I am trying to write unit test for this project
It appears that i need to refactor a lot and currently working on it. In order to test functions in project/api/handlers.go i was trying to write some unit test code however always taking error related with DB initializing. DB is from Psql Docker container. Error says given hostname is not valid, however without testing it works as no problem. Also, for Dockerized postgresql, container name is being used as hostname and this shouldn't be a problem.
The error is:
DB connection error: failed to connect to host=postgresdbT user=postgres database=worth2watchdb: hostname resolving error (lookup postgresdbT: no such host)
Process finished with the exit code 1
Anyway, i did a couple refactor and managed abstracting functions from DB query functions however this error still occurs and i cannot perform the test. So finally i decided to perform a totally blank test within same package simply checks with bcrypt package.
func TestCheckPasswordHash(t *testing.T) {
ret, err := HashPassword("password")
assert.Nil(t, err)
ok := CheckPasswordHash("password", ret)
if !ok {
t.Fail()
}
}
//HashPassword function hashes password with bcrypt algorithm as Cost value and return hashed string value with an error
func HashPassword(password string) (string, error) {
bytes, err := bcrypt.GenerateFromPassword([]byte(password), 4)
return string(bytes), err
}
//CheckPasswordHash function checks two inputs and returns TRUE if matches
func CheckPasswordHash(password, hash string) bool {
err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword([]byte(hash), []byte(password))
return err == nil
}
However when I've tried to perform test for only TestCheckPasswordHash function with command of go test -run TestCheckPasswordHash ./api, it still gives same error. Btw, File is handlers_test.go, functions are at handlers.go file, package name is api for both .
There is no contact with any kind of DB related functions however i am having same error again and again. When i run this TestCheckPasswordHash code in another project or at project/util/util_test.go, it checks and passes as expected.
I don't know what to do, it seems that i cannot perform any test in this package unless figure this out.
Thanks in advance. Best wishes.
Was checking your repo, nice implementation, neat an simple good job!
I think your issue is in the init function, please try commenting it out and see if it work for that single test.
Is a bit complex to explain how the init function works without a graph of files as example but you can check the official documentation:
https://go.dev/doc/effective_go#init
PD: if this doesn't work please write me back
I've found the reason why this error occured and now it's solved.
This is partially related with Docker's working principle of how DB_Hostname must be declared but we can do nothing about it. So we need a better approach to overcome.
When go test command executed for (even) a function, Go testing logic checks whole package(not whole project) as per execution order, such as firstly variable declarations and init() function later. In case of calling an external package item, runtime detours that package for the item also.
Even if you are testing only an irrelevant function, you should consider that, before performing the test, Go runtime will evaluate whole package.
In order to prevent this, i wrapped the package level variables(even though they are in another package) that directly calls DB and cache. On initial stage, these can be allocated as a new variable. However, their connection will be ensured by main or main.init()
And now, prior to testing, all relevant variables (in same package or via external) are checked. Let's say if DB agent (redis.client or pgxpool.Pool) is needed, we are creating a new agent, compiler doesn't complain and testing begins. Agent will be operational only by a function call from main or somewhere we want to.
This is a better(may be not best) practice for a more maintainable code. Initialization of dependants should be able to be handled cautiously and in context with the functional needs. At least, with a simple refactoring, problem should be solvable.
Related
Well the system we have has a bunch of dependencies, but I'll try to summarize what's going on without divulging too much details.
Test assembly in the form of a .dll is the one being executed. A lot of these tests call an API.
In the problematic method, there's 2 API calls that have an await on them: one to write a record to that external interface, and another to extract all records and then read the last one in that external interface, both via API. The test is simply to check if writing the last record was successful in an end-to-end context, that's why there's both a write and then a read.
If we execute the test in Visual Studio, everything works as expected. I also tested it manually via command lining vstest.console.exe, and the expected results always come out as well.
However, when it comes to VS Test task in VSTS, it fails for some reason. We've been trying to figure it out, and eventually we reached the point where we printed the list from the 'read' part. It turns out the last record we inserted isn't in the data we pulled, but if we check the external interface via a different method, we confirmed that the write process actually happened. What gives? Why is VSTest getting like an outdated set of records?
We also noticed two things:
1.) For the tests that passed, none of the Console.WriteLine outputs appear in the logs. Only on Failed test do they do so.
2.) Even if our Data.Should.Be call is at the very end of the TestMethod, the logs report the fail BEFORE it prints out the lines! And even then, the printing should happen after reading the list of records, and yet when the prints do happen we're still missing the record we just wrote.
Is there like a bottom-to-top thing we're missing here? It really seems to me like VSTS vstest is executing the assert before the actual code. The order of TestMethods happen the right order though (the 4th test written top-to-bottom in the code is executed 4th rather than 4th to last) and we need them to happen in the right order because some of the later tests depend on the former tests succeeding.
Anything we're missing here? I'd put a source code but there's a bunch of things I need to scrub first if so.
Turns out we were sorely misunderstanding what 'await' does. We're using .Wait() instead for the culprit and will also go back through the other tests to check for quality.
I have a program that tests each method in a Test# subclass and outputs XML in JUnit's XML format.
For instance:
class ExampleTest : Test
{
Void testOne()
{
...
}
}
I want to execute the testOne method and capture the standard output and standard error produced in it. This out and err output will be included in the XML report.
My first idea was to look at sys::Env. The environment class sys::Env has err and out but are readonly.
My second idea is that sys::Process can be launched for each test method and redirect sys::Process#.err and sys::Process#.out in it, but I'm afraid it will be very slow.
There is other way to do it?
You won't be able to redirect output from your current process (and really should not).
If the output absolutely has to be stdout/err - you'll need to go the Process route. You'll take the fork/jvm/stream setup hit, but that may be negligible compared to your test runtime.
A better option would be to log using the Logging API - which will give more control over what gets logged, and where things go.
New to scala futures I try to call a web service like
wsClient.url(baseUrl + url).withHeaders("Content-Type" -> "application/json").post(dataForR).flatMap(parseOutlierResponse)
using ply-ws library
I validate & map the response as follows https://gist.github.com/geoHeil/943a18d43279762ad4cdfe9aa2e40770
The main thing is:
Await.result(callAMethodCallingTheFirstSnippet, 5.minutes)
Strangely this works just fine in the repl. However if run via sbt run I get a NullPointer Exception. I already verified the JSON response manually. It validates like a breeze. Even the mapping works great. However, there must be a problem with the futures I am using. But I am not sure what is wrong. It seems like the flatMap method is called before there already is a result.
Interestingly if I do not await the result there is no null-pointer exception, but the parsed result is displayed correctly (however, the program does not exit). But there, where I really use this code, I somehow need to await the successful completion to further deal with it.
Below you will find an illustration of the problem
I do not see any major concern with your code! I made a small test with the following code bit and it seems to be working perfectly, both in the REPL and when using sbt run:
WS.clientUrl(s"http://$hostName/api/put").withHeaders(jsonHeaders: _*).post(body).map { r =>
if (r.status >= 400)
logger.warn(s"Invalid http response status: ${r.status} \n ${r.body}")
else
logger.debug(s"Successfully persisted data. Http response ${r.status}")
}
After more and more debugging I found that some implicits were in the wrong scope and the order of dependent case-classes was wrong. After moving them into the correct scope (the method performing the request) the null-pointer exception is fixed.
I could only find the "real" error after changing from flatmap to map which I find very strange. However, now both methods work fine.
I have inherited a perl project that I am having a problem testing. There are existing tests, and one of them uses the Test::MockObject->fake_module function. This test passes now. However, if I add a use (or use_ok) for an additional testing module (which also works ok in different tests), I am getting the following:
No mocked subs for loaded module 'IO::File'
In the test in question we have this:
my $io_file_mock = Test::MockObject->new();
$io_file_mock->set_isa('IO::File', 'IO::Handle');
$io_file_mock->set_true('flush', 'print');
$io_file_mock->fake_module('IO::File');
$io_file_mock->fake_new('IO::File');
I see in the documentation for MockObject->fake_module that this is written:
If you use fake_module() to mock a module that already exists in memory -- one you've loaded elsewhere perhaps, but do not pass any subroutines to mock, this method will throw an exception. This is because if you call the constructor later on, you probably won't get a mock object back and you'll be confused.
Not sure I understand this message and how I can make my test work.
Can anyone please help me?
Thanks
Solved in the comments:
I was able to solve my problem by putting the above code in a separate BEGIN block before the BEGIN block that calls my use_ok calls. Is there any problem with that? - Mark
A BEGIN code block is executed as soon as possible, that is, the moment it is completely defined, even before the rest of the containing file (or string) is parsed.
If the use_ok method that was failing is in a BEGIN block and it depended other variables, then those dependent variables would need to be initialized in a BEGIN block as well or they would be temporarily undef when use_ok was called.
For more information read: BEGIN, UNITCHECK, CHECK, INIT and END
Okay, I just started learning golang and I like it so far. However I don't find their documentation good for go starters, Here is my problem.
I wanted to write little server program that accepts connections and writes something to the client. No problem doing that so far.
However as soon as the thing get a real functionality, I need to be able to handle multiple clients, which I though would also be a good exercise for goroutines.
listener, error := net.Listen("tcp", remote)
con, error := listener.Accept()
go handleClient(&con);
func handleClient(con *net.Conn) {
I've cut most of the code out. The problem is, no matter what I try, I can't pass con.
con.RemoteAddr undefined (type *net.Conn has no field or method RemoteAddr)
(found that in this example: http://raycompstuff.blogspot.com/2009/12/simpler-chat-server-and-client-in.html).
So i tried looking at the documentation, but it just gave me the source of the net package.
Read trough the source, and figured it should be
undefined: TCPConn
How can I pass the connection of a client to a goroutine, so i can handle multiple clients at once?
Ok, figured it out.
There is some guy who actually already wrote what I wanted to write in go.
https://github.com/dustin/gomemcached/blob/master/mc_conn_handler.go
go handleClient(con);
func handleClient(con net.Conn) {