I am trying to filter the response from the leadgen_form endpoint but it is giving me the message:
(#100) Filtering field 'leads_count' with operation 'greater_than' is not supported
The request I am making is:
/v12.0/{page-id}/leadgen_forms?fields=id,created_time,name,status,leads_count,expired_leads_count&filtering=[{'field':'leads_count','operator':'GREATER_THAN','value':0}]
Is it really not possible to filter on this simple integer property or am I doing something wrong?
Second question I have, is the leadgen_forms endpoint still supported? On a topic on the Facebook Developers portal it is mentioned to be deprecated since V5.0(?). But the endpoint is still there in V12.0. See https://developers.facebook.com/support/bugs/630926654372206/?join_id=f3d05695fb730c
Related
I have used this blog post to attempt to setup an endpoint to retrieve generic inquiry data but I appear to be missing something. Our default endpoint is on Contract 1 so I did not extend that endpoint, is that necessary to get this to work? We have another custom endpoint and I setup the generic inquiry as laid out in the blog post but when I make the PUT request via postman with the "$expand=Result" parameter I receive a 500 and exception error "The given key was not present in the dictionary".
I am not super familiar with Acumatica or generic inquiries but from that blog post and other resources my understanding is that in order to retrieve the results of a generic inquiry it cannot be setup as a top-level resource or else you will only receive 1 record. I am trying to retrieve the entire list of records.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
Here is a screenshot of the setup:
The error message you describe usually indicates something missing with respect to the endpoint. Per the blog post - did you define the endpoint like this (which is the correct structure)?:
If you are not sure, please post a picture of what you created in your custom endpoint, and I will see if I can assist from there.
I've actually been working on the same thing, referencing the same article.
I am able to get it to work as described. One question, are you specifying the $filter parameter? I only get this error when I try to use a filter. I am able to call the new endpoint and get back full results.
I found your post searching for a way to use a filter or I trying to find out if there is anyway to pass parameters to the GI from the rest call.
I have attempted to use the provided test data from the Cybersource documentation to create a token for a test PAN. However, when attempting to do so (assuming it was a REST Api) it results in a "403 - Forbidden" error. The documentation is limited, as it doesn't give much information on the API other than the following:
(Test) Endpoint: https://testsecureacceptance.cybersource.com/silent/token/create
Request to create a standalone payment token:
reference_number=123456789
transaction_type=create_payment_token
currency=usd
amount=100.00
locale=en
access_key=e2b0c0d0e0f0g0h0i0j0k0l0m0n0o0p3
profile_id=0FFEAFFB-8171-4F34-A22D-1CD38A28A384
transaction_uuid=02815b4f08e56882751a043839b7b481
signed_date_time=2013-07-11T15:16:54Z
signed_field_names=comma separated list of signed fields
unsigned_field_names=comma separated list of unsigned fields
signature=WrXOhTzhBjYMZROwiCug2My3jiZHOqATimcz5EBA07M=
payment_method=card
card_type=001
card_number=4111111111111111
card_expiry_date=12-2022
card_cvn=005
bill_to_forename=Joe
bill_to_surname=Smith
bill_to_email=joesmith#example.com
bill_to_address_line1=1 My Apartment
bill_to_address_city=Mountain View
bill_to_address_postal_code=94043
bill_to_address_state=CA
bill_to_address_country=US
Is this a REST or SOAP API? How can this be tested in Postman? I tested to check if either works, and was unsuccessful. There is no information on what to include in the header either, so this is a bit puzzling.
Example POST test I am attempting:
POST https://testsecureacceptance.cybersource.com/silent/token/create
Content-Type:application/json
Accept:application/json
{
reference_number:123456789
transaction_type:create_payment_token
currency:usd
amount:100.00
locale:en
access_key:e2b0c0d0e0f0g0h0i0j0k0l0m0n0o0p3
profile_id:0FFEAFFB-8171-4F34-A22D-1CD38A28A384
transaction_uuid:02815b4f08e56882751a043839b7b481
signed_date_time:2019-03-07T06:16:54Z
signed_field_names:profile_id,access_key,transaction_uuid,signed_field_names,unsigned_field_names,signed_date_time,locale,transaction_type,reference_number,auth_trans_ref_no,amount,currency,card_type,card_number,card_expiry_date,card_cvn,payment_method,bill_to_forename,bill_to_surname,bill_to_email,bill_to_address_line1,bill_to_address_city,bill_to_address_postal_code,bill_to_address_state,bill_to_address_country
unsigned_field_names:
signature:WrXOhTzhBjYMZROwiCug2My3jiZHOqATimcz5EBA07M=
payment_method:card
card_type:001
card_number:4111111111111111
card_expiry_date:12-2022
card_cvn:005
bill_to_forename:Joe
bill_to_surname:Smith
bill_to_email:joesmith#example.com
bill_to_address_line1:1 My Apartment
bill_to_address_city:Mountain View
bill_to_address_postal_code:94043
bill_to_address_state:CA
bill_to_address_country:US
}
"Is this a REST or SOAP API?"
The URL, https://testsecureacceptance.cybersource.com/silent/token/create, is used for Secure Acceptance Checkout API. Secure Acceptance Checkout API is neither a SOAP API or a REST API. It is designed to be used as an HTML form POST from a customers browser.
If your goal is to use a REST API from the browser then you will want to use Secure Acceptance Flexible Token documented here.
If your goal is to use Secure Acceptance Checkout API the full documentation for that is here.
"How can this be tested in Postman?"
Since this is not meant to be a REST API call but an HTML form POST and HTML response you may have limited success with Postman. For example even if you get the request to work successfully the response will be an HTML document not JSON.
One problem I see is that you are using the example signature, and that will not work for you. Ensure that you follow the documentation on how to create your signature as well as set the signed and unsigned fields.
#J.J. - the error you encountered -- "This field is invalid or missing.Please contact Customer Support.: ots_profileid' ". Is telling you that you are missing (or have an invalid) profileID in your request payload. The system doesn't know what profile to use when processing this request.
I'm trying to to get a response from this sandbox endpoint
sandbox-api.uber.com/v1/requests/resource_id/map
instead of getting something like this
{
"request_id":"b5512127-a134-4bf4-b1ba-fe9f48f56d9d",
"href":"https://sandbox-api.uber.com/v1/sandbox/map"
}
why am I getting this response?
{
"message": null,
"code": "conflict"
}
With the same Bearer token and resource_id I'm getting the right response to this endpoint sandbox-api.uber.com/v1/requests/resource_id/map
Thank you!
It looks like the receipt_id is being used instead of the request_id.
The 409 error can happen for a few different reasons: no_drivers_available, missing_payment_method, surge, fare_expired, retry_request, current_trip_exists. Details can be found here - https://developer.uber.com/docs/rides/api/v1-requests
I don't see the different between the two api requests examples you provided. The sandbox will always show a static map.
In production, maps are only available after a ride has been accepted by a driver and is in the accepted state. Attempting to GET this resource before that will result in a 404 not found error. The sandbox environment provides /v1/sandbox/map for testing, but it provides a static map.
Right now I have a REST service which creates a report via a POST:
POST http://myhost/reports
The report however is not persisted, and cannot later on be retrieved via a GET:
GET http://myhost/reports/{id}
Instead I return the report immediately in the response to the POST. Am I violating any REST principle here, e.g. anything a POST creates should always be accessible via a GET, or is this setup OK?
The POST method isn't a synonym to the create in CRUD. The POST method is used for any operation that isn't standardized, so as long as you document what it does, you're not violating REST, no matter what you do.
There's no such REST principle saying "anything a POST creates should always be accessible via a GET". This is a common misunderstanding due to conflating REST with CRUD. Read this answer for some clarification on that.
In informal language, what a POST says to the server is "take this data and apply it to the resource identified by the given URI, following the rules you documented for the resource media type."
No, you are not violating REST. As long as your interface is uniform it is up to you to determine what actions the urls of your API perform.
As part of your documentation you simply need to state which methods are valid for certain resources and which aren't. I really like to use the Twitter API as a good example of "What to do"
Example: Twitter REST API
POST statuses/update
does not create an object available for access at
GET statuses/update/3
The action performed by the POST method might not result in a resource
that can be identified by a URI. In this case, either 200 (OK) or 204
(No Content) is the appropriate response status, depending on whether
or not the response includes an entity that describes the result.
So according to the HTTP standard this is okay.
I'm trying to use the QBO v3 API object update function described here. The API explorer shows a different uri.
I'm trying to update an account with Id 42. Both of the following URIs get me a 401:
As the documentation would suggest:
https://quickbooks.api.intuit.com/v3/company/0123456789/account?requestid=42
(the above at least gives me a json blob with the 401)
As the api explorer would suggest:
https://qb.sbfinance.intuit.com/v3/company/0123456789/account?operation=update
(here I don't even get the json, just a plain 401)
My request body is successful when I use the api explorer, so I don't believe that's the problem. I also don't believe authentication is the problem, because I can successfully create objects and also make queries with the same headers.
What might I be missing?
Don't put the Account object's ID into the URL. The [?requestid=] from the documentation you mentioned apparently refers to an id related to the request (not the object in question). The API Explorer's URI appears to simply mislead (although I could certainly be missing something here).
In your example, just use this:
https://quickbooks.api.intuit.com/v3/company/0123456789/account
Let the headers and request body do the rest.
Correct BASE URI: https://quickbooks.api.intuit.com/v3/company/
you can refer example request/response section of any entity doc.
Ref -https://developer.intuit.com/docs/0025_quickbooksapi/0050_data_services/030_entity_services_reference/bill
To debug(401 authentication issue), you can use any standard RestClient.
In the following thread, I've explained how to use RestClinet plugin of Mozilla to test any QBO V3 endpoint.
InvalidTokenException: Unauthorized-401
You can download IPP's devkit and using that devkit you can call any endpoints easily.
https://developer.intuit.com/docs/0025_quickbooksapi/0055_devkits
Hope it will be useful.
Thanks