Docker deploy minidlna groupmod: /etc/group: Permission denied - docker-compose

I am quite a newbie using a raspberry pi (raspbian) with docker and portainer.
I have deployed a previous version of vladgh/minidlna and it worked well for months.
Yesterday, I created a new user in order to deactivate the default pi user.
I copied the /home/pi/ content to the new user /home and granted him with permissions, then assigned the new user with the same groups as well.
Finally, I deactivated the pi user.
Today, I wanted to update the vladgh/minidlna container with the last version, so I deployed vladgh/minidlna:latest.
The container is UP but the error is:
=== Set user and group identifier
groupmod: /etc/group.9: Permission denied groupmod: cannot lock
/etc/group; try again later.
What am I missing?

Related

No permission to webspace after changing webspace key

I am new to Sulu and trying to learn using it for a new project. After playling around a bit I wanted to change the platform key.
After that, the admin interface didn't show the Webspaces tab anymore.
I executed the commands
bin/console ca:cl
bin/adminconsole ca:cl
bin/adminconsole sulu:build dev
bin/adminconsole sulu:webspaces:init
bin/adminconsole sulu:content:validate:webspaces
But nothing helped. After some debugging I found out that the new webspace was initialized, but my admin user did not get the new permissions.
Looking in the database I found some entries still related to the old webspace key in the se_permissions table:
id
context
module
permissions
idRoles
8
sulu.webspaces..default-snippets
127
1
9
sulu.webspaces.
127
1
10
sulu.webspaces..analytics
127
1
11
sulu.webspaces..custom-urls
127
1
Is there a way to automatically update the permissions? Is it a bug in Sulu?
This is not a bug. Renaming a "webspace key" will lose all your connected data to it. Including that your role have permissionf for it.
Mostly a webspace key rename happens only on development.
If you have no data to loose you can go with (attention remove all existing data in your configured database):
bin/console sulu:build dev --destroy
Else a new or renamed webspace need to be added to your user role that you can see it. Go to Settings -> User Roles and give your role permissions for your new webspace / renamed webspace.
If you change a webspace key of a production website you would normally need to create database migrations. So you are not losing any pages, permissions, ... or other things connected to the webspace key.

Node-red in IBM Bluemix crashes while starting after sleeping (lite account)

After sleeping (in lite account type) node-red, created by node-red starter kit, crashes while starting. It is possible to login in editor for a few seconds and then it crashes with error code "an instance of the app crashed: APP/PROC/WEB: Exite with status 1 (out of memory)". Dashboard (node-red-dashboard) was installed before sleeping and worked correctly.
I tried to restart Node-RED, Stop and Start.
I solved this problem. The problem may be due to the memory overflow in the container Garden. Taking into account that the content is stored in the cache, the application cannot start after the restart process, it issues an Exit status 1 (out of memory) error.
The cache is updated only by pushing the application into the cloud.
An option that was checked for application recovery:
View the name of the database for NodeRED (which stores all information about the Node-RED) in Cloudant, for example, "nodered."
Install to PC Cloud Foundry Command Line Interface - CLI https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/cf-cli/install-go-cli.html
Download from github and unarchive the application's code bluemix-starter https://github.com/knolleary/node-red-bluemix-starter (clone or download -> download zip)
In the downloaded folder add a record to a manifest file (manifest.yml) in the env section, in which set the database name (for example, nodered) in Cloudant to environment variable NODE_RED_STORAGE_DB_NAME. Four spaces must be made before NODE_RED_STORAGE_DB_NAME. It is better to make changes using the Notepad ++ editor.
---
applications:
- memory: 256M
env:
OPTIMIZE_MEMORY: true
NODE_RED_STORAGE_DB_NAME: nodered
command: node index.js --settings ./bluemix-settings.js –v
Save the file after changing.
Run the command line (cmd) and then:
a. go to a folder with a downloaded project, such as Windows
cd c:/node-red-bluemix-starter
b. specify the api endpoint where the application is located, in our case:
cf api https://api.eu-gb.bluemix.net
c. send a registration command in the cloud
cf login
d. specify the mail and password (password is entered without explicit character display)
e. pushing the project by specifying the name of your instance Node-RED, for example NameApp
cf push NameApp

Issue connecting composer to Blockchain on Bluemix - identity or token does not match

I have fabric composer 0.72 installed on my mac, and I was able to follow this thread to get it connected to my Blockchain (v.61 of Fabric) on Bluemix.
fabric-composer-integration-with-bluemix-blockchain-service
Now I am trying to build an ubuntu (16.04) docker container and run composer-rest-server there. When I try to connect to my blockchain service from my docker container (using the same id, WebAppAdmin, that I used on my mac) I get an error:
Discovering types from business network definition ...
Connection fails: Error: Identity or token does not match.
It will be retried for the next request.
{ Error: Identity or token does not match.
at /home/composer/.nvm/versions/node/v6.10.3/lib/node_modules /composer-rest-server/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:417:17 code: 2, metadata: Metadata { _internal_repr: {} } }
I tried copying the cert from my mac to my docker container:
/home/composer/.composer-credentials/member.WebAppAdmin
but when I did that I got a different error that says "signature does not verify". I did some additional testing, and I discovered that if I used an id that I had not previously used with composer (i.e. user_type1_0) then I could connect, and I could see a new cert in my .composer-credentials directory.
I tried deleting that container and building a new one (I dorked something else up) I could not use that same userid again.
Does anybody know how security and these certs are supposed to work? It would seem as though something to do with certificate generation/validation is tied to the client (i.e. hardware address), such that if I try to re-use an id on a different machine, the certs or keys or something don't match. I have a way to make things work, but it doesn't seem like it's the right way if I can't use the same id from different machines.
Thanks!
Hi i tried to recreate this by having blockchain running on a unix machine and then i copied my connection profile and certificate to my mac and then edited my connection profile to update the ip address and key store. I then did a composer network ping and it worked fine.
I am using composer v0.7.4 so you could try that?
I have also faced this issue, and concluded that
There is inconsistent behavior while deploying network using composer on Cloud environment includeing Bluemix. Problem is not with composer, but with fabric 0.6.
I am assuming that this issue is also indirectly related to following known bugs into fabric 0.6, which will not be fixed in fabric 0.6.
ERROR:
"
throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
^
Error
at ClientDuplexStream._emitStatusIfDone (/home/ubuntu/.nvm/versions/node/v6.9.5/lib/node_modules/composer-cli/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:189:19)
at ClientDuplexStream._readsDone (/home/ubuntu/.nvm/versions/node/v6.9.5/lib/node_modules/composer-cli/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:158:8)
at readCallback (/home/ubuntu/.nvm/versions/node/v6.9.5/lib/node_modules/composer-cli/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:217:12)
"
So far, We have understood that following three JIRA are root cause , where essentially the cloud networking layer ends up killing the idle event hub connection after a period of inactivity and the fabric SDK cannot handle this.
https://jira.hyperledger.org/browse/FAB-4002 FAB-3310
https://jira.hyperledger.org/browse/FAB-3310
or FAB-2787
Conclusion:
There is no alternative way of fixing this issue with Bluemix or any cloud environment with fabric 0.6
You may not experience this issue with Fabric 1.0, but there is still possibilities as all above mentioned defects are not fixed yet.

"Project is not fully initialized with the default service accounts." Error in brand new account on first project?

i just signed up for Google Could Engine and started the most basic container engine quickstart on a brand new project:
https://cloud.google.com/container-engine/docs/quickstart
a few steps in it has me run this command
gcloud container clusters create example-cluster
which errors out:
$ gcloud container clusters create example-cluster
ERROR: (gcloud.container.clusters.create) ResponseError: code=503, message=Project hello-world-161713 is not fully initialized with the default service accounts. Please try again later.
so far, "trying again later" has not helped: it's been doing this every time for the past few hours.
as usual, Google has no obvious way of getting help in any timely manner, and Googling the error turns up nothing useful.
kind of a long shot but i found a link sending me over here on one of their pages (great support guys) so figured i'd give it a shot. thanks in advance.
The Container Engine API needs to be enabled, and unfortunately that error message is not correct (trying again later won't help).
If you visit the Google Container Engine page in the wb console https://console.cloud.google.com/kubernetes/list it should enable Google Container Engine. Make sure you select the project you're using with the quickstart. You can create your cluster from that page too if you'd prefer.
You can also enable the Container Engine API manually here: https://console.cloud.google.com/apis/api/container.googleapis.com/overview

Google cloud datalab deployment unsuccessful - sort of

This is a different scenario from other question on this topic. My deployment almost succeeded and I can see the following lines at the end of my log
[datalab].../#015Updating module [datalab]...done.
Jul 25 16:22:36 datalab-deploy-main-20160725-16-19-55 startupscript: Deployed module [datalab] to [https://main-dot-datalab-dot-.appspot.com]
Jul 25 16:22:36 datalab-deploy-main-20160725-16-19-55 startupscript: Step deploy datalab module succeeded.
Jul 25 16:22:36 datalab-deploy-main-20160725-16-19-55 startupscript: Deleting VM instance...
The landing page keeps showing a wait bar indicating the deployment is still in progress. I have tried deploying several times in last couple of days.
About additions described on the landing page -
An App Engine "datalab" module is added. - when I click on the pop-out url "https://datalab-dot-.appspot.com/" it throws an error page with "404 page not found"
A "datalab" Compute Engine network is added. - Under "Compute Engine > Operations" I can see a create instance for datalab deployment with my id and a delete instance operation with *******-ompute#developer.gserviceaccount.com id. not sure what it means.
Datalab branch is added to the git repo- Yes and with all the components.
I think the deployment is partially successful. When I visit the landing page again, the only option I see is to deploy the datalab again and not to start it. Can someone spot the problem ? Appreciate the help.
I read the other posts on this topic and tried to verify my deployment using - "https://console.developers.google.com/apis/api/source/overview?project=" I get the following message-
The API doesn't exist or you don't have permission to access it
You can try looking at the App Engine dashboard here, to verify that there is a "datalab" service deployed.
If that is missing, then you need to redeploy again (or switch to the new locally-run version).
If that is present, then you should also be able to see a "datalab" network here, and a VM instance named something like "gae-datalab-main-..." here. If either of those are missing, then try going back to the App Engine console, deleting the "datalab" service, and redeploying.