I am trying to create some authorization setup such that my Lambda function can return sound files in my S3 bucket to stream, however I'm running into the following issue:
It seems I can't attach an authorizer to this route. I'll admit I'm fairly new to this, but when I Googled this message I couldn't really find an answer as to why that is, and how to unlock adding an authorization. Do I have to create a new route other than default to do this? What is going on here?
This is particularly happening, when you choose a $default as stage.
If we choose $default as a stage, it is not letting us modify the integration
Related
For securing a frontend application, I created a new Keycloak client with a custom configuration:
mapper which includes "client roles"
scope configuration
client-specific roles (composite and non-composite roles)
This setup works fine in the local development setup. Now we need to transfer this configuration to the other environments like develop/preproduction/production stage.
As far as I understand, Keycloak offers the following exports:
Complete realm
Specific client
It looks as if both apporaches have some major drawbacks. Either I would need to overwrite the complete realm (which I definitely don't want to do in production) or I can import the basic client configuration which is missing all the roles.
And as soon as we, for example, add more roles later on, then we would need to re-configure all stages manually.
Is there some "good practice" how to deal with that? Does keycloak offer some kind of "sync" between stages?
I thought it is hard answer question.
it is compare API call vs UI configuration.
Disadvantage of API call I prefer API call but it takes a time to figure out API function and call order is matter and some properties missing in parent have to set detail in child, complicated structure API URL path ( example id/property/id/property), require more deep of knowledge for Keycloak.
Advantage of API call more fine tunning fast, easy organize from top to bottom (example configure client, Auth resources, auth scopes, policies and permissions to other environment), can transfer 100% configuration.
Disadvantage of UI configuration - not flexible, if un-match, id makes error, can't update/add a partial data (example get client's resource missing it's scopes - it have to set by separate API call), can't move 100% configuration from source to target environment, can make human error
Advantage of UI configuration - easy, quick even manual
My preference is API call - using Postman (single API call or running correction for a sequence of API call - at the local and develop stage, can simple unit test and check HTTP status) and curl call with Bash Schell for higher stage. If check condition of target, can handle scenario based transfer(example already setting, skip that configuration)
One more tips, If using a debug section by F12 in Chrome or Firefox, can see the API call in network tab. It saves time to figure out API call methods and payload/response JSON data.
I have a project that I have to do that deals with queues being loaded successfully and unsuccessfully whereby I do manually at the moment that can be tedious and also positive negative meaning the orchestrator can state that new queues have been added but when I access the actual job (process) nothing has been added.
I would like to know, is there a way to monitor queue success and unsuccessful rates on orchestrator instead of the using monitoring it manually?
You can access pretty much any information via the Orchestrator API.
You can find the "Orchestrator HTTP Request" activity, which will allow you to access any relevant endpoint.
Note that the provisioned Robot in Orchestrator needs to have the right access permission, so please have a look at what roles are associated to the Robot user.
The API reference can be found here:
https://docs.uipath.com/orchestrator/reference
You will see it mentions swagger, which in turn will give you all the information you need to access the relevant APIs.
Is there any way to tell S3 to wait for an object before responding? I want to do this directly against the S3 endpoint via an HTTP(S) request.
I understand this function exists in the PHP SDK
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/aws-sdk-php/v2/guide/feature-waiters.html#
But can you apply this wait functionality when downloading a resource directly from the S3 endpoint? (without an SDK)?
The answer is yes, but not really.
Yes, because everything the SDK can do can be done with your own code, because the SDK uses the same documented public APIs to access the services... the SDKs have no privileged interface... but, then again, not really, because the waiter logic is pretty much an illusion, a convenient fiction. It's not waiting for the service in a "tell me when you're ready" sense... it's really just polling the service to check the state of the resource in question. They're just a convenience so you don't have to write your own polling retry logic.
So, sure you can... but to do it, you just have to keep asking until you get the response you expect... which I assume is not the answer you were hoping for.
When you say "wait for an object," though, a new object (not an overwrite) should be available as soon as the PUT returns success. Overwrites and deletions are eventually-consistent, but new object consistency is immediate.
One exception to this is in the us-east-1 region of S3 where immediate consistency is only officially provided if you use the s3-external-1.amazonaws.com or s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com endpoints, not the s3.amazonaws.com endpoint.
I wanted to transfer resources (web apps) from an old subscription that had been disabled onto my new active subscription. I created a support request and they changed the disabled subscription into a Pay-As-You-Go -type and now using PowerShell I should be able to transfer my work over.
However I am still unable to access the old resource group in PS, for example when using Get-AzureRMResourceGroup only the new group I created comes up. I am also unable to do absolutely anything with my old work, even though the sub should now be active. I believe this is the reason I am unable to make the transfer. The title poses the actual dilemma that I believe is the root of my problems so, does anyone know a way to change this? Also I am happy to be corrected if I'm way off, or just be suggested an alternative approach.
Here's a silly picture to show the inconsistency I'm speaking of.
I am using Gatling and am running into an issue implementing an integration test. The test I am running has two parts (scenarios):
The first part is a simple GET request to verify expected server responses. In this step, it returns a form's configuration ID as well as other properties of the form.
In the next step, I am hitting PUT route which updates various properties of this form's configuration for testing of this route and other functionality through the back ends of an application.
The issue with these steps is that after running the second step, if there are any forms saved under that configuration, it will clone a copy for security purposes and changes the ID. Long story short, the same ID does not persist from test to test.
My question is: Is there a way within Gatling to run SQL Queries to get values and store them and then pass them? OR is there a way to store a variable from the GET method and pass it in in the second scenario's PUT method. I know there is Gatling's .saveAs() method, but I believe the scope of this function is only scenario.
Please notify me for further clarification and details; thanks in advance.
The Google group link only shows you how to share (&cache) data between different user-sessions.
If you are looking for sharing data between "scenarios" rather than "user sessions", you should check out Peter's answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/43061278/1395126
It's the only information I can find on the internet today that really shows you how to share data between scenarios in Gatling.
IMHO, it's super important to look out for the line of "// Set it here" comment. This is THE secret about sharing data among scenarios. Without setting session attribute first or accessing the "CreateId" directly in another scenario could not work.
This answer: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/gatling/bfpKd_9d6gk can probably be used to handle your use case.