Is it possible to control the progress of withAnimation
Ideal API would look something like this
withAnimation(progress: percentDragged) { showSecondView.toggle() }
Here's a full code example of the above line in context.
The goal is to smoothly slide between different app states with a user controlled gesture.
struct ContentView: View {
#State var showSecondView = false
var body: some View {
VStack {
ZStack {
if !showSecondView {
Text("First view")
.padding()
.background(Color.blue)
.transition(.slide)
} else {
Text("Second view")
.padding()
.background(Color.red)
.transition(.slide)
}
}
}
.gesture(
DragGesture()
.onChanged { value in
let percentDragged = value.translation.width / UIScreen.main.bounds.width
// Here I want to gradually slide (interpolate) between the two states
// Ideal API would look like this:
withAnimation(progress: percentDragged) { showSecondView.toggle() }
}
)
}
}
Yes.. I know I can trigger an animation whenever I want (like this). but that's not what I'm looking for! I want to control the progress
if percentDragged > 0.5 {
withAnimation { showSecondView.toggle() }
}
Yes.. I also know I could manually store a #State var offset: Double and control my own slide.
This just gets nasty when my app state is tied to tons of different visual changes. Views appearing/disappearing, alignments shifting, etc.
Related
I'm trying to simulate dealing cards in SwiftUI. I'm testing with one card, and the goal is to animate the card in the center (image1) to one of the sides (image2). I would like that the animation would rotate and translate the card simultaneously, but with this code the card rotates immediately without animation and then it translates animatedly. Any idea to get the rotation and translation effects simultaneously into the animation?
import SwiftUI
struct Card: Identifiable {
var id: String {
return value
}
let value: String
var dealt: Bool = false
}
struct CardView: View {
let card: Card
var flipped: Bool = false
var body: some View {
ZStack {
Color.white
Text("\(card.value)")
.padding(4)
Color.red.opacity(flipped ? 0.0 : 1.0)
}
.border(.black, width: 2)
}
}
struct CardsTableView: View {
#Namespace private var dealingNamespace
#State var card = Card(value: "1", dealt: false)
var body: some View {
ZStack {
Rectangle()
.foregroundColor(.clear)
.border(.black, width: 2)
.padding(10)
VStack {
ZStack {
centerCard
lateralCard
}
Spacer()
Button {
withAnimation(.linear(duration: 1)) {
card.dealt.toggle()
}
} label: {
Text("Deal")
}
.padding()
}
}
}
var centerCard: some View {
VStack {
Spacer()
if !card.dealt {
CardView(card: card)
.frame(width: 40, height: 70)
.matchedGeometryEffect(id: card.id, in: dealingNamespace)
.transition(AnyTransition.asymmetric(insertion: .opacity, removal: .identity))
}
Spacer()
}
}
var lateralCard: some View {
HStack {
Spacer()
if card.dealt {
CardView(card: card)
.matchedGeometryEffect(id: card.id, in: dealingNamespace)
.frame(width: 40, height: 70)
.rotationEffect(.degrees(-90))
.transition(AnyTransition.asymmetric(insertion: .identity, removal: .opacity))
}
}
.padding(.trailing, 20)
}
}
The matchedGeometryEffect modifier doesn't know about the rotationEffect modifier, so neither view's rotation is animated during the transition. I'll explain how to get the animation you want in two ways: using transitions and using “slots”. Both solutions produce this animation:
Using transitions
You can use a custom .modifier transition to animate the rotation. I wouldn't do it this way, but since it has a similar structure as the code you posted, I'll explain it first.
For the sake of this answer, let's simplify CardView:
struct CardView: View {
var body: some View {
Text("C")
.foregroundColor(.black)
.padding()
.background(Color.white)
.border(Color.black, width: 1)
}
}
To animate rotation, we need a ViewModifier type that applies the rotation effect:
struct CardRotationModifier: ViewModifier {
var angle: Angle
func body(content: Content) -> some View {
content.rotationEffect(angle)
}
}
Here's CardTableView:
struct CardTableView: View {
#Namespace var namespace
#State var isSide = false
var body: some View {
ZStack {
VStack {
if !isSide {
topCard
}
Spacer()
}
HStack {
Spacer()
if isSide {
sideCard
}
}
}
.padding()
.background(Color.mint)
.onTapGesture {
withAnimation(.linear) {
isSide.toggle()
}
}
}
}
And finally here are the top and side card views:
extension CardTableView {
var topCard: some View {
CardView()
.matchedGeometryEffect(id: 0, in: namespace)
.transition(
.modifier(
active: CardRotationModifier(angle: .degrees(90)),
identity: CardRotationModifier(angle: .zero)))
}
var sideCard: some View {
CardView()
.matchedGeometryEffect(id: 0, in: namespace)
.transition(
.modifier(
active: CardRotationModifier(angle: .zero),
identity: CardRotationModifier(angle: .degrees(90))))
}
}
Note that the side card doesn't have a .rotationEffect. Instead, both cards have a transition that applies CardRotationModifier. SwiftUI applies the active modifier at the start of an entrance transition and the end of an exit transition. It applies the identity modifier at the end of an entrance transition, the start of an exit transition, and the entire time the view is “at rest” (present and not transitioning). So the top card normally has rotation zero, and the side card normally has rotation 90°, and each card is animated to the other's rotation during a transition.
What I don't like about this solution is that the transitions are configured specifically for moving a card between the top and side positions. The transition on the top position knows about the rotation of the side position, and vice versa. So what if you want to add a left-side position with a rotation of -90°? You've got a problem. Now you need to dynamically set the transition of each position based on where the card is moving from and to. Every position needs to know details of every other position, so it can be O(N) work to add another position.
Using slots
Instead, I would use what I think of as “slots”: put a hidden view at each possible position (“slot”) of a card. Then, use a view with a persistent identity to draw the card, and tell that persistent view to match the geometry of whichever slot it should occupy.
So, we need a way to identify each slot:
enum Slot: Hashable {
case top
case side
}
Now CardTableView lays out a subview for each slot, and a view for the card:
struct CardTableView: View {
#Namespace var namespace
#State var isSide = false
var body: some View {
ZStack {
topSlot
sideSlot
card
}
.padding()
.background(Color.mint)
.onTapGesture {
withAnimation(.linear) {
isSide.toggle()
}
}
}
}
Here are the slot subviews:
extension CardTableView {
var topSlot: some View {
VStack {
CardView()
.hidden()
.matchedGeometryEffect(id: Slot.top, in: namespace)
Spacer()
}
}
var sideSlot: some View {
HStack {
Spacer()
CardView()
.hidden()
.matchedGeometryEffect(id: Slot.side, in: namespace)
}
}
}
And here is the card subview:
extension CardTableView {
var card: some View {
CardView()
.rotationEffect(isSide ? .degrees(90): .zero)
.matchedGeometryEffect(
id: isSide ? Slot.side : Slot.top,
in: namespace, isSource: false)
}
}
Notice that now there are no transitions anywhere, and none of the slots knows anything about the other slots. If you want to add another slot, it's a matter of defining another slot subview, adding that new slot subview to the CardTableView ZStack, and updating the card subview to know how to pose itself in the new slot. None of the existing slot subviews are affected. It's O(1) work to add a new slot.
I am working on this audio player with multiple view components in it.
I added a way to hide/show the top view and the bottom view when we click anywhere in the middle view.
Before it was working fine, but recently when I tried again, it only dismiss it and doesn't trigger the onTapGesture again.
I believe the only difference with before is that the view is presented instead of pushed in a view controller.
I have tried to use a custom gesture with a TapGesture() on onEnded() but the same result.
I also tried to add a Rectangle shape like said [here][1].
struct PlayerView: View {
#ObservedObject private var playerState = PlayerState()
#Binding var isPlayerReduced: Bool
private let interfaceColor: Color = .gray//.black
private let interfaceOpacity: Double = 0.9
private let interfaceAnimationDuration: Double = 0.4
var body: some View {
ZStack(content: {
GeometryReader(content: { geometry in
VStack(content: {
if !self.playerState.isInterfaceHidden {
TopPlayerView(playerState: self.playerState,
isPlayerReduced: self.$isPlayerReduced)
.transition(.opacity)
.background(self.interfaceColor.opacity(self.interfaceOpacity))
}
MiddlePlayerView(skipIntro: self.$playerState.skipIntro)
// Allow to spread the background zone for click purposes
.background(Color.clear)
// I want to have the middle under my TopPlayer and my BottomPlayer
.zIndex(-1)
.onTapGesture(perform: {
withAnimation(.easeInOut(duration: self.interfaceAnimationDuration)) {
self.playerState.isInterfaceHidden.toggle()
}
})
// .gesture(TapGesture()
// .onEnded({ _ in
// }))
if !self.playerState.isInterfaceHidden {
BottomPlayerView(playerState: self.playerState)
.padding(.bottom, geometry.safeAreaInsets.bottom)
.transition(.opacity)
.background(self.interfaceColor.opacity(self.interfaceOpacity))
}
})
})
})
.background(Color.black)
.edgesIgnoringSafeArea(.all)
.navigationBarTitle("")
.navigationBarHidden(true)
}
}
I am kind of out of ideas here, any help is welcomed! thank you!
Alright, so after touching everything possible in this code. I ended up making it work.
The difference is where I put the padding to my views.
I switch the paddings to the VStack instead of my views in the VStack.
It seems to work now.
I post below the working code.
var body: some View {
ZStack(alignment: .center, content: {
GeometryReader(content: { geometry in
VStack(content: {
self.topMarker()
if !self.playerState.isInterfaceHidden {
TopPlayerView(playerState: self.playerState,
isPlayerReduced: self.$isPlayerReduced)
.transition(.opacity)
.background(self.interfaceColor.opacity(self.interfaceOpacity))
}
MiddlePlayerView(skipIntro: self.$playerState.skipIntro)
// Allow to spread the background zone for click purposes
.background(Color.white.opacity(0.00000001))
// I want to have the middle under my TopPlayer and my BottomPlayer
.zIndex(-1)
.onTapGesture(perform: {
withAnimation(.easeInOut(duration: self.interfaceAnimationDuration)) {
self.playerState.isInterfaceHidden.toggle()
}
})
if !self.playerState.isInterfaceHidden {
BottomPlayerView(playerState: self.playerState)
.transition(.opacity)
.background(self.interfaceColor.opacity(self.interfaceOpacity))
}
})
.padding(.top, 8)
.padding(.bottom, geometry.safeAreaInsets.bottom)
})
})
.background(Color.black)
.edgesIgnoringSafeArea(.all)
.navigationBarTitle("")
.navigationBarHidden(true)
}
To be honest, I have no idea what would be the difference here...
Even in the view debugger there is no difference..
Lately, I have been working on creating a complex view that allows me to use a Picker below a Form. In every case, the Form will only have two options, thus not enough data to scroll downwards for more data. Being able to scroll this form but not Picker below makes the view feel bad. I can't place the picker inside of the form or else SwiftUI changes the styling on the Picker. And I can't find anywhere whether it is possible to disable scrolling on a List/Form without using:
.disable(condition)
Is there any way to disable scrolling on a List or Form without using the above statement?
Here is my code for reference
VStack{
Form {
Section{
Toggle(isOn: $uNotifs.notificationsEnabled) {
Text("Notifications")
}
}
if(uNotifs.notificationsEnabled){
Section {
Toggle(isOn: $uNotifs.smartNotifications) {
Text("Enable Smart Notifications")
}
}.animation(.easeInOut)
}
} // End Form
.listStyle(GroupedListStyle())
.environment(\.horizontalSizeClass, .regular)
if(!uNotifs.smartNotifications){
GeometryReader{geometry in
HStack{
Picker("",selection: self.$hours){
ForEach(0..<24){
Text("\($0)").tag($0)
}
}
.pickerStyle(WheelPickerStyle())
.frame(width:geometry.size.width / CGFloat(5))
.clipped()
Text("hours")
Picker("",selection: self.$min){
ForEach(0..<61){
Text("\($0)").tag($0)
}
}
.pickerStyle(WheelPickerStyle())
.frame(width:geometry.size.width / CGFloat(5))
.clipped()
Text("min")
}
Here it is
Using approach from my post SwiftUI: How to scroll List programmatically [solution]?, it is possible to add the following extension
extension ListScrollingProxy {
func disableScrolling(_ flag: Bool) {
scrollView?.isScrollEnabled = !flag
}
}
and the use it as in example for above demo
struct DemoDisablingScrolling: View {
private let scrollingProxy = ListScrollingProxy()
#State var scrollingDisabled = false
var body: some View {
VStack {
Button("Scrolling \(scrollingDisabled ? "Off" : "On")") {
self.scrollingDisabled.toggle()
self.scrollingProxy.disableScrolling(self.scrollingDisabled)
}
Divider()
List(0..<50, id: \.self) { i in
Text("Item \(i)")
.background(ListScrollingHelper(proxy: self.scrollingProxy))
}
}
}
}
You can use the .scrollDisabled(true) modifier on the component (Form or List) to accomplish this behavior.
I have a simple app in SwiftUI that shows a List, and each item is a VStack with two Text elements:
var body: some View {
List(elements) { item in
NavigationLink(destination: DetailView(item: item)) {
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
Text(item.name)
Text(self.distanceString(for: item.distance))
}
}
}
.animation(.default)
}
The .animate() is in there because I want to animate changes to the list when the elements array changes. Unfortunately, SwiftUI also animates any changes to content, leading to weird behaviour. For example, the second Text in each item updates quite frequently, and an update will now shortly show the label truncated (with ... at the end) before updating to the new content.
So how can I prevent this weird behaviour when I update the list's content, but keep animations when the elements in the list change?
In case it's relevant, I'm creating a watchOS app.
The following should disable animations for row internals
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
Text(item.name)
Text(self.distanceString(for: item.distance))
}
.animation(nil)
The answer by #Asperi fixed the issue I was having also (Upvoted his answer as always).
I had an issue where I was animating the whole screen in using the below: AnyTransition.asymmetric(insertion: .move(edge: .bottom), removal: .move(edge: .top))
And all the Text() and Button() sub views where also animating in weird and not so wonderful ways. I used animation(nil) to fix the issue after seeing Asperi's answer. However the issue was that my Buttons no longer animated on selection, along with other animations I wanted.
So I added a new State variable to turn on and off the animations of the VStack. They are off by default and after the view has been animated on screen I enable them after a small delay:
struct QuestionView : View {
#State private var allowAnimations : Bool = false
var body : some View {
VStack(alignment: .leading, spacing: 6.0) {
Text("Some Text")
Button(action: {}, label:Text("A Button")
}
.animation(self.allowAnimations ? .default : nil)
.onAppear() {
DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + 0.4) {
self.allowAnimations = true
}
}
}
}
Just adding this for anyone who has a similar issue to me and needed to build on Asperi's excellent answer.
Thanks to #Brett for the delay solution. My code needed it in several places, so I wrapped it up in a ViewModifier.
Just add .delayedAnimation() to your view.
You can pass parameters for defaults other than one second and the default animation.
import SwiftUI
struct DelayedAnimation: ViewModifier {
var delay: Double
var animation: Animation
#State private var animating = false
func delayAnimation() {
DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + delay) {
self.animating = true
}
}
func body(content: Content) -> some View {
content
.animation(animating ? animation : nil)
.onAppear(perform: delayAnimation)
}
}
extension View {
func delayedAnimation(delay: Double = 1.0, animation: Animation = .default) -> some View {
self.modifier(DelayedAnimation(delay: delay, animation: animation))
}
}
In my case any of the above resulted in strange behaviours. The solution was to animate the action that triggered the change in the elements array instead of the list. For example:
#State private var sortOrderAscending = true
// Your list of elements with some sorting/filtering that depends on a state
// In this case depends on sortOrderAscending
var elements: [ElementType] {
let sortedElements = Model.elements
if (sortOrderAscending) {
return sortedElements.sorted { $0.name < $1.name }
} else {
return sortedElements.sorted { $0.name > $1.name }
}
}
var body: some View {
// Your button or whatever that triggers the sorting/filtering
// Here is where we use withAnimation
Button("Sort by name") {
withAnimation {
sortOrderAscending.toggle()
}
}
List(elements) { item in
NavigationLink(destination: DetailView(item: item)) {
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
Text(item.name)
}
}
}
}
I’m trying to get my views to animate/transition using .transition() on views. I use similar code from here and put .transition() to both conditional views.
struct Base: View {
#State private var isSignedIn = false
var body: some View {
Group {
if(isSignedIn){
Home().transition(.slide)
}else{
AuthSignin(isSignedIn: self.$isSignedIn).transition(.slide)
}
}
}
}
struct AuthSignin: View {
#Binding var isSignedIn: Bool
var body: some View {
VStack {
Button(action: {
self.isSignedIn = true
}) {
Text("Sign In")
.bold()
.frame(minWidth: CGFloat(0), maxWidth: .infinity)
.padding()
.background(Color.blue)
.foregroundColor(Color.white)
.cornerRadius(CGFloat(10))
}.padding()
}
}
}
However, whenever I click on the "Sign In" button (with or without .transition()), the app will freeze for a second and then the Home() view will suddenly appear without any animation/transition. I've also tried to wrap self.isSignedIn = true in withAnimation but it still won't work. Any ideas or is there a better way to do this?
Place your .transition on the container of the views that will switch, not each conditional view. Here's a trivial example from some code I have done (which works).
In the main View that needs to transition conditionally:
import SwiftUI
struct AppWrapperView: View {
#State var showFirstRun:Bool = true
var body: some View {
ZStack {
if (showFirstRun) {
FirstRunView(showFirstRun: $showFirstRun)
} else {
Text("Some other view")
}
}
.transition(.slide)
}
}
Then, somewhere in the view that triggers the change in condition:
import SwiftUI
struct FirstRunView: View {
#Binding var showFirstRun:Bool
var body: some View {
Button(action: {
withAnimation {
self.showFirstRun = false
}
}) {
Text("Done")
}
}
}
I had to put my if..else statement inside ZStack container instead of Group. Seems that Group was the main reason for broken animation in my case. Also, I applied .transition in combination with .animation to container instead of views.
ZStack {
if(isSignedIn){
Home()
} else {
AuthSignin(isSignedIn: self.$isSignedIn)
}
}
.transition(.slide)
.animation(.easeInOut)
Put
WithAnimation before self.isSignedIn = true