I am currently going through the documentation regarding filtering:
https://www.ag-grid.com/angular-data-grid/tree-data/
In the "Example: Organisational Hierarchy" demo section example code, I added:
filter: 'agTextColumnFilter'
to each column.
However, when trying to filter for:
Job Title rows with "Exec" AND Organistion Hierarchy rows with "Erica" the resulting data shown is empty.
Is there a way to make the filtering independent such that Org Hierarchy rows with "Erica" are shown with any "Job Title" rows with "Exec" shown?
My goal is that parent rows i.e. Organisation Hierarchy are not affected by the filtering of other columns.
Demo Plnkr:
https://plnkr.co/edit/vEAePeMCk2YsjrmQ?preview
Demo Video Example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-omH9SxTTQ
Related
I have 2 tables in my visualization. One is a list of tasks to be done, and one is a list of repairs that have been done at each location. I want to be able to filter the repairs table by the locations of the highlighted tasks. Ergo if you marked a task that takes place at location 1, the second table would filter to only show repairs for location 1. Is that something that's doable?
Thanks in advance
This is pretty easy to do. You need to create a relation on the Location column between your two tables (Data table properties, Relations tab). Then create a details visualization (right click on "parent" table and select details visualization). Because you have created the relation already, it will ask you which table you want to be the "child". After selecting which table, you will be able to click on the parent, and it will filter in the child table. Also note, using the right click menu is engaging the data limiting with marking, which you will be able to see in the properties dialog, data menu. You don't have to use the right click menu to setup details visualizations. It's just easy.
I've written a lot about how to use relations and column matches. See links below. Relations integrate filtering, which is what you want. Column matches integrate marking.
https://www.bigmountainanalytics.com/apply-relations-and-column-matches-in-spotfire/
https://www.bigmountainanalytics.com/how-to-use-relations-in-spotfire/
https://www.bigmountainanalytics.com/how-to-use-column-matches-in-spotfire/
I'm using the basic work item process in Azure DevOps.
If I look at my backlog without any filters, then it shows me a hierarchy, with epics as the top-level items, then issues and then work items.
If I filter this to only show items that are to do or doing, it shows them as a flat list, not a hierarchy.
Is there any way to see the items as a hierarchy, but filter out done items?
Update following Shayki Abramczyk's comment
The options button doesn't include an option to show parents...
Go to the Work Item Query tab and create a work item query. Configure it to Tree view and let it follow the parent/child relation.
You can filter on the top level (top part of the query editor) and the lower levels (bottom part of the query editor). Use the State in filter to select multiple states. You can't multi-select them in the UI, so typing is required:
PS: The , is the list separator in most languages, but sometimes you need to use ;.
If you want to see parents when ANY child leaf is still open, set the Filter: Match top-level items first to Filter: Match child-level items first.
To specify the order, add the Backlog Priority field to the query and use the table header to sort by it:
Or use the Sorting option in the "Choose Columns" fly-out:
Note: The exact field name differs per Process template. Backlog Priority is for the Scrum Template, Stackrank for CMMI and Agile and Basic:
An easy way to get started is to take the board view closest to what you want and save it as a work item query.
I'm adding Row-level security to a Power BI model and it's working on all the normal tables, but there's a DAX table created from a SUMMARIZE that's ignoring the security. I've created a small model that reproduces the issue - am I doing something wrong here, or is this behavior intentional?
Here's my data model - "Raw Table" is just a manual table with some numbers in it and a filter column:
"DAX Table" is created with a SUMMARIZE statement that just makes it a copy of the manual table (since every row is unique anyways):
DAX Table = SUMMARIZE('Raw Table', 'Raw Table'[Number], 'Raw Table'[Filter])
Here's what the content of the tables look like when nothing is filtered:
I've added row-level security that filters the Filter table to just the "Show" records:
And through the join, this appears to filter the Raw table normally - when it's enabled, I can only see the rows with "Show" in them (as expected). However, the DAX table continues to show everything, even the filtered rows that I'm not supposed to see:
What am I doing wrong here? Since I'm not allowed (via RLS) to see the rows labelled "Hide" in the raw table, shouldn't those also be excluded from the SUMMARIZE statement? I realize that adding a slicer on the Filter table and slicing the Raw table doesn't impact the SUMMARIZE statement (I still see all the rows in that case) - am I just seeing the same thing here? Since I'm prevented from seeing these rows based on a security setting, I'd expect them to be hidden from my DAX as well.
Assuming I'm doing this correctly and this is intentional, how can I create a DAX table that does respect my security filters (as I need to do this in my full model)?
Here's a link to the testing PBIX file as well.
Calculated Tables (and columns) get calculated when the model is loaded, and materialized. Not at runtime.
You will need to connect that table to your model so security propagates there aswell.
continuing a project I have posted a few questions for already are you able to have a more precise definition of what a dropdown is populated with?
I am using FM Starting Point and have a Projects, Estimate and Task table. A project can hold multiple estimates and tasks. Estimates contain multiple lines (stored in a separate table).
When In a Project you can add a task for that project. What I want to do is replace the field that gives the task a name with a list of lines contained within the estimates related to the project i have selected to add the task from.
I have created a dropdown and using the inspector got it to display all estimate lines but somehow I need to write a function that will only select lines from estimates that are within the project and also only estimates that have a field set to "active" for example.
what I am struggling with is where I can programme such a thing? In the inspector, you are limited to displaying a value and cant programme in a statement. I have tried a script that executes OnObjectEnter or OnObjectModify but that doesn't appear to work.
Any ideas where I can enter a more complex set of rules as to what populates a dropdown?
Create a relationship with the criteria you need. Base the value list for the dropdown on this relationship.
As for display, The value list's second field can be from a calculated field with any data or several other fields stringed together if no single field is sufficient. The first field should be the ID.
I have a two dimensions with the following data set
Original Dimension
I would like to create two filters that can be used to filter my dashboard. These two filter would be called - "Product_Type" and "Product" and should have the following drop downs:
Filter Breakdown
To summarize, I am looking for a way to take my original dimension and create the filter breakdowns so that in my dashboard I can have two filter (Product_type and Product). When i click on the Product_type filter, i should be able to see "overall", "fruits", "vegetable" and "leafy. Based on my selection , the Product filter should automatically show only the relevant values - i.e. if i picked "leafy" it should only show "spinach" and "kale". Finally if i select "kale" my entire dashboard should change accordingly.
Looking for a way to do this without drastically affecting the performance.
update: i was able to achieve this by creating multiple parameters and then using the pop window technique (https://vimeo.com/107352893) - but this has affected my workbook performance very badly. Need another solution!!
You should be able to accomplish your desired functionality by creating a calculated field for product type and a CASE statement to classify the products based on the product type you specified your image.
Further, filters can be configured to display available values based on the other filters in place. I would recommend having your Product Type filter a the "context" or "data-source" level, and your product filter at the lowest level, so that the selectable options for the product filter can be displayed using the "only relevant Values" option and limits the products that can be chosen.
Please see the following link for some more information on filtering hierarchies
Performance Related
General Filtering
Blog Post
"Only relevant values - Specifies which values to show in the filter. When you select this option other filters are considered and only values that pass these filters are shown. For example, a filter on State will only show the Eastern states when a filter on Region is set. You can use the toggle at the top of the filter card to switch between this option and the All Values in Database option.
All values in database - Specifies which values to show in the filter. When you select this option all values in the database are shown regardless of the other filters on the view.
All values in context (Tableau Desktop only) - When one of the filters in the view is a context filter, select this option on a different filter to only display values that pass through the context filter. For more information, see Improve View Performance with Context Filters."