I'm running into an issue where I have a random number being entered into a field and then all digits except the last 4 are being hidden.
I want to have a step checking that it is working correctly and then verify the last 4 digits. I'm using Selenium to store a temporary card to get through a payment process and need to confirm the last 4 digits of the card once it has been entered into the field.
Since the number is one variable and generated randomly I was looking for a way to potentially make a new variable with only the last 4 digits of the card
store text | css=.card-number | Number
Related
I need to submit my thesis in word in a few days and heard that I could not submit it if my reference numbers were not in chronological order.
Word seems to number text references first and then start on captions in tables and figures. The result is that for example on the first page I have an alinea with reference number 1 at the end and below is figure 1 with reference number 59 in the caption instead of reference number 2.
Last year I used EndNote, this year Mendeley and had the same problem with both. If you need more information, please let me now. It's quite an emergency, need to solve this as quick as possible.
I have two Coldfusion templates (getdata.cfm and generate.cfm). The first template getdata.cfm will retrieve from a database with a query, in addition to other tasks. It will retrieve exactly 16 rows of data and each row will have 8 fields. Such as this:
<cfquery datasource="xyz name="lista">
SELECT n1,n2,n3,n4,n5,n6,n7,n8
FROM atable
WHERE product = "abc"
ORDER BY date DESC LIMIT 16
</cfquery>
The second template will generate some random numbers and compare them against these 16 rows. There is a Refresh button on the second template to regenerate the numbers. This is how I would like it to work.
However, right now the only way for it to work is having the database <cfquery> in the second template, generate.cfm That means every time I press Refresh, it will access the database, retrieve the same 16 rows every time, and generate the random numbers. This is not ideal. Because the 16 rows are the same, it makes no sense to retrieve them every time a new set of random numbers get generated. It would be best to get them once, in the first template and somehow pass them to the second template. The 16 sets of numbers will need to be displayed on the screen at all times. The matched and unmatched numbers need to be shown.
How can I pass the whole query result from the first template to the second one without having to pass the 16 records as 16 lists via the form as form fields? Is this even possible? Thanks in advance.
Generate a set of random numbers.
Compare those numbers against a static set of data.
Repeat.
Do you need to do the comparison in the application (CFML) code? Can you generate the set of random numbers and send them to the DB as part of the query in a single request? That way, you get the records from the DB that match your set of numbers and not all 16.
Then every refresh would send the new set of random numbers to the DB, returning only the relevant data.
Alternately, you can use cfquery with the cachedWithin attribute in order to store the results of the query into memory for a specific amount of time while refreshing your random set of numbers.
https://cfdocs.org/cfquery
I have a data set of users and the applications they used. For each application, I want to compute the total number of users who used only this application, who used this application + another application, +2 other applications,... At the end I need to get a treemap with where each square represents the total number of users who used only the application, the application + 1 application, + 2 applications,......and also compute the overlap percentage, that is how many users used only this application vs how many users used this application with another application. I could compute these metrics if I don't add the application constraint, that is compute the number of users who used one application, 2 applications, 3 applications, ..... and the overlap percentage was the percentage of users who used more than one application.
To do so,
I created a calculated field to count the total number of applications per user
Then I used this field to create bins, which gave me the total number of users who used 1 app, 2 apps, ..... N apps
I then ended up creating a treemap with those bins where the size of each square is the countD(users).
How to do the same but instead of only having (All) applications, be able to do it with only one application and their companion applications. I need an application selector, where each time I change the application, the treemap changes.
As you have not given sample data, I am proposing a solution assuming -
No rows are duplicate i.e. every user is associated with any unique application not more than once.
application types may not vary more than 15-20 (in that situation the solution may not work given the calculation range of tableau)
I have taken a sample data as follows-
Step-1 Create calculated field (CF) named as CF as -
// map every application with a number
CASE [Apl id]
WHEN 'apl1' THEN 1
WHEN 'apl2' THEN 2
WHEN 'apl3' THEN 3
WHEN 'apl4' THEN 4
WHEN 'apl5' THEN 5
END
You may add as many values as you have (all unique values of apl)
Step-2 add another CF CF1 as
// binary representation of each application used
{FIXED [User id]: sum(10^([CF]-1))}
Step-3 Create a parameter as
Step-4 add another CF CF2 as
// checking which user uses selected application mandatorily
If
LEFT(RIGHT(RIGHT('00000'+STR([CF1]),5), [Parameter 1]),1) = '1'
then 'Y' else 'N' end
Now you may build your view as shown below
Selecting parameter value will filter out those records where user is at least associated with selected value. Distinct count value will give you count of total applications used by these users. Now you can proceed to build your treemap. Please tell if any other help/explanation in the solution is required.
Note-1. This solution is proposed on binary logic (and hence the restriction). If you will see sum(CF1) values will give you a binary representation of applications used by that user where rightmost placeholder denotes that user is using apl1 yes (1) or not (0); and similarly onwards right to left.
Note-2: While calculating CF2 I have padded the CF1 values with leading zeros at most 5. This you have to change according to total count of your applications.
I am trying to create a job management system using FileMaker Pro 14 advanced and FM Starting Point 4.6.
I have only just started looking at it so am pretty much a noob with it. Basically FM Starting Point has Projects and Estimates, Each Project can have multiple Estimates. What I have done is set it so that you have to assign a Project to a Estimate before it will save. I have used the Looked-up value in the database management to fill the Estimate ID with The Project ID that has been assigned.
Project numbers start with an A and 6 digits so for example A120000. What I want to do is change the A to a Q when the Project ID is set as Estimate ID.
Can any one point me towards the right methods.
Have a look at calculated fields. I would probably have one field for the digits and one for the flag, then concatenate these in a calculated field for display.
Then set up a script that triggers on change in a field, which sets the flag to the other value.
More info about calculated fields: http://www.filemaker.com/help/12/fmp/html/create_db.8.17.html
More info about script triggers: http://www.filemaker.com/help/13/fmp/en/html/create_layout.9.61.html
I have a report that I've written and I understand how to create running totals and such, but need help creating a custom evaluation formula.
I have two levels of groups, first group is based upon a certain user, the next group is based upon transactions that user has been involved in. I have details hidden, and am only interested in the totals for a particular activity. This is working great, and totals are working properly but the problem is, each activity has a 'line number', which essentially can be the same as another activity (ie: two activities can have lines 1, 2, 3 contained within), so doing a distinctive total based upon a set of data isn't accurate because I only want it to be distinct based upon each individual recordset, and not globally.
The example is below... if I do a count on each record for this dataset, it comes out to 18 because there are duplicate line numbers on each... but if I do distinct, it only comes to 9 because of duplicate line numbers across multiple actives.
I guess what I need to know is how I can take the totals per detail group, and have them total up in my second footer properly. I assume it's going to take me compiling together a string including the activity number and line number, and then comparing them?
Here is an example of the data contained within the total groupings:
I figured this out on my own... turned out it was pretty simple. I converted my numeric values to text, and included a copy of the transaction id and the line id as my test value, and did distinct on that... Sometimes it just helps not staring the problem down.