I use Kubernetes in my project, specially HPA. So, every minute in project we started check-status request for checking if all microservices are available. Availability is defined by simple response from one of replicas (not all) each microservice.
But I have one moment related to HPA. When HPA automatically decides to remove some pods from cluster and my check-status request comes to server at the same time then very often occurs that my API-gateway service push it to deleted pod and doesn't get any response. It means that microservice is unavailable for our server.
My question is what is the best way for setting autoscaler to avoid this cases.
It is not related to HPA in this case but more on how you graceful shut down your pods.
In short, your service/LB is not aware if your pod is ready to accept new requests, so on a SIGTERM signal, your pod should set your readiness probe to false, and give some time for the app to shutdown. If your readiness probe is not healthy, the service won't send new requests to your pod.
Then you can shut it down once all requests have been addressed AND the pod won't receive new requests.
I would advise you of reading these sources:
https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/containers-kubernetes/kubernetes-best-practices-terminating-with-grace
https://pracucci.com/graceful-shutdown-of-kubernetes-pods.html
Related
From Kubernetes document, when readiness probe fails, it removes the Pod's IP address from the endpoints of all services that match the pod.
We are thinking about implementing SIGTERM handler to fail the health check and stop the pod from receiving future traffic. That's what we want, no more Inbound traffic. The question is, if the pod contains requests that depend on backend service which are not reside in the same pod, will the pod still be able to complete those outbound requests?
From the docs (emphasis mine):
Sometimes, applications are temporarily unable to serve traffic. For example, an application might need to load large data or configuration files during startup, or depend on external services after startup. In such cases, you don't want to kill the application, but you don't want to send it requests either. Kubernetes provides readiness probes to detect and mitigate these situations. A pod with containers reporting that they are not ready does not receive traffic through Kubernetes Services.
The pod can't be reached through Kubernetes services. You can still make outbound requests, and anyone using the pod name or IP directly will also still be able to reach it.
I am currently trying to scale automatically a deployment when the readiness probe hass failed for its pods currently running.
A pod is IDLE until a POST request is sent to it and while it is processing the request, it is not answering any other request.
To know when a processing is in progress, I created an endpoint returning TRUE if the pod is IDLE, FALSE otherwise.
I configure the readiness probe to query this endpoint to mark it as unavailable when a processing is in progress (and to mark it back to available when it is not processing anymore).
By default I have a limited pool of pods (like 5) that can answer requests.
But I still want to be able to send another POST with other parameters to trigger another processing when all my 5 pods are unavailable.
So, when the readiness probe fails for all pods, I want to scale the deployment in order to have other pods availbel to answer requests.
The issue here is that I did not find how to do such a thing with K8S or if this is even possible. Is there someone who could help me on this?
An alternative would be to create a 'watcher' pod who would watch all the readiness probe for a given deployement and when I fails for all pods, the watch would be in charge of scaling the deployement.
But this alternative implies development that I would like to avoid if it is natively possible to do in K8S.
Thank you :)
A readinessprobe by itself shouldn't be able to scale a deployment. By default, the only thing it can do is removing the Pod's IP from the endpoints of all the services that match the Pod.
The only solution that comes to my mind is what you said, so having an Horizontal Pod Autoscaler with custom metrics pointing to a Pod that keeps track of all the readinessprobes.
I've recently been reading myself into kubernetes and want to create a StatefulSet for a service of mine.
As far as I understood, a StatefulSet with let's say 5 replicas offers certian dns entries to reach it.
E.g. myservice1.internaldns.net, myservice2.internaldns.net
What would now happen, if one of the pods behind the dns entries goes down, even if it's just for a small amount of time?
I had a hard time finding information on this.
Is the request held until the pod is back? Will it be router to another pod, possibly losing the respective state? Will it just straightup fail?
If you're Pod is not ready, then the traffic is not forwarded to that Pod. So, your service will not load balance traffic to Pods that are not ready.
To decide if the given Pod is ready or not, you should define readinessProbe. I recommend reading the Kubernetes documentation on "Configure Liveness, Readiness and Startup Probes".
I'm following this task Configure Liveness, Readiness and Startup Probes
and it's unclear to me whether a container where the check is made is a container only used to check the availability of a pod? Because it makes sense if pod check container fails therefore api won't let any traffic in to the pod.
So a health check signal must be coming from container where some image or app runs? (sorry, another question)
From the link you provided it seems like they are speaking about Containers and not Pods so the probes are meant to be per containers. When all containers are ready the pod is described as ready too as written in the doc you provided :
The kubelet uses readiness probes to know when a Container is ready to
start accepting traffic. A Pod is considered ready when all of its
Containers are ready. One use of this signal is to control which Pods
are used as backends for Services. When a Pod is not ready, it is
removed from Service load balancers.
So yes, every containers that are running some images or apps are supposed to expose those metrics.
Livenes and readiness probes as described by Ko2r are additional checks inside your containers and verified by kubelet according to the settings fro particular probe:
If the command (defined by health-check) succeeds, it returns 0, and the kubelet considers the Container to be alive and healthy. If the command returns a non-zero value, the kubelet kills the Container and restarts it.
In addition:
The kubelet uses liveness probes to know when to restart a Container. For example, liveness probes could catch a deadlock, where an application is running, but unable to make progress. Restarting a Container in such a state can help to make the application more available despite bugs.
Fro another point of view:
Pod is a top-level resource in the Kubernetes REST API.
As per docs:
Pods are ephemeral. They are not designed to run forever, and when a Pod is terminated it cannot be brought back. In general, Pods do not disappear until they are deleted by a user or by a controller.
Information about controllers can find here:
So the best practise is to use controllers like describe above. You’ll rarely create individual Pods directly in Kubernetes–even singleton Pods. This is because Pods are designed as relatively ephemeral, disposable entities. When a Pod gets created (directly by you, or indirectly by a Controller), it is scheduled to run on a Node in your cluster. The Pod remains on that Node until the process is terminated, the pod object is deleted, the Pod is evicted for lack of resources, or the Node fails.
Note:
Restarting a container in a Pod should not be confused with restarting the Pod. The Pod itself does not run, but is an environment the containers run in and persists until it is deleted
Because Pods represent running processes on nodes in the cluster, it is important to allow those processes to gracefully terminate when they are no longer needed (vs being violently killed with a KILL signal and having no chance to clean up). Users should be able to request deletion and know when processes terminate, but also be able to ensure that deletes eventually complete. When a user requests deletion of a Pod, the system records the intended grace period before the Pod is allowed to be forcefully killed, and a TERM signal is sent to the main process in each container. Once the grace period has expired, the KILL signal is sent to those processes, and the Pod is then deleted from the API server. If the Kubelet or the container manager is restarted while waiting for processes to terminate, the termination will be retried with the full grace period.
The Kubernetes API server validates and configures data for the api objects which include pods, services, replicationcontrollers, and others. The API Server services REST operations and provides the frontend to the cluster’s shared state through which all other components interact.
For example, when you use the Kubernetes API to create a Deployment, you provide a new desired state for the system. The Kubernetes Control Plane records that object creation, and carries out your instructions by starting the required applications and scheduling them to cluster nodes–thus making the cluster’s actual state match the desired state.
Here you can find information about processing pod termination.
There are different probes:
For example for HTTP probe:
even if your app isn’t an HTTP server, you can create a lightweight HTTP server inside your app to respond to the liveness probe.
Command
For command probes, Kubernetes runs a command inside your container. If the command returns with exit code 0 then the container is marked as healthy.
More about probes and best practices.
Hope this help.
I have a Kubernetes cluster with two services deployed: SvcA and SvcB - both in the service mesh.
SvcA is backed by a single Pod, SvcA_P1. The application in SvcA_P1 exposes a PreStop HTTP hook. When performing a "kubectl drain" command on the node where SvcA_P1 resides, the Pod transitions into the "terminating" state and remains in that state until the application has completed its work (the rest request returns and Kubernetes removes the pod). The work for SvcA_P1 includes completing ongoing in-dialog (belonging to established sessions) HTTP requests/responses. It can stay in the "terminating" state for hours before completing.
When the Pod enters the "terminating" phase, Istio sidecar appears to remove the SvcA_P1 from the pool. Requests sent to SvcA_P1 from e.g., SvcB_P1 are rejected with a "no healthy upstream".
Is there a way to configure Istio/Envoy to:
Continue to send traffic/sessions with affinity to SvcA_P1 while in "terminating" state?
Reject traffic without session affinity to SvcA_P1 (no JSESSIONID, cookies, or special HTTP headers)?
I have played around with the DestinationRule(s), modifying trafficPolicy.loadBalancer.consistentHash.[httpHeaderName|httpCookie] with no luck. Once the Envoy removes the upstream server, the new destination is re-hashed using the reduced set of servers.
Thanks,
Thor
According to Kubernetes documentation, when pod must be deleted three things happen simultaneously:
Pod shows up as “Terminating” when listed in client commands
When the Kubelet sees that a Pod has been marked as terminating because the "dead" timer for the Pod has been set in the API server,
it begins the pod shutdown process.
If the pod has defined a preStop hook, it is invoked inside of the pod. If the preStop hook is still running after the grace period
expires, step 2 is then invoked with a small (2 second) extended grace
period.
Pod is removed from endpoints list for service, and are no longer considered part of the set of running pods for replication
controllers. Pods that shutdown slowly cannot continue to serve
traffic as load balancers (like the service proxy) remove them from
their rotations.
As soon as Istio works like a mesh network below/behind Kubernetes Services and Services no longer consider a Pod in Terminating state as a destination for the traffic, tweaking Istio policies doesn't help much.
Is there a way to configure Istio/Envoy to continue to send traffic/sessions with affinity to SvcA_P1 while in "terminating" state?
This problem is at Kubernetes level rather than Istio/Envoy level: by default, upon entering the "Terminating" state, Pods are removed from their corresponding Services.
You can change that behaviour by telling your Service to advertise Pods in the "Terminating" state: see that answer.