I have the Linq query below:
var result = (from booking in _context.Booking.AsNoTracking()
join vendor in _context.Vendor.AsNoTracking() on booking.VendorId equals vendor.Id
where
booking.ClientId == userId
orderby booking.Id descending
select vendor.TypeId).FirstOrDefault();
A Vendor can be subtyped into a Mobile or a Garage.
But for my use case, I don't care about the subtype.
The SQL that is generated includes the subtype tables with a UNION.
exec sp_executesql N'SELECT TOP (1)
[Project3].[TypeId] AS [TypeId]
FROM ( SELECT
[Extent1].[Id] AS [Id],
[Join1].[TypeId] AS [TypeId]
FROM [dbo].[Booking] AS [Extent1]
INNER JOIN (SELECT [UnionAll1].[VendorId] AS [VendorId], [Extent4].[TypeId] AS [TypeId]
FROM (SELECT
[Extent2].[VendorId] AS [VendorId]
FROM [dbo].[Garage] AS [Extent2]
UNION ALL
SELECT
[Extent3].[VendorId] AS [VendorId]
FROM [dbo].[Mobile] AS [Extent3]) AS [UnionAll1]
INNER JOIN [dbo].[Vendor] AS [Extent4] ON [UnionAll1].[VendorId] = [Extent4].[Id] ) AS [Join1] ON [Extent1].[VendorId] = [Join1].[VendorId]
WHERE [Extent1].[ClientId] = #p__linq__0
) AS [Project3]
ORDER BY [Project3].[Id] DESC',N'#p__linq__0 uniqueidentifier',#p__linq__0='6AE9C275-7944-47B0-9B03-7B10EC88C98C'
This is wasteful.
How can I exclude the SubTypes from being included in the SQL command?
Bonus question.
Can I make the TOP 1 run in the nested SQL?
Again. This is wasteful. It gets a full result first, and then TOP 1s it.
Related
I'm trying to get lateral to work in a Postgres 9.5.3 query.
select b_ci."IdOwner",
ci."MinimumPlaces",
ci."MaximumPlaces",
(select count(*) from "LNK_Stu_CI" lnk
where lnk."FK_CourseInstanceId" = b_ci."Id") as "EnrolledStudents",
from "Course" c
join "DBObjectBases" b_c on c."Id" = b_c."Id"
join "DBObjectBases" b_ci on b_ci."IdOwner" = b_c."Id"
join "CourseInstance" ci on ci."Id" = b_ci."Id",
lateral (select ci."MaximumPlaces" - "EnrolledStudents") x
I want the right-most column to be the result of "MaximumPlaces" - "EnrolledStudents" for that row but am struggling to get it to work. At the moment PG is complaining that "EnrolledStudents" does not exist - which is exactly the point of "lateral", isn't it?
select b_ci."IdOwner",
ci."MinimumPlaces",
ci."MaximumPlaces",
(select count(*) from "LNK_Stu_CI" lnk
where lnk."FK_CourseInstanceId" = b_ci."Id") as "EnrolledStudents",
lateral (select "MaximumPlaces" - "EnrolledStudents") as "x"
from "Course" c
join "DBObjectBases" b_c on c."Id" = b_c."Id"
join "DBObjectBases" b_ci on b_ci."IdOwner" = b_c."Id"
join "CourseInstance" ci on ci."Id" = b_ci."Id"
If I try inlining the lateral clause (shown above) in the select it gets upset too and gives me a syntax error - so where does it go?
Thanks,
Adam.
You are missing the point with LATERAL. It can access columns in tables in the FROM clause, but not aliases defined in SELECT clause.
If you want to access alias defined in SELECT clause, you need to add another query level, either using a subquery in FROM clause (AKA derived table) or using a CTE (Common Table Expression). As CTE in PostgreSQL acts as an optimization fence, I strongly recommend going with subquery in this case, like:
select
-- get all columns on the inner query
t.*,
-- get your new expression based on the ones defined in the inner query
t."MaximumPlaces" - t."EnrolledStudents" AS new_alias
from (
select b_ci."IdOwner",
ci."MinimumPlaces",
ci."MaximumPlaces",
(select count(*) from "LNK_Stu_CI" lnk
where lnk."FK_CourseInstanceId" = b_ci."Id") as "EnrolledStudents",
from "Course" c
join "DBObjectBases" b_c on c."Id" = b_c."Id"
join "DBObjectBases" b_ci on b_ci."IdOwner" = b_c."Id"
join "CourseInstance" ci on ci."Id" = b_ci."Id"
) t
I have a difficulty dealing with a SQL query. I use PostgreSQL.
The query says: Show the customers that have done at least an order that contains products from 3 different categories. The result will be 2 columns, CustomerID, and the amount of orders. I have written this code but I don't think it's correct.
select SalesOrderHeader.CustomerID,
count(SalesOrderHeader.SalesOrderID) AS amount_of_orders
from SalesOrderHeader
inner join SalesOrderDetail on
(SalesOrderHeader.SalesOrderID=SalesOrderDetail.SalesOrderID)
inner join Product on
(SalesOrderDetail.ProductID=Product.ProductID)
where SalesOrderDetail.SalesOrderDetailID in
(select DISTINCT count(ProductCategoryID)
from Product
group by ProductCategoryID
having count(DISTINCT ProductCategoryID)>=3)
group by SalesOrderHeader.CustomerID;
Here are the database tables needed for the query:
where SalesOrderDetail.SalesOrderDetailID in
(select DISTINCT count(ProductCategoryID)
Is never going to give you a result as an ID (SalesOrderDetailID) will never logically match a COUNT (count(ProductCategoryID)).
This should get you the output I think you want.
SELECT soh.CustomerID, COUNT(soh.SalesOrderID) AS amount_of_orders
FROM SalesOrderHeader soh
INNER JOIN SalesOrderDetail sod ON soh.SalesOrderID = sod.SalesOrderID
INNER JOIN Product p ON sod.ProductID = p.ProductID
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT p.ProductCategoryID) >= 3
GROUP BY soh.CustomerID
Try this :
select CustomerID,count(*) as amount_of_order from
SalesOrder join
(
select SalesOrderID,count(distinct ProductCategoryID) CategoryCount
from SalesOrderDetail JOIN Product using (ProductId)
group by 1
) CatCount using (SalesOrderId)
group by 1
having bool_or(CategoryCount>=3) -- At least on CategoryCount>=3
In SQL Server, I know for sure that the following query;
SELECT things.*
FROM things
LEFT OUTER JOIN (
SELECT thingreadings.thingid, reading
FROM thingreadings
INNER JOIN things on thingreadings.thingid = things.id
ORDER BY reading DESC LIMIT 1) AS readings
ON things.id = readings.thingid
WHERE things.id = '1'
Would join against thingreadings only once the WHERE id = 1 had restricted the record set down. It left joins against just one row. However in order for performance to be acceptable in postgres, I have to add the WHERE id= 1 to the INNER JOIN things on thingreadings.thingid = things.id line too.
This isn't ideal; is it possible to force postgres to know that what I am joining against is only one row without explicitly adding the WHERE clauses everywhere?
An example of this problem can be seen here;
I am trying to recreate the following query in a more efficient way;
SELECT things.id, things.name,
(SELECT thingreadings.id FROM thingreadings WHERE thingid = things.id ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT 1),
(SELECT thingreadings.reading FROM thingreadings WHERE thingid = things.id ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT 1)
FROM things
WHERE id IN (1,2)
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!15/a172c/2
Not really sure why you did all that work. Isn't the inner query enough?
SELECT t.*
FROM thingreadings tr
INNER JOIN things t on tr.thingid = t.id AND t.id = '1'
ORDER BY tr.reading DESC
LIMIT 1;
sqlfiddle demo
When you want to select the latest value for each thingID, you can do:
SELECT t.*,a.reading
FROM things t
INNER JOIN (
SELECT t1.*
FROM thingreadings t1
LEFT JOIN thingreadings t2
ON (t1.thingid = t2.thingid AND t1.reading < t2.reading)
WHERE t2.thingid IS NULL
) a ON a.thingid = t.id
sqlfiddle demo
The derived table gets you the record with the most recent reading, then the JOIN gets you the information from things table for that record.
The where clause in SQL applies to the result set you're requesting, NOT to the join.
What your code is NOT saying: "do this join only for the ID of 1"...
What your code IS saying: "do this join, then pull records out of it where the ID is 1"...
This is why you need the inner where clause. Incidentally, I also think Filipe is right about the unnecessary code.
I have a nested select query that is returning the proper amount of rows. The query builds a recordset and compares it to a table and returns the records in the query that are not in the table.
I converted the select query to an update query. I am trying to populate the table with the rows returned from the query. When I run the update query it is returning with zero rows to update. I dont understand why because the select query is returning record and I am using the same code in the update query.
Thanks
Select Query: (This is returning several records)
Select *
From
(SELECT DISTINCT
ProductClass,SalProductClass.[Description],B.Branch,B.BranchDesc,B.Salesperson,B.Name,
CAST(0 AS FLOAT) AS Rate,'N' AS Split
FROM (SELECT SalBranch.Branch,SalBranch.[Description] AS BranchDesc,A.Salesperson,A.Name
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT
Salesperson,Name
FROM SalSalesperson
) A
CROSS JOIN SalBranch
) B
CROSS JOIN SalProductClass
) C
Left Outer Join RateComm On
RateComm.ProductClass = C.ProductClass and
RateComm.Branch = C.Branch And RateComm.Salesperson = C.Salesperson
Where RateComm.ProductClass is Null
Update Query: (This is returning zero records)
UPDATE RateComm
SET RateComm.ProductClass=C.ProductClass,RateComm.ProdClassDesc=C.ProdClassDesc,
RateComm.Branch=C.Branch,RateComm.BranchDesc=C.BranchDesc,RateComm.Salesperson=C.Salesperson,
RateComm.Name=C.Name,RateComm.Rate=C.Rate,RateComm.Split=C.Split
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT
ProductClass,SalProductClass.[Description] AS ProdClassDesc,B.Branch,B.BranchDesc,B.Salesperson,B.Name,
CAST(0 AS FLOAT) AS Rate,'N' AS Split
FROM (SELECT SalBranch.Branch,SalBranch.[Description] AS BranchDesc,A.Salesperson,A.Name
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT
Salesperson,Name
FROM SalSalesperson
) A
CROSS JOIN SalBranch
) B
CROSS JOIN SalProductClass
) C
LEFT OUTER JOIN RateComm ON C.ProductClass=RateComm.ProductClass AND
C.Salesperson=RateComm.Salesperson AND C.Branch=RateComm.Branch
WHERE RateComm.ProductClass IS NULL
It's difficult to update what doesn't exist. Have you tried an INSERT query instead?
How would I redesign the below query so that it will recursively loop through entire tree to return all descendants from root to leaves? (I'm using SSMS 2008). We have a President at the root. under him are the VPs, then upper management, etc., on down the line. I need to return the names and titles of each. But this query shouldn't be hard-coded; I need to be able to run this for any selected employee, not just the president. This query below is the hard-coded approach.
select P.staff_name [Level1],
P.job_title [Level1 Title],
Q.license_number [License 1],
E.staff_name [Level2],
E.job_title [Level2 Title],
G.staff_name [Level3],
G.job_title [Level3 Title]
from staff_view A
left join staff_site_link_expanded_view P on P.people_id = A.people_id
left join staff_site_link_expanded_view E on E.people_id = C.people_id
left join staff_site_link_expanded_view G on G.people_id = F.people_id
left join facility_view Q on Q.group_profile_id = P.group_profile_id
Thank you, this was most closely matching what I needed. Here is my CTE query below:
with Employee_Hierarchy (staff_name, job_title, id_number, billing_staff_credentials_code, site_name, group_profile_id, license_number, region_description, people_id)
as
(
select C.staff_name, C.job_title, C.id_number, C.billing_staff_credentials_code, C.site_name, C.group_profile_id, Q.license_number, R.region_description, A.people_id
from staff_view A
left join staff_site_link_expanded_view C on C.people_id = A.people_id
left join facility_view Q on Q.group_profile_id = C.group_profile_id
left join regions R on R.regions_id = Q.regions_id
where A.last_name = 'kromer'
)
select C.staff_name, C.job_title, C.id_number, C.billing_staff_credentials_code, C.site_name, C.group_profile_id, Q.license_number, R.region_description, A.people_id
from staff_view A
left join staff_site_link_expanded_view C on C.people_id = A.people_id
left join facility_view Q on Q.group_profile_id = C.group_profile_id
left join regions R on R.regions_id = Q.regions_id
WHERE C.STAFF_NAME IS NOT NULL
GROUP BY C.STAFF_NAME, C.job_title, C.id_number, C.billing_staff_credentials_code, C.site_name, C.group_profile_id, Q.license_number, R.region_description, A.people_id
ORDER BY C.STAFF_NAME
But I am wondering what is the purpose of the "Employee_Hierarchy"? When I replaced "staff_view" in the outer query with "Employee_Hierarchy", it only returned one record = "Kromer". So when/where can we use "Employee_Hierarchy"?
See:
SQL Server - Simple example of a recursive CTE
MSDN: Recursive Queries using Common Table Expression
SQL Server recursive CTE (this seems pretty much like exactly what you are working on!)
Update:
A proper recursive CTE consist of basically three things:
an anchor SELECT to begin with; that can select e.g. the root level employees (where the Reports_To is NULL), or it can select any arbitrary employee that you define, e.g. by a parameter
a UNION ALL
a recursive SELECT statement that selects from the same, typically self-referencing table and joins with the recursive CTE being currently built up
This gives you the ability to recursively build up a result set that you can then select from.
If you look at the Northwind sample database, it has a table called Employees which is self-referencing: Employees.ReportsTo --> Employees.EmployeeID defines who reports to whom.
Your CTE would look something like this:
;WITH RecursiveCTE AS
(
-- anchor query; get the CEO
SELECT EmployeeID, FirstName, LastName, Title, 1 AS 'Level', ReportsTo
FROM dbo.Employees
WHERE ReportsTo IS NULL
UNION ALL
-- recursive part; select next Employees that have ReportsTo -> cte.EmployeeID
SELECT
e.EmployeeID, e.FirstName, e.LastName, e.Title,
cte.Level + 1 AS 'Level', e.ReportsTo
FROM
dbo.Employees e
INNER JOIN
RecursiveCTE cte ON e.ReportsTo = cte.EmployeeID
)
SELECT *
FROM RecursiveCTE
ORDER BY Level, LastName
I don't know if you can translate your sample to a proper recursive CTE - but that's basically the gist of it: anchor query, UNION ALL, recursive query