There used to be a method named buildArguments() which was very useful for viewing query arguments. It seems that it was removed after the package version 9.0.0.
I was using it to print my queries to the console, so I was able to spot any mistakes. Was a new method introduced to replace buildArguments()?
Related
When my scala-js code throws an error, I'd like to send a sensible stacktrace back to my server to put in the logs. By "sensible stacktrace" I mean something that gives the Scala methods, filenames, and line numbers rather than the transpiled javascript code.
I've made good progress by getting the source map and using the Javascript source-map library (https://github.com/mozilla/source-map) to translate each element of the stacktrace from javascript to the corresponding Scala code.
My issue: I need the column number of the javascript code that threw the error but don't see how to obtain it. Printing a StackTraceElement gives a result similar to
oat.browser.views.query.QueryRunView$.renderParamsTable$1(https://localhost:9443/assets/browser-fastopt.js:34787:188)
I need the "188" at the end of the line but don't see how to get it other than calling toString and parsing the result. Looking at the StackTraceElement code, the column number is a private variable with nothing in the API to access it.
Is there another approach to this that I'm completely overlooking? Anything built into scala-js that converts a javascript stacktrace to a Scala stacktrace?
I subsequently found the StackTraceJS library which does what I needed. I combined a ScalaJS facade for it with a facade for JSNlog to come up with a package that meets my needs pretty well. See jsnlog-facade. It logs to the browser console and/or the server, with Scala stack traces. Demo code included.
There is nothing in the public API to access the column number because this is a Java API, and Scala.js cannot add public members to Java APIs.
To work around this issue in the case of StackTraceElement, we export getColumnNumber(): Int to JavaScript. You can therefore use the following code to retrieve the column number:
def columnNumberOfStackTraceElement(ste: StackTraceElement): Int =
ste.asInstanceOf[js.Dynamic].getColumnNumber().asInstanceOf[Int]
Note that this "feature" is undocumented, and might change without notice in a future major version of Scala.js. If it disappears, it will be replaced by something reliable. In the meantime, the above should get you going.
I'm learning Elixir and attempting to use the elixir-mongo library. During the auth/1 command, A the function uses Server.call, piping in the MongoDB request string. looking at the Mongo.Server class, it does not appear to be an actual genserver, nor have a method to match call/1. How is this working?
With high probability it doesn't work. Mongo.Server module doesn't export call function. There are no macros that generate it magically. My guess is that master branch is currently broken. If you are using the library and want to dig into the sources make sure you are looking at the same tag as the version you are using in your project.
Also, there are no classes and methods in Elixir. There are modules and functions :)
I was working on some DSL examples in Drools and I required to 'see' how the generated DRL looked like. I've tried with both 6.3.0-SNAPSHOT and 6.4.0-SNAPSHOT versions.
According to the documentation [1], it should be possible to add the special keyword result as a comment in the DSL file. This should print the generated DRL straight to System.out.
I've tried adding the following line to my DSL file, but I didn't get any DRL printed.
#/ debug display result and usage
I've also tried with:
#/ result
But I didn't have any luck.
So, my question is: Is this result keyword currently supported? The only keyword mentioned in the documentation that appears to be working is usage.
Never mind, I've debugged the code myself and this appears to be a soft bug in Drools.
The thing is that the keywords keyword, when and then use System.out to print the debug statements, but the keywords result and steps are using a Logger.
I've seen several conflicting descriptions of how to do this around the google results, and haven't been able to get any of them to work.
My problem is basically this: where I call ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction (with an llvm::Function*), I'd like to instead get the pretty-printed x86 assembly that would be produced for this function.
Anybody?
[ETA: I'm using LLVM 3.3. The descriptions I've found seem to be for earlier versions of LLVM.]
It turns out that you can add an event listener to a JIT ExecutionEngine with ExecutionEngine::RegisterJITEventListener. If you provide an instance of that class, you can have your callback invoked when machine code is generated for you, and you'll be given a pointer to the machine code and its length. With this, you can call llvm::sys::disassembleBuffer to get a description of the machine code buffer.
However, the llvm::sys::disassembleBuffer function just defers to the udis library if LLVM was compiled with that support. Since my build of LLVM didn't have this flag set and I can't rebuild it, I'll just look into using the udis library directly:
https://github.com/vmt/udis86
(I am also using .NET 4.0 and VS 2010.)
I created a function import returning a complex type, as explained at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb896231.aspx. The function import and new complex type appear in my .edmx file and in the Designer.cs file. However, the function does not appear when I view the service in the browser, and when I add or update a service reference in the client project, the function does not appear there either - as is to be expected, given the first result.
Creating an imported function and using it seems conceptually very simple and straightforward, and one would think it would just work, as Microsoft's step-by-step instructions appear to suggest: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc716672.aspx#Y798 (which article shows the SP returning entity types - I tried this also, and it doesn't work for me either).
This blog post shows the addition of a method to the DataService class, which Microsoft's instructions omit: http://www.codegain.com/articles/wcf/miscellaneous/how-to-use-stored-procedure-in-wcf-data-service.aspx I tried adding one method returning a list of entity types and another returning a list of complex types, and still had no success. I still could not access the functions, either directly via the browser or from the client application via a service reference.
Thanks in advance for any help with this.
config.SetServiceOperationAccessRule("*", ServiceOperationRights.All);
MS would do well to add a note to the walkthroughs stating that the above bit of code must be there. (It may be better to enable each operation explicitly than to use "*".)
http://www.codegain.com/articles/wcf/miscellaneous/how-to-use-stored-procedure-in-wcf-data-service.aspx shows that line of code. Also, something it is there in the code, commented out, when one creates the WCF Data Service. Some of us like to delete commented-out code that we aren't using and that seems irrelevant - perhaps doing so a bit prematurely, sometimes.