Thanos requires a targetPort defined as a string in the Service for the ServiceMonitor to communicate with it.
However, just defining the targetPort as a string causes problems. I believe that something more is needed in the Deployment. I think the targetPort 'web' must be defined in the Deployment.
Can anyone assist with how the Deployment should look?
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: my-service
labels:
app: my-app
tenant: a
servicemonitor: my-servicemonitor
monitor: "true"
spec:
type: ClusterIP
ports:
- name: web
port: 80
protocol: TCP
targetPort: web
selector:
app: my-app
---
apiVersion: monitoring.coreos.com/v1
kind: ServiceMonitor
metadata:
labels:
app: my-app
tenant: a
name: my-monitor
spec:
endpoints:
- port: web
path: /metrics
namespaceSelector:
matchNames:
- my-namespace
selector:
matchLabels:
servicemonitor: my-servicemonitor
monitor: "true"
A simple example of defining the targetPort as string is to first define it in the Deployment before you can refer to it as a string in targetPort in a service. Below is the simple example to show how to map "http" ( port name) from deployment in a service targetPort spec.
Deployment:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: backend
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
app: hello
tier: backend
track: stable
replicas: 3
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: hello
tier: backend
track: stable
spec:
containers:
- name: hello
image: "gcr.io/google-samples/hello-go-gke:1.0"
ports:
- name: http
containerPort: 80
Service:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: hello
spec:
selector:
app: hello
tier: backend
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 80
targetPort: http
You can set targetPort to an integer value or a name.
If you refer to it by name, that name has to be defined within the pod(s) in spec > containers[n] > ports[n] > name
If you refer by integer, there is no need to define ports in pods at all, although it's reasonable to still do it for clarity.
By providing a matching port name in the Deployment, things appear to work properly:
ports:
- name: web
containerPort: 80
Related
I created a Digitalocean kubernetes cluster and create a service with 4 replicas. the service type is LoadBalancer. the load balancer is also created. but I posted my request to the target endpoint by using postman. and I have written the endpoint with the pod host name. but every time I get the response from the same pod. if the load is balanced by the load balancer, the requests should go to each and every pods. but is not happening as I expected.
my manifest file like below.
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: user-service-deployment
labels:
app: user-service
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
app: user-service
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: user-service
spec:
containers:
- name: user-service
image: myRepo/ms-user-service:1.0.1
ports:
- containerPort: 8080
env:
- name: SPRING_PROFILES_ACTIVE
value: proud
- name: MY_NODE_NAME
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
fieldPath: spec.nodeName
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: user-service
spec:
selector:
app: user-service
type: LoadBalancer
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 8080
targetPort: 8080
please resolve this problem.
you have to disable the keepalive feature (service.beta.kubernetes.io/do-loadbalancer-enable-backend-keepalive) when you create the service. under the metadata.annotations you can configure it like the below. read for more detail.
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: user-service
annotations:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/do-loadbalancer-enable-backend-keepalive: "false"
spec:
selector:
app: user-service
type: LoadBalancer
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 8080
targetPort: 8080
I have two Kubernetes deployments: composite-app (1 pod) and product-app (2 pods), both listening in port 8080. The first one needs to call the second one sometimes.
However, the first deployment can't find the second one. When it tries to call it using the product.app host it fails:
Exception: I/O error on GET request for "http://product-app:8080/product/123": product-app;
nested exception is UnknownHostException
Am I using the right host? So far I've tried (to no avail):
product
product-app.default.pod.cluster.local
product-app
Here's my YAML:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: composite-service
spec:
type: NodePort
selector:
app: composite-app
ports:
- targetPort: 8080
port: 8080
nodePort: 30091
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: composite-deploy
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: composite-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: composite-app
spec:
containers:
- name: composite-container
image: 192.168.49.2:2376/composite-ms:latest
imagePullPolicy: Never
ports:
- containerPort: 8080
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: product-deploy
spec:
replicas: 2
selector:
matchLabels:
app: product-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: product-app
spec:
containers:
- name: product-container
image: 192.168.49.2:2376/product-ms:latest
imagePullPolicy: Never
ports:
- containerPort: 8080
You need to define a Service object for the product-deploy Deployment as well for the other pod to be able to connect to it. The Service can be of type ClusterIP if it is not needed to be exposed to the external world.
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: product-service
spec:
type: ClusterIP
selector:
app: product-app
ports:
- targetPort: 8080
port: 8080
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: product-deploy
spec:
replicas: 2
selector:
matchLabels:
app: product-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: product-app
spec:
containers:
- name: product-container
image: 192.168.49.2:2376/product-ms:latest
imagePullPolicy: Never
ports:
- containerPort: 8080
You can connect to the other pod using the pod's IP without the service. However, that is not recommended since the pod's IP can be changed across pod updates.
You can then connect to the product-app pod from the composite-app using product-service.
I have created a Node port service in Google cloud with the following specification... I have a firewall rule created to allow traffic from 0.0.0.0/0 for the port '30100' ,I have verified stackdriver logs and traffic is allowed but when I either use curl or from browser to hit http://:30100 I am not getting any response. I couldn't proceed how to debug the issue also... can someone please suggest on this ?
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: nginx-deployment
labels:
app: nginx
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: nginxv1
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: nginxv1
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx:latest
ports:
- containerPort: 8080
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: nginxv1
namespace: default
spec:
ports:
- port: 80
protocol: TCP
targetPort: 8080
nodePort: 30100
selector:
app: nginxv1
type: NodePort
Thanks.
You need to fix the container port, it must be 80 because the nginx container exposes this port as you can see here
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: nginx-deployment
labels:
app: nginx
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: nginxv1
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: nginxv1
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx:latest
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: nginxv1
namespace: default
spec:
ports:
- port: 80
protocol: TCP
targetPort: 80
nodePort: 30100
selector:
app: nginxv1
type: NodePort
Also, you need to create a firewall rule to permit the traffic to the node, as mentioned by #danyL in comments:
gcloud compute firewall-rules create test-node-port --allow tcp:30100
Get the node IP with the command
kubectl get nodes -owide
And them try to access the nginx page with:
curl http://<NODEIP>:30100
I'm executing kubectl create -f nginx.yaml which creates the pods successfully. But the PODS aren't exposed on Public IP of my instance. Following is the YAML used be me with service type as nodeport:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: nginx-deployment
labels:
app: nginx
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
app: nginx
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: nginx
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx:1.7.9
ports:
- containerPort: 80
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: nginx
labels:
name: nginx
spec:
type: NodePort
ports:
- port: 80
nodePort: 30080
name: http
- port: 443
nodePort: 30443
name: https
selector:
name: nginx
What could be in-correct in my approach or above YAML file to expose the pod on deployment to the public IP?
PS: Firewall and ACLs are open to internet on all TCP
The endpoint was not getting added. On debugging I found the label between deployment and Service has a mismatch. Hence changed the label type from "app" to "name" and it worked.
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: nginx-deployment
labels:
name: nginx
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
name: nginx
template:
metadata:
labels:
name: nginx
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx:1.7.9
ports:
- containerPort: 80
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: nginx
labels:
name: nginx
spec:
type: NodePort
ports:
- port: 80
nodePort: 30080
name: http
selector:
name: nginx
Jeel is right. Your Service selector is mismatch with Pod labels.
If you fix that like what Jeel already added in this answer
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: nginx
labels:
name: nginx
spec:
type: NodePort
ports:
- port: 80
nodePort: 30080
name: http
selector:
name: nginx
Your Service will be exposed in Node IP address. Because your Service Type is NodePort.
If your Node IP is, lets say, 35.226.16.207, you can connect to your Pod using this IP and NodePort
$ curl 35.226.16.207:30080
In this case, your node must have a public IP. Otherwise, you can't access
Second option, you can create LoadBalancer Type Service
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: nginx
labels:
name: nginx
spec:
type: LoadBalancer
ports:
- port: 80
name: http
selector:
name: nginx
This will provide you a public IP.
For more details, check this
How correct write yaml configuration for kubernetes pod and service in minikube cluster with driver on docker with one requirement: 80 port of container must be accessible from host machine. Solution with nodePort doesn't work as excepected:
type: NodePort
ports:
- port: 80
targetPort: 8006
selector:
app: blogapp
Label app: blogapp set on container. Can you show correct configuration for nginx image for example with port accessible from host.
You should create a Kubernetes deployment instead of creating a NodePort. Once you create the deployment(which will also create a ReplicaSet and Pod automatically), you can expose it. The blogapp will not be available to the outside world by default, so you must expose it if you want to be able to access it from outside the cluster.
Exposing the deployment will automatically create a service as well.
deployment.yml
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: blogapp
labels:
app: blogapp
spec:
replicas: 1
strategy: {}
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: blogapp
spec:
containers:
- image: <YOUR_NGINX_IMAGE>
name: blogapp
ports:
- containerPort: 8006
resources: {}
restartPolicy: Always
status: {}
Create the deployment
kubectl create -f deployment.yml
Expose the deployment
kubectl expose deployment blogapp --name=blogapp --type=LoadBalancer --target-port=8006
Get the exposed URL
minikube service blogapp --url
You can use the below configuration:
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: blog-app-server-instance
labels:
app: blog-app
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: blog-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: blog-app
spec:
containers:
- name: blog-app-server-instance
image: blog-app-server
ports:
- containerPort: 8006
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: blog-app-service
labels:
app: blog-app
spec:
selector:
app: blog-app
type: NodePort
ports:
- port: 80
nodePort: 31364
targetPort: 8006
protocol: TCP
name: http
I guess you were missing spec.ports[0].nodePort.