profileid ,
sessionseqnum;
sessionid nodeid profileid sessionseqnum next_seq_num
--
170000229594 1 1 1 2
170000229594 1 1 2
170000229598 1 1 0 2
170000229598 1 1 2
170000229600 1 1 0 1
170000229600 1 1 1 3
170000229600 1 1 3 5
170000229600 1 1 5
170000459184 1 1 0 1
170000459184 1 1 1 3
170000459184 1 1 3
The ORDER BY clause isn't strictly necessary; it just makes it easier for humans to read the output.
Now you can join the original table to produce a row that shows relevant pairs of rows. There are several different ways to express that in standard SQL. Here, I'm using a common table expression.
WITH next_seq_nums
AS ( SELECT * ,
lead(sessionseqnum) OVER ( PARTITION BY sessionid, nodeid, profileid ORDER BY sessionseqnum ) AS next_seq_num
FROM ContactCallDetail
)
SELECT t1.sessionid ,
t1.nodeid ,
t1.profileid ,
t1.sessionseqnum ,
t2.sessionseqnum next_sessionseqnum ,
t2.nodeid next_nodeid ,
t2.profileid next_profileid
FROM next_seq_nums t1
LEFT JOIN ContactCallDetail t2 ON t1.sessionid = t2.sessionid
AND t1.nodeid = t2.nodeid
AND t1.profileid = t2.profileid
AND t1.next_seq_num = t2.sessionseqnum
ORDER BY t1.sessionid ,
t1.nodeid ,
t1.profileid ,
t1.sessionseqnum;
The LEFT JOIN will leave NULLs in the rows for the last session sequence numbers in each session. That makes sense--on the last row, there isn't a "next leg of the call". But it's easy enough to exclude those rows if you need to.
If your dbms doesn't support the lead() analytic function, you can replace the common table expression above with this one.
WITH next_seq_nums
AS ( SELECT t1.* ,
( SELECT MIN(sessionseqnum)
FROM contactcalldetail
WHERE sessionid = t1.sessionid
AND nodeid = t1.nodeid
AND profileid = t1.profileid
AND sessionseqnum > t1.sessionseqnum
) next_seq_num
FROM contactcalldetail t1
)
...
with cte
as
(SELECT *,
rank() OVER
(partition BY sessionid,profileid,nodeid
ORDER BY sessionseqnum ) AS Rank
FROM dbo.Table_1)
SELECT
cte.sessionid,cte.nodeid,cte.profileid,cte.sessionseqnum,cte_1.sessionseqnum
FROM cte LEFT JOIN
cte AS cte_1
ON cte.sessionid = cte_1.sessionid
and cte.profileid= cte_1.profileid
and cte.nodeid= cte_1.nodeid
and cte.rank= cte_1.rank-1