I made two 3D plots on the same axis. now I desire to give them different colors for easy identification. How do I do this coloring? The MATLAB code is shown below.
tic
Nx = 50;
Ny = 50;
x = linspace(0,1,Nx);
y = linspace(0,0.5,Ny);
[X,Y] = meshgrid(x,y);
[M,N] = size(X);
for m=1:M
for n=1:N
%get x,y coordinate
x_mn = X(m,n);
y_mn = Y(m,n);
%%% X=D2 and Y=D1
%Check if x_mn and y_mn satisfy requirement
if(x_mn >= y_mn)
%evaluate function 1
Z(m,n) = (x_mn^2 - 2*x_mn*y_mn + y_mn^2);
Z_1(m,n) = (x_mn^2);
elseif(x_mn < y_mn)
%evaluate function 2
Z(m,n) = 0;
Z_1(m,n) = (x_mn^2);
%% Z(m,n) = 2*(2*x_mn*y_mn + y_mn - y_mn^2 - 2*x_mn);
else
Z(m,n) = 0;
end
end
end
%Plot the surface
figure
surf(X,Y,Z) %first plot
surfc(X,Y,Z)
hold on
surf(X,Y,Z_1) %second plot
xlabel('Dm');
ylabel('D');
zlabel('pR');
grid on
shading interp
toc
disp('DONE!')
How can I create two differently colored surfaces?
figure
surf(X,Y,Z) %first plot
surfc(X,Y,Z)
hold on
surf(X,Y,Z_1)
Your surfc() call actually overwrites your surf() call, is this intended?
As to your colour: the documentation is a marvellous thing:
surfc(X,Y,Z,C) additionally specifies the surface color.
In other words: just specify the colour as you want it. C needs to be a matrix of size(Z) with the desired colours, i.e. set all of them equal to create an monocoloured surface:
x = 1:100;
y = 1:100;
z = rand(100);
figure;
surfc(x,y,z,ones(size(z)))
hold on
surfc(x,y,z+6,ones(size(z))+4)
Results in (MATLAB R2007b, but the syntax is the same nowadays)
Related
I'm trying to fill an area between two curves with respect to a function which depends on the values of the curves.
Here is the code of what I've managed to do so far
i=50;
cc = #(xx,x,y) 1./(1+(exp(-xx)/(exp(-x)-exp(-y))));
n_vec = 2:0.1:10;
x_vec = linspace(2,10,length(n_vec));
y_vec = abs(sin(n_vec));
N=[n_vec,fliplr(n_vec)];
X=[x_vec,fliplr(y_vec)];
figure(1)
subplot(2,1,1)
hold on
plot(n_vec,x_vec,n_vec,y_vec)
hp = patch(N,X,'b')
plot([n_vec(i) n_vec(i)],[x_vec(i),y_vec(i)],'linewidth',5)
xlabel('n'); ylabel('x')
subplot(2,1,2)
xx = linspace(y_vec(i),x_vec(i),100);
plot(xx,cc(xx,y_vec(i),x_vec(i)))
xlabel('x'); ylabel('c(x)')
This code produces the following graph
The color code which I've added represent the color coding that each line (along the y axis at a point on the x axis) from the area between the two curves should be.
Overall, the entire area should be filled with a gradient color which depends on the values of the curves.
I've assisted the following previous questions but could not resolve a solution
MATLAB fill area between lines
Patch circle by a color gradient
Filling between two curves, according to a colormap given by a function MATLAB
NOTE: there is no importance to the functional form of the curves, I would prefer an answer which refers to two general arrays which consist the curves.
The surf plot method
The same as the scatter plot method, i.e. generate a point grid.
y = [x_vec(:); y_vec(:)];
resolution = [500,500];
px = linspace(min(n_vec), max(n_vec), resolution(1));
py = linspace(min(y), max(y), resolution(2));
[px, py] = meshgrid(px, py);
Generate a logical array indicating whether the points are inside the polygon, but no need to extract the points:
in = inpolygon(px, py, N, X);
Generate Z. The value of Z indicates the color to use for the surface plot. Hence, it is generated using the your function cc.
pz = 1./(1+(exp(-py_)/(exp(-y_vec(i))-exp(-x_vec(i)))));
pz = repmat(pz',1,resolution(2));
Set Z values for points outside the area of interest to NaN so MATLAB won't plot them.
pz(~in) = nan;
Generate a bounded colourmap (delete if you want to use full colour range)
% generate colormap
c = jet(100);
[s,l] = bounds(pz,'all');
s = round(s*100);
l = round(l*100);
if s ~= 0
c(1:s,:) = [];
end
if l ~= 100
c(l:100,:) = [];
end
Finally, plot.
figure;
colormap(jet)
surf(px,py,pz,'edgecolor','none');
view(2) % x-y view
Feel free to turn the image arround to see how it looks like in the Z-dimention - beautiful :)
Full code to test:
i=50;
cc = #(xx,x,y) 1./(1+(exp(-xx)/(exp(-x)-exp(-y))));
n_vec = 2:0.1:10;
x_vec = linspace(2,10,length(n_vec));
y_vec = abs(sin(n_vec));
% generate grid
y = [x_vec(:); y_vec(:)];
resolution = [500,500];
px_ = linspace(min(n_vec), max(n_vec), resolution(1));
py_ = linspace(min(y), max(y), resolution(2));
[px, py] = meshgrid(px_, py_);
% extract points
in = inpolygon(px, py, N, X);
% generate z
pz = 1./(1+(exp(-py_)/(exp(-y_vec(i))-exp(-x_vec(i)))));
pz = repmat(pz',1,resolution(2));
pz(~in) = nan;
% generate colormap
c = jet(100);
[s,l] = bounds(pz,'all');
s = round(s*100);
l = round(l*100);
if s ~= 0
c(1:s,:) = [];
end
if l ~= 100
c(l:100,:) = [];
end
% plot
figure;
colormap(c)
surf(px,py,pz,'edgecolor','none');
view(2)
You can use imagesc and meshgrids. See comments in the code to understand what's going on.
Downsample your data
% your initial upper and lower boundaries
n_vec_long = linspace(2,10,1000000);
f_ub_vec_long = linspace(2, 10, length(n_vec_long));
f_lb_vec_long = abs(sin(n_vec_long));
% downsample
n_vec = linspace(n_vec_long(1), n_vec_long(end), 1000); % for example, only 1000 points
% get upper and lower boundary values for n_vec
f_ub_vec = interp1(n_vec_long, f_ub_vec_long, n_vec);
f_lb_vec = interp1(n_vec_long, f_lb_vec_long, n_vec);
% x_vec for the color function
x_vec = 0:0.01:10;
Plot the data
% create a 2D matrix with N and X position
[N, X] = meshgrid(n_vec, x_vec);
% evaluate the upper and lower boundary functions at n_vec
% can be any function at n you want (not tested for crossing boundaries though...)
f_ub_vec = linspace(2, 10, length(n_vec));
f_lb_vec = abs(sin(n_vec));
% make these row vectors into matrices, to create a boolean mask
F_UB = repmat(f_ub_vec, [size(N, 1) 1]);
F_LB = repmat(f_lb_vec, [size(N, 1) 1]);
% create a mask based on the upper and lower boundary functions
mask = true(size(N));
mask(X > F_UB | X < F_LB) = false;
% create data matrix
Z = NaN(size(N));
% create function that evaluates the color profile for each defined value
% in the vectors with the lower and upper bounds
zc = #(X, ub, lb) 1 ./ (1 + (exp(-X) ./ (exp(-ub) - exp(-lb))));
CData = zc(X, f_lb_vec, f_ub_vec); % create the c(x) at all X
% put the CData in Z, but only between the lower and upper bound.
Z(mask) = CData(mask);
% normalize Z along 1st dim
Z = normalize(Z, 1, 'range'); % get all values between 0 and 1 for colorbar
% draw a figure!
figure(1); clf;
ax = axes; % create some axes
sc = imagesc(ax, n_vec, x_vec, Z); % plot the data
ax.YDir = 'normal' % set the YDir to normal again, imagesc reverses it by default;
xlabel('n')
ylabel('x')
This already looks kinda like what you want, but let's get rid of the blue area outside the boundaries. This can be done by creating an 'alpha mask', i.e. set the alpha value for all pixels outside the previously defined mask to 0:
figure(2); clf;
ax = axes; % create some axes
hold on;
sc = imagesc(ax, n_vec, x_vec, Z); % plot the data
ax.YDir = 'normal' % set the YDir to normal again, imagesc reverses it by default;
% set a colormap
colormap(flip(hsv(100)))
% set alpha for points outside mask
Calpha = ones(size(N));
Calpha(~mask) = 0;
sc.AlphaData = Calpha;
% plot the other lines
plot(n_vec, f_ub_vec, 'k', n_vec, f_lb_vec, 'k' ,'linewidth', 1)
% set axis limits
xlim([min(n_vec), max(n_vec)])
ylim([min(x_vec), max(x_vec)])
there is no importance to the functional form of the curves, I would prefer an answer which refers to two general arrays which consist the curves.
It is difficult to achieve this using patch.
However, you may use scatter plots to "fill" the area with coloured dots. Alternatively, and probably better, use surf plot and generate z coordinates using your cc function (See my seperate solution).
The scatter plot method
First, make a grid of points (resolution 500*500) inside the rectangular space bounding the two curves.
y = [x_vec(:); y_vec(:)];
resolution = [500,500];
px = linspace(min(n_vec), max(n_vec), resolution(1));
py = linspace(min(y), max(y), resolution(2));
[px, py] = meshgrid(px, py);
figure;
scatter(px(:), py(:), 1, 'r');
The not-interesting figure of the point grid:
Next, extract the points inside the polygon defined by the two curves.
in = inpolygon(px, py, N, X);
px = px(in);
py = py(in);
hold on;
scatter(px, py, 1, 'k');
Black points are inside the area:
Finally, create color and plot the nice looking gradient colour figure.
% create color for the points
cid = 1./(1+(exp(-py)/(exp(-y_vec(i))-exp(-x_vec(i)))));
c = jet(101);
c = c(round(cid*100)+1,:); % +1 to avoid zero indexing
% plot
figure;
scatter(px,py,16,c,'filled','s'); % use size 16, filled square markers.
Note that you may need a fairly dense grid of points to make sure the white background won't show up. You may also change the point size to a bigger value (won't impact performance).
Of cause, you may use patch to replace scatter but you will need to work out the vertices and face ids, then you may patch each faces separately with patch('Faces',F,'Vertices',V). Using patch this way may impact performance.
Complete code to test:
i=50;
cc = #(xx,x,y) 1./(1+(exp(-xx)/(exp(-x)-exp(-y))));
n_vec = 2:0.1:10;
x_vec = linspace(2,10,length(n_vec));
y_vec = abs(sin(n_vec));
% generate point grid
y = [x_vec(:); y_vec(:)];
resolution = [500,500];
px_ = linspace(min(n_vec), max(n_vec), resolution(1));
py_ = linspace(min(y), max(y), resolution(2));
[px, py] = meshgrid(px_, py_);
% extract points
in = inpolygon(px, py, N, X);
px = px(in);
py = py(in);
% generate color
cid = 1./(1+(exp(-py)/(exp(-y_vec(i))-exp(-x_vec(i)))));
c = jet(101);
c = c(round(cid*100)+1,:); % +1 to avoid zero indexing
% plot
figure;
scatter(px,py,16,c,'filled','s');
I need to extract the isoline coordinates of a 4D variable from a 3D surface defined using a triangulated mesh in MATLAB. I need the isoline coordinates to be a ordered in such a manner that if they were followed in order they would trace the path i.e. the order of the points a 3D printer would follow.
I have found a function that can calculate the coordinates of these isolines (see Isoline function here) but the problem is this function does not consider the isolines to be joined in the correct order and is instead a series of 2 points separated by a Nan value. This makes this function only suitable for visualisation purposes and not the path to follow.
Here is a MWE of the problem of a simplified problem, the surface I'm applying it too is much more complex and I cannot share it. Where x, y and z are nodes, with TRI providing the element connectivity list and v is the variable of which I want the isolines extracted from and is not equal to z.
If anyone has any idea on either.....
A function to extract isoline values in the correct order for a 3D tri mesh.
How to sort the data given by the function Isoline so that they are in the correct order.
.... it would be very much appreciated.
Here is the MWE,
% Create coordinates
[x y] = meshgrid( -10:0.5:10, -10:0.5:10 );
z = (x.^2 + y.^2)/20; % Z height
v = x+y; % 4th dimension value
% Reshape coordinates into list to be converted to tri mesh
x = reshape(x,[],1); y = reshape(y,[],1); z = reshape(z,[],1); v = reshape(v,[],1);
TRI = delaunay(x,y); % Convertion to a tri mesh
% This function calculates the isoline coordinates
[xTows, yTows, zTows] = IsoLine( {TRI,[x, y, z]}, v, -18:2:18);
% Plotting
figure(1); clf(1)
subplot(1,2,1)
trisurf(TRI,x,y,z,v)
hold on
for i = 1:size(xTows,1)
plot3( xTows{i,1}, yTows{i,1}, zTows{i,1}, '-k')
end
hold off
shading interp
xlabel('x'); ylabel('y'); zlabel('z'); title('Isolines'), axis equal
%% This section is solely to show that the isolines are not in order
for i = 1:size(xTows,1)
% Arranging data into colums and getting rid of Nans that appear
xb = xTows{i,1}; yb = yTows{i,1}; zb = zTows{i,1};
xb = reshape(xb, 3, [])'; xb(:,3) = [];
yb = reshape(yb, 3, [])'; yb(:,3) = [];
zb = reshape(zb, 3, [])'; zb(:,3) = [];
subplot(1,2,2)
trisurf(TRI,x,y,z,v)
shading interp
view(2)
xlabel('x'); ylabel('y'); zlabel('z'); title('Plotting Isolines in Order')
axis equal; axis tight; hold on
for i = 1:size(xb,1)
plot3( [xb(i,1) xb(i,2)], [yb(i,1) yb(i,2)], [zb(i,1) zb(i,2)], '-k')
drawnow
end
end
and here is the function Isoline, which I have slightly adpated.
function [xTows, yTows, zTows] = IsoLine(Surf,F,V,Col)
if length(Surf)==3 % convert mesh to triangulation
P = [Surf{1}(:) Surf{2}(:) Surf{3}(:)];
Surf{1}(end,:) = 1i;
Surf{1}(:,end) = 1i;
i = find(~imag(Surf{1}(:)));
n = size(Surf{1},1);
T = [i i+1 i+n; i+1 i+n+1 i+n];
else
T = Surf{1};
P = Surf{2};
end
f = F(T(:));
if nargin==2
V = linspace(min(f),max(f),22);
V = V(2:end-1);
elseif numel(V)==1
V = linspace(min(f),max(f),V+2);
V = V(2:end-1);
end
if nargin<4
Col = 'k';
end
H = NaN + V(:);
q = [1:3 1:3];
% -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% Loop over iso-values ----------------------------------------------------
xTows = [];
yTows = [];
zTows = [];
for k = 1:numel(V)
R = {[],[]};
G = F(T) - V(k);
C = 1./(1-G./G(:,[2 3 1]));
f = unique(T(~isfinite(C))); % remove degeneracies by random perturbation
F(f) = F(f).*(1+1e-12*rand(size(F(f)))) + 1e-12*rand(size(F(f)));
G = F(T) - V(k);
C = 1./(1-G./G(:,[2 3 1]));
C(C<0|C>1) = -1;
% process active triangles
for i = 1:3
f = any(C>=0,2) & C(:,i)<0;
for j = i+1:i+2
w = C(f,q([j j j]));
R{j-i} = [R{j-i}; w.*P(T(f,q(j)),:)+(1-w).*P(T(f,q(j+1)),:)];
end
end
% define isoline
for i = 1:3
X{i} = [R{1}(:,i) R{2}(:,i) nan+R{1}(:,i)]';
% X{i} = [R{1}(:,i) R{2}(:,i)]'; % Changed by Matt
X{i} = X{i}(:)';
end
% plot isoline
if ~isempty(R{1})
% hold on
% H(k) = plot3(X{1},X{2},X{3},Col);
% Added by M.Thomas
xTows{k,1} = X{1};
yTows{k,1} = X{2};
zTows{k,1} = X{3};
end
end
What you will notice is that the isolines (xTows, yTows and zTows) are not in order there "jump around" when plotted sequentially. I need to sort the tows so that they give a smooth plot in order.
I have created some MatLab code that plots a plane wave using two different expressions that give the same plane wave. The first expression is in Cartesian coordinates and works fine. However, the second expression is in polar coordinates and when I calculate the plane wave in this case, the plot is distorted. Both plots should look the same. So what am I doing wrong in transforming to/from polar coordinates?
function Plot_Plane_wave()
clc
clear all
close all
%% Step 0. Input paramaters and derived parameters.
alpha = 0*pi/4; % angle of incidence
k = 1; % wavenumber
wavelength = 2*pi/k; % wavelength
%% Step 1. Define various equivalent versions of the incident wave.
f_u_inc_1 = #(alpha,x,y) exp(1i*k*(x*cos(alpha)+y*sin(alpha)));
f_u_inc_2 = #(alpha,r,theta) exp(1i*k*r*cos(theta-alpha));
%% Step 2. Evaluate the incident wave on a grid.
% Grid for field
gridMax = 10;
gridN = 2^3;
g1 = linspace(-gridMax, gridMax, gridN);
g2 = g1;
[x,y] = meshgrid(g1, g2);
[theta,r] = cart2pol(x,y);
u_inc_1 = f_u_inc_1(alpha,x,y);
u_inc_2 = 0*x;
for ir=1:gridN
rVal = r(ir);
for itheta=1:gridN
thetaVal = theta(itheta);
u_inc_2(ir,itheta) = f_u_inc_2(alpha,rVal,thetaVal);
end
end
%% Step 3. Plot the incident wave.
figure(1);
subplot(2,2,1)
imagesc(g1(1,:), g1(1,:), real(u_inc_1));
hGCA = gca; set(hGCA, 'YDir', 'normal');
subplot(2,2,2)
imagesc(g1(1,:), g1(1,:), real(u_inc_2));
hGCA = gca; set(hGCA, 'YDir', 'normal');
end
Your mistake is that your loop is only going through the first gridN values of r and theta. Instead you want to step through the indices of ix and iy and pull out the rVal and thetaVal of the matrices r and theta.
You can change your loop to
for ix=1:gridN
for iy=1:gridN
rVal = r(ix,iy); % Was equivalent to r(ix) outside inner loop
thetaVal = theta(ix,iy); % Was equivalent to theta(iy)
u_inc_2(ix,iy) = f_u_inc_2(alpha,rVal,thetaVal);
end
end
which gives the expected graphs.
Alternatively you can simplify your code by feeding matrices in to your inline functions. To do this you would have to use an elementwise product .* instead of a matrix multiplication * in f_u_inc_2:
alpha = 0*pi/4;
k = 1;
wavelength = 2*pi/k;
f_1 = #(alpha,x,y) exp(1i*k*(x*cos(alpha)+y*sin(alpha)));
f_2 = #(alpha,r,theta) exp(1i*k*r.*cos(theta-alpha));
% Change v
f_old = #(alpha,r,theta) exp(1i*k*r *cos(theta-alpha));
gridMax = 10;
gridN = 2^3;
[x,y] = meshgrid(linspace(-gridMax, gridMax, gridN));
[theta,r] = cart2pol(x,y);
subplot(1,3,1)
contourf(x,y,real(f_1(alpha,x,y)));
title 'Cartesian'
subplot(1,3,2)
contourf(x,y,real(f_2(alpha,r,theta)));
title 'Polar'
subplot(1,3,3)
contourf(x,y,real(f_old(alpha,r,theta)));
title 'Wrong'
I am trying to plot the elliptical trajectory of a particle, but my matlab code runs and gives me warning that I m trying to plot imaginary values. How can I remove this error?
My Matlab code is as follows:
% plot of trajectory of the particle in flexural gravity wave
U =5;
t=1;
y1=0;
h=50;
k=2*pi/100;
w=pi;
X= (-80*pi:pi:80*pi);
Y= (-80*pi:pi:80*pi);
H=1;
A= (H/2)*cosh(k*(h+y1))/sinh(k*h);
B= (H/2)*sinh(k*(h+y1))/sinh(k*h);
Y = B.* ((1-((X-U*t)./A).^2).^(1/2));
plot(X,Y);
xlabel('X');
ylabel('Y');
The warning matlab shows is:
Warning: Imaginary parts of complex X and/or Y arguments ignored
Please help me out with this.
If you want to plot imaginary number only,
Please change the code, plot(X,Y); as plot(X,imag(Y)).
In case of real value, plot(X,real(Y)).
If you are interested in magnitude of complex number, plot(X,abs(Y)).
I got the answer to my question.
I can plot it by using general coordinates of the ellipse, ie, using x=acos(t) and y=asin(t). and that really worked.
% plot of trajectory of the particle in flexural gravity wave
U = 5;
t = 1;
y1 = 0;
h = 50;
k = 2*pi/100;
w = pi;
x0 = U*t;
y0 = 0;
H = 1;
A = (H/2)*cosh(k*(h+y1))/sinh(k*h);
B = (H/2)*sinh(k*(h+y1))/sinh(k*h);
z = -2*pi:0.01:2*pi;
X = x0 + A*cos(z);
Y = y0 + B*sin(z);
plot(X,Y);
xlabel('X');
ylabel('Y');
I like to visualize conics with Matlab or Octave. The (general) conic is given by the equation 0 = ax² + bxy + cy² +dxz +eyz+f*z² for a point p=(x,y,z). How can I plot this with Matlab or octave if I know the parameters a,b,c,d,e and f? Or respectively, how can I find the points that satisfy this equation?
Since you are asking for the conics, I understand that you are probably referring to the 2D contours of the general conic equation. I will also cover how to visualize this equation in other different ways.
For all the following examples, I have set the conic constants so that I obtain a hiperboloid.
My code is written in MATLAB syntax. If you are using Octave, it might differ slightly.
Visualizing 2D Conics with CONTOUR
I have isolated z in terms of x and y, from the general conic equation:
z = (1/2)*(-d*x-e*y±sqrt(-4*a*f*x.^2-4*b*f*x.*y-4*c*f*y.^2+d^2*x.^2+2*d*e*x.*y+e^2*y.^2))/f;
Since z is a piecewise function due to (± sqrt), I need to make sure that I plot both hemispheres. I designate z1 for +sqrt, and z2 for -sqrt.
Finally, I plot the contours for z1 and z2 that will yield the set of conics in 2D. This conics will be circles of different radius.
Code:
clear all;
clc;
% Conic constants.
a = 1;
b = 0;
c = 1;
d = 0;
e = 0;
f = -1;
% Value for x and y domain.
v = 10;
% Domain for x and y.
x = linspace(-v,v);
y = linspace(-v,v);
% Generate a 2D mesh with x and y.
[x,y] = meshgrid(x,y);
% Isolate z in terms of x and y.
z1 = (1/2)*(-d*x-e*y+sqrt(-4*a*f*x.^2-4*b*f*x.*y-4*c*f*y.^2+d^2*x.^2+2*d*e*x.*y+e^2*y.^2))/f;
z2 = (1/2)*(-d*x-e*y-sqrt(-4*a*f*x.^2-4*b*f*x.*y-4*c*f*y.^2+d^2*x.^2+2*d*e*x.*y+e^2*y.^2))/f;
% Find complex entries in z.
i = find(real(z1)~=z1);
j = find(real(z2)~=z2);
% Replace complex entries with NaN.
z1(i) = NaN;
z2(j) = NaN;
figure;
subplot(1,2,1);
% Draw lower hemisphere.
contour(x,y,z1,'ShowText','on');
% Adjust figure properties.
title('2D Conics: Lower hemishphere');
xlabel('x-axis');
ylabel('y-axis');
axis equal;
grid on;
box on;
axis([-10 10 -10 10]);
subplot(1,2,2);
% Draw upper hemisphere.
contour(x,y,z2,'ShowText','on');
hold off;
% Adjust figure properties.
title('2D Conics: Upper hemishphere');
xlabel('x-axis');
ylabel('y-axis');
axis equal;
grid on;
box on;
axis([-10 10 -10 10]);
Output:
Visualizing 3D Conics with CONTOUR3
Same as on the previous example, but now we plot the set of conics in 3D.
Code:
clear all;
clc;
% Conic constants.
a = 1;
b = 0;
c = 1;
d = 0;
e = 0;
f = -1;
% Value for x and y domain.
v = 10;
% Domain for x and y.
x = linspace(-v,v);
y = linspace(-v,v);
% Generate a 2D mesh with x and y.
[x,y] = meshgrid(x,y);
% Isolate z in terms of x and y.
z1 = (1/2)*(-d*x-e*y+sqrt(-4*a*f*x.^2-4*b*f*x.*y-4*c*f*y.^2+d^2*x.^2+2*d*e*x.*y+e^2*y.^2))/f;
z2 = (1/2)*(-d*x-e*y-sqrt(-4*a*f*x.^2-4*b*f*x.*y-4*c*f*y.^2+d^2*x.^2+2*d*e*x.*y+e^2*y.^2))/f;
% Find complex entries in z.
i = find(real(z1)~=z1);
j = find(real(z2)~=z2);
% Replace complex entries with NaN.
z1(i) = NaN;
z2(j) = NaN;
% Lower hemisphere. Draw 20 conics.
contour3(x,y,z1,20);
hold on;
% Upper hemisphere. Draw 20 conics.
contour3(x,y,z2,20);
hold off;
% Adjust figure properties.
title('3D Conics');
xlabel('x-axis');
ylabel('y-axis');
zlabel('z-axis');
axis equal;
grid on;
box on;
axis([-10 10 -10 10 -10 10]);
Output:
Visualizing Quadrics with ISOSURFACE
I have isolated f in terms of x, y and z, from the general conic equation, and renamed it to f_eq:
f_eq = -(a*x.^2+b*x.*y+c*y.^2+d*x.*z+e*y.*z)./z.^2;
Finally, I obtain the set of points that satisfy the equation f_eq = f, which is in fact an isosurface that yields a quadric; in this example a hiperboloid.
Code:
clear all;
clc;
% Conic constants.
a = 1;
b = 0;
c = 1;
d = 0;
e = 0;
f = -1;
% Value for x, y and z domain.
v = 10;
% Domain for x ,y and z.
x = linspace(-v,v);
y = linspace(-v,v);
z = linspace(-v,v);
% Generate a 3D mesh with x, y and z.
[x,y,z] = meshgrid(x,y,z);
% Evaluate function (3D volume of data).
f_eq = -(a*x.^2+b*x.*y+c*y.^2+d*x.*z+e*y.*z)./z.^2;
% Draw the surface that matches f_eq = f.
p = patch(isosurface(x,y,z,f_eq,f));
isonormals(x,y,z,f_eq,p)
p.FaceColor = 'red';
p.EdgeColor = 'none';
% Adjust figure properties.
title('Quadric');
xlabel('x-axis');
ylabel('y-axis');
zlabel('z-axis');
axis equal;
grid on;
box on;
axis([-10 10 -10 10 -10 10]);
camlight left;
lighting phong;
Output: