How to create a root component based on which mesh variable was set in BP e.g. I want to use the constructor to set a root but the BP variable doesn't exist. Creating the components in postinit works but the components are not visible in the editor and it doesn't set the root.
Is there any way to make the BP var available in constructor, otherwise how to set root and make components visible outside constructor?
Aitem::Aitem() {
if(var1) {
SetRootComponent(CreateDefaultSubobject<USkeletalMeshComponent>(TEXT("Mesh"));
} else if(var2) {
SetRootComponent(CreateDefaultSubobject<UStaticMeshComponent>(TEXT("Mesh"));
}
}
Related
My page contains 3 tabs, if i forward to next page from tab3 and then coming back from that page using $ionicHistory.goBack() it redirects to tab1. how to make it redirects to tab3 itself
function sample($scope,$ionicHistory){
$ionicHistory.goBack();
};
}
I'm not sure it's possible to do that just through $state. I'm new to Ionic myself as I had my first peek back in December (2016). However, I happened to have this exact scenario. This is how I solved it.
In my case, I was not using tabs. Instead, I had three different DIVs that were visible depending on the "tab number". When initializing the view, I set it to "1" and used the property to control what code is executed.
I'm guessing that the control you're using has a property like that to identify and set the particular tab you need, as this is the most likely way to change tabs on tab-click. Consider putting the value of that property "tab #" into the appropriate service used by the controller. This is a stripped-down version of actual code in one of my services defined via Factory.
YourService.js:
// controllers are instances. When navigating away, state is lost. This
// tracks the tab we wish to view when we load the home page.
var activeHomePageTab = 1;
var service = {
getActiveTab: getActiveTab,
setActiveTab: setActiveTab,
...
};
return service;
////////////////
function getActiveTab() { return activeHomePageTab; }
function setActiveTab(num) { activeHomePageTab = num; }
...
Here, the functions are private. In your controller, when you set your tab, also set this property. As a singleton, this will remain in effect as long as your application is running.
Next, in your init() routine, when the controller is loaded, check for this property and set the tab if it is defined:
function init() {
var tab = YourService.getActiveTab();
if (tab !== undefined) {
setTab(tab);
} else {
setTab(1)
}
...
}
Of course, there are other ways - maybe using Value or a property on a Constant object.
How can i call a c++ variable inside a blueprint. I have created a widget blueprint and i have to display a variable value in a text block inside that blueprint. The variable is obtained from c++. Is it possible.? Please help.....
Use the UPROPERTY macro to specify properties for the next variable you declare. In this case you may want to use the BlueprintReadOnly property.
So if your variable declaration looks like this:
int widgetValue
You have to add this:
UPROPERTY(BlueprintReadOnly)
int widgetValue
This will make the variable readable in blueprints but it won't allow you to modify it through those means.
Here is an example of how I manage my Widgets in Unreal Using C++
You want to create a custom widget to base your widgets on. To do this create a C++ class that inherits from UUserWidget:
// Copyright 2014-2016 Blackbriar Softworks, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
#pragma once
#include "Blueprint/UserWidget.h"
#include "XUserWidget.generated.h"
/**
*
*/
UCLASS()
class UNSUNGHEROES_API UXUserWidget : public UUserWidget
{
GENERATED_BODY()
public:
UPROPERTY(EditAnywhere, BlueprintReadWrite, Category = "XConfiguration")
FString WidgetName;
};
Inside the editor you want to now reparent your widget that you want to have access to custom properties:
Open Widget -> File -> Reparent Widget -> Your C++ Widget Class Name
now you can access the WidgetName inside the blueprint widget or use data binding to display the values./
This is where you expose the property to blueprints:
UPROPERTY(EditAnywhere, BlueprintReadWrite, Category = "XConfiguration")
FString WidgetName;
I am using the excellent Mvvmcross and Ninja Coder for Mvvmcross for building a cross platform app. For my windows store app I have created a view and a view model using Ninja coder. I have also created a UserControl which will be referenced in the view. Hence I need to bind the same viewmodel to the User control also. I have been trying to set the Data context of the user control to the singleton instance of viewmodel. I have set the data context of the user control like below.
public sealed partial class SearchResultsGridViewControl : UserControl
{
private SearchresultsViewModel _viewModel;
public SearchResultsGridViewControl()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
_viewModel = Mvx.IocConstruct<SearchresultsViewModel>();
this.DataContext = _viewModel;
}
}
But when I refer this User Control in my main view, it throws an error in XAML saying "Object Reference not set to an instance of an object. Cannot create an instance of SearchResultsGridViewControl".
This is my viewmodel:
public class SearchresultsViewModel : BaseViewModel
{
private ISearchResultsService _searchResultsService;
public SearchresultsViewModel(ISearchResultsService searchResultsService)
{
_searchResultsService = searchResultsService;
var items = _searchResultsService.DisplaySearchResults();
SchoolDetails = new ObservableCollection<School>(items);
}
private ObservableCollection<School> _schoolDetails;
public ObservableCollection<School> SchoolDetails
{
get { return _schoolDetails; }
set
{
_schoolDetails = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(() => SchoolDetails);
}
}
public ICommand RefineCommand
{
get
{
refineCommand = refineCommand ?? new MvxCommand(FilterSearchResultsBasedOnRefine);
return refineCommand;
}
}
public void FilterSearchResultsBasedOnRefine()
{
SchoolDetails = new ObservableCollection<School>(_searchResultsService.FilterSchoolsBasedOnRefine(MidDayMeals, PlayGround, DigitalClassroom, DayBoarding, TransportationFacility));
}
}
The grid view in my usercontrol is getting populated when it loads for the first time. But when RefineCommand is called to update the collection from the main view, the grid view in usercontrol is not getting updated. And I am guessing its because of that error earlier in setting the data context of the user control to view model. Please let me know what could be going wrong. I have been banging my head about it for days.
I've been using MVVMCross with Windows Store fairly recently. Without looking back at my code, I'm pretty sure that the Datacontext will inherit from it's parent unless overridden.
So as long as the MvxPage that you have presented has a viewmodel, any user control that you add to it, either in XAML or in code-behind, should share the same data context. If you are looking at doing some MVVMCross data-binding from the User Control, you should probably make sure your User Control implements IMvxStoreView, and ensure that the ViewModel property is set to the value of DataContext.
Hope that help.
Cheers,
Tristan
I think your first problem "Object Reference not set to an instance of an object" is a design time only issue - because you are trying to set the viewmodel using Mvx. at design time. You can workaround this issue if you want to by using design time viewmodels and possibly also by using one of the design time helpers (see https://github.com/MvvmCross/MvvmCross/blob/v3.1/CrossCore/Cirrious.CrossCore.Wpf/Platform/MvxDesignTimeHelper.cs).
I've no idea what your second problem is "The grid view in my usercontrol is getting populated when it loads for the first time. But when RefineCommand is called to update the collection from the main view, the grid view in usercontrol is not getting updated" - this sounds like an issue either in your xaml or in the results returned from FilterSearchResultsBasedOnRefine. From the current level of detail, I can't see what it is. My "gut feeling" is that the problem won't be MvvmCross specific - it'll just be a general Mvvm/data-binding issue.
I'm trying to prevent the dragging and dropping of nodes outside of the parent node ("LLCA") with no luck.
Any suggestions?
Image of Treeview
I ended up getting it to work using your code below:
function onDrop(e) {
var dst = e.destinationNode;
var first = $('.k-item:first');
var pos = e.dropPosition;
if (dst && dst.uid === first.uid && pos !== "over") {
e.setValid(false);
}
}
Lets define the treeview:
var tree = $("#tree").kendoTreeView({
dataSource :content,
dragAndDrop:true
}).data("kendoTreeView");
What I'm going to do is add a drop callback where I will control that:
We are not dropping outside the tree
We are not dropping before or after the first node of the tree
The definition of the tree would be:
var tree = $("#tree").kendoTreeView({
dataSource :content,
dragAndDrop:true,
drop :function (ev) {
var dst = tree.dataItem(ev.destinationNode);
var first = tree.dataItem(".k-item:first");
var pos = ev.dropPosition;
if (dst && dst.uid === first.uid && pos !== "over") {
console.log("invalid");
ev.setValid(false);
}
}
}).data("kendoTreeView");
Check http://docs.kendoui.com/api/web/treeview#drop for information on drop event.
Because I cannot comment on an answer, I will write my own.
User Mithrilhall asked about MVC wrappers, also the top answer only prevents movement to the root node.
I will attempt to answer both Mithrilhall and provide an example where you can only move a child within the context of its parent. To put it another way, to only allow children of any parent to change their order within the parent.
Firstly, for MithrilHall, this is how you get to the events in MVC.
#(Html.Kendo().TreeView()
.Name("ourTreeView")
.Events(e => e.Drop("treeViewDrop"))
There are other events in treeview, you can take a gander for yourself. The argument is the name of a javascript function. Here is an example javascript function for this MVC wrapper to prevent children from moving outside of their parent, but allowing them to still move within the parent.
<script type="text/javascript">
function treeViewDrop(dropEvent) {
var treeView = $("#ourTreeView").data("kendoTreeView");
var destination = treeView.dataItem(dropEvent.destinationNode);
var source = treeView.dataItem(dropEvent.sourceNode);
if (!(destination && destination.parentID == source.parentID)) {
dropEvent.setValid(false);
}
}
</script>
I had a parentID field modeled in my datasource. You could accomplish this in many ways. The dataItem method returns a kendo treeview item, so it has all of your modeled fields in it.
Also understand, this solution does not change the widget to show an X when you are moving to a place you cannot drop to. This is another problem with another solution.
I hope this helps, good luck!
I create a GWT Tree, and I would like it to be initially displayed with open nodes. Let's take the standard Tree example from GWT javadocs:
public class TreeExample implements EntryPoint {
public void onModuleLoad() {
// Create a tree with a few items in it.
TreeItem root = new TreeItem("root");
root.addItem("item0");
root.addItem("item1");
root.addItem("item2");
// Add a CheckBox to the tree
TreeItem item = new TreeItem(new CheckBox("item3"));
root.addItem(item);
Tree t = new Tree();
t.addItem(root);
// Add it to the root panel.
RootPanel.get().add(t);
}
}
I want it initially displayed as:
root
item0
item1
item2
item3
Now, I thought that it was as simple as setting the state of the TreeItem that I want to be opened by calling setState(true): javadoc for setState says "Sets whether this item's children are displayed". However, if I add for example
root.setState(true);
to the above example, I don't get the expected effect. Apparently nothing changes when I do root.setState(true); or root.setState(false);: the tree is always displayed with its nodes closed.
How do I get the desired behaviour?
The call to setState() depends on the sequence of the method calls to TreeItem and Tree (as stated here).
As a rule of thumb call setState(true) after adding all the items to the TreeItem and after adding the root item to the Tree.