Poltergeist using FromSqlRaw with EF Core5 - entity-framework

I have to retrieve this data from 2 different databases within the same instance
For which I put that same SQL statement in my code
public int ImportarUTEs()
{
try
{
int registrosAñadidos = 0;
var registrosSAP = _contextSAP.Licitadores
.FromSqlRaw(#"select distinct ot.IDLICITADOR as IdLicitador,
l.cardcode as CodigoSAP,
ic.cardname as Nombre
from ofertantes ot INNER JOIN licitadores l on ot.idlicitador=l.idlicitador
inner join ofertas o on o.codigoanalizada=ot.codigoanalizada
inner join Fulcrum.dbo.OCRD ic on l.cardcode=ic.cardcode collate SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS
where year(o.fechapres)>=2015 AND
ot.idlicitador in(
select IDLICITADOR from LICITADORES
GROUP by IDLICITADOR
HAVING COUNT(*)>1
)
order by IdLicitador, CodigoSAP")
.ToList();
But what is my surprise when I see the result obtained
When you have to obtain the 2 records corresponding to LicitasorID 2368, I see that I get 3 records where [8] repeats the value of [6] and instead of being the value corresponding to LicitadorID 2881 and CodigoSAP 430FULCRUM, it assigns the value LicitadorID 2368. But the strangest thing is that when it is time to collect the values of IdLicitador 3150 it turns out that it does the same thing, IdLicitador 3150 and CodigoSAP 430FULCRUM the [10 ] turns it into IdLicitador 2368 and CodigoSAP 430FULCRUM.
That is, for some reason that I can't understand the value obtained in the EF Core 5 project is not the same as the one obtained in the SQL Server instance and I can't think of what to do about it
Any idea, please?
Thanks

The problem was to define the primary key in LicitadoresSAP entity
modelBuilder.Entity<LicitadorSAP>()
.HasKey(c => new { c.IdLicitador, c.CodigoSAP });
Now works fine

Related

T-SQL Question for Getting One Customer Type When There Can be More Than One Value

We have an organization that can have more than one customer type basically. However, what a user wants to see is either the partner or direct type (customer type is either Direct, Partner1, Partner2, or Partner3 but can be direct plus a partner value but only can be one of the partner values). So if a customer is both (ex: Direct and Partner1) they just want the type that is a partner (ex: Partner1). So I tried splitting out partners only into one temp table from a few tables joining together different org data. I have the same query without any limit pulling into a different temp table. Then I calculate count and put that into a temp table. Then I tried gathering data from all the temp tables. That is where I run into trouble and lose some of the customers where the type is direct (I have a image link below for a directcustomer and a customer who is both). I have been out of SQL for a bit so this one is throwing me...I figure the issue is the fact that I have a case statement referencing a table that a direct customer will not exist in (#WLPO). However I am not sure how to achieve pulling in these customers while also only selecting which partner type it is for a customer that has a partner and is also direct. FYI using MSSMS for querying.
If OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#WLPO') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #WLPO
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#org') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #org
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#OrgCount') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #OrgCount
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#cc') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #cc
Select
o.OrganizationID,
o.OrganizationName,
os.WhiteLabelPartnerID,
s.StateName
INTO #WLPO
from [Org].[Organizations] o
join [Org].[OrganizationStates] os on o.OrganizationID=os.OrganizationID --and os.WhiteLabelPartnerID = 1
join [Lookup].[States] s on os.StateID = s.StateID
join [Org].[PaymentOnFile] pof on pof.OrganizationID=o.OrganizationID
where os.WhiteLabelPartnerID in (2,3,4)
and os.StateID in (1, 2, 3)
and o.OrganizationID = 7613
select * from #WLPO
Select
o.OrganizationID,
o.OrganizationName,
os.WhiteLabelPartnerID,
s.StateName
INTO #org
from [Org].[Organizations] o
join [Org].[OrganizationStates] os on o.OrganizationID=os.OrganizationID --and os.WhiteLabelPartnerID = 1
join [Lookup].[States] s on os.StateID = s.StateID
join [Org].[PaymentOnFile] pof on pof.OrganizationID=o.OrganizationID
where 1=1--os.WhiteLabelPartnerID = 1
and os.StateID in (1, 2, 3)
and o.OrganizationID = 7613
select * from #org
Select
OrganizationID,
count(OrganizationID) AS CountOrgTypes
INTO #OrgCount
from #org
where OrganizationID = 7613
group by OrganizationID
select * from #OrgCount
Select distinct
ct.OrganizationID,
ok.OrganizationName,
ct.CountOrgTypes,
case when ct.CountOrgTypes = 2 then wlp.WhiteLabelPartnerID
when ct.CountOrgTypes = 1 then ok.WhiteLabelPartnerID
END AS CustomerTypeCode,
case when ct.CountOrgTypes = 2 then wlp.StateName
when ct.CountOrgTypes = 1 then ok.StateName END As OrgState
INTO #cc
from #org ok
left join #WLPO wlp on wlp.OrganizationID=ok.OrganizationID
join #OrgCount ct on wlp.OrganizationID=ct.OrganizationID
select * from #cc
Select
OrganizationID,
OrganizationName,
CountOrgTypes,
case when CustomerTypeCode = 1 then 'Direct'
when CustomerTypeCode = 2 then 'Partner1'
when CustomerTypeCode = 3 then 'Partner2'
when CustomerTypeCode = 4 then 'Partner3' ELSE Null END AS CustomerType,
OrgState
from #cc
order by OrganizationName asc
DirectCustomer
CustomerwithBoth

COALESCE failing following CTE Deletion. (PostgreSQL)

PostgreSQL 11.1 PgAdmin 4.1
This works some of the time:
BEGIN;
SET CONSTRAINTS ALL DEFERRED;
WITH _in(trx, lastname, firstname, birthdate, old_disp, old_medname, old_sig, old_form, new_disp, new_medname, new_sig, new_form, new_refills) AS (
VALUES ('2001-06-07 00:00:00'::timestamp,
UPPER(TRIM('JONES')), UPPER(TRIM('TOM')), '1952-12-30'::date,
64::integer,
LOWER(TRIM('adipex 37.5mg tab')), LOWER(TRIM('one tab po qd')), LOWER(TRIM('tab')),
63::integer,
LOWER(TRIM('adipex 37.5mg tab')), LOWER(TRIM('one tab po qd')), LOWER(TRIM('tab')),
33::integer
)
),
_s AS ( -- RESOLVE ALL SURROGATE KEYS.
SELECT n.*, d1.recid as old_medication_recid, d2.recid as new_medication_recid, pt.recid as patient_recid
FROM _in n
JOIN medications d1 ON (n.old_medname, n.old_sig, n.old_form) = (d1.medname, d1.sig, d1.form)
JOIN medications d2 ON (n.new_medname, n.new_sig, n.new_form) = (d2.medname, d2.sig, d2.form)
JOIN patients pt ON (pt.lastname, pt.firstname, pt.birthdate) = (n.lastname, n.firstname, n.birthdate)
),
_t AS ( -- REMOVE CONFLICTING RECORD, IF ANY.
DELETE FROM rx r
USING _s n
WHERE (r.trx::date, r.disp, r.patient_recid, r.medication_recid)=(n.trx::date, n.new_disp, n.patient_recid, n.new_medication_recid)
RETURNING r.*
),
_u AS( -- GET NEW SURROGATE KEY.
SELECT COALESCE(_t.recid, r.recid) as target_recid, r.recid as old_recid
FROM _s n
JOIN rx r ON (r.trx, r.disp, r.patient_recid, r.medication_recid) = (n.trx, n.old_disp, n.patient_recid, n.old_medication_recid)
LEFT JOIN _t ON (_t.trx::date, _t.disp, _t.patient_recid, _t.medication_recid) = (n.trx::date, n.new_disp, n.patient_recid, n.new_medication_recid)
)
UPDATE rx r -- UPDATE ORIGINAL RECORD WITH NEW VALUES.
SET disp = n.new_disp, medication_recid = n.new_medication_recid, refills = n.new_refills, recid = _u.target_recid
FROM _s n, _u
WHERE r.recid = _u.old_recid
RETURNING r.*;
COMMIT;
Where table rx is defined as:
CREATE TABLE phoenix.rx
(
recid integer NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval('rx_recid_seq'::regclass),
trx timestamp without time zone NOT NULL,
disp integer NOT NULL,
refills integer,
tprinted timestamp without time zone,
tstop timestamp without time zone,
modified timestamp without time zone DEFAULT now(),
patient_recid integer NOT NULL,
medication_recid integer NOT NULL,
dposted date NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT pk_rx_recid PRIMARY KEY (recid),
CONSTRAINT rx_unique UNIQUE (dposted, disp, patient_recid, medication_recid)
DEFERRABLE,
CONSTRAINT rx_medication_fk FOREIGN KEY (medication_recid)
REFERENCES phoenix.medications (recid) MATCH SIMPLE
ON UPDATE CASCADE
ON DELETE RESTRICT
DEFERRABLE,
CONSTRAINT rx_patients FOREIGN KEY (patient_recid)
REFERENCES phoenix.patients (recid) MATCH SIMPLE
ON UPDATE CASCADE
ON DELETE RESTRICT
)
After many hours, it is found that the "Delete.." of a conflicting record works as expected, but the "COALESCE" STATEMENT seems to fail when deciding on the new surrogate key (primary key) of rx.recid -- it does not seem to receive the result of the delete. (Or maybe the timing is wrong???)
Any help would be most appreciated.
TIA
This is documented:
The sub-statements in WITH are executed concurrently with each other and with the main query. Therefore, when using data-modifying statements in WITH, the order in which the specified updates actually happen is unpredictable. All the statements are executed with the same snapshot (see Chapter 13, so they cannot “see” one another's effects on the target tables.
Don't use the same table twice in a statement with a CTE if it occurs in a DML statement. Rather, use DELETE ... RETURNING and use the returned values in the other parts of the statement.
If you cannot rewrite the statement like that, use more than one statement instead of putting everything into a single CTE.
#LaurenzAlbe is totally correct in his answer. Below is a working solution to my problem. There are a few things to note:
The unique constraint is formed on a column in rx defined as a date and created by a trigger on update/insert that casts the timestamp of trx to a date: as in trx::date. For reasons I am not clear on, using r.trx::date in place of r.dposted leads to many records being identified and not the one record I want. Not sure why???. So the first fix was to use r.dposted, not r.trx::date.
Although the cte's are designed to be independent of each other, by using "RETURNING..." and incorporating the cte's in a step-wise fashion, one can be built upon another to obtain a final result set.
The working code is:
WITH _in(trx, lastname, firstname, birthdate, old_disp, old_medname, old_sig, old_form, new_disp, new_medname, new_sig, new_form, new_refills) AS (
VALUES ('2001-06-07 00:00:00'::timestamp,
UPPER(TRIM('smith')), UPPER(TRIM('john')), '1957-12-30'::date,
28::integer,
LOWER(TRIM('test')), LOWER(TRIM('i am sig')), LOWER(TRIM('tab')),
28::integer,
LOWER(TRIM('test 1')), LOWER(TRIM('i am sig')), LOWER(TRIM('tab')),
8::integer
)
),
_m AS (
SELECT n.*, d1.recid as old_medication_recid, d2.recid as new_medication_recid, pt.recid as patient_recid
FROM _in n
JOIN patients pt ON (pt.lastname, pt.firstname, pt.birthdate) = (n.lastname, n.firstname, n.birthdate)
JOIN medications d1 ON (n.old_medname, n.old_sig, n.old_form) = (d1.medname, d1.sig, d1.form)
LEFT JOIN medications d2 ON (n.new_medname, n.new_sig, n.new_form) = (d2.medname, d2.sig, d2.form)
),
_t AS ( -- REMOVE CONFLICTING RECORD, IF ANY.
DELETE FROM rx r
USING _m
WHERE (r.dposted, r.disp, r.patient_recid, r.medication_recid) = (_m.trx::date,_m.new_disp, _m.patient_recid, _m.new_medication_recid)
RETURNING r.*
),
_s AS ( -- GET NEW SURROGATE KEY
SELECT _m.*, r1.recid as old_recid, r2.recid as new_recid, COALESCE(r2.recid, r1.recid) as target_recid
FROM _m
JOIN rx r1 ON (r1.dposted, r1.disp, r1.patient_recid, r1.medication_recid) = (_m.trx::date,_m.old_disp, _m.patient_recid, _m.old_medication_recid)
LEFT JOIN rx r2 ON (r2.dposted, r2.disp, r2.patient_recid, r2.medication_recid) = (_m.trx::date,_m.new_disp, _m.patient_recid, _m.new_medication_recid)
LEFT JOIN _t ON (_t.recid = r2.recid)
)
UPDATE rx -- UPDATE ORIGINAL RECORD WITH NEW VALUES.
SET disp = _s.new_disp, medication_recid = _s.new_medication_recid, refills = _s.new_refills, recid = _s.target_recid
FROM _s
WHERE rx.recid = _s.old_recid
RETURNING rx.*;
COMMIT;
Hope this helps somebody.

How to use CASE clause (DB2) to display values from a different table?

I'm working in a bank so I had to adjust the column names and information in the query to fit the external web, so if there're any weird mistakes know it is somewhat fine.
I'm trying to use the CASE clause to display data from a different table, I know this is a workaround but due to certain circumstances I'm obligated to use it, plus it is becoming interesting to figure out if there's an actual solution.
The error I'm receiving for the following query is:
"ERROR [21000] [IBM][CLI Driver][DB2] SQL0811N The result of a scalar
fullselect, SELECT INTO statement, or VALUES INTO statement is more
than one row."
select bank_num, branch_num, account_num, client_id,
CASE
WHEN exists(
select *
from bank.services BS
where ACCS.client_id= BS.sifrur_lakoach
)
THEN (select username from bank.services BS where BS.client_id = ACCS.client_id)
ELSE 'NONE'
END username_new
from bank.accounts accs
where bank_num = 431 and branch_num = 170
EDIT:
AFAIK we're using DB2 v9.7:
DSN11015 - DB21085I Instance "DB2" uses "64" bits and DB2 code release "SQL09075" with
level identifier "08060107".
Informational tokens are "DB2 v9.7.500.702", "s111017", "IP23287", and Fix Pack "5".
Use listagg function to include all results.
select bank_num, branch_num, account_num, client_id,
CASE
WHEN exists(
select *
from bank.services BS
where ACCS.client_id= BS.sifrur_lakoach
)
THEN (select LISTAGG(username, ', ') from bank.services BS
where BS.client_id = ACCS.client_id)
ELSE 'NONE'
END username_new
from bank.accounts accs
where bank_num = 431 and branch_num = 170

How to return specific properties from a JPA repository?

I'm getting a ClassCastException when retrieving an entity into a resource. It occurs only when the JPA repository statement explicitly specifies the properties to be returned.
For example, this works just fine and there is no exception triggered:
#Query("SELECT r FROM Rollout r, RolloutAdmin ra WHERE r.id = ra.rollout.id AND ra.admin = :admin")
And it renders as:
select rollout0_.id as id1_8_, rollout0_.version as version2_8_, rollout0_.bts_nb_all as bts_nb_a3_8_, rollout0_.country_id as country_9_8_, rollout0_.creation_datetime as creation4_8_, rollout0_.description as descript5_8_, rollout0_.end_datetime as end_date6_8_, rollout0_.name as name7_8_, rollout0_.operator_id as operato10_8_, rollout0_.start_datetime as start_da8_8_ from rollout rollout0_ cross join rollout_admin rolloutadm1_ where rollout0_.id=rolloutadm1_.rollout_id and rolloutadm1_.admin_id=1 order by rollout0_.name asc limit 10;
But this triggers the exception:
#Query("SELECT DISTINCT r.id, r.country, r.operator, r.name, r.description, r.creationDatetime, r.startDatetime, r.endDatetime FROM Rollout r, RolloutAdmin ra, BTS b WHERE b.rollout.id = r.id AND r.id = ra.rollout.id AND ra.admin = :admin GROUP BY r.id")
And it renders as:
select distinct rollout0_.id as col_0_0_, rollout0_.country_id as col_1_0_, rollout0_.operator_id as col_2_0_, rollout0_.name as col_3_0_, rollout0_.description as col_4_0_, rollout0_.creation_datetime as col_5_0_, rollout0_.start_datetime as col_6_0_, rollout0_.end_datetime as col_7_0_, country3_.id as id1_4_0_, operator4_.id as id1_6_1_, country3_.version as version2_4_0_, country3_.code as code3_4_0_, country3_.list_order as list_ord4_4_0_, country3_.name as name5_4_0_, operator4_.version as version2_6_1_, operator4_.country_id as country_9_6_1_, operator4_.description as descript3_6_1_, operator4_.image as image4_6_1_, operator4_.messenger as messenge5_6_1_, operator4_.name as name6_6_1_, operator4_.operator_id as operator7_6_1_, operator4_.url as url8_6_1_ from rollout rollout0_ inner join country country3_ on rollout0_.country_id=country3_.id inner join operator operator4_ on rollout0_.operator_id=operator4_.id cross join rollout_admin rolloutadm1_ cross join bts bts2_ where bts2_.rollout_id=rollout0_.id and rollout0_.id=rolloutadm1_.rollout_id and rolloutadm1_.admin_id=1 group by rollout0_.id order by rollout0_.name asc limit 10;
How come such a difference ? Any way to specify the properties to be returned without fetching the whole dependent parent properties ?
EDIT: I now understand, thanks to Nizet, that I need to return an object of the same type as my repository method.
It's quite simple:
SELECT r FROM Rollout r
means: I want this query to return r, of type Rollout. The query returns a List<Rollout>.
Whereas
SELECT DISTINCT r.id, r.country, r.operator, r.name, r.description, r.creationDatetime, r.startDatetime, r.endDatetime FROM Rollout r
means: I want this query to return many different things: an ID, a country, an operator, etc. Since the query returns many different things, of different types, and potentially from several different entities (not the case in this specific example, but you could also return properties from ra), the query returns a List<Object[]>, where the first element of the array of objects is ID, the second is country, the third is operator, etc.
Not that even your first query is more complex than it should. The association between the two entities already says how the two entities are joined. So all you need is
SELECT r FROM RolloutAdmin ra join ra.rollout r WHERE ra.admin = :admin

Forming JPQL query from native SQL query for multiple views with CASE condition and join statements

Kindly helping in converting native query ti JPQL query for multiple views with CASE condition and join statements.Table c1 and c3 are views. I am trying the get the current and pending information from c1.
Please find the query mentioned below
SELECT c3.eqip_id AS EQIP_ID,
CASE WHEN c1.inst_ts IS NULL OR c1.sent_ts > c1.inst_ts THEN c1.ver_nm END AS PEND,
CASE WHEN c1.sent_ts IS NULL OR c1.sent_ts > c1.inst_ts THEN c1.ver_nm END AS CURRENT,
c1.trm_ver_hist_id AS TRM_VER_HIST_ID
FROM trm_ver_hist_vw c1
JOIN(SELECT Max(trm_ver_hist_id) AS TRM_VER_HIST_ID, dvc_id, status
FROM trm_ver_hist_vw
WHERE ver_typ_id = 1 AND status IN( 'C', 'P' )
GROUP BY dvc_id, status) c2
ON c1.trm_ver_hist_id = c2.trm_ver_hist_id
JOIN trm_dtl_vw c3 ON c1.dvc_id = c3.trm_id
WHERE c3.co_actv_ind = 'Y' AND c3.mach_hdwr_asscn_ind = 'Y' AND pin = 'ABC'
Can anyone please help me to make this query in JPA/JPQL?
It seems very complex and data specific. I would recommend using a native SQL query.
The JPA spec does not allow selects in the FROM clause, although EclipseLink does have some support for this.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/UserGuide/JPA/Basic_JPA_Development/Querying/JPQL#Sub-selects_in_FROM_clause