We have SAAS multitenant Web Application for hotel reservation and Key issuing, that can work both in Online and Offline modes.
The user needs limited features like making the reservation and issuing keys for Guest through the webapp, in case he is offline and full feature access when he becomes online again. I thought of the following options:
Make the hotel host a server locally that will replicate event from the cloud database to the local
Create a light version of limited feature of the App to host locally with the replicate Database
Create a shortcut URL to local computer but Only allow access to the local web app when Internet connection down
Save all message(CRUD from feature table) to a Queue in the local server(Linux box)
When internet is back, send these to the cloud for data Sync
This seems like a good solution since it is cover the scenario and it integrates a local server, relational datastore and a queuing messages to send to cloud
Very easy solution when it come to mobile , but since this is a web, we seems to be limited by available technics.
Has anyone worked/working on such an application. Ideas welcome.
Related
Need to understand something related to Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop.
If I install a software (e.g. Paint.NET) on Citrix Server and publish it via XenApp and XenDesktop to set of users. My understanding is below,
Users who are accessing published application as XenApp; is a thin client application.
users who are accessing using XenDesktop; is a thick client application.
Is my understanding is correct? I googled a lot but still couldn't get a proper answer. I am very new to this Citrix world.
Can someone please explain me in laymen language?
I'm not sure these categories can really be cleanly applied to Citrix. Let me just explain in a nutshell how it works and you can be the judge yourself which of the (if either) it should be.
I have a farm of Citrix servers that I deploy WPF to. The servers are basically just Windows machines, so I can browse for files, upload, interact with the local file system in any way. The app itself to the Citrix server just like it was a personal computer. Citrix technology basically just transmits a picture of whatever apps each user has open on the server(s). It does this by the user installing a client (web browser plug-in), and all that comes across the wire is the compressed graphics info. There is no discernible lag, so it's basically just like I'm working directly from the server. I can't copy objects directly to my laptop from these web servers, because the OS I'm on there isn't really the same OS (although can browse through the network to my laptop and copy it that way very quickly).
That is Xenapp. I assume XenDesktop is the same as what we call 'Remote Desktop, but double-check me on that. This is what I use to log into a computer in the office from my home and control it. It works very much like the above except that, instead of logging into a server , it's used to log into a desktop PC.
Both technologies just transmit a (compressed) image, and both allow you to send keystrokes and mouse movements so that it's like you're working directly on that machine. As I understand it, Citrix is one of the few games in town with this kind of technology, and last I heard, even MS licensed it from them.
The typical usage is to install fat client apps on a Citrix farm so that they then become web/browser accessible from outside the work place. The apps are published on a gateway web site with links to the individual apps (although you can also browse through the file system and open that way). The only thing the user needs to have installed to do this is the Citrix client to decipher the visual stream. The client is free and lightweight.
So basically, I would say Citrix technology allows for fat clients to be installed on the Citrix server and then accessed like thin clients.
There are a few key differences between Citrix deployment and the way typical web app works. One is that the user has to actually close the app out, not just their local web browser , otherwise the app stays running on the Citrix server. By default that doesn't typically happen because from the Portal, a particular app will be published, so that only that particular app pops up on click of the link (not a desktop or Windows Explorer). So when the close the 'picture' of it running in the browser, they do so by closing the 'X' on the app. But if they're crafty, they're can disconnect the client from the server and leave it running. That can be handy if ones need to some work that shutting downt the laptop would otherwise close out (long-running datawarehouse pulls, etc). Another difference is that speed and performance are pretty much the same no matter the location of the user(at least with XenaPP). Normally, if you have a Wide Area Network, and you say, deploy an ASP.NET web page on web server in City A, the user in City B 1000 miles away may have a bit of a lag, since the web app may have to query a database server, then spit out some Javascript, that then gets consumed and ran on the client. With Citrix Xenapp, everything is occurring on the server in City A. In Citry B, the user is just getting a compressed picture stream. For this reason, it's better to avoid too fancy graphics, because they waste bandwidth and usually get autocompressed to look weird anyhow. But assuming that is done and the farm doesn't suck, performance will be appreciably the same in India or the Philipines or the United States for the same app. Another difference is that the data is inherently Sandboxed, and there are is no URL unless you decide to put the app on a web server and then have users access it through Citrix (which I've seen done in companies with sensitive data using offshore vendors because of the Sandboxing and speed benefits). But if you do that, you have to open the web app from within the Citrix portal and then you can run the browser on that server (you can't just put a link to that web app from the web). Finally--and maybe this is just where I work--but the load balancing seems to work a little differently than with web servers. Users tend to get thrown on the same server if they already have another app open. That can be handy for copying files, etc, but also means less balance in the load for particular servers at times, so that you typically don't want the overall average load to go high (need more servers).
Hopefully that helps explain it and give you an idea. Citrix just sends a picture of the wire that you can use to remote-control a machine. I would say it's kind of "both" on the thick or thin client question. Typically it is used to deploy Winforms, WPF or other 'fat client' technologies, and is largely unnecessary for technologies that already allow for thin clients (web apps). But sometimes web apps are pushed through there also, for various reasons.
I am not a programmer but I have an idea that I would like to see developed. I want to have a cross platform web app that is programmed to, for any DNS look-up request from any app on the device (even native apps), first look in our DNS server that will check to see if the service provider is a member of our system, and if so, a different experience will be delivered to the user, and if not, then the user's device should be forwarded to the normal DNS that is specified in system settings. Is this feasible? Are there any risks to the users or me? Can the code be safe from being tampered with?
Many thanks.
What you are doing is not easily feasible for a web application. In effect what you are doing is running your own DNS server which the users connect to and if the website provider is a member you already have their DNS records loaded and it providers one set of records and if the website is not a member then it performs a forward lookup to an upstream provider to get the global DNS records for the DNS query made. I have implemented this for a number of small and medium businesses on their local networks so that queries to certain domains from the LAN resolve to internal addresses, both for the purpose of blocking domains from being accessed from work as well as for connecting the users to local servers where the domain in question is hosted locally, however to do this for client devices not on a single network would mean you would have to either install software to change the DNS settings on the device or to have the user change their DNS settings themselves which would not give you a unified experience as some would and some wouldn't, especially if you are talking about members of the public and their own devices. If memory serves there are also restrictions in place on mobile devices including Android and iOS devices which prevent an app from altering network settings such as DNS as a security precaution as such an app would present a huge risk to user online security. The best bet would be to simply provide DNS hosting for service providers and they host their DNS records with you and so you can present the enhanced experience to the end user.
I am planning to write an iPhone app and I am weighing in the options to either make the database local (on the device) or host on my server and access it through web services. What are the advantages/disadvantages of these two different approaches?
advantages of a local database
alwayws avaliable (also with no networkconnection)
fast because you don't need a networkconnection
secure because the data won't fly over the net
disadvantages of a local database
remotely change values (you cant change uservalues)
no statistical overview
I am trying to make the sync data application in which user have some value into the data base .And he have to send this data on to the server .With help http request how can i do that .
I need the
I am not using the php web server .
I am using the Normal HTTP web page .
ANd i have the some data in my iphone application and i want to Synchronization that data to server .
I it must check the Internet is available or not .If the Internet is ON than only he will Synchronization the data .that's my question .
Nothing else .You got my point or not .
I thing people will reply me soon please
Thanks
You have got to have some kind of server backend for synchronization of the local database. You can't do that using just the static HTML pages.
Your application and server have to have a way to talk to each other using a web service protocol, like SOAP or JSON/REST. Then your application has to translate the data from the database into such web service data objects.
Both your local database and the server (in case of more than one client) will have keep the records of at least the times of last synchronizations so both know what should be sent over the air in order to become in sync.
Also, in the usual case of more than one client, you have to solve the problem of conflicts resolution.
Web service versioning is important as well, as there will be very likely a need to improve the communication channel, maybe there will be changes in the database model to be synchronized.
As you can see, the idea of synchronizing local database to a server is not that simple, and if you think you can do it in a simple way, in time you'll realise that you're gradually reimplementing the aforementioned ideas.
Do a research on web service technologies, writing web services-aware apps, on synchronization with web services and on Reachability, for starters.
To check internet availability, check out the Reachability class from Apple. See this article.
To send data to a simple HTTP form via POST use NSURLConnection like in this article.
Cheers,
S
I've been talking with someone about the possibility of a iPhone development contract gig. All I really know at this point is that there is a company that wants to make an iPhone app that will hit their internal database. I'm not sure what the database type is( Oracle, MySQL, etc...).
I've wanted to know if the database type was Oracle or MySQL if there is a big learning curve for connecting to one of these across the internet?
If it's a real pain I may do more research before accepting the conract.
I would advise against directly accessing the database from the iPhone application.
Usually, you would create a web service which accesses the database, and then you consume that web service from the iPhone application.
Create a web service. This allows you to make the iphone app more of a thin client. Let the application push commands to the web service for processing and interaction with the database returning only the data needed by the app.
This option is better for the app, the database, and the customer's security.
You can easily perform the connection over the internet, the same way you would locally, but you are opening the database up to attacks if it will accept communication from any remote IP address. Typically you will just connect via a socket open to the server's remote IP address over the open port, MySQL's default port is 3306.
I would recommend against this sort of system in general unless there is some critical reason they want their internal database exposed to the world's hacker community.
What I am doing is creating a web service using Sinatra to access the online database.
Those answers from 2009 are mostly obsolete now.
http://ODBCrouter.com/ipad (new) has XCode client-side ODBC libraries, header files and multi-threaded Objective C objects that let your apps send SQL to server-side ODBC drivers and get back binary results! This reduces the need to stop and separately maintain SOAP/REST servers that can get pretty frightening anyway after a while maintaining it.
The XML schemes were okay for transferring static configurations to mobile devices "every once in a while", but XML was meant for infrequent inter-company type transfers in a "server environment" (with power cords, wired networks and air conditioning) and is definitely not efficient for frequent database queries coming in from n-copies of a mobile app. There are third-party JSON libraries that help things, but even with JSON, everything has to be encoded (and decoded) from the binary representation in the database to text representation on the server (only fine if it's going to be shown to the user in a web browser anyway, but not fine if the mobile app is going to translate it right back into binary so that it can perform calculations "behind the scenes" to what is going on with the user). Aside from the higher network overhead and battery power the mobile CPU will draw with XML and JSON, it will also make you buy more RAM and CPU power on the back-end server faster than just using an ODBC connection to the database.