I have a query function of the format:
function:{[x] select Y from table1 where date=x}
I want to iterate this function across all days stored in a separate table, like so
function each (select distinct date from table2)
and store every iteration into it's own, unique table. For example, if the first iteration was for 2021.11.10, all 'Y' values from table1 on that date are stored in a table named 'a', for the next iteration for date 2021.11.12, it goes to a table named 'b', or something like that. How can I do this?
Assume the following tables:
q)t1:([]date:.z.d + 0 0 0 1 1 1;a:1 2 3 4 5 6)
q)t2:([]date:.z.d+0 1)
then you could do something like:
q)function:{[x;y] x set select from t1 where date=y}
q)function'[`a`b;exec distinct date from t2]
`a`b
q)show a
date a
------------
2021.11.10 1
2021.11.10 2
2021.11.10 3
q)show b
date a
------------
2021.11.11 4
2021.11.11 5
2021.11.11 6
If you wanted to make it a bit more dynamic then you could also do something like:
q)function:{[x] (`$"tab",string[x] except ".") set select from t1 where date=x}
q)
q)
q)function each exec distinct date from t2
`tab20211110`tab20211111
q)show tab20211110
date a
------------
2021.11.10 1
2021.11.10 2
2021.11.10 3
q)show tab20211111
date a
------------
2021.11.11 4
2021.11.11 5
2021.11.11 6
The above creates new tables named for each date (we remove the "." from the resulting names as they could be confused for q's . operator)
Related
I have queried 3 columns from a table as follows:
lst: distinct select b_market_order_no,instrumentID,mkt from tb where event=`OvernightOrder
based on these I want to query another table and get a dates column from it
select dates from tbp where
I am not quite sure how to apply the where clause or join clause here so values from lst get the corresponding dates column from tbp. Both tb and tbp tables have the same columns, they are created for different days from the same schema.
If I understand your use case correctly then you can use a table in your where clause as follows:
q)show tab1:([]a:1 2 3;b:4 5 6)
a b
---
1 4
2 5
3 6
q)show tab2:([]date:.z.d+1 2 3;a:2 3 4;b:5 6 7)
date a b
--------------
2020.04.29 2 5
2020.04.30 3 6
2020.05.01 4 7
q)select date from tab2 where([]a;b)in tab1
date
----------
2020.04.29
2020.04.30
Basically this builds up a table of the relevant columns from tab2 that are in tab1 and compares them.
If the schema of the table being joined is variable another approach may be required, such as this:
q)select date from tab2 where(cols[tab1]#tab2)in tab1
date
----------
2020.04.29
2020.04.30
Or even using lj and adding an additional Boolean column to mark valid rows in tab1 to select from tab2:
select date from(tab2 lj cols[tab1]xkey update c:1b from tab1)where c
I've a table data as below, now I need to fetch the record with in same code, where (Value2-Value1)*2 of one row >= (Value2-Value1) of consequtive date row. (all dates are uniform with in all codes)
---------------------------------------
code Date Value1 Value2
---------------------------------------
1 1-1-2018 13 14
1 2-1-2018 14 16
1 4-1-2018 15 18
2 1-1-2019 1 3
2 2-1-2018 2 3
2 4-1-2018 3 7
ex: output needs to be
1 1-1-2018 13 14
as I am begginer to SQL coding, tried my best, but cannot get through with compare only on consequtive dates.
Use a self join.
You can specify all the conditions you've listed in the ON clause:
SELECT T0.code, T0.Date, T0.Value1, T0.Value2
FROM Table As T0
JOIN Table As T1
ON T0.code = T1.code
AND T0.Date = DateAdd(Day, 1, T1.Date)
AND (T0.Value2 - T0.Value1) * 2 >= T1.Value2 - T1.Value1
I have the following input table:
Seq Group GroupSequence
1 0
2 4 A
3 4 B
4 4 C
5 0
6 6 A
7 6 B
8 0
Output table is:
Line NewSeq GroupSequence
1 1
2 2 A
3 2 B
4 2 C
5 3
6 4 A
7 4 B
8 5
The rules for the input table are:
Any positive integer in the Group column indicates that the rows are grouped together. The entire field may be NULL or blank. A null or 0 indicates that the row is processed on its own. In the above example there are two groups and three 'single' rows.
the GroupSequence column is a single character that sorts within the group. NULL, blank, 'A', 'B' 'C' 'D' are the only characters allowed.
if Group has a positive integer, there must be alphabetic character in GroupSequence.
I need a query that creates the output table with a new column that sequences as shown.
External apps needs to iterate through this table in either Line or NewSeq order(same order, different values)
I've tried variations on GROUP BY, PARTITION BY, OVER(), etc. WITH no success.
Any help much appreciated.
Perhaps this will help
The only trick here is Flg which will indicate a new Group Sequence (values will be 1 or 0). Then it is a small matter to sum(Flg) via a window function.
Edit - Updated Flg method
Example
Declare #YourTable Table ([Seq] int,[Group] int,[GroupSequence] varchar(50))
Insert Into #YourTable Values
(1,0,null)
,(2,4,'A')
,(3,4,'B')
,(4,4,'C')
,(5,0,null)
,(6,6,'A')
,(7,6,'B')
,(8,0,null)
Select Line = Row_Number() over (Order by Seq)
,NewSeq = Sum(Flg) over (Order By Seq)
,GroupSequence
From (
Select *
,Flg = case when [Group] = lag([Group],1) over (Order by Seq) then 0 else 1 end
From #YourTable
) A
Order By Line
Returns
Line NewSeq GroupSequence
1 1 NULL
2 2 A
3 2 B
4 2 C
5 3 NULL
6 4 A
7 4 B
8 5 NULL
Any help with the following would be much appreciated!
I have two tables: table1 is a summary table whilst table2 is a list of all data points. I want to be able to summarise the information in table2 for each row in table1.
table1:flip `grp`constraint!(`a`b`c`d; 10 10 20 20);
table2:flip `grp`cat`constraint`val!(`a`a`a`a`a`b`b`b;`cl1`cl1`cl1`cl2`cl2`cl2`cl2`cl1; 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8);
function:{[grpL;constraintL;catL] first exec total: sum val from table2 where constraint=constraintL, grp=grpL,cat=catL};
update cl1:function'[grp;constraint;`cl1], cl2:function'[grp;constraint;`cl2] from table1;
The fourth line of this code achieves what I want for the two categories:cl1 and cl2
In table1 I want to name a new column with the name of the category (cl1, cl2, etc.) and I want the values in that column to be the output from running the function over that column.
However, I have hundreds of different categories, so don't want to have to list them out manually as in the fourth line. How would I pass in a list of categories, e.g. below?
`cl1`cl2`cl3
Sticking to your approach, you would just have to make your update statement functional and then iterate over the columns like so:
{![`table1;();0b;(1#x)!enlist ((';function);`grp;`constraint;1#x)]} each `cl1`cl2
Assuming you can amend table1 in place. If you must retain the original table1 then you can pass it by value though it will consume more memory
{![x;();0b;(1#y)!enlist ((';function);`grp;`constraint;1#y)]}/[table1;`cl1`cl2]
Another approach would be to aggregate, pivot and join though it's not necessarily a better solution as you get nulls rather than zeros
a:select sum val by cat,grp,constraint from table2
p:exec (exec distinct cat from a)#cat!val by grp,constraint from a
table1 lj p
There are several different methods you can look into.
The easiest method would be a functional update - http://code.kx.com/wiki/JB:QforMortals2/queries_q_sql#Functional_update
Below, though, should somewhat prove more useful, quicker and neater:
Your problem can be split into 2 parts. For the first part, you are looking to create a sum of each category by grp and constraint within table2. As for the second part, you are looking to join these results (the lookups) onto the corresponding records from table1.
You can create the necessary groups using by
q)exec val,cat by grp,constraint from table2
grp constraint| val cat
--------------| ------------------------------
a 10 | 1 2 3 4 5 `cl1`cl1`cl1`cl2`cl2
b 10 | 6 8 `cl2`cl1
b 20 | ,7 ,`cl2
Note though, this will only create nested lists of the columns in your select query
Next is to sum each of the cat groups
q)exec sum each val group cat by grp,constraint from table2
grp constraint|
--------------| ------------
a 10 | `cl1`cl2!6 9
b 10 | `cl2`cl1!6 8
b 20 | (,`cl2)!,7
Then, to create the cat's columns you can use a pivot like syntax - http://code.kx.com/wiki/Pivot
q)cats:asc exec distinct cat from table2
q)exec cats#sum each val group cat by grp,constraint from table2
grp constraint| cl1 cl2
--------------| -------
a 10 | 6 9
b 10 | 8 6
b 20 | 7
Now you can use this lookup table and index into each row from table1
q)(exec cats#sum each val group cat by grp,constraint from table2)[table1]
cl1 cl2
-------
6 9
8 6
To fill the nulls with zeros, use the carat symbol - http://code.kx.com/wiki/Reference/Caret
q)0^(exec cats#sum each val group cat by grp,constraint from table2)[table1]
cl1 cl2
-------
6 9
8 6
0 0
0 0
And now you can join on each row from table1 to your results using join-each
q)table1,'0^(exec cats#sum each val group cat by grp,constraint from table2)[table1]
grp constraint cl1 cl2
----------------------
a 10 6 9
b 10 8 6
c 20 0 0
d 20 0 0
HTH, Sean
This approach is the easiest way to pass in a list of categories
{table1^flip x!function'[table1`grp;table1`constraint;]each x}`cl1`cl2
I have several CTEs. CTE1A counts number of type A shops in area 1. CTE1B counts number of type B shops in area 1 and so on up to CTE1D. Similarly, CTE2B counts number of type B shops in area 2 and so on. shop_types CTE selects all types of shops: A,B,C,D. How to display a table that shows for each area (column) how many shops of each type there is (rows).
For example:
1 2 3 4 5
A 0 7 4 0 0
B 2 3 8 2 9
C 8 5 8 1 6
D 7 1 5 4 3
Database has 2 tables:
Table regions: shop_id, region_id
Table shops: shop_id, shop_type
WITH
shop_types AS (SELECT DISTINCT shops.shop_type AS type FROM shops WHERE shops.shop_type!='-9999' AND shops.shop_type!='Other'),
cte1A AS (
SELECT regions.region_id, COUNT(regions.shop_id) AS shops_number, shops.shop_type
FROM regions
RIGHT JOIN shops
ON shops.shop_id=regions.shop_id
WHERE regions.region_id=1
AND shops.shop_type='A'
GROUP BY shops.shop_type,regions.region_id)
SELECT * FROM cte1A
I'm not entirely sure I understand why you are after, but it seems you are looking for something like this:
select sh.shop_type,
count(case when r.region_id = 1 then 1 end) as region_1_count,
count(case when r.region_id = 2 then 1 end) as region_2_count,
count(case when r.region_id = 3 then 1 end) as region_3_count
from shops sh
left join regions r on r.shop_id = sh.shop_id
group by sh.shop_type
order by sh.shop_type;
You need to add one case statement for each region you want to have in the output.
If you are using Postgres 9.4 you can replace the case statements using a filter condition which kind of makes the intention a bit easier to understand (I think)
count(*) filter (where r.region_id = 1) as region_1_count,
count(*) filter (where r.region_id = 2) as region_2_count,
...
SQLFiddle: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!1/98391/1
And before you ask: no you can't make the number of columns "dynamic" based on a select statement. The column list for a query must be defined before the statement is actually executed.