Does RHEL 8.3 support MATLAB Compiler Runtime Version 9.0? - matlab

I've been using MATLAB R2016a (9.0) in Windows 10 and MATLAB Compiler Runtime Version 9.0 in RHEL 7.2. I used to compile the code in Windows & run the binaries on the target machine (50GB RAM, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 0 # 2.30GHz, 12 cores) having RHEL 7.2. Now the OS is upgraded to RHEL 8.3 in the target machine. Without even knowing whether the MATLAB Compiler Runtime Version 9.0 is supported in RHEL 8.3 or not, I took the binaries & ran them on RHEL 8.3 and observed that the performance (processing speed wise) has degraded. Earlier the binaries used to take X amount of time. Now it's taking X+Y amount of time.
Generally, the OS upgrade must improve/retain the performance instead of degrading it. So please clarify my doubts mentioned below,
Is MATLAB Compiler Runtime Version 9.0 supported in RHEL 8.3?
If supported, what could cause the performance degradation?

Related

VS Code not running windows 7 64bit

I have only one Windows 7 64 bit old PC. And I learning web development and I want to run VS Code code editor but when I install VS Code and double click launching icon then VSCode does not launching.
Confirmation my PC:
RAM : 4GB (DDR4)
HDD : 500 GB
CPU : Dual Core Processors
GPU:
OS : Windows 7 64bit
I am the first on this platform so please forgive me if I have made any mistakes.
Thank you.
Currently, you can install Visual Studio Code v1.70.3.
P.s. It works well in my computer.
https://code.visualstudio.com/updates/v1_70
this is last supported version for Windows7
I also still use Windows 7 Pro 64-bit. I discovered that the latest version of Code downloaded directly from Microsoft - 1.74.3 at the time I'm writing this - runs fine and all features (like debugging) appear to work IF you use the ZIP download. Every time I start it, it pops up the message "Visual Studio Code on Windows 7 will no longer receive any further updates." But when the next update comes along, I plan to just download the newest zip.
Note that all the projects I had opened in the installed version are still available in the zipped version. So, I won't be upgrading this system to Windows 10.
Hardware# Visual Studio Code is a small download (< 200 MB) and has a
disk footprint of < 500 MB. VS Code is lightweight and should easily
run on today's hardware.
We recommend:
1.6 GHz or faster processor 1 GB of RAM Platforms# VS Code is supported on the following platforms:
OS X El Capitan (10.11+) Windows 8.0, 8.1 and 10, 11 (32-bit and
64-bit) Linux (Debian): Ubuntu Desktop 16.04, Debian 9 Linux (Red
Hat): Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, CentOS 7, Fedora 34

Solaris11 packaging

I am just started exploring the Solaris kernel. I am studying the Solaris kernel modules. During my study I got following question, Is it possible to embed two kernel modules (e.g Solaris 11 and Solaris 11.4 kernel modules) in single package? This scenario is doable in Linux but not sure it is possible in Solaris.
It is possible to embed two modules (say /kernel/misc/foo and /kernel/drv/bar) in the same Solaris IPS package, but not two versions of the same module for different OS releases (such as /kernel/drv/bar for 11.3 and /kernel/drv/bar for 11.4). That problem is usually solved by making two versions of the package - one for the older release and one for the newer release, during the transition period (such as right now, since Solaris 11.4 just came out, so not everyone has upgraded from 11.3 yet - Solaris 11.0 through 11.2 are no longer supported, so you shouldn't need to build modules for them).

What are the system requirements for vscode?

What are the system requirements for vscode?
The download page only shows the different platforms this is available on, but doesn't mention any requirements such as Windows version (i know it doesn't work on XP) or additional required components, such as the .NET framework.
System requirements for VSCode are available on the documentation page.
In a nutshell, VSCode now is self contained for Linux, Mac and Windows. There is a complete list for the additional helpful tools available on the setup page.
It's not listed in their requirements, but you'll also need a decent video card. It may seem ridiculous, since it's mainly displaying text, but vscode's GPU hardware requirement is well beyond what other applications require. There is a switch --disable-gpu to switch it to software rendering but it's still laggy.
As of Version 1.32
1.6 GHz or faster processor with 1 GB RAM recommended
OS X Yosemite
Windows 7 (with .NET Framework 4.5.2), 8.0, 8.1 and 10 (32-bit and 64-bit)
Linux with GLIBCXX version 3.4.15 or later, GLIBC version 2.15 or later, tested with Linux (Debian): Ubuntu Desktop 14.04, Debian 7, Linux (Red Hat): Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, CentOS 7, Fedora 23

Will higher version Matlab work on windows 7 (32bit OS)

Matlab has version 7 series (7.0,7.1 upto 7.14) and now 8 series. Someone told MATLAB 7.8 (R2009a) only works with windows 7 and higher matlab version will not work with windows-7 32bit OS. Is it true ?
I am having windows-7 32bit OS. I wants to install recent version of Matlab software. Which higher version of matlab I can install ? And what about window-8 32bit OS ? Thanks in advance...
It is not true, the latest Matlab definitely runs on Windows 7 and much older Windows versions too: http://www.mathworks.com/support/sysreq/current_release/

Which version of Eclipse should I run on OSX? 32bit or 64bit?

This may be a silly question but should I use the 32 bit or 64 bit version of Eclipse on my Mac?
I'm fully up to date with Snow Leopard and all patches and I have a pretty recent iMac (30", Dual Core, 3GB)
I thought that Java on Snow Leopard was now 64 bit only so can't understand why there is a 32bit download. Is it just the Eclipse download page that is showing 32 bit for older versions of OSX?
You're probably better off with the 64-bit edition. Nearly all the system software is 64-bit in Snow Leopard, and if you only run 64-bit apps, you don't pay the cost of having to load the 32-bit runtimes (which can consume quite a lot of memory). It may also benefit from the 64-bit memory model, though I'm not sure how well the JVM takes advantage of that yet. I expect the 32-bit version is provided for Leopard (and earlier) compatability.
I would use 64bit Eclipse.
safe bit is 32-bit :)