How can I change my PostgreSQL WAL file size as my wish. By default at pg_wal directory postgres generate 16MB WAL files. I try to change using max_wal_size, min_wal_size parameter. But I think it is not right parameter to change. Necessary details given in the below screenshot.
With an old and outdated version like 9.4, your only option is to build PostgreSQL from source and configure it with
./configure --with-wal-segsize=1024
Then you have to dump and restore the cluster to that new installation.
With current versions. You could simply shut down PostgreSQL cleanly (important!) and run pg_resetwal with the appropriate option.
Upgrade!
Related
I would like to switch from postgres 9.6 to version 14 which runs on Ubuntu 21.04. I have a cluster with 3 databases.
I would like to know what is the difference between upgrading with pg_upgrade and pg_upgradecluster? Which one is faster and safer?
pg_upgrade is a tool from Postgresql itself that will operate on a single database (folder).
pg_upgradecluster however is a wrapper from your operating system (= Ubuntu) to pg_upgrade or pg_dump/pg_restore. In addition to very conveniently upgrading your database, it will also do some housekeeping like moving the config files to the correct folder in /etc/postgres/ .
So, if you have set up your database by pg_createcluster and it is hence listed by pg_lsclusters, I'd strongly recommend using pg_upgradecluster to upgrade it.
In terms of "faster vs. safer", be sure to read about the various options on the manpage.
If you can take a reliable backup (e.g. snapshot), you can safely use the -m upgrade --link option which will be fastest and allow for a very short downtime (depending on database size and resources, but I've recently upgraded a 700GB database in ~25 seconds).
The safest option of course is not using pg_upgrade, but the default pg_dump/pg_restore method, which will shut down your original database and copy the data to a new database in a new location (= it will use at approx. twice the space, at least temporarily until you decide to delete the original folder).
I try to configure backuping database in postgresql with pg_basebackup and WAL logs.
For now I created full backup once a week and want to backup wal logs too. But, as I understand, posgresql writes them all the time. So, how can I copy them and be shure that they are not corrupted?
Thanks
You set archive_command to a shell command that copies the WAL file to a safe archive location, so that burden is mostly on you.
When PostgreSQL runs archive_command, it assumes that the WAL file is not corrupted. Only a PostgreSQL bug or a bug in the storage system could cause a corrupted WAL segment.
There is no better protection against PostgreSQL bugs than always running the latest bugfix release, and you can invest in storage hardware that will at least detect failure.
You can also write your archive_command with a certain amount of paranoia, e.g. by comparing the md5sum of the WAL segment and its archive copy.
Another idea is to write two copies of the WAL file to different storage systems.
I am not a DBA but i am using postgresql for production server and i am using postgresql 10 database. I am using Bigsql and i started replication of my production server to other server and on replication server everything is working but on my production server their is no space left. And after du command on my production server i am getting that pg_wal folder have 17 gb file and each file is of 16 mb size.
After some google search i change my postgresql.conf file as:
wal_level = logical
archive_mode = on
archive_command = 'cp -i %p /etc/bigsql/data/pg10/pg_wal/archive_status/%f'
i install postgresql 10 from Bigsql and did above changes.
After changes the dir /pg_wal/archive_status had 16 gb of log. So my question is that should i delete them manually or i have to wait for system delete them automatically.
And is that if i write archive_mode to on should that wal file getting removed automatically??
Thanks for your precious time.
This depends on how you do your backups and whether you'd ever need to restore the database to some point in time.
Only a full offline filesystem backup (offline meaning with database turned off) or an on-line logical backup with pg_dumpall will not need those files for a restore.
You'd need those files to restore a filesystem backup created while the database is running. Without them the backup will fail to restore. Though there exist backup solutions that copy needed WAL files automatically (like Barman).
You'd also need those files if your replica database will ever fall behind the master for some reason. Or you'd need to restore the database to some past point-in-time.
But these files compress pretty well - should be less than 10% size after compression - you can write your archive_command to compress them automatically instead of just copying.
And you should delete them eventually from the archive. I'd recommend to not delete them until they're at least a month old and also at least 2 full successful backups are done after creating them.
Using postgres 9.3.
I'm a bit confused on the proper usage of pg_archivecleanup.
I'm using both streaming replication and backup with continuous archiving for PITR recovery.
I don't think I can configure pg_archivecleanup in recovery.conf on the standby as it wouldn't achieve anything. The master is not archiving to a location accessible to the standby. The master is archiving to a location on its local disk, and then those archives and the associated backup are being rsync'd to a large backup disk.
So, it seems the solution would be to run pg_archivecleanup in "standalone" mode on the master, such as:
/usr/lib/postgresql/9.3/bin/pg_archivecleanup -d /archive 0000000100000010000000F0.00000028.backup
So, I'd do a cron job that would run the pg_archivecleanup command for any .backup files which are older than the latest one, and then delete those backup files, leaving only the latest one.
Is my understanding and plan correct?
If you want to retain only WAL segments after the latest base backup, you simply run pg_archivecleanup in standalone mode for the latest .backup file (not for those older than the latest).
But do you really want to have only one available backup? First of all, you won't be able to restore to the point before the last backup. Second, it makes sense to have some backups just in case (corruptions, etc).
And it seems strange to archive segments to local disk and then rsync them elsewhere. Why not putting your rsync (and then sync to flush OS buffers to disk) into archive_command? This ensures that the segment won't be removed from pg_xlog before it reaches the destination.
I am currently using pg_dump piped to gzip piped to split. But the problem with this is that all output files are always changed. So checksum-based backup always copies all data.
Are there any other good ways to perform an incremental backup of a PostgreSQL database, where a full database can be restored from the backup data?
For instance, if pg_dump could make everything absolutely ordered, so all changes are applied only at the end of the dump, or similar.
Update: Check out Barman for an easier way to set up WAL archiving for backup.
You can use PostgreSQL's continuous WAL archiving method. First you need to set wal_level=archive, then do a full filesystem-level backup (between issuing pg_start_backup() and pg_stop_backup() commands) and then just copy over newer WAL files by configuring the archive_command option.
Advantages:
Incremental, the WAL archives include everything necessary to restore the current state of the database
Almost no overhead, copying WAL files is cheap
You can restore the database at any point in time (this feature is called PITR, or point-in-time recovery)
Disadvantages:
More complicated to set up than pg_dump
The full backup will be much larger than a pg_dump because all internal table structures and indexes are included
Does not work well for write-heavy databases, since recovery will take a long time.
There are some tools such as pitrtools and omnipitr that can simplify setting up and restoring these configurations. But I haven't used them myself.
Also check out http://www.pgbackrest.org
pgBackrest is another backup tool for PostgreSQL which you should be evaluating as it supports:
parallel backup (tested to scale almost linearly up to 32 cores but can probably go much farther..)
compressed-at-rest backups
incremental and differential (compressed!) backups
streaming compression (data is compressed only once at the source and then transferred across the network and stored)
parallel, delta restore (ability to update an older copy to the latest)
Fully supports tablespaces
Backup rotation and archive expiration
Ability to resume backups which failed for some reason
etc, etc..
Another method is to backup to plain text and use rdiff to create incremental diffs.