Suppose Kafka, 1 partition, 2 consumers.(2nd consumer is idle)
Suppose the 1st one consumed a message, goes to handle it with 3 other services and suddenly sticks on one of them and miss the Kafka's timeout.
Will Kafka reappoint the partition to the 2nd consumer and the message will doubly handled (suppose the 1st one eventually succeed)?
What if a Kafka's consumer handles a message too long? Will Kafka reappoint this partition to another consumer and the message will doubly handled?
Yes, that's correct. If Kafka consumer takes too long to handle a message and subsequent poll() is delayed, Kafka will re-appoint this partition to another consumer and the message will be processed again (and again).
For more clarity, first we need decide and define 'How long is too long?'.
This is defined by the property max.poll.interval.ms. From the docs,
The maximum delay between invocations of poll() when using consumer group management. This places an upper bound on the amount of time that the consumer can be idle before fetching more records. If poll() is not called before expiration of this timeout, then the consumer is considered failed and the group will rebalance in order to reassign the partitions to another member.
Consumer group is rebalanced if there are no calls to poll() within this time.
There is one more property auto.commit.interval.ms. The auto commit offsets check will be called only during the poll - it checks whether time elapsed is greater than the configured auto commit interval time and if result is yes, the offset is committed.
If Kafka consumer is taking too long to process the records, then the subsequent poll() call is also delayed and the offsets returned on the last poll() are not committed. If rebalance happens at this time, the new consumer client assigned to this partition will start processing the messages again.
Consumer group rebalance and resulting partition reassignment can be avoided by increasing this value. This will increase the allowed interval between polls and give more time to consumers to handle the record(s) returned from poll(). The consumers will only join the rebalance inside the call to poll, so increasing max poll interval will also delay group rebalances.
There is one more problem in increasing max poll interval to a big value. If the consumer dies for some other reason, it takes longer than the configured max.poll.interval.ms interval to detect the failure.
session.timeout.ms and heartbeat.interval.ms are available in this case to detect the total failure as earlier as possible.
For more details about these parameters:
Please refer this
KIP-62
Please note that the values configured for session.timeout.ms must be in the allowable range as configured in the broker configuration by properties
group.min.session.timeout.ms
group.max.session.timeout.ms
Otherwise, following exception will be thrown while starting consumer client.
Exception in thread "main" org.apache.kafka.common.errors.InvalidSessionTimeoutException:
The session timeout is not within the range allowed by the broker
(as configured by group.min.session.timeout.ms and group.max.session.timeout.ms)
Update: To avoid handling the messages again
There is another method in KafkaConsumer class commitAsync() to trigger commit offsets operation.
ConsumerRecords<String, String> records = kafkaConsumer.poll(Duration.ofMillis(500));
kafkaConsumer.commitAsync();
For more details on commitSync() and commitAsync(), please check this thread
Committing an offset manually is an action of saying that the offset has been processed so that the Kafka won't send the committed records for the same partition again. When offsets are committed manually, it is important to note that if the consumer dies before processing records for any reason, there is a chance these records won't be processed again.
Related
I have question regarding handling of consumers death due to exceeding the timeout values.
my example configuration:
session.timeout.ms = 10000 (10 seconds)
heartbeat.interval.ms = 2000 (2 seconds)
max.poll.interval.ms = 300000 (5 minutes)
I have 1 topic, 10 partitions, 1 consumer group, 10 consumers (1 partition = 1 consumer).
From my understanding consuming messages in Kafka, very simplified, works as follows:
consumer polls 100 records from topic
a heartbeat signal is sent to broker
processing records in progress
processing records completes
finalize processing (commit, do nothing etc.)
repeat #1-5 in a loop
My question is, what happens if time between heartbeats takes longer than previously configured session.timeout.ms. I understand the part, that if session times out, the broker initializes a re-balance, the consumer which processing took longer than the session.timeout.ms value is marked as dead and a different consumer is assigned/subscribed to that partition.
Okey, but what then...?
Is that long-processing consumer removed/unsubscribed from the topic and my application is left with 9 working consumers? What if all the consumers exceed timeout and are all considered dead, am I left with a running application which does nothing because there are no consumers?
Long-processing consumer finishes processing after re-balancing already took place, does broker initializes re-balance again and consumer is assigned a partition anew? As I understand it continues running #1-5 in a loop and sending a heartbeat to broker initializes also process of adding consumer to the consumers group, from which it was removed after being given dead status, correct?
Application throws some sort of exception indicating that session.timeout.ms was exceeded and the processing is abruptly stopped?
Also what about max.poll.interval.ms property, what if we even exceed that period and consumer X finishes processing after max.poll.interval.ms value? Consumer already exceeded the session.timeout.ms value, it was excluded from consumer group, status set to dead, what difference does it gives us in configuring Kafka consumer?
We have a process which extracts data for processing and this extraction consists of 50+ SQL queries (majority being SELECT's, few UPDATES), they usually go fast but of course all depends on the db load and possible locks etc. and there is a possibility that the processing takes longer than the session's timeout. I do not want to infinitely increase sessions timeout until "I hit the spot". The process is idempotent, if it's repeated X times withing X minutes we do not care.
Please find the answers.
#1. Yes. If all of your consumer instances are kicked out of the consumer group due to session.timeout, then you will be left with Zero consumer instance, eventually, consumer application is dead unless you restart.
#2. This depends, how you write your consumer code with respect to poll() and consumer record iterations. If you have a proper while(true) and try and catch inside, you consumer will be able to re-join the consumer group after processing that long running record.
#3. You will end up with the commit failed exception:
failed: Commit cannot be completed since the group has already rebalanced and assigned the partitions to another member. This means that the time between subsequent calls to poll() was longer than the configured max.poll.interval.ms, which typically implies that the poll loop is spending too much time message processing. You can address this either by increasing max.poll.interval.ms or by reducing the maximum size of batches returned in poll() with max.poll.records.
And again it depends on your code, to auto join into the consumer group.
#4. Answer lies here
session.timeout.ms
The amount of time a consumer can be out of contact with the brokers while still
considered alive defaults to 3 seconds. If more than session.timeout.ms passes
without the consumer sending a heartbeat to the group coordinator, it is considered
dead and the group coordinator will trigger a rebalance of the consumer group to
allocate partitions from the dead consumer to the other consumers in the group. This
property is closely related to heartbeat.interval.ms. heartbeat.interval.ms con‐
trols how frequently the KafkaConsumer poll() method will send a heartbeat to the
group coordinator, whereas session.timeout.ms controls how long a consumer can
go without sending a heartbeat. Therefore, those two properties are typically modi‐
fied together—heatbeat.interval.ms must be lower than session.timeout.ms, and
is usually set to one-third of the timeout value. So if session.timeout.ms is 3 sec‐
onds, heartbeat.interval.ms should be 1 second. Setting session.timeout.ms
lower than the default will allow consumer groups to detect and recover from failure
sooner, but may also cause unwanted rebalances as a result of consumers taking
longer to complete the poll loop or garbage collection. Setting session.timeout.ms
higher will reduce the chance of accidental rebalance, but also means it will take
longer to detect a real failure.
I'm trying to understand what is better option to handle records that take longer to process in kafka consumer? I ran few tests to understand this and observed that we can control this with by modifying either max.poll.records or max.poll.interval.ms.
Now my question is, what's the better option to choose? Please suggest.
max.poll.records simply defines the maximum number of records returned in a single call to poll().
Now max.poll.interval.ms defines the delay between the calls to poll().
max.poll.interval.ms: The maximum delay between invocations of
poll() when using consumer group management. This places an upper
bound on the amount of time that the consumer can be idle before
fetching more records. If poll() is not called before expiration of
this timeout, then the consumer is considered failed and the group
will rebalance in order to reassign the partitions to another member.
For consumers using a non-null group.instance.id which reach this
timeout, partitions will not be immediately reassigned. Instead, the
consumer will stop sending heartbeats and partitions will be
reassigned after expiration of session.timeout.ms. This mirrors the
behavior of a static consumer which has shutdown.
I believe you can tune both in order to get to the expected behaviour. For example, you could compute the average processing time for the messages. If the average processing time is say 1 second and you have max.poll.records=100 then you should allow approximately 100+ seconds for the poll interval.
If you have slow processing and so want to avoid rebalances then tuning either would achieve that. However extending max.poll.interval.ms to allow for longer gaps between poll does have a bit of a side effect.
Each consumer only uses 2 threads - polling thread and heartbeat thread.
The latter lets the group know that your application is still alive so can trigger a rebalance before max.poll.interval.ms expires.
The polling thread does everything else in terms of group communication so during the poll method you find out if a rebalance has been triggered elsewhere, you find out if a partition leader has died and hence metadata refresh is required. The implication is that if you allow longer gaps between polls then the group as a whole is slower to respond to change (for example no consumers start receiving messages after a rebalance until they have all received their new partitions - if a rebalance occurs just after one consumer has started processing a batch for 10 minutes then all consumers will be hanging around for at least that long).
Hence for a more responsive group in situations where processing of messages is expected to be slow you should choose to reduce the records fetched in each batch.
I've below consumer settings.
auto.offset.reset=earliest
enable.auto.commit=true (default value)
session.timeout.ms=10000 (default value)
max.poll.interval.ms= 300000 (default value)
With the above configuration, let's say i have five messages( m1, m2, m3, m4 and m5) in a topic A (with only 1 partition). Now I've consumer subscribed to this topic and was able to process first two messages (m1 and m2) without any issues and committed offset.
Now, Let us say the consumer got the third message m3 and trying to process it and it took 300100 ms for processing because of some network latency. Now, as per my understanding, the offset commit will not happen because the record processing took more than max.poll.interval.ms and hence the consumer would be considered as dead and removed from the group.
Now I've two questions
What happens to the message m3? I mean, would it be picked in the next poll because it's offset was not committed
What happens to the other messages m4 and m5?
Expiring max.poll.inteval.ms without calling poll() is one of the reasons of rebalance. When rebalance starts in a consumer group, all the consumers in this consumer group are revoked. (removed from consumer list) During rebalance Kafka waits all healthy consumers to send joinGroupRequest by calling poll() until rebalance timeout (rebalance timeout equals to max.poll.interval.ms). Upon completion of joinGroupRequests of healthy consumers or rebalance timeout, Kafka assign partitions to consumers that sends joinGroupRequests.
In your case:
What happens to the message m3? I mean, would it be picked in the next
poll because it's offset was not committed
Answer: Its process continues even after your consumer is revoked unless you have a logic to interrupt process thread in case of revoke. So all the messages returned from previous poll are processed. But offset cannot be committed. If this partition is assigned to another consumer at the result of the rebalance, then new consumer will get same messages starts from M3. So message(s) will be processed twice. When first consumer sends poll request again, that means joinGroupRequests and again rebalance will be triggered.
What happens to the other messages m4 and m5?
Answer: If these messages are returned from poll() as well as m3, then result will be the same. They will be processed, but cannot be committed by the old consumer. New consumer will process messages and commit offset.
Using kafka version 2.11-0.11.0.3 to publish 10,000 messages (total size of all messages are 10MB), there will be 2 consumers (with same group-id) to consume the message as a parallel processing.
While consuming, same message was consumed by both the consumers.
Below errors/warning were throws by kafka
WARN: This member will leave the group because consumer poll timeout
has expired. This means the time between subsequent calls to poll()
was longer than the configured max.poll.interval.ms, which typically
implies that the poll loop is spending too much time processing
messages. You can address this either by increasing
max.poll.interval.ms or by reducing the maximum size of batches
returned in poll() with max.poll.records.
INFO: Attempt to heartbeat failed since group is rebalancing
INFO: Sending LeaveGroup request to coordinator
WARN: Synchronous auto-commit of offsets
{ingest-data-1=OffsetAndMetadata{offset=5506, leaderEpoch=null,
metadata=''}} failed: Commit cannot be completed since the group has
already rebalanced and assigned the partitions to another member. This
means that the time between subsequent calls to poll() was longer than
the configured max.poll.interval.ms, which typically implies that the
poll loop is spending too much time message processing. You can
address this either by increasing max.poll.interval.ms or by reducing
the maximum size of batches returned in poll() with max.poll.records.
Below configurations were provided to kafka
server.properties
max.poll.interval.ms=30000
group.initial.rebalance.delay.ms=0
group.max.session.timeout.ms=120000
group.min.session.timeout.ms=6000
consumer.properties
session.timeout.ms=30000
request.timeout.ms=40000
What should have changed to resolve the multiple consumptions?
Are your consumers in the same group? If yes you will have multiple consumption if a consumer leaves/dies/timeouts without having committed some messages it has processed.
If all your messages are consumed by both consumers you probably have not set the same group id for them.
More info:
So you have set the same group id for all consumers, good. You are in the situation where the cluster/broker thinks that a consumer died and therefore rebalances the load to another one. This other one will start consuming where the last commit was done.
So lets say consumer C_A read offsets up to 100 from partition P_1 then processed them then committed '100' then read offsets up to 200 then processed them but could not commit because the broker considered C_A as dead.
The broker reassigns partition P_1 to consumer C_B which will start from the last commit for the group, which is 100, will read up to 200, process and commit 200.
So your question is how to avoid that the consumer is considered as dead (I assume it is not dead)?
The answer is already in the yellow WARN message in your question: you can tell your consumer to consume less messages (max.poll.records) in one poll to reduce the processing time between two polls to the broker AND/OR you can increase the max.poll.interval.ms telling the broker to wait longer before considering your consumer as dead...
I see from the logs that exact same message is consumed by the 665 times. Why does this happen?
I also see this in the logs
Commit cannot be completed since the group has already rebalanced and assigned the partitions to another member.
This means that the time between subsequent calls to poll() was longer than the configured session.timeout.ms, which typically implies
that the poll loop is spending too much time message processing. You can address this either by increasing the session
timeout or by reducing the maximum size of batches returned in poll() with max.poll.records.
Consumer properties
group.id=someGroupId
bootstrap.servers=kafka:9092
enable.auto.commit=false
key.deserializer=org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringDeserializer
value.deserializer=org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringDeserializer
session.timeout.ms=30000
max.poll.records=20
PS: Is it possible to consume only a specific number of messages like 10 or 50 or 100 messages from the 1000 that are in the queue?
I was looking at 'fetch.max.bytes' config, but it seems like it is for a message size rather than number of messages.
Thanks
The answer lies in the understanding of the following concepts:
session.timeout.ms
heartbeats
max.poll.interval.ms
In your case, your consumer receives a message via poll() but is not able to complete the processing in max.poll.interval.ms time. Therefore, it is assumed hung by the Broker and re-balancing of partitions happen due to which this consumer loses the ownership of all partitions. It is marked dead and is no longer part of a consumer group.
Then when your consumer completes the processing and calls poll() again two things happen:
Commit fails as the consumer no longer owns the partitions.
Broker identifies that the consumer is up again and therefore a re-balance is triggered and the consumer again joins the Consumer Group, start owning partitions and request messages from the Broker. Since the earlier message was not marked as committed (refer #1 above, failed commit) and is pending processing, the broker delivers the same message to consumer again.
Consumer again takes a lot of time to process and since is unable to finish processing in less than max.poll.interval.ms, 1. and 2. keep repeating in a loop.
To fix the problem, you can increase the max.poll.interval.ms to a large enough value based on how much time your consumer needs for processing. Then your consumer will not get marked as dead and will not receive duplicate messages.
However, the real fix is to check your processing logic and try to reduce the processing time.
The fix is described in the message you pasted:
You can address this either by increasing the session timeout or by
reducing the maximum size of batches returned in poll() with
max.poll.records.
The reason is a timeout is reached before your consumer is able to process and commit the message. When your Kafka consumer "commits", it's basically acknowledging receipt of the previous message, advancing the offset, and therefore moving onto the next message. But if that timeout is passed (as is the case for you), the consumer's commit isn't effective because it's happening too late; then the next time the consumer asks for a message, it's given the same message
Some of your options are to:
Increase session.timeout.ms=30000, so the consumer has more time
process the messages
Decrease the max.poll.records=20 so the consumer has less messages it'll need to work on before the timeout occurs. But this doesn't really apply to you because your consumer is already only just working on a single message
Or turn on enable.auto.commit, which probably also isn't the best solution for you because it might result in dropping messages though, as mentioned below:
If we allowed offsets to auto commit as in the previous example
messages would be considered consumed after they were given out by the
consumer, and it would be possible that our process could fail after
we have read messages into our in-memory buffer but before they had
been inserted into the database.
Source: https://kafka.apache.org/090/javadoc/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/KafkaConsumer.html