I use Specflow with SpecRunner+ I am using the Deafult.srprofile to to re-run failed tests 3 times in visual studio it shows 2passed 1 failed but the status of the test is a failure, the same goes for azure devops if a re-ran test passes the outcome of the run is a failure. The Failures are sometimes caused by locator timeouts or server timeouts not often but saw it happen few time thats why we decided to implement a re-run.
Could anyone help on this?
022-02-09T12:40:13.8607507Z Test Run Failed.
2022-02-09T12:40:13.8608607Z Total tests: 37
2022-02-09T12:40:13.8609271Z Passed: 36
2022-02-09T12:40:13.8609858Z Failed: 1
2022-02-09T12:40:13.8617476Z Total time: 7.4559 Minutes
2022-02-09T12:40:13.9226929Z ##[warning]Vstest failed with error. Check logs for failures. There might be failed tests.
2022-02-09T12:40:14.0075402Z ##[error]Error: The process 'D:\Microsoft_Visual_Studio\2019\Common7\IDE\Extensions\TestPlatform\vstest.console.exe' failed with exit code 1
2022-02-09T12:40:14.8164576Z ##[error]VsTest task failed.
But then the report states that it was retried 3 times which 2 of the retries were seccusefull but still a failure status on the azure devops run.
The behavior of the report is the correct one and sadly this can't be configured to be changed.
What you can do is to adjust how the results are reported back to Azure DevOps.
You can configure it via the VSTest element in the srProfile- File.
This example means, that at least one retry has to be passing:
<VSTest testRetryResults="Unified" passRateAbsolute="1"/>
Docs: https://docs.specflow.org/projects/specflow-runner/en/latest/Profile/VSTest.html
Be aware that we have stopped the development of the SpecFlow+ Runner. More details here: https://specflow.org/using-specflow/the-retirement-of-specflow-runner/
I am using boofuzz to try to fuzz a specific application. While creating the blocks etc and some testing i noticed that the target sometimes closes the connection. This causes procmon to terminate the target process and restarts it. However this is totally unnecessary for this target.
Can i somehow tell boofuzz to not handle this as an Error (so target is not restarted)
[2017-11-04 17:09:07,012] Info: Receiving...
[2017-11-04 17:09:07,093] Check Failed: Target connection reset.
[2017-11-04 17:09:07,093] Test Step: Calling post_send function:
[2017-11-04 17:09:07,093] Info: No post_send callback registered.
[2017-11-04 17:09:07,093] Test Step: Sleep between tests.
[2017-11-04 17:09:07,094] Info: sleeping for 0.100000 seconds
[2017-11-04 17:09:07,194] Test Step: Contact process monitor
[2017-11-04 17:09:07,194] Check: procmon.post_send()
[2017-11-04 17:09:07,196] Check OK: No crash detected.
Excellent question! There isn't (wasn't) any way to do this, but there really should be. A reset connection does not always mean a failure.
I just added ignore_connection_reset and ignore_connection_aborted options to the Session class to ignore ECONNRESET and ECONNABORTED errors respectively. Available in version 0.0.10.
Description of arguments available in the docs: http://boofuzz.readthedocs.io/en/latest/source/Session.html
You may find the commit that added these arguments informative for how some of the boofuzz internals work (relevant lines 182-183, 213-214, 741-756): https://github.com/jtpereyda/boofuzz/commit/a1f08837c755578e80f36fd1d78401f21ccbf852
Thank you for the solid question.
I have been working with HFC SDK for Node.js and it used to work, but since last night I am having some problems.
When running helloblockchain.js only few times works, most time I get this error when it tries to enroll a new user:
E0113 11:56:05.983919636 5288 handshake.c:128] Security handshake failed: {"created":"#1484304965.983872199","description":"Handshake read failed","file":"../src/core/lib/security/transport/handshake.c","file_line":237,"referenced_errors":[{"created":"#1484304965.983866102","description":"FD shutdown","file":"../src/core/lib/iomgr/ev_epoll_linux.c","file_line":948}]}
Error: Failed to register and enroll JohnDoe: Error
Other times, the enroll works and the failure appears deploying the chaincode:
Enrolled and registered JohnDoe successfully
Deploying chaincode ...
E0113 12:14:27.341527043 5455 handshake.c:128] Security handshake failed: {"created":"#1484306067.341430168","description":"Handshake read failed","file":"../src/core/lib/security/transport/handshake.c","file_line":237,"referenced_errors":[{"created":"#1484306067.341421859","description":"FD shutdown","file":"../src/core/lib/iomgr/ev_epoll_linux.c","file_line":948}]}
Failed to deploy chaincode: request={"fcn":"init","args":["a","100","b","200"],"chaincodePath":"chaincode","certificatePath":"/certs/peer/cert.pem"}, error={"error":{"code":14,"metadata":{"_internal_repr":{}}},"msg":"Error"}
Or:
Enrolled and registered JohnDoe successfully
Deploying chaincode ...
E0113 12:15:27.448867739 5483 handshake.c:128] Security handshake failed: {"created":"#1484306127.448692244","description":"Handshake read failed","file":"../src/core/lib/security/transport/handshake.c","file_line":237,"referenced_errors":[{"created":"#1484306127.448668047","description":"FD shutdown","file":"../src/core/lib/iomgr/ev_epoll_linux.c","file_line":948}]}
events.js:160
throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
^
Error
at ClientDuplexStream._emitStatusIfDone (/usr/lib/node_modules/hfc/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:189:19)
at ClientDuplexStream._readsDone (/usr/lib/node_modules/hfc/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:158:8)
at readCallback (/usr/lib/node_modules/hfc/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:217:12)
E0113 12:15:27.563487641 5483 handshake.c:128] Security handshake failed: {"created":"#1484306127.563437122","description":"Handshake read failed","file":"../src/core/lib/security/transport/handshake.c","file_line":237,"referenced_errors":[{"created":"#1484306127.563429661","description":"FD shutdown","file":"../src/core/lib/iomgr/ev_epoll_linux.c","file_line":948}]}
This code worked yesterday, so I don't know what could be happening.
Does anybody know how can I fix it?
Thanks,
Javier.
ibm-bluemix
blockchain
These types of intermittent issues are usually related to GRPC. An initial suggestion is to ensure that you are using at least GRPC version 1.0.0.
If you are using a Mac, then the maximum number of open file descriptors should be checked (using ulimit -n). Sometimes this is initially set to a low value such as 256, so increasing the value could help.
There are a couple of GRPC issues with similar symptoms.
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/8732
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/8839
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/8382
There is a grpc.initial_reconnect_backoff_ms property that is mentioned in some of these issues. Increasing the value past the 1000 ms level might help reduce the frequency of issues. Below are instructions for how the helloblockchain.js file can be modified to set this property to a higher value.
Open the helloblockchain.js file in the Hyperledger Fabric Client example and find the enrollAndRegisterUsers function.
Add “grpc.initial_reconnect_backoff_ms": 5000 to the setMemberServicesUrl call.
chain.setMemberServicesUrl(ca_url, {
pem: cert, "grpc.initial_reconnect_backoff_ms": 5000
});
Add “grpc.initial_reconnect_backoff_ms": 5000 to the addPeer call.
chain.addPeer("grpcs://" + peers[i].discovery_host + ":" + peers[i].discovery_port,
{pem: cert, "grpc.initial_reconnect_backoff_ms": 5000
});
Note that setting the grpc.initial_reconnect_backoff_ms property may reduce the frequency of issues, but it will not necessarily eliminate all issues.
The connection to the eventhub that is made in the helloblockchain.js file can also be a factor. There is an earlier version of the Hyperledger Fabric Client that does not utilize the eventhub. This earlier version could be tried to determine if this makes a difference. After running git clone https://github.com/IBM-Blockchain/SDK-Demo.git, run git checkout b7d5195 to use this prior level. Before running node helloblockchain.js from a Node.js command window, the git status command can be used to check the code level that is being used.
I was following the processes in this very helpful post:
How do I run a Play Framework 2.0 application as a Windows service?
when I ran into trouble in Step 9. When I execute runConsole.bat, the service cycles between the running and restarting states. The full log is here:
wrapper.log
but what jumps out at me in the log are the following:
INFO|7268/0|play.core.server.NettyServer|13-12-28 13:07:28|Oops, cannot start the server.
INFO|7268/0|play.core.server.NettyServer|13-12-28 13:07:28|Configuration error: Configuration error[Cannot connect to database [default]]
...
INFO|7268/0|play.core.server.NettyServer|13-12-28 13:07:28|Caused by: org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLException: Database may be already in use: "Locked by another process". Possible solutions: close all other connection(s); use the server mode [90020-168]
...
INFO|wrapper|play.core.server.NettyServer|13-12-28 13:07:28|restart process due to default exit code rule
INFO|wrapper|play.core.server.NettyServer|13-12-28 13:07:28|restart internal RUNNING
INFO|wrapper|play.core.server.NettyServer|13-12-28 13:07:28|stopping process with pid/timeout 7268 45000
INFO|wrapper|play.core.server.NettyServer|13-12-28 13:07:30|process exit code: -1
...
INFO|7812/1|play.core.server.NettyServer|13-12-28 13:07:45|[error] c.j.b.h.AbstractConnectionHook - Failed to obtain initial connection Sleeping for 0ms and trying again. Attempts left: 0. Exception: null
INFO|7812/1|play.core.server.NettyServer|13-12-28 13:07:45|Oops, cannot start the server.
INFO|7812/1|play.core.server.NettyServer|13-12-28 13:07:45|Configuration error: Configuration error[Cannot connect to database [default]]
repeats several times...
Half way through writing this post, I realized that before step 9., you should terminate the start.bat script which you start up in step 6. When I did this, runConsole.bat would execute normally without all the errors I list above.
I am using msdeploy -presync to backup the current deployment of a website in IIS before the -postsync deploys it, however I recently had a situation where the -presync failed (raised a warning due to a missing dll) and the -postsync continued and overwrote the code.
Both the presync and postsync run batch files.
Obviously this is bad as the backup failed so there is no backout route if the deployment has bugs or fails.
Is there anyway to stop the postsync if the presync raises warnings with msdeploy?
Perhaps the issue here is that the presync failure was raised as a warning not an error.
Supply successReturnCodes parameter set to 0 (success return code convention) to presync option such as:
-preSync:runCommand="your script",successReturnCodes=0
More info at: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee619740(v=ws.10).aspx