May u know any possibility to secure access to dashboard of jobrunr? As inside dashboard there are many critical operation can be done, it need be protected with user name and password. At the moment it seems it open for anyone who can access the dashboard's url.
thanks in advance
I don't recommend a setup where the dashboard can be accessed via the internet, I would only allow access via internal IP's.
If you also want to protect for internal IP's, there is a way to do so. Search the issues and the discussions for it (I'm not writing the answer here as I don't like to promote that solution).
Update regarding JobRunr 6
JobRunr Pro 6 will support OpenID Authentication.
Related
I am facing the challenge to request the Bing Ads API to get a couple of metrics from it.
I am using Apache Airflow DAGs hosted on a remote Kubernetes cluster to do so. It is a nice way to automate and schedule tasks.
Now, the documentation is rather light on the point of gaining access to the API.
I have followed this https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/advertising/guides/authentication-oauth-identity-platform?view=bingads-13#registerapplication
and the official SDK docs https://github.com/BingAds/BingAds-Python-SDK/.
I am failing at authenticating when querying, since I am lacking a couple of pieces of information.
When authenticating using the "refresh token" and "redirect URI", I do not have either. (Class OAuthWebAuthCodeGrant here: https://github.com/BingAds/BingAds-Python-SDK/blob/294d01eea57d80ba381a42cde8d006fc318af056/bingads/authorization.py#L566)
When using a different method (Class OAuthDesktopMobileAuthCodeGrant here: https://github.com/BingAds/BingAds-Python-SDK/blob/294d01eea57d80ba381a42cde8d006fc318af056/bingads/authorization.py#L532), I fail w/
AADSTS700016: Application with identifier '<someidentifier>' was not found in the directory '<somethingelse>'. This can happen if the application has not been installed by the administrator of the tenant or consented to by any user in the tenant. You may have sent your authentication request to the wrong tenant.
Thank you very much in advance! If you need more details, let me know!
Also great documentation in general, if I can make it more "newb"-friendly, let me know!
Edit1:
Sadly, while there has been some traffic to this question, nobody seems to be able to answer.
I will specify the set up a bit further.
We use Airflow DAGs to request daily updates from the API. For this, we need to authenticate. The authentication comes from a "new device" every time, since the code runs on a k8s cluster which allocates the jobs dynamically to it's pods.
For authentication, we ventured into different solutions, but all require some form of human interaction to get the refresh token into the DAG.
Is there any solution which allows for a hands-free deamon like many-server-to-server communication?
This link sheds some light on what we are looking for: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/scenario-daemon-app-registration#api-permissions---app-permissions-and-admin-consent
Sadly, the Bing Ads API does not show up there.
What key piece of information are we missing?
Bing Ads, like Google Ads, uses OAuth for its API.
If you reference the Getting Started page, it mentions that you need a developer token, complete with links.
You can follow these steps to get a developer token for production.
Sign in with Super Admin credentials at the Microsoft Advertising Developer Portal account tab.
Choose the user that you want associated with the developer token. Typically an application only needs one universal token regardless how many users will be supported.
Click on the Request Token button.
Regarding your specific scenario--an application running in the cloud without an interface--you should know that OAuth requires you to interact with it to set things up. So run your app locally ONCE, or at least the getting_started code from your language's walkthrough: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/advertising/guides/walkthrough-desktop-application-python?view=bingads-13
Running it locally will go through the authentication process with your browser and generate a refresh token (in the file refresh.txt by default). Store this file with your code. It will have to be on the server that's making the request, and since it's in Kubernetes, you'll have to keep it with your container file.
I apologize to come before you with such a rudimentary question, but Google apps is giving me a hard time simply verifying the domain from which I want to make server side YouTube search API calls.
Google is insisting on using the DNS text verification method (even though it provides a link to alternate methods that are not recognized by Google apps). But my registrar (GoDaddy) is not my authoritative DNS provider. That honor goes to DynDNS. So, I'm not sure I can even use Google's automated tool to set up the TXT record. In fact, it makes me nervous that they want me to grant their app to make changes to the DNS at GoDaddy.
I'm assuming this is a requirement to make server side api calls and retrieve results. Can someone point me in the right direction? Either how to fulfill the TXT record requirement under this scenario, or how to force Google Apps to accept an alternate verification method?
Thanks
Paul G
If Godaddy isn't managing your DNS, you won't be able to follow the automated flow in the Admin console. You're going to need to manually create the record with DynDNS to accomplish this.
Your host doesn't have specific steps on Google Support site (here) so you'll need to follow the generic one. Support for your host should be able to help but you can also contact Google Support via the Support section in your Admin console.
I'm quite new to Cloud Storage solutions, and I'm currently researching options to upgrade our current solution (we currently just upload on a SVN server).
What I have is a native application running on client computers, which will upload data to the Cloud Storage. Afterwards, client should be able to download and browse their data (source is not set in stone, could be a website or from other applications). They should not be able to access other user's data.
I'm not sure how I'm supposed to proceed. As far as I understand, the native application will upload using a Native Application Credential, using JSON.
Do I need multiple credentials to track multiple users? That seems wrong to me. Besides when they come back as 'users' through the web interface, they wouldn't be using that authentification, would they?
Do I need to change the ACL of the uploaded files afterwards?
Should I just not give write/read access to any particular users and handle read requests through Signed URLs, dealing with permission details by myself using something else on the side? (not forcing a Google Account is probably a requirement)
Sorry if this is too many questions, and thanks!
Benjamin
The "individual credentials per instance of an app" question has come up before, and unfortunately there's not a great answer. If you want every user to have different permissions, you need every user to be associated with a different account.
Like you point out, the best current answer, other than requiring users to have Google accounts, is to have a centralized service that vends signed URLs to the end applications. That service would be the only owner of all of the objects and would give out permission to read or upload as needed.
Can anyone think of a neat solution for this; we operate an website service and sell to large organisations. Rather than have a logon for everyone, we'd like to be able to provide a direct link to our website from the organisation's Intranet page. We'd then like to check the referrer and if it's in our listed of 'trusted referrers', i.e. the intranet url, then we grant logon without asking for credentials.
I'm aware you can do $_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER']; to get the referrer, but I'm also aware that can be spoofed. Can anyone think of how we could achieve what we want, but while also guaranteeing it won't be hackable?
Thanks in advance
It's not exectly what you want, but to make logging on easier and ensure you don't need to store all the passwords you could use, for example, OpenID.
I think that there is no perfect and safe solution for this.
One solution would be to append tokens to the urls. It will work and it will be save, but anyone who knows the link (including token) will be able to login as that organization
Another solution would be to check the source ip. This can be done in different ways *apache, load balancer, app, etc).
Also a combination of token + ip could work (this token for that organization but only if the request comes from allowed_ips for that organization)
A more elegant solution (which I implemented for several big companies) would be to integrate you website login with the active record domain login. It is possible to use the current user window login as login into a website, using domain authorization. If a user is logged in into a domain, when enters your site will automatically login to the website.
This solution is much more easy to implement than it sounds. But, requires Active directory and workstation that connects to a domain to be in the company (this shouldn't be a problem, most of corporations are using windows on workstations and active directory for domain controller). Also is working best on IE only (direct login to the website). On other browsers the domain login popup will appear and user will have to enter again the domain password.
Also, I am pretty sure that can be made to work on linux environments, but I have no idea how.
I'd like to use REST protocol with Geoserver running on a web, but when I enter username and password used to log into web interface, I get HTTP ERROR: 401 Full authentication is required to access this resource. Do I need to create separate user with some privileges? May it be webhosting related issue?
Update: I'm able to access existing workspace with web browser, but using QGIS to create new workspace I end up with error mentioned above.
Thank you.
Well I know this is a little late but I will answer it so that hopefully other people with this issue may find it helpful.
The REST process has its own security configuration that needs to be setup in addition to the web interface user. These are different configurations and are setup in different spots. The REST configuration does use that same users you have configured in the web interface it just doesn't use the access rules that you would have set up.
To setup the permissions you need to edit a file in the directory [Geoserver_data}/security called rest.properties.
Please see here and here on what entires to add and edit in this file to provide access to the rest services.