at the moment, the issue is that Facebook fbclid queries look atrocious on my otherwise very nice URLs.
I WANT THEM GONE
solution below
the solution that i could find was to use a handle hook to remove it if it's there.
import type { Handle } from '#sveltejs/kit';
export const handle: Handle = ({ event, resolve }) => {
let assign: any = {};
if (event.request.url.match(/\?fbclid=.+/)) {
assign = {
redirected: true,
headers: {
Location: event.request.url.replace(/[\?&]fbclid=[^&]+/, '')
}
};
}
let r = resolve(event);
Object.assign(r, assign);
return r;
};
the key part of this code here is the /[\\?&]fbclid=[^&]+/ which allows other query parameters to exist, this will only remove the fbclid parameter as shown on regexr
I hope this helps :)
Related
In our Android project (download manager) we need to show built-in web browser so we able to catch downloads there with the all data (headers, cookies, post data) so we can handle them properly.
Unfortunately, WebView control we use does not provide any way to access POST data of the requests it makes.
So we use a hacky way to get this data. We inject this javascript code in the each html code the browser loads:
<script language="JavaScript">
HTMLFormElement.prototype._submit = HTMLFormElement.prototype.submit;
HTMLFormElement.prototype.submit = formSubmitMonitor;
window.addEventListener('submit', function(e) {
formSubmitMonitor(e);
}, true);
function formSubmitMonitor(e) {
var frm = e ? e.target : this;
formSubmitMonitor_onsubmit(frm);
frm._submit();
}
function formSubmitMonitor_onsubmit(f) {
var data = "";
for (i = 0; i < f.elements.length; i++) {
var name = f.elements[i].name;
var value = f.elements[i].value;
//var type = f.elements[i].type;
if (name)
{
if (data !== "")
data += '&';
data += encodeURIComponent(name) + '=' + encodeURIComponent(value);
}
}
postDataMonitor.onBeforeSendPostData(
f.attributes['method'] === undefined ? null : f.attributes['method'].nodeValue,
new URL(f.action, document.baseURI).href,
data,
f.attributes['enctype'] === undefined ? null : f.attributes['enctype'].nodeValue);
}
XMLHttpRequest.prototype.origOpen = XMLHttpRequest.prototype.open;
XMLHttpRequest.prototype.open = function(method, url, async, user, password) {
// these will be the key to retrieve the payload
this.recordedMethod = method;
this.recordedUrl = url;
this.origOpen(method, url, async, user, password);
};
XMLHttpRequest.prototype.origSend = XMLHttpRequest.prototype.send;
XMLHttpRequest.prototype.send = function(body) {
if (body)
{
postDataMonitor.onBeforeSendPostData(
this.recordedMethod,
this.recordedUrl,
body,
null);
}
this.origSend(body);
};
const origFetch = window.fetch;
window.fetch = function()
{
postDataMonitor.onBeforeSendPostData(
"POST",
"test",
"TEST",
null);
return origFetch.apply(this, arguments);
}
</script>
Generally, it works fine.
But in Google Mail web interface, it's not working for some unknown reason. E.g. when the user enters his login name and presses Next. I thought it's using Fetch API, so I've added interception for it too. But this did not help. Please note, that we do not need to intercept the user credentials, but we need to be able to intercept all, or nothing. Unfortunately, this is the way the whole system works there...
Addition #1.
I've found another way: don't override shouldInterceptRequest, but override onPageStarted instead and call evaluateJavascript there. That way it works even on Google Mail web site! But why the first method is not working then? We break HTML code somehow?
I'm in trouble to use variables in an Axios request to a Loopback(v3) API.
What works?
If I use the "REST notation" it works well:
getInfo() {
axios.get('http://myIp/api/tabs?filter[where][name]=' + this.name).then(response => {
this.tabs = response.data
})
What doesn't work yet:
I can't translate the "REST notation" to the "Node notation" that I would prefer to use here.
What I tried already:
axios.get('http://myIp/api/tabs?filter={"where":{"name": this.name }}).then(response => {
this.tabs = response.data
})
I realise that with single quotes around the whole request, I can't get variable interpolation. But if I use double quotes, I don't know how to escape the ones used for the reserved words like "where", ...
What would be the correct way to use variables in this context?
Try:
axios.get('http://myIp/api/tabs').then(response => {
this.tabs = response.data.filter(b => b.name === this.name)
It should work.
the main trick is response.data.filter() then give your filter logic inside the filter().
I suggest to run something like this:
let value = "John";
let filter = {
where: {
name: value
}
};
axios.get('http://myIp/api/tabs?filter=' + JSON.stringify(filter)).then(response => {
this.tabs = response.data
});
This way you will be sure that object is constructed in a proper way and you won't pass full object into the request, also you won't get lost with opening and closing brackets/parentheses
ok, I will try to split this in smaller chunks and I need to add another answer to that becasue it's too long for a comment:
axios.get
axios.get('http://myIp/api/tabs?filter=' + JSON.stringify(filter)).then(response => { ... });
This expects a url as a string. since it's GET request, you cannot pass variables in the different form than in request url as variables, eg. http://mypage.com?variable1=value1&variable2=value2
argument
axios.get('http://myIp/api/tabs?filter=' + JSON.stringify(filter)).then(response => {
this.tabs = response.data
});
Making super complicated urls can be a bit frustrating and not readable. fortunately, in loopback you can pass in an object instead. but to do this in the GET request, you need to pass it as a string. So you can call JSON.stringify on the object to make it a string.
concatenation
axios.get('http://myIp/api/tabs?filter=' + JSON.stringify(filter)).then(response => {
this.tabs = response.data
});
Then, to pass that into URL you can concatenate your url with filter object stringified, like this:
# one method
url + JSON.stringify(filter)
# another method
var filters = JSON.stringify(filter);
axios.get(`http://myapi.com?filter=${filters}`, function(...))
Hopefully that helps
axios.get('http://myIp/api/tabs?filter={"where":{"name":'+this.name }})
.then(response => {
this.tabs = response.data
I've come across different types of syntax for Protractor's Page Objects and I was wondering, what's their background and which way is suggested.
This is the official PageObject syntax from Protractor's tutorial. I like it the most, because it's clear and readable:
use strict;
var AngularHomepage = function() {
var nameInput = element(by.model('yourName'));
var greeting = element(by.binding('yourName'));
this.get = function() {
browser.get('http://www.angularjs.org');
};
this.setName = function(name) {
nameInput.sendKeys(name);
};
this.getGreeting = function() {
return greeting.getText();
};
};
module.exports = AngularHomepage;
However, I've also found this kind:
'use strict';
var AngularPage = function () {
browser.get('http://www.angularjs.org');
};
AngularPage.prototype = Object.create({}, {
todoText: { get: function () { return element(by.model('todoText')); }},
addButton: { get: function () { return element(by.css('[value="add"]')); }},
yourName: { get: function () { return element(by.model('yourName')); }},
greeting: { get: function () { return element(by.binding('yourName')).getText(); }},
todoList: { get: function () { return element.all(by.repeater('todo in todos')); }},
typeName: { value: function (keys) { return this.yourName.sendKeys(keys); }} ,
todoAt: { value: function (idx) { return this.todoList.get(idx).getText(); }},
addTodo: { value: function (todo) {
this.todoText.sendKeys(todo);
this.addButton.click();
}}
});
module.exports = AngularPage;
What are the pros/cons of those two approaches (apart from readability)? Is the second one up-to-date? I've seen that WebdriverIO uses that format.
I've also heard from one guy on Gitter that the first entry is inefficient. Can someone explain to me why?
Page Object Model framework becomes popular mainly because of:
Less code duplicate
Easy to maintain for long
High readability
So, generally we develop test framework(pom) for our convenience based on testing scope and needs by following suitable framework(pom) patterns. There are NO such rules which says that, strictly we should follow any framework.
NOTE: Framework is, to make our task easy, result oriented and effective
In your case, 1st one looks good and easy. And it does not leads to confusion or conflict while in maintenance phase of it.
Example: 1st case-> element locator's declaration happens at top of each page. It would be easy to change in case any element locator changed in future.
Whereas in 2nd case, locators declared in block level(scatter across the page). It would be a time taking process to identify and change the locators if required in future.
So, Choose which one you feel comfortable based on above points.
I prefer to use ES6 class syntax (http://es6-features.org/#ClassDefinition). Here, i prepared some simple example how i work with page objects using ES6 classes and some helpful tricks.
var Page = require('../Page')
var Fragment = require('../Fragment')
class LoginPage extends Page {
constructor() {
super('/login');
this.emailField = $('input.email');
this.passwordField = $('input.password');
this.submitButton = $('button.login');
this.restorePasswordButton = $('button.restore');
}
login(username, password) {
this.email.sendKeys(username);
this.passwordField.sendKeys(password);
this.submit.click();
}
restorePassword(email) {
this.restorePasswordButton.click();
new RestorePasswordModalWindow().submitEmail(email);
}
}
class RestorePasswordModalWindow extends Fragment {
constructor() {
//Passing element that will be used as this.fragment;
super($('div.modal'));
}
submitEmail(email) {
//This how you can use methods from super class, just example - it is not perfect.
this.waitUntilAppear(2000, 'Popup should appear before manipulating');
//I love to use fragments, because they provides small and reusable parts of page.
this.fragment.$('input.email').sendKeys(email);
this.fragment.$('button.submit')click();
this.waitUntilDisappear(2000, 'Popup should disappear before manipulating');
}
}
module.exports = LoginPage;
// Page.js
class Page {
constructor(url){
//this will be part of page to add to base URL.
this.url = url;
}
open() {
//getting baseURL from params object in config.
browser.get(browser.params.baseURL + this.url);
return this; // this will allow chaining methods.
}
}
module.exports = Page;
// Fragment.js
class Fragment {
constructor(fragment) {
this.fragment = fragment;
}
//Example of some general methods for all fragments. Notice that default method parameters will work only in node.js 6.x
waitUntilAppear(timeout=5000, message) {
browser.wait(this.EC.visibilityOf(this.fragment), timeout, message);
}
waitUntilDisappear(timeout=5000, message) {
browser.wait(this.EC.invisibilityOf(this.fragment), timeout, message);
}
}
module.exports = Fragment;
// Then in your test:
let loginPage = new LoginPage().open(); //chaining in action - getting LoginPage instance in return.
loginPage.restorePassword('batman#gmail.com'); // all logic is hidden in Fragment object
loginPage.login('superman#gmail.com')
When user refresh a certain page, I want to set some initial values from the mongoDB database.
I tried using the onRendered method, which in the documentation states will run when the template that it is run on is inserted into the DOM. However, the database is not available at that instance?
When I try to access the database from the function:
Template.scienceMC.onRendered(function() {
var currentRad = radiationCollection.find().fetch()[0].rad;
}
I get the following error messages:
Exception from Tracker afterFlush function:
TypeError: Cannot read property 'rad' of undefined
However, when I run the line radiationCollection.find().fetch()[0].rad; in the console I can access the value?
How can I make sure that the copy of the mongoDB is available?
The best way for me was to use the waitOn function in the router. Thanks to #David Weldon for the tip.
Router.route('/templateName', {
waitOn: function () {
return Meteor.subscribe('collectionName');
},
action: function () {
// render all templates and regions for this route
this.render();
}
});
You need to setup a proper publication (it seems you did) and subscribe in the route parameters. If you want to make sure that you effectively have your data in the onRendered function, you need to add an extra step.
Here is an example of how to make it in your route definition:
this.templateController = RouteController.extend({
template: "YourTemplate",
action: function() {
if(this.isReady()) { this.render(); } else { this.render("yourTemplate"); this.render("loading");}
/*ACTION_FUNCTION*/
},
isReady: function() {
var subs = [
Meteor.subscribe("yoursubscription1"),
Meteor.subscribe("yoursubscription2")
];
var ready = true;
_.each(subs, function(sub) {
if(!sub.ready())
ready = false;
});
return ready;
},
data: function() {
return {
params: this.params || {}, //if you have params
yourData: radiationCollection.find()
};
}
});
In this example you get,in the onRendered function, your data both using this.data.yourData or radiationCollection.find()
EDIT: as #David Weldon stated in comment, you could also use an easier alternative: waitOn
I can't see your collection, so I can't guarantee that rad is a key in your collection, that said I believe your problem is that you collection isn't available yet. As #David Weldon says, you need to guard or wait on your subscription to be available (remember it has to load).
What I do in ironrouter is this:
data:function(){
var currentRad = radiationCollection.find().fetch()[0].rad;
if (typeof currentRad != 'undefined') {
// if typeof currentRad is not undefined
return currentRad;
}
}
I've got a mySql db with non-standard IDs and field names, so I was trying to use both jsonResultsAdapterProvider and setRestangularFields. Here's the code in my app.config file:
RestangularProvider.setBaseUrl(remoteServiceName);
RestangularProvider.setRestangularFields({id: 'personID'});
RestangularProvider.addResponseInterceptor(function(data, operation, what, url, response, deferred) {
if (data.error) {
return data.error;
}
var extractedData = data.result;
return jsonResultsAdapterProvider.$get().camelizeKeys(extractedData);
});
RestangularProvider.addRequestInterceptor(function(elem, operation, what, url) {
return jsonResultsAdapterProvider.$get().decamelizeKeys(elem);
});
It's all good until I try to do a put/save. When I look at the request payload within the browser dev tools, it's: {"undefined":12842} (but the url is correct, so I know the id is set) If I don't use the ResultsAdapter and change the id field to Person_ID, payload looks good, so I know I'm making the right calls to Get and Save the Restangular objects. But for what it's worth, here's the code:
$scope.tests = Restangular.all('members').getList().$object;
vm.testEdit = function () {
$scope.test = Restangular.one('members', 12842).get().then(function(test) {
var copy = Restangular.copy(test);
copy.title = 'xxxx';
copy.put(); // payload was: undefined: 12842
});
}
// I also tried customPUT...
// copy.customPUT(copy, '', {}, {'Content-Type':'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'});
I tried "fixing" the id other ways too, too. like this:
Restangular.extendModel('members', function(model) {
model.id = model.personID;
return model;
});
but that messed up the urls, causing missing ids. And I tried getIdFromElem, but it only got called for my objects created with Restangular.one(), not with Restangular.all()
Restangular.configuration.getIdFromElem = function(elem) {
console.log('custom getIdFromElem called');
if (elem.route === 'members') { // this was never true
return elem[personID];
}
};
It seems like Restangular needs to substitute 'personID' most of the time, but maybe it needs 'Person_ID' at some point during the Save? Any ideas on what I could try to get the Save working?
I finally figured it out! The problem was in my config code and in the way I was decamelizing. Because of inconsistencies in my db field names (most use underscores, but some are already camelCase), I was storing the server's original elem names in an array within the jsonResultsAdapterProvider. But since I was calling jsonResultsAdapterProvider.$get().camelizeKeys(extractedData); within the interceptors, I was reinstantiating the array each time I made a new request. So, the undefined in the PUT request was coming from my decamelizeKeys() method.
My updated config code fixed the problem:
RestangularProvider.setBaseUrl(remoteServiceName);
RestangularProvider.setRestangularFields({id: 'personID'});
var jsonAdapter = jsonResultsAdapterProvider.$get();
RestangularProvider.addResponseInterceptor(function(data, operation, what, url, response, deferred) {
if (data.error) {
return data.error;
}
var extractedData = data.result;
// return extractedData;
return jsonAdapter.camelizeKeys(extractedData);
});
RestangularProvider.addRequestInterceptor(function(elem, operation, what, url) {
return jsonAdapter.decamelizeKeys(elem);
});