Can I use HTTP PATCH on endpoint /users to check if some handler is available?
Related
The http client from phpStorm supports change http verbs in requests?
More info about this client - https://www.jetbrains.com/help/phpstorm/http-client-in-product-code-editor.html#run_request . I read the HTTP Requests Collection from phpStorm but nothing show that support http verb change.
Yes, it does:
You can use whatever request method you need except for custom ones.
I have resource server which has below resource. I want to protect resource based on http request method. If user request with http GET/POST method for the protected resource, Keycloak should grant permission.
http://localhost:8080/jobs
How to achieve this using javascript/Droll based policy.
I'd like to have health checks to an haproxy instance fail solely based on whether haproxy is running. In other words I don't want the health check to be proxied to a backend server.
I see there is a way to do this by returning a static file. This would work for me, but I was wondering: Is there a way to return an empty response with just a status code without having to return a file and deal with the false 503? The solution linked seems hacky and I worry that behavior will not be allowed in some later version.
monitor-uri <uri>
Intercept a URI used by external components' monitor requests
May be used in sections :
When an HTTP request referencing will be received on a frontend,
HAProxy will not forward it nor log it, but instead will return either
"HTTP/1.0 200 OK" or "HTTP/1.0 503 Service unavailable", depending on
failure conditions defined with "monitor fail". This is normally
enough for any front-end HTTP probe to detect that the service is UP
and running without forwarding the request to a backend server. Note
that the HTTP method, the version and all headers are ignored, but the
request must at least be valid at the HTTP level. This keyword may
only be used with an HTTP-mode frontend.
Example :
# Use /haproxy_test to report haproxy's status
frontend www
mode http
monitor-uri /haproxy_test
I'm trying to redirect messages internet URL with the Application Request Routing (ARR), the component to the IIS in Windows Server.
I want to redirect that messages by the HTTP Method. Example:
HTTP POST: http://XXX.XXX.XXX.XX:7050/api/createUser
HTTP DELETE: http://XXX.XXX.XXX.XX:7050/api/deleteUser
HTTP PUT: http://XXX.XXX.XXX.XX:7050/api/modifyUser
The endpoint will be Mule (REST API Service with RAML).
Is it possible to make this filter?
I think you could do it by using choice router with this MEL expression #[message.inboundProperties.'http.method'] ?
I'm trying to setup AWS Api Gateway as a reverse proxy for my actual deployed API.
My understanding is that I do this by creating a "Proxy" Resource and then specifying my http endpoint URL - as described here
Create and Test an API with HTTP Proxy Integration through a Proxy Resource
This works fine when I try to use the API through the "Test" function within the Resource Editor. I can make calls to any exposed resources using GET methods and see the successful responses.
However, when I deploy the API Gateway API I can no longer access anything using the "Invoke URL" it gives me - I simply get:
{
"Message": "No HTTP resource was found that matches the request URI 'http://<myuniqueid>.execute-api.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/api/Sector/100'.",
"MessageDetail": "No type was found that matches the controller named 'Sector'."
}
If I remove the "Use HTTP Proxy integration" checkbox from the "Integration Request" I can get it working, but why doesn't it work as a proxy?
I suspect that this is caused by a known issue with the HTTP proxy integration. When you use an HTTP proxy integration, API Gateway passes all headers through to the integration endpoint, including the HOST header. Many existing http endpoint require the use of a HOST header which matches their DNS name and in such cases, passing through the HOST header of the API Gateway can confuse the endpoint.
UPDATE: We identified a work-around for this issue.
In your integration request, explicitly add a header named "Host" and give it the value of the integration endpoint DNS name. This will replace the Host header forwarded from the incoming client request with the Host header you specify. This should allow your backend endpoint to function correctly.