I have a TypeScript component which extends LitElement. I want to fetch some data from db from time to time and render the data on this component. I assume the component logic to be responsible for collecting that data since there are going to be a few similar ones. So I am trying to call the component's server method, marked by #ClientCallable annotation and return the JsonValue data. For this I am using the $server handle which is meaned to be a field a component, according to the docs https://vaadin.com/docs/latest/create-ui/element-api/client-server-rpc . But there is no $server defined. How do I make it work?
Here is my repro https://github.com/asdnf/vaadin-sample.git
Related
I am desperately waiting for someone attention to get my question answered.... please help..
ModelAdmin model has to export to Excel action method.
I need to access related model fields in action method. That means I can not pass any arguments therefore I tried relatedmodel_set but ModelAdmin action method shows memory location and fails when I try to access values through attributes:
<django.db.models.fields.related_descriptors.create_reverse_many_to_one_manager..RelatedManager object at 0x7f8eea904ac0>
model.py
class EnrolStudent(models.Model):
def get_trn_activity(self):
return self.studenttraininactivities_set
class StudentTraininActivities(models.Model):
trainin_activities = models.ForeignKey(EnrolStudent,
on_delete=CASCADE, null=True )
<other fields...>
admin.py
#admin.register(EnrolStudent)
class EnrolAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
form = CityInlineForm
inlines = [CohortTraininActivitiesInline]
...
actions = [export_as_txt_action_0120("File NAT00120 data Export"
, fields=['information_no', 'get_trn_activity',
'student_enrol__student_code'])]
I need to access related model fields to export to excel.
I can not pass parameter to get_trn_activity as you have noticed.
Therefore selected rows only data from Django admin change_list page will only need bit of work using its queryset in actions method used in separate actions.py file that I can do!
Please help me with this issue. I am new to Python / Django.
I also tried property decorator in related model then access in a method in main model then call it inside action but same problem with memory address not the direct value and then how to get data of memory location here .... I don't know.
If I can access the related fields then I can do it no issue.
Another question:
I had same situation with model/related model before, but they were connected through OneToOneField relationship and I was able to use dundor to access related model fields but in this case of ForiegnKey relationship I can not see related model in queryset.
In other case this is what I can do easily; here cohortdetails is related model and when I debug I saw it was listed in queryset that was great.
actions = [export_as_txt_action_0080("File NAT00080 txt Export",
fields=['rto_student_code', 'first_name', 'family_name'
,'cohortdetails__highest_school__highestschool_levelcode',
'cohortdetails__cohort_gender'
, 'cohortdetails__student_dob' ])]
I am getting an error when I try to extract a user from a form with validation errors.
I have the following route configured in my routes file:
GET /users/:user controllers.UsersController.viewUser(user: models.User)
GET /users/:user/edit controllers.UsersController.editUser(user: models.User)
This is fine at this point, and I can render a link to the user view from my scala templates:
routes.UsersController.viewUser(myUserObject)
My problem is that in my user edition form I need to get myUserObject from a Form[User] object. What I am currently doing is:
routes.UsersController.viewUser(userForm.get)
However, when the userForm has any errors, the get method raises an exception, as shown in the documentation.
The approach I have taken is passing an additional User parameter to the scala view, together with the Form[User] parameter I was passing up to now, I mean,
userEdit.render(user, userForm)
instead of just
userEdit.render(userForm)
However, I would like to know if there is a more suitable solution that does not involve including an additional parameter.
The documentation states that you can prefill a form with existing data:
val filledForm = userForm.fill(User("Bob", 18))
Given the preexisting User, it should be trivial to adapt to your example.
In my project, there are additional (non-wicket) applications, which need to know the URL representation of some domain objects (e.g. in order to write a link like http://mydomain.com/user/someUserName/ into a notification email).
Now I'd like to create a spring bean in my wicket module, exposing the URLs I need without having a running wicket context, in order to make the other application depend on the wicket module, e.g. offering a method public String getUrlForUser(User u) returning "/user/someUserName/".
I've been stalking around the web and through the wicket source for a complete workday now, and did not find a way to retrieve the URL for a given PageClass and PageParameters without a current RequestCycle.
Any ideas how I could achieve this? Actually, all the information I need is somehow stored by my WebApplication, in which I define mount points and page classes.
Update: Because the code below caused problems under certain circumstances (in our case, being executed subsequently by a quarz scheduled job), I dived a bit deeper and finally found a more light-weight solution.
Pros:
No need to construct and run an instance of the WebApplication
No need to mock a ServletContext
Works completely independent of web application container
Contra (or not, depends on how you look at it):
Need to extract the actual mounting from your WebApplication class and encapsulate it in another class, which can then be used by standalone processes. You can no longer use WebApplication's convenient mountPage() method then, but you can easily build your own convenience implementation, just have a look at the wicket sources.
(Personally, I have never been happy with all the mount configuration making up 95% of my WebApplication class, so it felt good to finally extract it somewhere else.)
I cannot post the actual code, but having a look at this piece of code will give you an idea how you should mount your pages and how to get hold of the URL afterwards:
CompoundRequestMapper rm = new CompoundRequestMapper();
// mounting the pages
rm.add(new MountedMapper("mypage",MyPage.class));
// ... mount other pages ...
// create URL from page class and parameters
Class<? extends IRequestablePage> pageClass = MyPage.class;
PageParameters pp = new PageParameters();
pp.add("param1","value1");
IRequestHandler handler = new BookmarkablePageRequestHandler(new PageProvider(MyPage.class, pp));
Url url = rm.mapHandler(handler);
Original solution below:
After deep-diving into the intestines of the wicket sources, I was able to glue together this piece of code
IRequestMapper rm = MyWebApplication.get().getRootRequestMapper();
IRequestHandler handler = new BookmarkablePageRequestHandler(new PageProvider(pageClass, parameters));
Url url = rm.mapHandler(handler);
It works without a current RequestCycle, but still needs to have MyWebApplication running.
However, from Wicket's internal test classes, I have put the following together to construct a dummy instance of MyWebApplication:
MyWebApplication dummy = new MyWebApplication();
dummy.setName("test-app");
dummy.setServletContext(new MockServletContext(dummy, ""));
ThreadContext.setApplication(dummy);
dummy.initApplication();
I'm trying to populate a GXT Grid using data retrieved from an online API (for instance, going to www.example.com/documents returns a JSON array of documents). In addition, I need to paginate the result.
I've read all the various blogs and tutorials, but most of them populate the pagination proxy using something like TestData.GetDocuments(). However, I want to get that info using HTTP GET.
I've managed to populate a grid, but without pagination, using a RequestBuilder + proxy + reader + loader. But it seems as though the actual loading of the data is "put off" until some hidden stage deep inside the GXT code. Pagination requires that data from the start, so I'm not sure what to do.
Can someone provide a simple code example which does what I need?
Thank you.
I managed to get this going, here is what I did:
First I defined the proxy and loader for my data along with the paging toolbat:
private PagingModelMemoryProxy proxy;
private PagingLoader<PagingLoadResult<ModelData>> loader;
private PagingToolBar toolBar;
Next is the creation of each one, initializing with an empty ArrayList.
proxy = new PagingModelMemoryProxy(new ArrayList<EquipmentModel>());
loader = new BasePagingLoader<PagingLoadResult<ModelData>>(proxy);
loader.setRemoteSort(true);
toolBar = new PagingToolBar(100);
toolBar.bind(loader);
loader.load(0, 100);
Last, I have a set method in my view that gets called when the AJAX call is complete, but you could trigger it anywhere. Here is my entire set method, Equipment and EquipmentModel are my database and view models respectively.
public void setEquipmentData(List<Equipment> data)
{
Collections.sort(data);
// build a list of models to be loaded
List<EquipmentModel> models = new ArrayList<EquipmentModel>();
for (Equipment equipment : data)
{
EquipmentModel model = new EquipmentModel(equipment);
models.add(model);
}
// load the list of models into the proxy and reconfigure the grid to
// refresh display.
proxy.setData(models);
ListStore<EquipmentModel> equipmentStore = new ListStore<EquipmentModel>(loader);
equipmentGrid.reconfigure(equipmentStore, equipmentColumnModel);
loader.load(0, 100);
}
The key here for me was re-creating the store with the same loader, the column model was pre-created and gets reused.
I've been looking on forums for 2 days now and can't find a good answer so I'll just post it.
I appear to be having a problem posting JSON back to the controller to save. The JSON should map to model view but it keeps getting default(constructor)values rather then the values from the POST.
We have a series of JS widgets that contain a data field with json in them. We do all our data manipulation in these widget objects on the client side. When a user wants to save we grab the data we need from the widgets involved and we put it into another JSON object that matches a ViewModel and POST that back to the server.
For example:
$("#Save").click(function () {
if (itemDetails.preparedForSubmit() && itemConnections.preparedForSubmit()) {
itemComposite.data.Details = itemDetails.data;
itemComposite.data.Connections= itemConnections.data;
$.post(MYURL, itemComposite.data);
} else {
alert("failed to save");
}
});
The preparedForSubmit() method simple does stuff like any validation checks or last minute formatting you might need to do client side.
The itemDetails widgets data matches a ViewModel.
The itemConnections widgets data matches a collection of ViewModels.
The Controller looks like this:
[HttpPost]
virtual public JsonResult SaveItemDetailsComposite(ItemComposite inItemData)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
try
{
_Mapper.Save(itemComposite.Details , itemComposite.Connections);
return Json(true);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
_log.Error("Exception " + ex.InnerException.Message);
throw;
}
}
return Json(SiteMasterUtilities.CreateValidationErrorResponse(ModelState));
}
The ItemComposite Class is a simple View Model that contains a single itemDetails object and a collection of itemConnections. When it returns data to here it is just getting the default data as if it got a new ItemComposite rather than converting the POST data.
in Firebug I see the data is posted. Although it looks weird not automatically formatted in firebug.
Are you saying that itemComposite.data is formatted as a JSON object? If so, I'm pretty sure you're going to have to de-serialize it before you can cast it to your object. Something like:
ItemComposite ic = jsSerializer.Deserialize<ItemComposite>(this.HttpContext.Request.Params[0]);
You may want to look into a framework like JSON.NET to ensure that your data is being serialized properly when it gets supplied to your Action.
JSON.NET seems like it's one of the main stream frameworks: http://json.codeplex.com/releases/view/43775
Hope this helps.
Cory
You could also use the JSON Serializer in WCF: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.runtime.serialization.json.datacontractjsonserializer.aspx
SO wouldn't let me put both links in one answer, sorry for the split answer.
Thanks everyone. I think I have solved my problem and I'm pretty sure that I had four issues. For the most part I followed thatSteveguys's suggestion and read more on this article: http://haacked.com/archive/2010/04/15/sending-json-to-an-asp-net-mvc-action-method-argument.aspx
Using jQuery's post() method and specifying json as the type didn't seem to actually send it as json. By using the ajax() method and specifying json it sent it as json.
The JSON.serialize() method was also need to cleanly send over the json.
Also my ViewModel design was a big problem. We are using the MS code analytic build junk and it didn't want me having a setter for my collections in the ViewModel. So me being from a java/hibernate world, thought it didn't need them to bind and it would just come in as a serialized object magically. Once I just suppressed the error and reset up my setters. I am getting the collections now in my controller.
I believe using the MVC2 Future's Value Providers are doing something but it still doesn't convert json dates robustly, So I am still investigating the best way to do that.
I hope my issues help out others.
UPDATE: using this method to update collections of data appears to be super slow. A collection with 200 entries in it and 8 fields per entry takes 3 minutes to get to the controller. Just 1 or 2 entries take very little time. The only thing I know of that is happening between here is data binding to the model view. I don't know if MVC2 provides a easy way to send this much data and bind it.