I get on creating Migration some Warnings like this one:
The foreign key property 'AppUserClaim.UserId1' was created in shadow state because a conflicting property with the simple name 'UserId' exists in the entity type, but is either not mapped, is already used for another relationship, or is incompatible with the associated primary key type. See https://aka.ms/efcore-relationships for information on mapping relationships in EF Core.
It applies to all entities with AppUser navigation property. Other navigation properties has no warning.
public class AppUser : IdentityUser<Guid>, IChangeTrackerObject
{
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
[Column(TypeName = "text")]
public string ProfilePictureDataUrl { get; set; }
public string CreatedBy { get; set; }
public DateTime CreatedOn { get; set; }
public string ChangedBy { get; set; }
public DateTime? ChangedOn { get; set; }
public bool IsDeleted { get; set; }
public DateTime? DeletedOn { get; set; }
public bool IsActive { get; set; }
public string RefreshToken { get; set; }
public DateTime RefreshTokenExpiryTime { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<AppUserClaim> Claims { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<AppUserLogin> Logins { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<AppUserToken> Tokens { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<AppUserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }
public AppUser()
{
}
}
public class AppUserClaim : IdentityUserClaim<Guid>, IChangeTrackerObject
{
public string ChangedBy { get; set; }
public DateTime? ChangedOn { get; set; }
public string CreatedBy { get; set; }
public DateTime CreatedOn { get; set; }
public virtual AppUser User { get; set; }
}
private static void BuildIdentity(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<AppUser>(entity =>
{
entity.ToTable(name: "Users", schema);
entity.Property(e => e.Id).ValueGeneratedOnAdd();
// Each User can have many UserClaims
entity.HasMany(e => e.Claims)
.WithOne()
.HasForeignKey(uc => uc.UserId)
.IsRequired();
// Each User can have many UserLogins
entity.HasMany(e => e.Logins)
.WithOne()
.HasForeignKey(ul => ul.UserId)
.IsRequired();
// Each User can have many UserTokens
entity.HasMany(e => e.Tokens)
.WithOne()
.HasForeignKey(ut => ut.UserId)
.IsRequired();
// Each User can have many entries in the UserRole join table
entity.HasMany(e => e.UserRoles)
.WithOne()
.HasForeignKey(ur => ur.UserId)
.IsRequired();
});
modelBuilder.Entity<AppUserClaim>(entity =>
{
entity.ToTable("UserClaims", schema);
});
}
I ran into a similar issue. In my OnModelCreating method, I had flipped the order in which I was applying migrations.
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
builder.ApplyConfigurationsFromAssembly(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly());
}
Basically, it seemed like if the call to the base method came after the call to apply the configurations from my code, then the configurations in the base method would override my configurations, which gave me a similar error to what you had. So what I'm assuming is happening is you're calling BuildIdentity() after you call base.OnModelCreating(). You may need to reverse that order, otherwise the relationships defined in the default identity DB may take precedence.
Related
I am quite new to EF Core 6.0. We currently have a projet to upgrade, we cannot change the actual tables (use by another program) so we use Database fisrt approch.
So I need to add some Permission on user (the database are in french) We curently have an UsagerEW table (user table) and we add an Permission Table and an joint table PermissionUsagerEW for the Many2Many. After doing Scaffold-dbContect here is the result:
UsagerEW (primary key is Code_Int)
public partial class UsagerEW
{
public UsagerEW()
{
PermissionUsagerEW = new HashSet<PermissionUsagerEW>();
RefreshToken = new HashSet<RefreshToken>();
}
public string Code { get; set; }
public string Nom { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
public string ModeLogin { get; set; }
public string PasswordTemp { get; set; }
public DateTime? PasswordTempExp { get; set; }
public int code_int { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<PermissionUsagerEW> PermissionUsagerEW { get; set; }
}
Pemrssion and PermissionUsagerEW
public partial class Permission
{
public Permission()
{
PermissionUsagerEW = new HashSet<PermissionUsagerEW>();
}
public int id { get; set; }
public string code { get; set; }
public string description { get; set; }
public int? moduleId { get; set; }
public virtual Module module { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<PermissionUsagerEW> PermissionUsagerEW { get; set; }
}
public partial class PermissionUsagerEW
{
public int id { get; set; }
public int permissionId { get; set; }
public int usagerCodeInt { get; set; }
public virtual Permission permission { get; set; }
public virtual UsagerEW usagerCodeIntNavigation { get; set; }
}
That compile and I can "navigate with include" from UsagerEW and get an list of PermissionUsagerEW for a specific UsagerEW.
Now like I am in EF COre 6.0 that supposed to support Many2Many
I add this nav propertie in the Permnission class
public virtual ICollection<UsagerEW> UsagerEW { get; set; }
and this in the UsagerEW class:
public virtual ICollection<Permission> Permission { get; set; }
But I got execution error either I just try to load some user wintout any include:
UsagerEW user = _EWContext.UsagerEW.Where(u=>u.Code == usagerId).SingleOrDefault();
System.InvalidOperationException: 'Cannot use table
'PermissionUsagerEW' for entity type 'PermissionUsagerEW
(Dictionary<string, object>)' since it is being used for entity type
'PermissionUsagerEW' and potentially other entity types, but there is
no linking relationship. Add a foreign key to 'PermissionUsagerEW
(Dictionary<string, object>)' on the primary key properties and
pointing to the primary key on another entity type mapped to
'PermissionUsagerEW'.'
The FK are detect by the scaffold:
modelBuilder.Entity<PermissionUsagerEW>(entity =>
{
entity.HasOne(d => d.permission)
.WithMany(p => p.PermissionUsagerEW)
.HasForeignKey(d => d.permissionId)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.ClientSetNull)
.HasConstraintName("FK_PermissionUsager_Permission");
entity.HasOne(d => d.usagerCodeIntNavigation)
.WithMany(p => p.PermissionUsagerEW)
.HasForeignKey(d => d.usagerCodeInt)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.ClientSetNull)
.HasConstraintName("FK_PermissionUsager_Usager");
});
Any idea?
---EDIT 1
I change your code to reflect the scaffolded PermissionUsagerEW table:
//--UsagewrEW
modelBuilder.Entity<UsagerEW>()
.HasKey(u => u.code_int);
modelBuilder.Entity<UsagerEW>()
.HasMany(u => u.Permissions)
.WithMany(p => p.Users)
.UsingEntity<PermissionUsagerEW>(
p => p.HasOne(e => e.permission)
.WithMany()
.HasForeignKey(e => e.permissionId),
p => p.HasOne(p => p.usagerCodeIntNavigation)
.WithMany()
.HasForeignKey(e => e.usagerCodeInt)
);
modelBuilder.Entity<PermissionUsagerEW>()
.HasOne(p => p.usagerCodeIntNavigation)
.WithMany()
.HasForeignKey(p => p.usagerCodeInt);
When testing with
UsagerEW user = _EWContext.UsagerEW.Where(u=>u.Code == usagerId).Include(u => u.Permissions).SingleOrDefault();
Now I got this error:
Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: 'Invalid column name
'UsagerEWcode_int'.'
I think EF tries to link something automatically. I do not have any UsagerEWcode_int in my solution.
EDIT2:
There is the SQL generated. Wierd column name and some repetition...
SELECT [u].[code_int], [u].[Administrateur], [u].[Code], [u].[Email], [u].[EmpContact], [u].[Inactif], [u].[KelvinConfig], [u].[LectureSeule], [u].[ModeLogin], [u].[Nom], [u].[ParamRole], [u].[Password], [u].[PasswordTemp], [u].[PasswordTempExp], [u].[RestreintCommContrat], [u].[RestreintProjet], [u].[Role], [u].[UsagerAD], [u].[doitChangerPW], [u].[estSuperviseur], [u].[idSuperviseur], [u].[infoSession], [u].[paramRole2], [u].[permsGrps], [t].[id], [t].[Permissionid], [t].[UsagerEWcode_int], [t].[permissionId0], [t].[usagerCodeInt], [t].[id0], [t].[code], [t].[description], [t].[moduleId]
FROM [UsagerEW] AS [u]
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT [p].[id], [p].[Permissionid], [p].[UsagerEWcode_int], [p].[permissionId] AS [permissionId0], [p].[usagerCodeInt], [p0].[id] AS [id0], [p0].[code], [p0].[description], [p0].[moduleId]
FROM [PermissionUsagerEW] AS [p]
INNER JOIN [Permission] AS [p0] ON [p].[permissionId] = [p0].[id]
) AS [t] ON [u].[code_int] = [t].[usagerCodeInt]
WHERE [u].[Code] = #__usagerId_0
ORDER BY [u].[code_int], [t].[id]
You can configure direct Many-to-Many relationships with an existing database, and you can have the linking entity in the model or exclude it. There are several examples in the docs. And you can leave the foreign key properties in the model, or you can replace them with shadow properties. But the Scaffolding code doesn't do any of this for you. It creates the simplest correct model for the database schema.
Also you usually should rename the entities and properties to align with .NET coding conventions.
Anyway something like this should work:
public partial class UsagerEW
{
public string Code { get; set; }
public string Nom { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
public string ModeLogin { get; set; }
public string PasswordTemp { get; set; }
public DateTime? PasswordTempExp { get; set; }
public int code_int { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Permission> Permissions { get; } = new HashSet<Permission>();
}
public partial class Permission
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Code { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public int? ModuleId { get; set; }
//public virtual Module module { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<UsagerEW> Users { get; } = new HashSet<UsagerEW>();
}
public partial class PermissionUsagerEW
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int PermissionId { get; set; }
public int UsagerCodeInt { get; set; }
public virtual Permission Permission { get; set; }
public virtual UsagerEW User { get; set; }
}
public class Db : DbContext
{
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
builder.Entity<UsagerEW>()
.HasKey(u => u.code_int);
builder.Entity<UsagerEW>()
.HasMany(u => u.Permissions)
.WithMany(p => p.Users)
.UsingEntity<PermissionUsagerEW>(
p => p.HasOne(e => e.Permission)
.WithMany()
.HasForeignKey(e => e.PermissionId),
p => p.HasOne(p => p.User)
.WithMany()
.HasForeignKey( e => e.UsagerCodeInt)
);
builder.Entity<PermissionUsagerEW>()
.HasOne(p => p.User)
.WithMany()
.HasForeignKey(p => p.UsagerCodeInt);
foreach (var prop in builder.Model.GetEntityTypes().SelectMany(e => e.GetProperties()))
{
prop.SetColumnName(char.ToLower(prop.Name[0]) + prop.Name.Substring(1));
}
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
}
But when you're working in a database-first workflow, there's a downside to deeply customizing the EF model: you loose the ability to regenerate the EF model from the database.
So you can use a "nice" customized EF model, or a "plain" scaffolded model. If you customize the model, you can no longer regenerate it, and need to alter it to match future database changes by hand.
You can apply some customizations, though, like the convention-based property-to-column and entity-to-table mappings in the example. But changing the generated "indirect many-to-many" to "direct many-to-many" will prevent you from regenerating the EF model through scaffolding.
I'm using Entity Framework Core with Code First approach but recieve following error when updating the database:
Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_AnEventUsers_Users_UserId' on table 'AnEventUsers' may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths. Specify ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other FOREIGN KEY constraints.
Could not create constraint or index. See previous errors.
My entities are these:
public class AnEvent
{
public int AnEventId { get; set; }
public DateTime Time { get; set; }
public Gender Gender { get; set; }
public int Duration { get; set; }
public Category Category { get; set; }
public int MinParticipants { get; set; }
public int MaxParticipants { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public Status EventStatus { get; set; }
public int MinAge { get; set; }
public int MaxAge { get; set; }
public double Longitude { get; set; }
public double Latitude { get; set; }
public ICollection<AnEventUser> AnEventUsers { get; set; }
public int UserId { get; set; }
public User User { get; set; }
}
public class User
{
public int UserId { get; set; }
public int Age { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public Gender Gender { get; set; }
public double Rating { get; set; }
public ICollection<AnEventUser> AnEventUsers { get; set; }
}
public class AnEventUser
{
public int AnEventId { get; set; }
public AnEvent AnEvent { get; set; }
public int UserId { get; set; }
public User User { get; set; }
}
public class ApplicationDbContext:DbContext
{
public ApplicationDbContext(DbContextOptions<ApplicationDbContext> options):base(options)
{ }
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<AnEventUser>()
.HasOne(u => u.User).WithMany(u => u.AnEventUsers).IsRequired().OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Restrict);
modelBuilder.Entity<AnEventUser>()
.HasKey(t => new { t.AnEventId, t.UserId });
modelBuilder.Entity<AnEventUser>()
.HasOne(pt => pt.AnEvent)
.WithMany(p => p.AnEventUsers)
.HasForeignKey(pt => pt.AnEventId);
modelBuilder.Entity<AnEventUser>()
.HasOne(eu => eu.User)
.WithMany(e => e.AnEventUsers)
.HasForeignKey(eu => eu.UserId);
}
public DbSet<AnEvent> Events { get; set; }
public DbSet<User> Users { get; set; }
public DbSet<AnEventUser> AnEventUsers { get; set; }
}
The issue I thought was that if we delete a User the reference to the AnEvent will be deleted and also the reference to AnEventUser will also be deleted, since there is a reference to AnEventUser from AnEvent as well we get cascading paths. But I remove the delete cascade from User to AnEventUser with:
modelBuilder.Entity<AnEventUser>()
.HasOne(u => u.User).WithMany(u => u.AnEventUsers).IsRequired().OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Restrict);
But the error doesn't get resolved, does anyone see what is wrong? Thanks!
In your sample code in OnModelCreating you have declared modelBuilder.Entity<AnEventUser>().HasOne(e => e.User)... twice: at start of method and at end.
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<AnEventUser>() // THIS IS FIRST
.HasOne(u => u.User).WithMany(u => u.AnEventUsers).IsRequired().OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Restrict);
modelBuilder.Entity<AnEventUser>()
.HasKey(t => new { t.AnEventId, t.UserId });
modelBuilder.Entity<AnEventUser>()
.HasOne(pt => pt.AnEvent)
.WithMany(p => p.AnEventUsers)
.HasForeignKey(pt => pt.AnEventId);
modelBuilder.Entity<AnEventUser>() // THIS IS SECOND.
.HasOne(eu => eu.User) // THIS LINES
.WithMany(e => e.AnEventUsers) // SHOULD BE
.HasForeignKey(eu => eu.UserId); // REMOVED
}
Second call overrides first. Remove it.
This is what I did from the answer of Dmitry,
and It worked for me.
Class:
public class EnviornmentControls
{
public int Id { get; set; }
...
public virtual Environment Environment { get; set; }
}
And it's Mapping
public EnviornmentControlsMap(EntityTypeBuilder<EnviornmentControls> entity)
{
entity.HasKey(m => m.Id);
entity.HasOne(m => m.Environment)
.WithMany(m => m.EnviornmentControls)
.HasForeignKey(m => m.EnvironmentID)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Restrict); // added OnDelete to avoid sercular reference
}
These solutions didn't work for my case, but I found a way. I am not quite sure yet if it is safe but there's just something that's happening with deleting. So I modified the generated Migration File instead of putting an override.
onDelete: ReferentialAction.Cascade
The reason I did this because all the overriding mentioned above is not working for me so I manually removed the code which relates to Cascading of Delete.
Just check which specific relation being mentioned at the error so you can go straightly.
Hope this will be able to help for some people who's having the same issue as mine.
public Guid? UsuarioId { get; set; }
builder.Entity<Orcamentacao>()
.HasOne(x => x.Usuario)
.WithMany(x => x.Orcamentacaos)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Restrict)
.IsRequired(false)
.HasForeignKey(x => x.UsuarioId);
Is it possible to create 2 M:M relationships using the same join table?
I have the following situation and am receiving the exception:
Unhandled Exception: System.InvalidOperationException: Cannot create a relationship between 'ApplicationUser.ExpertTags' and 'UserTag.User', because there already is a relationship between 'ApplicationUser.StudyTags' and 'UserTag.User'. Navigation properties can only participate in a single relationship
In Tag:
public class Tag {
public Tag() {
Users = new List<UserTag>();
}
public int TagId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public ICollection<UserTag> Users { get; set; }
In ApplicationUser:
public class ApplicationUser : IdentityUser
{
public ApplicationUser()
{
StudyTags = new HashSet<UserTag>();
ExpertTags = new HashSet<UserTag>();
}
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public string Location { get; set; }
public ICollection<UserTag> StudyTags { get; set; }
public ICollection<UserTag> ExpertTags { get; set; }
}
In UserTag (CLR join):
public class UserTag
{
public string UserId { get; set; }
public ApplicationUser User { get; set; }
public int TagId { get; set; }
public Tag Tag { get; set; }
}
In ApplicationDbContext:
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
modelBuilder.Entity<UserTag>()
.HasKey(x => new { x.UserId, x.TagId });
modelBuilder.Entity<UserTag>()
.HasOne(ut => ut.User)
.WithMany(u => u.StudyTags)
.HasForeignKey(ut => ut.UserId);
modelBuilder.Entity<UserTag>()
.HasOne(ut => ut.User)
.WithMany(u => u.ExpertTags)
.HasForeignKey(ut => ut.UserId);
modelBuilder.Entity<UserTag>()
.HasOne(ut => ut.Tag)
.WithMany(t => t.Users)
.HasForeignKey(ut => ut.TagId);
}
Do I need to create separate CLR classes? Something like UserStudyTag and UserExpertTag?
Thanks!
Step down to SQL DB. You want to have table UserTag with one UserId field. How EF should guess, which records in this table are related to StudyTags and which to ExpertTags collections?
You should duplicate something.
Either split UserTag to two tables (UserStudyTag and UserExpertTag), or make two UserId fields in UserTag, say ExpertUserId and StudyUserId. Both nullable, with only one having some value in each record.
I'm trying to integrate the SimpleMembership tables with the rest of my Object Model - to manage all the entities from a single database and context.
Up to now the best recipe I've found for manually spinning up the SM tables (the entry point to combine SimpleMember with the rest of my Object Model) is found here. But, as cited in the comments section there are a couple mistakes in the code sample provided. The comments attempt to provide corrections but, due to formatted, really hard to follow.
I'm 80% the way there but getting stuck with the Foreign Key generation for the Membership table. Does the code within OnModelCreating block belong in the MyDbContext class? I'm getting a compile error on the .WithMany(u => u.Members) line.
Membership.cs
[Table("webpages_Membership")]
public class Membership
{
[Key, DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None)]
public int UserId { get; set; }
public DateTime? CreateDate { get; set; }
[StringLength(128)]
public string ConfirmationToken { get; set; }
public bool? IsConfirmed { get; set; }
public DateTime? LastPasswordFailureDate { get; set; }
public int PasswordFailuresSinceLastSuccess { get; set; }
[Required, StringLength(128)]
public string Password { get; set; }
public DateTime? PasswordChangedDate { get; set; }
[Required, StringLength(128)]
public string PasswordSalt { get; set; }
[StringLength(128)]
public string PasswordVerificationToken { get; set; }
public DateTime? PasswordVerificationTokenExpirationDate { get; set; }
<strike>public virtual ICollection<Role> Roles { get; set; }</strike>
EDIT: Originally I added the line above to remove a compiler complaint in the extraneous code block below. Removing this attempt to create a FK to Roles will align the rest of this code so that these model classes create a Migration that generates tables for SM.
OAuthMembership.cs
[Table("webpages_OAuthMembership")]
public class OAuthMembership
{
[Key, Column(Order = 0), StringLength(30)]
public string Provider { get; set; }
[Key, Column(Order = 1), StringLength(100)]
public string ProviderUserId { get; set; }
public int UserId { get; set; }
}
Role.cs
[Table("webpages_Roles")]
public class Role
{
[Key]
public int RoleId { get; set; }
[StringLength(256)]
public string RoleName { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<UserProfile> UserProfiles { get; set; }
}
UserProfile.cs
[Table("UserProfile")]
public class UserProfile
{
[Key]
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public int UserId { get; set; }
public string UserName { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Role> Roles { get; set; }
}
MyDbContext.cs
public MyDbContext()
: base("DefaultConnection")
{
}
public DbSet<UserProfile> UserProfiles { get; set; }
public DbSet<Membership> Membership { get; set; }
public DbSet<Role> Roles { get; set; }
public DbSet<OAuthMembership> OAuthMembership { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<UserProfile>()
.HasMany<Role>(r => r.Roles)
.WithMany(u => u.UserProfiles)
.Map(m =>
{
m.ToTable("webpages_UsersInRoles");
m.MapLeftKey("UserId");
m.MapRightKey("RoleId");
});
EDIT: The block below was included in one of the article's comments but seems not to be needed.
//modelBuilder.Entity<Membership>()
// .HasMany<Role>(r => r.Roles)
// .WithMany(u => u.Members)
// .Map(m =>
// {
// m.ToTable("webpages_UsersInRoles");
// m.MapLeftKey("UserId");
// m.MapRightKey("RoleId");
// });
}
}
I followed the instructions in the article, and I also took into account the the comments that suggested the article was wrong in a few ways.
I ended up with the following classes:
UserProfile.cs
[Table("UserProfile")]
public class UserProfile
{
[Key, ForeignKey("Membership")]
[DatabaseGeneratedAttribute(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public int UserId { get; set; }
public string UserName { get; set; }
public ICollection<WebSecurity.Role> Roles { get; set; }
public WebSecurity.Membership Membership { get; set; }
}
You should notice right away the "ForeignKey" attribute I use on the UserId column. Since the user is first created in the Membership table, my UserProfile table is the dependent table.
Membership.cs
[Table("webpages_Membership")]
public class Membership
{
//public Membership()
//{
// Roles = new List<Role>();
// OAuthMemberships = new List<OAuthMembership>();
//}
[Key, DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None)]
public int UserId { get; set; }
public DateTime? CreateDate { get; set; }
[StringLength(128)]
public string ConfirmationToken { get; set; }
public bool? IsConfirmed { get; set; }
public DateTime? LastPasswordFailureDate { get; set; }
public int PasswordFailuresSinceLastSuccess { get; set; }
[Required, StringLength(128)]
public string Password { get; set; }
public DateTime? PasswordChangedDate { get; set; }
[Required, StringLength(128)]
public string PasswordSalt { get; set; }
[StringLength(128)]
public string PasswordVerificationToken { get; set; }
public DateTime? PasswordVerificationTokenExpirationDate { get; set; }
public UserProfile UserProfile { get; set; }
}
Per Richard's comments in the article, I commented out the constructor. I also created a reference back to the UserProfile, but not to roles.
OAuthMembership.cs
[Table("webpages_OAuthMembership")]
public class OAuthMembership
{
[Key, Column(Order = 0), StringLength(30)]
public string Provider { get; set; }
[Key, Column(Order = 1), StringLength(100)]
public string ProviderUserId { get; set; }
public int UserId { get; set; }
//[Column("UserId"), InverseProperty("OAuthMemberships")]
//public Membership User { get; set; }
}
My OAuthMembership class remained basically the same; I commented out only the User attribute, per Richard's comment in the article.
AccountModel.cs+UsersContext
Finally, the UserContext class, where I create the association for the UsersInRoles table.
public class UsersContext : DbContext
{
public UsersContext()
: base("DefaultConnection")
{
}
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<InternetApplication.Models.WebSecurity.Role>()
.HasMany<InternetApplication.Models.UserProfile>(r => r.UserProfiles)
.WithMany(u => u.Roles)
.Map(m =>
{
m.ToTable("webpages_UsersInRoles");
m.MapLeftKey("UserId");
m.MapRightKey("RoleId");
});
}
public DbSet<WebSecurity.Membership> Membership { get; set; }
public DbSet<WebSecurity.OAuthMembership> OAuthMembership { get; set; }
public DbSet<WebSecurity.Role> Roles { get; set; }
public DbSet<UserProfile> UserProfiles { get; set; }
}
In addition to adding the UsersInRoles mapping, I added DbSet entries for each table.
Now that everything has been created, I can use my Add-Migration and Update-Database commands and use the following code snippet that combines the Membership, UserProfile, and Roles tables:
using (var db = new UsersContext())
{
var memberships = db.Membership
.Include("UserProfile")
.Include("UserProfile.Roles")
.ToList();
foreach (var member in memberships)
{
member.IsConfirmed = true;
}
db.SaveChanges();
}
This was a long post, but I hope that helps.
I used the answer to this question to automatically generate the models from the existing 'webpage_' tables in my database. This ensures that the models are created in the exact same way that SimpleMembership creates them. This resulted in the following code:
Models:
public partial class webpages_Membership
{
public int UserId { get; set; }
public Nullable<System.DateTime> CreateDate { get; set; }
public string ConfirmationToken { get; set; }
public Nullable<bool> IsConfirmed { get; set; }
public Nullable<System.DateTime> LastPasswordFailureDate { get; set; }
public int PasswordFailuresSinceLastSuccess { get; set; }
public string Password { get; set; }
public Nullable<System.DateTime> PasswordChangedDate { get; set; }
public string PasswordSalt { get; set; }
public string PasswordVerificationToken { get; set; }
public Nullable<System.DateTime> PasswordVerificationTokenExpirationDate { get; set; }
}
public partial class webpages_Roles
{
public webpages_Roles()
{
this.webpages_UsersInRoles = new HashSet<webpages_UsersInRoles>();
}
public int RoleId { get; set; }
public string RoleName { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<webpages_UsersInRoles> webpages_UsersInRoles { get; set; }
}
public partial class webpages_UsersInRoles
{
public int UserId { get; set; }
public int RoleId { get; set; }
public virtual webpages_Roles webpages_Roles { get; set; }
}
Fluent Mappings:
internal partial class MembershipMapping : EntityTypeConfiguration<webpages_Membership>
{
public MembershipMapping()
{
this.HasKey(t => t.UserId);
this.ToTable("webpages_Membership");
this.Property(t => t.UserId).HasColumnName("UserId").HasDatabaseGeneratedOption(new Nullable<DatabaseGeneratedOption>(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None));
this.Property(t => t.CreateDate).HasColumnName("CreateDate");
this.Property(t => t.ConfirmationToken).HasColumnName("ConfirmationToken").HasMaxLength(128);
this.Property(t => t.IsConfirmed).HasColumnName("IsConfirmed");
this.Property(t => t.LastPasswordFailureDate).HasColumnName("LastPasswordFailureDate");
this.Property(t => t.PasswordFailuresSinceLastSuccess).HasColumnName("PasswordFailuresSinceLastSuccess");
this.Property(t => t.Password).HasColumnName("Password").IsRequired().HasMaxLength(128);
this.Property(t => t.PasswordChangedDate).HasColumnName("PasswordChangedDate");
this.Property(t => t.PasswordSalt).HasColumnName("PasswordSalt").IsRequired().HasMaxLength(128);
this.Property(t => t.PasswordVerificationToken).HasColumnName("PasswordVerificationToken").HasMaxLength(128);
this.Property(t => t.PasswordVerificationTokenExpirationDate).HasColumnName("PasswordVerificationTokenExpirationDate");
}
}
internal partial class RolesMapping : EntityTypeConfiguration<webpages_Roles>
{
public RolesMapping()
{
this.HasKey(t => t.RoleId);
this.ToTable("webpages_Roles");
this.Property(t => t.RoleId).HasColumnName("RoleId");
this.Property(t => t.RoleName).HasColumnName("RoleName").IsRequired().HasMaxLength(256);
}
}
internal partial class UsersInRolesMapping : EntityTypeConfiguration<webpages_UsersInRoles>
{
public UsersInRolesMapping()
{
this.HasKey(t => new { t.UserId, t.RoleId });
this.ToTable("webpages_UsersInRoles");
this.Property(t => t.UserId).HasColumnName("UserId").HasDatabaseGeneratedOption(new Nullable<DatabaseGeneratedOption>(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None));
this.Property(t => t.RoleId).HasColumnName("RoleId").HasDatabaseGeneratedOption(new Nullable<DatabaseGeneratedOption>(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None));
this.HasRequired(t => t.webpages_Roles).WithMany(t => t.webpages_UsersInRoles).HasForeignKey(d => d.RoleId);
}
}
Database Context:
public class MembershipContext : DbContext, IDisposable
{
public DbSet<webpages_Membership> Membership { get; set; }
public DbSet<webpages_Roles> Roles { get; set; }
public DbSet<webpages_UsersInRoles> UsersInRoles { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Configurations.Add(new MembershipMapping());
modelBuilder.Configurations.Add(new RolesMapping());
modelBuilder.Configurations.Add(new UsersInRolesMapping());
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
}
}
Note that I have excluded the OAuthMembership table, because I didn't need it for my solution. But if you follow the steps in the link I provided above you can easily include that table as well.
Starting from a blank MVC4 Internet Template I ran the project so as to create the SimpleMembership tables in a fresh db - then used EF's Reverse Engineer tool to create POCOs from those tables. Stepped thru it line by line to find the error and edited the code block in the OP.
With that code in place I used Package Manager to 'Add-Migration' and 'Update-Database'. Initial tests confirm everything works - I suppose I'll have to revisit if I find edge-cases that expose any deeper problems.
I'm having issues applying multiple relationships (or possibly foreignkey) on two POCO objects. I've got the first relationship many-to-many working and when the database is created it creates the three tables (Projects, Users and ProjectsUsers) needed for the relationship.
Code so far:
public class Project
{
public int ProjectId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public DateTime? StartDate { get; set; }
public DateTime? CompletionDate { get; set; }
public bool Deleted { get; set; }
public ICollection<User> Users { get; set; }
}
public class User
{
public User()
{
Name = new Name();
}
public int UserId { get; set; }
public string LoginId { get; set; }
public string Password { get; set; }
public Name Name { get; set; }
public ICollection<Project> ManagedProjects { get; set; }
}
public class ProjectConfiguration : EntityTypeConfiguration<Project>
{
public ProjectConfiguration()
{
HasMany(x => x.Users)
.WithMany(x => x.ManagedProjects);
}
}
public UserConfiguration()
{
HasMany(x => x.ManagedProjects)
.WithMany(x => x.Users);
}
Now I want to add an optional one-to-one relationship of Project.ManagingUser -> User. However, I can't seem to figure out how to indicate this in the configuration.
Code for what I think is needed:
public class Project
{
public int ProjectId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public DateTime? StartDate { get; set; }
public DateTime? CompletionDate { get; set; }
public bool Deleted { get; set; }
public int? ManagingUserId { get; set; }
public User ManagingUser { get; set; }
public ICollection<User> Users { get; set; }
}
I don't think the User object needs to change.
This shows my last attempt on mapping the new relationship:
public ProjectConfiguration()
{
HasMany(p => p.Users)
.WithMany(u => u.Projects);
this.HasOptional(p => p.ManagingUser)
.WithOptionalDependent()
.Map(m=>m.MapKey("ManagingUserId"))
.WillCascadeOnDelete(false);
}
What is happening when the database is created, I now end up with only two tables (Projects and Users). And it looks like it is only trying to setup the one-to-one relationship.
Can someone tell me what I'm missing?
Richard I've not changed the UserConfiguration and below is the DbContext:
public class MyDbContext : DbContext
{
public MyDbContext() : base(Properties.Settings.Default.ConnectionString)
{
}
public DbSet<User> Users { get; set; }
public DbSet<Project> Projects { get; set; }
}
You probably want WithMany instead of WithOptionalDependent - it's a one:many relationship, not a one:one.
HasOptional(p => p.ManagingUser)
.WithMany()
.HasForeignKey(m => m.ManagingUserId)
.WillCascadeOnDelete(false);
EDIT
I think you're missing the OnModelCreating override from the DbContext class:
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
modelBuilder.Configurations.Add(new ProjectConfiguration());
modelBuilder.Configurations.Add(new UserConfiguration());
}