I have some tables in PostgreSQL 12.9 that were declared as something like
-- This table is written in old style
create table old_style_table_1 (
id bigserial not null primary key,
...
);
-- This table uses new feature
create table new_style_table_2 (
id bigint generated by default as identity,
...
);
Second table seems to be declared using the identity flag introduced in 10th version.
Time went by, and we have partitioned the old tables, while keeping the original sequences:
CREATE TABLE partitioned_old_style_table_1 (LIKE old_style_table_1 INCLUDING DEFAULTS) PARTITION BY HASH (user_id);
CREATE TABLE partitioned_new_style_table_2 (LIKE new_style_table_2 INCLUDING DEFAULTS) PARTITION BY HASH (user_id);
DDL for their id columns seems to be id bigint default nextval('old_style_table_1_id_seq') not null and id bigint default nextval('new_style_table_2_id_seq') not null.
Everything has worked fine so far. Partitioned tables proved to be a great boon and we decided to retire the old tables by dropping them.
DROP TABLE old_style_table_1, new_style_table_2;
-- [2BP01] ERROR: cannot drop desired object(s) because other objects depend on them
-- Detail: default value for column id of table old_style_table_1 depends on sequence old_style_table_1_id_seq
-- default value for column id of table new_style_table_2 depends on sequence new_style_table_2_id_seq
After some pondering I've found out that sequences may have owners in postgres, so I opted to change them:
ALTER SEQUENCE old_style_table_1_id_seq OWNED BY partitioned_old_style_table_1.id;
DROP TABLE old_style_table_1;
-- Worked out flawlessly
ALTER SEQUENCE new_style_table_2_id_seq OWNED BY partitioned_new_style_table_2.id;
ALTER SEQUENCE new_style_table_2_id_seq OWNED BY NONE;
-- Here's the culprit of the question:
-- [0A000] ERROR: cannot change ownership of identity sequence
So, apparently the fact that this column has pg_attribute.attidentity set to 'd' forbids me from:
• changing the default value of the column:
ALTER TABLE new_style_table_2 ALTER COLUMN id SET DEFAULT 0;
-- [42601] ERROR: column "id" of relation "new_style_table_2" is an identity column
• dropping the default value:
ALTER TABLE new_style_table_2 ALTER COLUMN id DROP DEFAULT;
-- [42601] ERROR: column "id" of relation "new_style_table_2" is an identity column
-- Hint: Use ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... DROP IDENTITY instead.
• dropping the identity, column or the table altogether (new tables already depend on the sequence):
ALTER TABLE new_style_table_2 ALTER COLUMN id DROP IDENTITY IF EXISTS;
-- or
ALTER TABLE new_style_table_2 DROP COLUMN id;
-- or
DROP TABLE new_style_table_2;
-- result in
-- [2BP01] ERROR: cannot drop desired object(s) because other objects depend on them
-- default value for column id of table partitioned_new_style_table_2 depends on sequence new_style_table_2_id_seq
I've looked up the documentation, it provides the way to SET IDENTITY or ADD IDENTITY, but no way to remove it or to change to a throwaway sequence without attempting to drop the existing one.
➥ So, how am I able to remove an identity flag from the column-sequence pair so it won't affect other tables that use this sequence?
UPD: Tried running UPDATE pg_attribute SET attidentity='' WHERE attrelid=16816; on localhost, still receive [2BP01] and [0A000]. :/
Though I managed to execute the DROP DEFAULT value bit, but it seems like a dead end.
I don't think there is a safe and supported way to do that (without catalog modifications). Fortunately, there is nothing special about sequences that would make dropping them a problem. So take a short down time and:
remove the default value that uses the identity sequence
record the current value of the sequence
drop the table
create a new sequence with an appropriate START value
use the new sequence to set new default values
If you want an identity column, you should define it on the partitioned table, not on one of the partitions.
Related
To have an integer auto-numbering primary key on a table, you can use SERIAL
But I noticed the table information_schema.columns has a number of identity_ fields, and indeed, you could create a column with a GENERATED specifier...
What's the difference? Were they introduced with different PostgreSQL versions? Is one preferred over the other?
serial is the "old" implementation of auto-generated unique values that has been part of Postgres for ages. However that is not part of the SQL standard.
To be more compliant with the SQL standard, Postgres 10 introduced the syntax using generated as identity.
The underlying implementation is still based on a sequence, the definition now complies with the SQL standard. One thing that this new syntax allows is to prevent an accidental override of the value.
Consider the following tables:
create table t1 (id serial primary key);
create table t2 (id integer primary key generated always as identity);
Now when you run:
insert into t1 (id) values (1);
The underlying sequence and the values in the table are not in sync any more. If you run another
insert into t1 default_values;
You will get an error because the sequence was not advanced by the first insert, and now tries to insert the value 1 again.
With the second table however,
insert into t2 (id) values (1);
Results in:
ERROR: cannot insert into column "id"
Detail: Column "id" is an identity column defined as GENERATED ALWAYS.
So you can't accidentally "forget" the sequence usage. You can still force this, using the override system value option:
insert into t2 (id) overriding system value values (1);
which still leaves you with a sequence that is out-of-sync with the values in the table, but at least you were made aware of that.
identity columns also have another advantage: they also minimize the grants you need to give to a role in order to allow inserts.
While a table using a serial column requires the INSERT privilege on the table and the USAGE privilege on the underlying sequence this is not needed for tables using an identity columns. Granting the INSERT privilege is enough.
It is recommended to use the new identity syntax rather than serial
In database dump created with pg_dump, some tables have DEFAULTs in the CREATE TABLE statement, i.e.:
CREATE TABLE test (
f1 integer DEFAULT nextval('test_f1_seq'::regclass) NOT NULL
);
But others have an additional ALTER statement:
ALTER TABLE ONLY test2 ALTER COLUMN f1 SET DEFAULT nextval('test2_f1_seq'::regclass);
What is the reason of this? All sequential fields were created with type SERIAL, but in the dump they look different, and I can't guess any rule for this.
The difference must be that in the first case, the sequence is “owned” by the table column.
You can specify this dependency using the OWNED BY clause when you create a sequence. A sequence that is owned by a column will automatically be dropped when the column is.
If a sequence is implicitly created by using serial, it will be owned by the column.
I have a table with existing data. Is there a way to add a primary key without deleting and re-creating the table?
(Updated - Thanks to the people who commented)
Modern Versions of PostgreSQL
Suppose you have a table named test1, to which you want to add an auto-incrementing, primary-key id (surrogate) column. The following command should be sufficient in recent versions of PostgreSQL:
ALTER TABLE test1 ADD COLUMN id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY;
Older Versions of PostgreSQL
In old versions of PostgreSQL (prior to 8.x?) you had to do all the dirty work. The following sequence of commands should do the trick:
ALTER TABLE test1 ADD COLUMN id INTEGER;
CREATE SEQUENCE test_id_seq OWNED BY test1.id;
ALTER TABLE test1 ALTER COLUMN id SET DEFAULT nextval('test_id_seq');
UPDATE test1 SET id = nextval('test_id_seq');
Again, in recent versions of Postgres this is roughly equivalent to the single command above.
ALTER TABLE test1 ADD COLUMN id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY;
This is all you need to:
Add the id column
Populate it with a sequence from 1 to count(*).
Set it as primary key / not null.
Credit is given to #resnyanskiy who gave this answer in a comment.
To use an identity column in v10,
ALTER TABLE test
ADD COLUMN id { int | bigint | smallint}
GENERATED { BY DEFAULT | ALWAYS } AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY;
For an explanation of identity columns, see https://blog.2ndquadrant.com/postgresql-10-identity-columns/.
For the difference between GENERATED BY DEFAULT and GENERATED ALWAYS, see https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com/en/sequences-gains-and-pitfalls/.
For altering the sequence, see https://popsql.io/learn-sql/postgresql/how-to-alter-sequence-in-postgresql/.
I landed here because I was looking for something like that too. In my case, I was copying the data from a set of staging tables with many columns into one table while also assigning row ids to the target table. Here is a variant of the above approaches that I used.
I added the serial column at the end of my target table. That way I don't have to have a placeholder for it in the Insert statement. Then a simple select * into the target table auto populated this column. Here are the two SQL statements that I used on PostgreSQL 9.6.4.
ALTER TABLE target ADD COLUMN some_column SERIAL;
INSERT INTO target SELECT * from source;
ALTER TABLE test1 ADD id int8 NOT NULL GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY;
I'm switching from MongoDB to PostgreSQL and was wondering how I can implement the same concept as used in MongoDB for uniquely identifying each raws by MongoId.
After migration, the already existing unique fields in our database is saved as character type. I am looking for minimum source code changes.
So if any way exist in postgresql for generating auto increment unique Id for each inserting into table.
The closest thing to MongoDB's ObjectId in PostgreSQL is the uuid type. Note that ObjectId has only 12 bytes, while UUIDs have 128 bits (16 bytes).
You can convert your existsing IDs by appending (or prepending) f.ex. '00000000' to them.
alter table some_table
alter id_column
type uuid
using (id_column || '00000000')::uuid;
Although it would be the best if you can do this while migrating the schema + data. If you can't do it during the migration, you need to update you IDs (while they are still varchars: this way the referenced columns will propagate the change), drop foreign keys, do the alter type and then re-apply foreign keys.
You can generate various UUIDs (for default values of the column) with the uuid-ossp module.
create extension "uuid-ossp";
alter table some_table
alter id_column
set default uuid_generate_v4();
Use a sequence as a default for the column:
create sequence some_id_sequence
start with 100000
owned by some_table.id_column;
The start with should be bigger then your current maximum number.
Then use that sequence as a default for your column:
alter table some_table
alter id_column set default nextval('some_id_sequence')::text;
The better solution would be to change the column to an integer column. Storing numbers in a text (or varchar) column is a really bad idea.
I would like to drop the sequence used in table and the table itself in one statement using CASCADE, but I'm getting NOTICE and table is not dropped. For example:
CREATE SEQUENCE seq1;
CREATE TABLE t1 (f1 INT NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval('seq1'));
And then when I do:
DROP SEQUENCE seq1 CASCADE;
I get following message, and the table is not dropped:
NOTICE: drop cascades to default for table t1 column f1
I'm definitely doing something wrong but these are my very first steps in PostgreSQL.
The table is never a depending object of an associated sequence and is never dropped by:
DROP SEQUENCE ... CASCADE;
Only a column DEFAULT drawing from the sequence "depends" on the sequence and is set to NULL if the sequence is deleted with CASCADE.
It's the other way round: if the sequence is owned by a table column it is dropped with:
DROP TABLE f1 CASCADE;
For a sequence to be owned by a table column you can either use the serial type, or ALTER an existing sequence:
ALTER SEQUENCE seq1 OWNED BY t1.f1;
I don't know why are you creating a sequence manually - maybe you have justification, or maybe it's due to habits working with another DBMS.
But if you don't have a special need for it, use the SERIAL pseudo-type and when you drop the table the sequence(s) behind the SERIAL column(s) will be dropped too.
You asked to drop the sequence and cascade that action. While the default can't exist without the sequence, and it is therefore dropped, the table and the column can exist without the sequence, so they remain.
With the way you've specified this, dropping the table will not drop the sequence, although you can make the sequence depend on the column with which it is used, and therefore have it drop automatically if you drop the table. You can do this by altering the owner of the sequence, or use SERIAL instead. Declaring a column to be type SERIAL automatically creates a sequence, makes it generate a default for the column, and makes that column the owner of the sequence.
drop cascade table table_name;
you can also use this... and i will also recommend you to use a serial with primary key so that you can identify a column uniquely..