Has anyone be able to run VS Code on Windows Server 2012R2? I have tried running the application normally and in compatibility mode(s). And each time running the app pegs the CPU to 100% utilization.
Does anyone have any suggestions or know if the app cannot be run on Windows Server OS?
It seems there is an issue with VSCode running on vm machines using a single cpu. Some users have experienced that adding an addition cpu solve the issue.
My Bluestacsk2 installation does not pop-up after extracting. Just nothing happens after that window. I tried disabling antivirus programs and running it as administrator. My system fulfils the system requirements:
Windows 10 Pro, 4 GB Ram.
Version: BlueStacks2_native_8e68b6e001e5a05ff01c3f89c5790f9d
I also have the latest version of Directx and .NET framework. My graphic card is up to date and works very well.
This problem occurs only for the Bluestacks 2. I can setup the previous beta version. I tried both win7 and win10 versions for Bluestacks2 but they are not starting to install.
I figured out that I don't have enough space in C drive. But it was really annoying that Bluestacks does not warn me about this. I had several gigabytes in C, but I have been able to install it properly after I removed 10 gb of data from there. (I don't think you need to remove such big data)
I am using NetBeans as my IDE. After working a few hours, I got the following problems
1. It got stuck with scan for external changes suspended
2. and after this came, the auto-load also got fails. It shows please wait... only.
Due to this I am planning to change my IDE. Is there any way to overcome this? I thought it was due to the issue with my slow computer. I just formatted and upgraded it. Then also it shows the same issue.
My NetNeans is the small package with PHP and HTML only.
3. It also cause high CPU usage sometimes
My operating system is Windows 8.1 with 4 GB memory and i3 processor
You should close your old projects that you are not working. You clears your netbeans cache as well.
You can get help about clear netbeans cache from here
I have installed Eucalyptus Cloud in a Box (Bundled with CentOS 6.4 64 bit)on an HP Probook 430 G1 laptop with the following processor specifications
Intel i7 4500u
Before Install I get the message "Unsupported Hardware of combination thereof detected".
Inspite of this I can still install Eucalyptus just fine.
However, after the first reboot and subsequent reboots I see a message
Detected CPU model 6 family 69
UNSUPPORTED HARDWARE device: Intel CPU Model
After this the machine does not go beyond the first loading screen.
1).Is this a problem with the new fourth generation Haswell architecture ?
2).And is there any solution to this apart from using another machine ?
3).What does CPU model 6 family 69 mean ?
4).Is there any way to know which specific hardware is unsupported ?
Below is the link that shows the supported hardware of Red Hat
https://hardware.redhat.com/laptop/Hewlett%20Packard/&quicksearch=
Thank you in advance. Any help will be greatly appreciated
Yes, I believe "Model 6 Family 69" is a 4th generation Haswell i7.
You should be able to add "unsupported_hardware" to your kickstart file, if that's when it's occurring.
I don't know, but here's Intel's information page for what I think is a typical 4th gen processor: http://ark.intel.com/products/76087/Intel-Core-i7-4750HQ-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_20-GHz
You could look at the kernel source for the kernel you're using. Might be in arch/x86/kernel/cpu somewhere.
The "Feature" explained
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Features/WarnTaintedHardware
This says it should only affect the installer, so the "subsequent reboots" behavior you describe should not happen unless you're running the installer on every boot.
And a recent feature added to kickstart to allow it to boot unattended:
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html-single/6.4_Technical_Notes/
BZ#824963
A kickstart installation on unsupported hardware resulted in a dialog box asking for confirmation before proceeding with the installation process. As a consequence, it was not possible to perform a kickstart installation on unsupported hardware without any user input. To fix this bug, a new unsupported_hardware kickstart command has been added, which skips the interactive dialog warning when installing a system on unsupported hardware without user input.
It seems that the Windows Phone 7 SDK doesn't support running inside a VM. On Parallels, the entire VM simply crashes when the emulator is starting up.
Around the web, though, a few people have reported that they were able to use it by changing a lot of the VM settings.
What do I have to change to be able to run it? I'm specially interested in Parallels, but VMWare or any other simulator that run on OSX if fine for me!
The WinPhone7 (and WinPhone8) emulator is itself a VM and few (if any) general-purpose VM's will host another VM infrastructure, which is why it crashes Parallels etc.
If you want to have the emulator run from within a different VM to the one MS provides, then you're into the realm of extracting images, toggling bits and trying to tack it into your VM of choice. Of course, the chances of the emulator then working as expected with no residual issues is as close to nil as makes no difference ;)
[Update 2013-01-30] VMWare5 & Parallels Desktop 8 now support running Hyper-V guest VM's. This is particularly useful for those wanting to develop against the Windows Phone 8 SDK which runs Windows Phone 8 guest VM's on Hyper-V.
Here's a guide to how to run Visual Studio 2012 & Windows 8 SDK (inc. the Windows Phone 8 Hyper-V-based emulator) in VMWare5 or Parallels desktop 5: Link
Note: Running Windows & Hyper-V inside a VM will be slower than running natively. Dual-booting into Windows (using Boot Camp on OSX) is stil the recommended method of developing for the Windows platform, especially if you want to use Hyper-V guest VM's.
I'm working in VMware Fusion with Expression Blend 4 RC AND the emulator.
works like a charm!
As others have said, WP7 is itself a virtual machine. Even if you can get it to run inside a virtual machine like Parallels, the performance will be abysmal. If your computer supports hardware virtualization, the emulator runs really smooth, without it it's very very sluggish. Running it inside another VM will make it even more sluggish - I am guessing to the point that it's unusable.
I know this is not the answer you want to hear, but I would recommend running Windows in Bootcamp, you will have much better experience developing and emulating.
I'm not so sure about compatibility for long term development, but in last september, I remembering trying the Windows Phone 7.1beta SDK on VirtualBox (I'm using mac SL), a free virtual machine from oracle (previously by Sun) and it works well there.
I just do a regular install of Windows 7 Home Basic (any Win7 except Starter will do, CMIIW) in the VBox with no tweaking at all, install the GuestAddition inside win7 (provided by VBox), then install the SDK. I create new WP project, arrange UI, make some codes as usual, then run it in emulator. Surprisingly, the emulator works fairly well and showing the app I've developed.
I'm not even experience any lag (my macbook is i5, 4GB ram, the VBox setting is dual core, 2GB ram, note that no other heavy mac process is on the run, so I solely run the VBox ... and iTunes for listening musics).
So if you still want to try WP SDK 7.1 on VM, why don't you try VirtualBox? My current VBox is installed with Windows 8 and have no extra space to reinstall the win7+WPSDK. If you do give a try on VBox, please report the result here to inform everyone.
I've run the Android emulator inside a VM before. It was slower, but still usable to test basic apps. Also, the Android emulator was then slow to where you couldn't tell a difference from between native or from within running Eclipse from within a virtual machine running Linux
x86-to-x86 emulation tends to be pretty fast nowadays due to both Intel and AMD CPUs having hardware to help it along. A lot of x86-to-x86 emulation also doesn't do a full emulation (see Android's emulator to see how a full emulator runs in comparison). In the x86-to-x86 case, the faster ones will try to pass as many instructions to the host OS so that a chunk of the code runs natively
People have made claims like 80-95% performance, which is pretty good. If you have a 3.2 GHz CPU, you get knocked down to around a 2.4 GHz equivalent of your CPU. That's not bad at all, and I honestly don't notice that much overhead running in a good x86-to-x86 VM
The biggest reason why the WP emulator has problems with VMs doesn't have to deal with it being a VM-in-a-VM, but it's most likely that it requires DirectX 10. This might have to do with XNA, which is Microsoft's really nifty gaming API that lets you easily port between Windows, WP, and the Xbox 360. A lot of VM programs don't support hardware 3d acceleration
On another note: if you want to use a low-end system, AMD CPUs may fare better since AMD doesn't tend to disable hardware virtualization features in their lower-end CPUs
If you're deploying to a device, you should be able to use a VM, since it's the emulator that has issues being a VM itself.
We have successfully deployed, and performance is acceptable in our environment, virtual Windows 8.1 Pro Desktop under VMware vSphere 5.5 (ESXi 5.5), and have the Windows 8 SDK and Emulator working correctly with no performance issues. (In Education - to University Labs for Windows Phone development).
The issue experienced by most, is you most have the Hypervisor pass through the Intel-VT into the VM, to effecticely create Nested Hypervisors. This is possible using VMware vSphere 5.5.
This option is available in virtual machine version 10, enabled in the vSphere Web Client - Enable Hardware Virtualisation.