I've been trying to figure out how to translate the following LINQ query syntax to method syntax, but I just don't get it:
from exa in _context.Exams
from stu in exa.Class.Students
where exa.Id == 1
select new StudentFullName
{
Id = stu.Id,
FullName = stu.Person.FirstName + " " + stu.Person.LastName
}
The property ICollection<Student> Students from the table Classes for the many-to-many relationship with Students is causing my confusion.
I tried this:
_context.Exams
.Where(exa => exa.Id == id)
.Select(exa => new StudentFullName
{
Id = exa.Class.Students.Select(stu => stu.Id),
FullNamee = exa.Class.Students.Select(stu => stu.Person.FirstName + " " + stu.Person.LastName)
}).ToList();
But I can't create the class StudentFullName because the query returns IEnumerable<int> instead of int for each property.
That's what I get: https://imgur.com/a/Tp5hPHE
That's what I should get: https://imgur.com/a/PyWYQh5
EDIT: Tweaked the solution from tymtam and it worked
_context.Exams
.Where(exa => exa.Id == id)
.SelectMany(exa => exa.Class.Students
.Select(stu => new StudentFullNameViewModel
{
Id = stu.Id,
FullName = stu.Person.FirstName + " " + stu.Person.LastName
})
).ToList()
It's very suspicious that:
there is no join between students and exams
exa is not used in the result object
A 1-to-1 translation is I think this:
var students2 = exams
.Where(exa => exa.Id == id)
.SelectMany(exa => exa.Class.Students
.Select(stu => new StudentFullName
{
Id = stu.Id,
FullNamee = stu.Person.FirstName + " " + stu.Person.LastName
}))
.ToList();
Related
enter image description hereI have a code. And there you need to make a grouping by name.
//<date,<partid,amount>>
Dictionary<string, Dictionary<int, double>> emSpending = new Dictionary<string, Dictionary<int, double>>();
foreach (Orders order in db.Orders.ToList())
{
foreach (OrderItems orderitem in order.OrderItems.ToList())
{
if (!emSpending.ContainsKey(order.Date.ToString("yyyy-MM"))) emSpending.Add(order.Date.ToString("yyyy-MM"), new Dictionary<int, double>());
if (!emSpending[order.Date.ToString("yyyy-MM")].ContainsKey(Convert.ToInt32(orderitem.PartID))) emSpending[order.Date.ToString("yyyy-MM")].Add(Convert.ToInt32(orderitem.PartID), 0);
emSpending[order.Date.ToString("yyyy-MM")][Convert.ToInt32(orderitem.PartID)] += Convert.ToDouble(orderitem.Amount);
}
}
DataGridViewColumn col1 = new DataGridViewColumn();
col1.CellTemplate = new DataGridViewTextBoxCell();
col1.Name = "Department";
col1.AutoSizeMode = DataGridViewAutoSizeColumnMode.Fill;
col1.HeaderText = "Department";
dgvEMSpending.Columns.Add(col1);
foreach (string date in emSpending.Keys)
{
DataGridViewColumn col = new DataGridViewColumn();
col.Name = date;
col.HeaderText = date;
col.AutoSizeMode = DataGridViewAutoSizeColumnMode.Fill;
col.CellTemplate = new DataGridViewTextBoxCell();
dgvEMSpending.Columns.Add(col);
}
List<string> allKey = emSpending.Keys.ToList();
foreach (string date in allKey)
if (date == "Department") continue;
else
{
dgvEMSpending.Rows.Add();
foreach (int partid in emSpending[date].Keys)
{
dgvEMSpending.Rows[dgvEMSpending.Rows.Count - 1].Cells[0].Value = db.Parts.Where(x => x.ID == partid).SingleOrDefault().Name.GroupBy(Name);
for (int i = 1; i < dgvEMSpending.Columns.Count; i++)
{
if (!emSpending.ContainsKey(dgvEMSpending.Columns[i].Name)) emSpending.Add(dgvEMSpending.Columns[i].Name, new Dictionary<int, double>());
if (!emSpending[dgvEMSpending.Columns[i].Name].ContainsKey(partid)) emSpending[dgvEMSpending.Columns[i].Name].Add(partid, 0);
double val = emSpending[dgvEMSpending.Columns[i].Name][partid];
dgvEMSpending.Rows[dgvEMSpending.RowCount - 1].Cells[i].Value = val;
}
}
}
I tried to use group by myself, but something doesn't work. It just outputs the same names, and I want to group them so that there is a grouping. Pls helped to me.
Ok, a few issues to help you out first. This code:
foreach (Orders order in db.Orders.ToList())
{
foreach (OrderItems orderitem in order.OrderItems.ToList())
{
if (!emSpending.ContainsKey(order.Date.ToString("yyyy-MM"))) emSpending.Add(order.Date.ToString("yyyy-MM"), new Dictionary<int, double>());
if (!emSpending[order.Date.ToString("yyyy-MM")].ContainsKey(Convert.ToInt32(orderitem.PartID))) emSpending[order.Date.ToString("yyyy-MM")].Add(Convert.ToInt32(orderitem.PartID), 0);
emSpending[order.Date.ToString("yyyy-MM")][Convert.ToInt32(orderitem.PartID)] += Convert.ToDouble(orderitem.Amount);
}
}
Right off the bat this is going to trip lazy loading on OrderItems. If you have 10 orders 1-10 you're going to be running 11 queries against the database:
SELECT * FROM Orders;
SELECT * FROM OrderItems WHERE OrderId = 1;
SELECT * FROM OrderItems WHERE OrderId = 2;
// ...
SELECT * FROM OrderItems WHERE OrderId = 10;
Now if you have 100 orders or 1000 orders, you should see the problem. At a minimum ensure that if you are touching a collection or reference on entities you are loading, eager load it with Include:
foreach (Orders order in db.Orders.Include(x => x.OrderItems).ToList())
This will run a single query that fetches the Orders and their OrderItems. However, if you have a LOT of rows this is going to take a while and consume a LOT of memory.
The next tip is "only load what you need". You need 1 field from Order and 2 fields from OrderItem. So why load everything from both tables??
var orderItemDetails = db.Orders
.SelectMany(o => o.OrderItems.Select(oi => new { o.Date, oi.PartId, oi.Amount })
.ToList();
This would give us just the Order date, and each Part ID and Amount. Now that this data is in memory we can group it to populate your desired dictionary structure without having to iterate over it row by row.
var emSpending = orderItemDetails.GroupBy(x => x.Date.ToString("yyyy-MM"))
.ToDictionary(g => g.Key,
g => g.GroupBy(y => y.PartId)
.ToDictionary(g2 => g2.Key, g2 => g2.Sum(z => z.Amount)));
Depending on the Types in your entities you may need to insert casts. This first groups the outer dictionary of the yyyy-MM of the order dates, then it groups the remaining data for each date by part ID, and sums the Amount.
Now relating to your question, from your code example I'm guessing the problem area you are facing is this line:
dgvEMSpending.Rows[dgvEMSpending.Rows.Count - 1].Cells[0].Value = db.Parts
.Where(x => x.ID == partid)
.SingleOrDefault().Name.GroupBy(Name);
Now the question would be to explain what exactly you are expecting from this? You are fetching a single Part by ID. How would you expect this to be "grouped"?
If you want to display the Part name instead of the PartId then I believe you would just want to Select the Part Name:
dgvEMSpending.Rows[dgvEMSpending.Rows.Count - 1].Cells[0].Value = db.Parts
.Where(x => x.ID == partid)
.Select(x => x.Name)
.SingleOrDefault();
We can go one better to fetch the Part names for each used product in one hit using our loaded order details:
var partIds = orderItemDetails
.Select(x=> x.PartId)
.Distinct()
.ToList();
var partDetails = db.Parts
.Where(x => partIds.Contains(x.ID))
.ToDictionary(x => x.ID, x => x.Name);
This fetches us a dictionary set indexed by ID for the part names, it would be done outside of the loop after we had loaded the orderItemDetails. Now we don't have to go to the DB with every row:
dgvEMSpending.Rows[dgvEMSpending.Rows.Count - 1].Cells[0].Value = partDetails[partId];
I have entities like Product(Id, Name) and Keyword(Id, Description), and there is a many-to-many relationship between them.
The essence of my task is the following, I need to do a full-text search on Name and Description columns, using EF CORE 6
I already have some SQL code that works fine.
SELECT a."Id", a."Name" as name, k.txt
FROM "Products" AS a
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT x."ProductsId" as Id, string_agg(y."Description", ' ') as txt
FROM "ProductKeywords" x
JOIN "Keywords" y ON y."Id" = x."KeywordId"
GROUP BY 1
) k ON a."Id" = k.Id
WHERE to_tsvector(concat_ws(' ', a."Name", k.txt))
## to_tsquery('Some text');
And I need to write some LINQ code that will do something similar, but I have a problem with string_agg, and I don't understand how to implement it in LINQ and EF CORE will reflect it correctly
I tried to do the following
var products = _context.Products
.Select(e => new
{
Id = e.Id,
Name = e.Name,
Keywords = string.Join(" ", e.Keywords.Select(q => q.Description))
}).Where(e => EF.Functions.ToTsVector(e.Keywords).Matches("Some text")).ToList();
But I get an error, and it's most likely because of string.Join
could not be translated. Either rewrite the query in a form that can be translated, or switch to client evaluation explicitly by inserting a call to 'AsEnumerable', 'AsAsyncEnumerable', 'ToList', or 'ToListAsync'
Got the result, using linq2db
var query = _context.Products.ToLinqToDB()
.LeftJoin(_context.ProductsKeywords.ToLinqToDB().GroupBy(r => r.ProductId).Select(e => new {
Key = e.Key,
Txt = e.StringAggregate(",", t => t.Keyword.Description).ToValue()
}),
(product, productKeyword) => product.Id == productKeyword.Key,
(i, j) => new {
Id = i.Id,
Txt = j.Txt
}).Select(e => new {
Id = e.Id,
Txt = EF.Functions.ToTsVector(e.Txt)
}).Where(w => w.Txt.Matches("Some text"));
In this little ASP.Net Core application, I am attempting to group students by their enrollment date and return the students' names in a comma separated string, as opposed to another kind of aggregation.
When using SQL, I've used the stuff function in the past, and I haven't been able to perform the equivalent operation as a subquery in LINQ.
Core won't allow me to perform client-side GroupBys, which I tried at first.
Client side GroupBy is not supported.
I've tried the following code and received an InvalidOperationException:
IQueryable<EnrollmentDateGroup> data =
_context.Students
.GroupBy(s => s.EnrollmentDate)
.Select(s => new EnrollmentDateGroup()
{
EnrollmentDate = s.Key,
StudentCount = s.Count(),
//BELOW IS NOT WORKING
StudentNamesCSV = string.Join(",", s.Select(x => x.FirstMidName + " " + x.LastName))
});
Another attempt and error message, moving away from using the already grouped data:
SqlException: Column 'Student.EnrollmentDate' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause.
//ALSO NOT WORKING
...
StudentNamesCSV = string.Join(",", _context.Students
.Where(x => x.EnrollmentDate == s.Key)
.Select(x => x.FirstMidName + " " + x.LastName))
...
Any ideas are welcome! Thank you.
Try to use below linq code:
var result = ((from uu in _context.Students.AsEnumerable()
select new
{
EnrollmentDate = uu.EnrollmentDate,
FullName = uu.FirstMidName + " " + uu.LastName
}).GroupBy(cc => cc.EnrollmentDate).
Select(s => new EnrollmentDateGroup()
{
EnrollmentDate = s.Key,
StudentCount = s.Count(),
StudentNamesCSV = string.Join(",", s.Select(ee => ee.FullName).ToList())
})
).ToList();
You can try this way
var data = _context.Students
.GroupBy(s => s.EnrollmentDate)
.Select(s => new
{
Key = s.Key,
listOfStudents = s.ToList()
}).ToList();
var result = data.Select(s => new EnrollmentDateGroup
{
EnrollmentDate = s.Key,
StudentCount = s.listOfStudents.Count,
//BELOW IS NOT WORKING
StudentNamesCSV = string.Join(",", s.listOfStudents.Select(x => x.FirstMidName + " " + x.LastName))
});
I have this SQL that I would like to execute in Entity Framework Core 2.1:
Select ItemTypeId, Count(ItemTypeId) as Count from Items i
where i.ParentId = 2
group by ItemTypeId
How do I do that?
This is what I came up with, but it returns zero:
var query = this._context.Items.Where(a => a.ParentId == 2)
.GroupBy(i => new { i.ItemTypeId })
.Select(g => new { g.Key.ItemTypeId, Count = g.Count(i=> i.ItemTypeId == g.Key.ItemTypeId) });
var items = query.ToList();
The only example I could find was here
You don't need Count = g.Count(i=> i.ItemTypeId == g.Key.ItemTypeId), instead use g.Count().
I have the following query in LINQ to SQL to fetch all records from a Table that are not already in a jointable.
// <param name="id">The ID of the Person</param>
IEnumberable<object> GetUnassignedClients(int id)
{
_db.Clients
.Select(i => new
{
Client_id = i.Id,
Person_id = id,
Cid = id + "." + i.Id // Please don't ask why I do this. I just have to do it
// ... some more fields
})
.Where(o =>
!_db.Clients_Persons
.Where(t => t.Person_id == id)
.Select(t => t.Client_id)
.Contains(o.Client_id))
.Distinct().ToList();
}
Now I have started a migration to EF4 but the "Cid" part of the anonymous type with the combination ToList() (ToList() triggered the exception is a simplified testcase without the WHERE condition) fails with the exception:
Unable to create a constant value of
type 'System.Object'. Only primitive
types ('such as Int32, String, and
Guid') are supported in this context.
Why is that so or am I missing something here?
EF does not know how to translate the expression id + "." + i.Id into valid SQL which is why it fails. You have to tell EF that it needs to convert id from an integer to a string. You can do this using the SqlFunctions class in the following way:
var ret = _db.Clients
.Select(i => new
{
Client_id = i.Id,
Person_id = id,
Cid = SqlFunctions.StringConvert((double) id) + "." + SqlFunctions.StringConvert((double) i.Id) // Please don't ask why I do this. I just have to do it
// ... some more fields
})
.Where(o =>
!_db.Clients_Persons
.Where(t => t.Person_id == id)
.Select(t => t.Client_id)
.Contains(id)
)
.Distinct()
.ToList()
;