is there a way to apply a rotation for any arbitrarily orientation (Object A's rotation relative to Object B's local orientation)
I know I can simply get desired result if i do setParent thing, but i want to get without it
In my situation, my character holds water bottle and moves around the room holding it so I set its rotation like this
transform.rotation = mainCamera.transform.rotation;
but As bottle top pointing to the sky seems more natural, I want it to rotate 90 degree by its own X-axis
I tried below codes but it dosent work as i intended
`originalRotation = transform.rotation;
Quaternion rotationDelta = Quaternion.FromToRotation(Vector3.forward, mainCamera.transform.forward);
transform.rotation = rotationDelta * originalRotation;`
Yes, Like i said above if i make my character parent to the bottle will solve the issue, but i want to
do it without it.
Thank you
Try this one:
transform.forward = mainCamera.transform.up;
Related
I want to make a game in Unity where a person can pick a surface and walk along all of its sides. I've gotten the movement working, but when I rotate my character around certain angles of corner the character flips 180 degrees in some direction (it's different depending on the corner) and when I want them to move forward the game freaks out as they keep going across the corner over and over again, turning, and going forward across the border again. I'd strongly prefer to keep my character from doing these 180-degree spins and I think it's just due to a flaw in the formula I use to calculate the angle they stand at (which is based around making sure their transform.up is aligned with the point they are meant to stand on). Any ideas on how I fix this rotation formula in Update?
Current formula:
angle = Vector3.Angle(closestPoint, transform.position);
var t = transform;
var angles = t.eulerAngles;
t.LookAt(GravityWellPoint.transform.position);
t.RotateAround(transform.position, -transform.right, 90);
transform.rotation = Quaternion.Lerp(transform.rotation, t.rotation, Time.deltaTime * 5.0f);
Got this solution from a different forum and it worked:
So this is actually not a trivial problem to solve. If you try doing it by calculating angles etc you almost always end up with a similar spinning/flipping issue in certain positions. You can solve it by doing the maths, but its a pain. I usually like to use Quaternion.LookRotation to solve this kind of problem. you can feed in the desired forward and upward directions. So you can calculate the desired upward direction like so:
Vector3 targetUpDirection = transform.position - GravityWellPoint.transform.position;
Then you would do the following:
transform.rotation = Quaternion.LookRotation(transform.forward,targetUpDirection);
but this doesnt quite work. LookRotation will ensure that your forward direction is exactly the one you specify, and then chooses the upward direction that's the closest possible to the one you specify. So you will find that we don't actually manage to point our object upwards in the way we intended. However, there is an unintuitive solution we can apply instead.
Calculate the upward direction in the same way, then use LookRotation to rotate our object to point its forward face in exactly our desired upwards direction, and its upward face towards the current forward direction:
Vector3 targetUpDirection = transform.position - GravityWellPoint.transform.position;
transform.rotation = Quaternion.LookRotation(targetUpDirection, transform.forward);
Now our object is aligned perfectly, but is the wrong way up. We can use LookRotation again, to swap the upwards and forwards directions:
transform.rotation = Quaternion.LookRotation(transform.up, transform.forward);
For clarity/TLDR here is the complete code for my solution:
//find the desired up direction:
Vector3 targetUpDirection = transform.position - other.position;
//face forward/upward via black magic
transform.rotation = Quaternion.LookRotation(targetUpDirection, transform.forward);
transform.rotation = Quaternion.LookRotation(transform.up, transform.forward);
I'm trying to make a pick up objects mechanic like the one in Amnesia. It's easy to calculate needed rigidbody's velocity, so that the held object stays in front of camera, but my problem is that the object doesn't rotate at all when I hold it. And I would rather have it always be rotated towards the camera. This could easily be achieved with simply parenting the object to player's camera, but...
The behaviour I'm after is as follows: if the bottle I picked up was standing on a table, with neck of the bottle facing ceiling, I would like to see this bottle always with its neck facing ceiling while I hold it. But if this bottle collides with something, it should behave like it actually bumped onto something, so it should rotate some small amount, but it should always try to return to its "original" rotation (in this case, neck facing ceiling).
I think that I need to calculate angular velocity for that and probably have some lerp to return to original rotation, but I'm at a loss on how to do that properly.
I think that the first thing I would need to do is to store the initial direction the moment player picks object up:
Vector3 targetDirection = playerCamera.transform.position - transform.position;
Script is on the held object, so "transform" refers to it. In FixedUpdate() I probably need to have some interpolation, so that angular velocity always tries to rotate the object to original rotation:
rigidbody.angularVelocity = Vector3.Lerp(rigidbody.angularVelocity, targetAngularVelocity, lerpSpeed * Time.fixedDeltaTime);
I don't know how to calculate targetAngularVelocity, because after all I would like the held object to return to original rotation smoothly. I'm not even sure if that's the right way to do this thing and perhaps I should do something else than to calculate angular velocity needed to rotate object properly. I tried just interpolating localRotation to original local rotation, but that did not allow the held object to bump on stuff (the movement then was very jittery). Any ideas?
You need a stabilizer. A script which will add torque/angular velocity to the object, whose angle is different from the target one. Say, you have two variables: targetDirection and currentDirection aka transform.forward. Then you write something like this in fixed update:
var rotation = Quaternion.FromToRotation(currentDirection, targetDirection).eulerAngles * sensitivity;
rigidbody.angularVelocity = rotation;
I recommend to set sensitivity about 0.05 and then increase it if the object stabilizes too slow.
Probably I confused the order, so you should put minus somewhere, but the approach itself is applicable.
The chest bone of my player can be rotated while aiming.
Now I wanted to evaluate how much (minimum and maximum rotation) I should let the chest be rotatable.
To do that, I allowed all degrees of rotation and took a look at the Inspector.
For example, the minimum value that the chest should be rotatable to the left should be Y=-15.
At Y=-15 (seen in the Inspector), it still looked natural.
Now I wanted to code this.
To my surprise, chest.localRotation.Y was a completely different value than what the Inspector is showing.
I have then taken a look at the chest variable and extended the view.
I just can't see the rotation value that the Inspector is showing.
How should I go on in this case, please?
I'm using this to rotate the bone:
Chest.LookAt(ChestLookTarget.position);
Chest.rotation = Chest.rotation * Quaternion.Euler(Offset);
Thank you!
The reason why it doesn't work:
Quaternion is not a human readable value.
One Quaternion is allways unique but can have multiple (infinite?) different representations in Euler space! The other way round one Euler represents allways exactly one Quaternion value.
If you look at the docs it explicitly says
Don't modify this directly unless you know quaternions inside out.
Than as said what you see in the inspector is the localRotation in relation to the parent Transform.
Better said it is one of the many possible Euler inputs that result in the Quaternion. What you see in the debug at localEulerAngles is another possible Euler representation. Unity usually in localEulerAngles also gives you only values > 0.
It seems that the chest anyway will only rotate around the Y axis, right?
If this is the case you can simply get the Angle between the chest's original forward vector and the target. It is way easier to handle Vector3 values than Quaternions ;)
It seems to be the same use case as in this post
// get the target direction
Vector3 targetDir = ChestLookTarget.position - Chest.position;
// Reset any difference in the Y axis
// since it would change the angle as well if there was a difference I the height
// between the two objects
targetDir.y = 0;
// however you currently rotate
// instead rotate only the Vector3 variable without applying it to the transform yet
Vector3 newDir = Vector3.RotateTowards(Chest.forward, targetDir, RotationSpeed * Time.deltaTime, 0.0f);
// Compare the target direction to the parents forward vector
float newAngle = Vector3.Angle(Chest.parent.transform.forward, newDir);
if (newAngle > MaxRotationAngle)
{
// What should happen if angle gets bigger?
return;
}
// If angle still okey set the new direction
Chest.rotation = Quaternion.LookRotation(newDir);
I am trying to figure out how to modify HelloARController.cs from the example ARCore scene to place objects directly in front of the camera. My thinking is that we are raycasting from the camera to a Vector3 on an anchor or tracked plane, so can't we get the Vector3 of the start of that ray and place an object at or near that point?
I have tried lots, and although I am somewhat a beginner, I have come up with this
From my understanding, ScreenToWorldPoint should output a vector3 of the screen position corresponding to the world, but it is not working correctly. I have tried other options instead of ScreenToWorldPoint, but nothing has presented the desired effect. Does anyone have any tips?
To place the object right at the middle of the camera's view, you would have to change the target gameObject's transform.position (as AlmightyR has said).
The ready code would look something like this:
GameObject camera;
GameObject object;
float distance = 1;
object.transform.position = camera.transform.position + camera.transform.forward * distance;
Since camera's forward component (Z axis) is always poiting at the direction where Camera is looking to, you take that vector's direction and multiply it by a distance you want your object to be placed on. If you want your object to always stay at that position no matter how camera moves, you can make it a child of camera's transform.
object.transform.SetParent(camera.transform);
object.transform.localPosition = Vector3.forward * distance;
Arman's suggestion works. Also giving credit to AlmightyR since they got me started in the right direction. Here's what I have now:
// Set a position in front of the camera
float distance = 1;
Vector3 cameraPoint = m_firstPersonCamera.transform.position + m_firstPersonCamera.transform.forward * distance;
// Intanstiate an Andy Android object as a child of the anchor; it's transform will now benefit
// from the anchor's tracking.
var andyObject = Instantiate(m_andyAndroidPrefab, cameraPoint, Quaternion.identity,anchor.transform);
The only problem with this is that because of the existing HelloAR example code, an object is only placed if you click on a point in the point cloud in my case (or a point on a plane by default). I would like it to behave so that you click anywhere on screen, and it places an object anchored to a nearby point in the point cloud, not necessarily one that you clicked. Any thoughts for how to do that?
Side tip for those who don't know: If you want to place something anchored to a point in the cloud, instead of on a plane, change
TrackableHitFlag raycastFilter = TrackableHitFlag.PlaneWithinBounds | TrackableHitFlag.PlaneWithinPolygon;
to
TrackableHitFlag raycastFilter = TrackableHitFlag.PointCloud;
In my game, Im always rotating a gameobject (Cube) with Quaternion.Lerp. And I need which face of this cube is looking up. So I think I can use current rotation of object to get this (if there is a better way please say it).
Firstly this gameobject's rotation (0,0,0). when I rotate it forward it becomes (90,0,0). There is no problem. But after that, when I rotate it second time it doesnt become (180,0,0). it is (0,180,180). How can I prevent unity to do this.
Try using euler angles instead of quaternions, they are much simpler, here is an example:
transform.eulerAngles = new Vector3(180, 0, 0);
There are multiple ways of representing a rotation with Euler angles. When you convert the rotation of your GameObject (stored internally as a quaternion) to Euler angles (using either transform.eulerAngles or transform.rotation.eulerAngles) you may not get the result you're expecting.
You could get around this by storing a Vector3 (let's call it currentRotation) containing the rotation of your object in Euler angles, and construct Quaternions from it using Quaternion.Euler(currentRotation). You can do your interpolation by calculating your target rotation (targetRotation) as a Vector3, then constructing a Quaternion for it before doing Quaternion.Lerp:
var targetRotationQuaternion = Quaternion.Euler(targetRotation);
var currentRotationQuaternion = Quaternion.Euler(currentRotation);
transform.rotation = Quaternion.Lerp(currentRotationQuaternion, targetRotationQuaternion, *your t*);
Incidentally, this answer is very similar to a comment on http://answers.unity3d.com/questions/667037/transformrotationeulerangles-not-accuarate.html but it's worth reproducing here in case that ever gets taken down.