I have a GitHub organisation set up and within that are two private repositories: Library and App. I have managed to configure a GitHub Action for the Library repository to create a NuGet package and push it to nuget.pkg.github.com. I added the Library package as a dependency to the App project and can fetch these locally using a configured Personal Access Token. I am now working on the GitHub Action to build and run unit tests on the App project.
I have added a step to the workflow to add the NuGet package source
- name: Set package source
run: dotnet nuget add source --username USERNAME --password ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} --store-password-in-clear-text --name github "https://nuget.pkg.github.com/REDACTED/index.json"
This is exactly the same line as is used when pushing the package, but when I reach the dotnet restore step later I get the following error:
/home/runner/work/App/App/App.Services/App.Services.csproj : error NU1101:
Unable to find package Library. No packages exist with this id in source(s): github, nuget.org [/home/runner/work/App/App/App.sln]
I understand that it is likely possible to work around this by adding a new Personal Access Token to the secrets of the App repository, but would prefer to rely on GITHUB_TOKEN if possible for both the security and management benefits.
According to GitHub, installing packages hosted with GitHub Packages requires minimal configuration using GITHUB_TOKEN. And by default, GITHUB_TOKEN has both read and write permissions for packages.
This question is different from this one as that relates to an issue with empty NuGet.config files which has since been resolved.
I hit the same problem, GITHUB_TOKEN can be used to push packages but not pull packages from other repos within the same organisation. This thread has a lot of people complaining about it: https://github.com/actions/setup-node/issues/49. I was unable to get any of the workarounds there working for me, and had no option in GitHub to grant specific permissions to repositories in the organisation for packages. Had to use a PAT in the end.
I want to upload a nuget package to my Github repo's "Packages". This is to say I want to upload a nuget to Github Packages.
However uploading the package with the "dotnet nuget" command automatically sets the description of the package in Github to the description of the csproj file. The problem is that there is no other information about the package, specifically - release notes. That is why, considering my repo already shares the same description, I find the only way to inform users of what was changed in a given version is to write it in the "description" of the package on Github.
Is there a way to specify the description either when uploading the package or after that through use of Github Actions or a CLI or an API or whatever? Because I want it to be done automatically, rather than by hand for every version.
The documentation is silent on this matter.
I've tried to publish a nuget package to my GitHub Packages account but in all cases I'm having the 404 error.
I've followed as requested on the GitHub's site:
nuget source Add -Name "GitHub" -Source "https://nuget.pkg.github.com/[MyAccount]/index.json" -UserName [MyUserName] -Password GH_TOKEN
It throwed me an error saying to add an api key.
So I created a Personal Access Token and set the api key:
nuget setapikey [MY_PAT_TOKEN] -Source "https://nuget.pkg.github.com/[MyAccount]/index.json"
But when trying to push again I had:
"Your request could not be authenticated by the GitHub Packages
service. Please ensure your access token is valid and has the
appropriate scopes configured."
So I created another token with the necessary scopes:
- read:packages
- write:packages
- delete:packages
- repo
I deleted the source and the api key and started the steps above again, with the new token, but I had the 404 error, saying that the source was not found.
So I've tried a lot of options... changing package name, changing source name, and a bunch of other things, but with the same result.
So I read this on the GitHub's website:
"When you publish a package, by default GitHub Packages uses the
package name to determine the GitHub repository containing the
package. For example, a package named odata-client would be published
to the OWNER/odata-client repository. If you would like to change the
repository containing the package, or publish multiple packages to the
same repository, you can include the URL to the GitHub repository in
the repository field of the package's .nuspec file."
As I'm using .NET Core 3.0 so I changed the csproj including:
<RepositoryUrl>https://nuget.pkg.github.com/[MyAccount]/Common</RepositoryUrl>
<RepositoryType>git</RepositoryType>
But this time I had a 400 (Bad Request)
And I tired some variations for the above url: ending with index.json, ending without index.json, ending with common, etc... But always have Bad Request error.
So I deleted this configurations and tryied again: 404 (Not Found)
I don't know what to do any more. There are someone that can help me with that? What am I doing wrong? It lacks some configuration?
I had same issue. For me it was wrong Repository Url in nuget package. I would advise you to check that RepositoryUrl is set and it is a valid url of existing repo.
I have been fixed the same error setting my repository URL:
<PropertyGroup>
<!--Others configurations values-->
<RepositoryUrl>https://github.com/GITUSERNAME/REPOSITORY-PATH**</RepositoryUrl>
</PropertyGroup>
I am using dotnet core and setting this configuration in .csproj
I had the same issue, my solution was to give all "Repo" permissions to the token.
PS: my Repo was private
I had the exact same issue and struggled with it alot.
I ended up using some of your pointers - adding
to my .nuspec and packed the project again.
This helped and pushing to github worked.
Please try packing your project again.
I'm trying to deploy a shiny app to the shinyapps.io server, but keep getting an error relating to a custom-built package that is hosted in a private github repo owned by our organization (note that I have replaced the actual name of the package, company name, and private repo name in the error below):
error: Building package: [PACKAGE NAME]
################################ Begin Task Log
################################
################################# End Task Log
#################################
Error: Unhandled Exception: Child Task 530176316 failed: Error building
image: Error fetching [PACKAGE NAME] (1.0.2) source. Error accessing GitHub
repository ORGANIZATION/PRIVATE_REPO. HTTP 404: Not Found
I know the repo link is good, because installing via devtools::install_github("ORGANIZATION/PRIVATE_REPO, auth_token = token works.
I'm an admin for the organization page, and also made sure that token has both repo and admin:org scope.
I've also made sure to tick "Private Repository Access" in my shinyapps.io account page as stated here.
Anyone have any thoughts on what I might be doing wrong??
Thanks!
Create an .Rprofile file in your project folder that you would intend to deploy.
You would need to set that repo options in the .Rprofile. and add your private github link. Something like
# A sample .Rprofile file with two different package repositories.
local({
r <- getOption("repos")
r["CRAN"] <- "https://cran.rstudio.com/"
r["mycompany"] <- "http://rpackages.mycompany.com/"
options(repos = r)
})
This is well explained here. Package management in RStudio Connect.
It is necessary to enable private access to the repo in the shinyapps.io dashboard as shown here
But you also need to give the proper permissions to the organization from github -> settings -> applications
Select shinyapps from the applications list
And then grant access to the specific organization
And you are done!
rsconnect will automatically detect the source of the repo, provided it as installed with the auth_token parameter using devtools::install_github
Just in case, I found the above answer to allow for specific corporate repositories, not installing from a private github repo. For that, this link has this to say:
Go to Account >> Profile, then under github LINK the accounts, and allow private repo access.
Is there a way to show the Jenkins build status on my project's GitHub Readme.md?
I use Jenkins to run continuous integration builds. After each commit it ensures that everything compiles, as well as executes unit and integration tests, before finally producing documentation and release bundles.
There's still a risk of inadvertently committing something that breaks the build. It would be good for users visiting the GitHub project page to know the current master is in that state.
Ok, here's how you can set up Jenkins to set GitHub build statuses. This assumes you've already got Jenkins with the GitHub plugin configured to do builds on every push.
Go to GitHub, log in, go to Settings, Developer Settings, Personal access tokens and click on Generate new token.
Check repo:status (I'm not sure this is necessary, but I did it, and it worked for me).
Generate the token, copy it.
Make sure the GitHub user you're going to use is a repository collaborator (for private repos) or is a member of a team with push and pull access (for organization repos) to the repositories you want to build.
Go to your Jenkins server, log in.
Manage Jenkins → Configure System
Under GitHub Web Hook select Let Jenkins auto-manage hook URLs, then specify your GitHub username and the OAuth token you got in step 3.
Verify that it works with the Test Credential button. Save the settings.
Find the Jenkins job and add Set build status on GitHub commit to the post-build steps
That's it. Now do a test build and go to GitHub repository to see if it worked. Click on Branches in the main repository page to see build statuses.
You should see green checkmarks:
In the meanwhile the UI of Jenkins and GitHub has changed a bit and it took me a while to figure out how to configure Jenkins now correctly. The explanation here is based on Jenkins version 2.121.1.
I also assume that you have already configured your Jenkins Job be triggered by a webhook or by polling.
Those are the steps that I have taken to get it working:
Configure Github: Create Personal Access Token with OAuth Scope repo:status
Configure Jenkins: Configure System and add the OAuth Secret as a GitHub Server - use Secret Text as an authentication method to put the OAuth Secret in there.
Configure your Jenkins Job: Add Set GitHub commit status as Post-build action. Set the Status Result to One of the default messages and statuses.
Check your result on GitHub: Check if you get the build status and build execution duration on your GitHub commit.
Configure Github
Configure Jenkins
Configure Jenkins Job
Result
You will now see the status for your commits and branches:
What I did is quite simple:
Install the Hudson Post Task Plugin
Create a Personal Access Token here : https://github.com/settings/tokens
Add a Post Task Plugin that always put success
curl -XPOST -H "Authorization: token OAUTH TOKEN" https://api.github.com/repos/:organization/:repos/statuses/$(git rev-parse HEAD) -d "{
\"state\": \"success\",
\"target_url\": \"${BUILD_URL}\",
\"description\": \"The build has succeeded!\"
}"
Add a Post Task Plugin that will put failure if "marked build as failure"
curl -XPOST -H "Authorization: token OAUTH TOKEN" https://api.github.com/repos/:organization/:repos/statuses/$(git rev-parse HEAD) -d "{
\"state\": \"failure\",
\"target_url\": \"${BUILD_URL}\",
\"description\": \"The build has failed!\"
}"
You can also add a call to pending at the beginning of tests
curl -XPOST -H "Authorization: token OAUTH TOKEN" https://api.github.com/repos/:organization/:repos/statuses/$(git rev-parse HEAD) -d "{
\"state\": \"pending\",
\"target_url\": \"${BUILD_URL}\",
\"description\": \"The build is pending!\"
}"
This plugin should work: https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Embeddable+Build+Status+Plugin
You should be able to embed badges like this into your README.md file:
The Commit Status API allows you to see the "Repo Statuses API".
And since April 26th 2013, you now can see the build status on your GitHub repo branch page:
That means it is another way, by visiting the GitHub project page, to see those statuses instead of having only Jenkins.
Starting April 30th, 2013, the API endpoint for commit statuses has been extended to allow branch and tag names, as well as commit SHAs.
There's also the plugin Embeddable Build Status that will give you a badge URL that you can post in your README.md file, and it looks like this:
If you have the GitHub plugin installed on your Jenkins, you can do it in the Post build actions like this:
Add the below line in your README.md file and change both URLs according to your Jenkins project.
[](https://jenkins../..project/lastBuild/)
In regards with setting up Jenkins and GitHub's protected branch. I'm using Jenkins 2.6, and these are the steps I did to make it work:
On your repository's GitHub webpage:
Navigate to Settings > Branches.
Under Protect branches, click on
the Choose a branch drown down menu and select the branch you want
to set as a Protected branch.
Enable the options as needed.
On the Jenkins Server:
(Make sure you have the Git and GitHub Plugin installed)
Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Configure System.
Under GitHub, set the API URL to https://api.github.com. Though this is the default value.
Select your generated token for the Credentials. If you haven't generated a token yet, click on Advanced... then on Additional actions, you can convert your login and password to token and use it as your credential.
Also, make sure the GitHub account that your Jenkins is using is a collaborator for the repository. I've set it with write permission level.
Hope this helps.
I followed the directions from Alex and it worked.
But, for GitHub Enterprise you need to modify the API URL when adding the server to Jenkins.
For example, if your company is creditcard.com, your URL would be
https://github.creditcard.com/api/v3/
Edit:
I'm no longer using this approach, please use one of the other answers.
Update: what I ended up doing, for our specific case: (above answers were great - thanks!)
Because our build server is not on the internet, we have a script to publish the build status to the gh-pages branch in github.
Start of build stamps failing
End of build stamps success
Project runs after main project to publish results -> build-status, API docs, test reports and test coverage.
GitHub caches images, so we created .htaccess file, that instructs a short cache timeout for the build-status image.
Put this in the directory with the build-status image:
ExpiresByType image/png "access plus 2 minutes"
Here's the build script. The target that publishes to gh-pages is '--publish.site.dry.run'
With less than 400 lines of config, we have:
Compile checks
unit & integration tests
Test Reports
Code Coverage Reports
API Docs
Publishing to Github
. . and this script can be run in or outside of Jenkins, so that:
Developers can run this script before commit, reducing the chance of a broken build that impacts others.
A failure is easy to reproduce locally.
The Results:
Project main page has the build status, updated after each build, along with latest API Docs, test results and test coverage.
Jently updates your GitHub commit status (as described by vonc), but unfortunately they have yet to implement the Repo Status API.
For pipeline projects, you can use the post section like so:
void setBuildStatus(String message, String state) {
step([
$class: "GitHubCommitStatusSetter",
reposSource: [$class: "ManuallyEnteredRepositorySource", url: "https://github.com/my-user/my-repo"],
contextSource: [$class: "ManuallyEnteredCommitContextSource", context: "ci/jenkins/build-status"],
errorHandlers: [[$class: "ChangingBuildStatusErrorHandler", result: "UNSTABLE"]],
statusResultSource: [ $class: "ConditionalStatusResultSource", results: [[$class: "AnyBuildResult", message: message, state: state]] ]
]);
}
pipeline {
agent any
triggers {
githubPush()
}
stages {
stage('Hello') {
steps {
echo 'Hello World'
}
}
}
post {
success {
setBuildStatus("Build succeeded", "SUCCESS");
}
failure {
setBuildStatus("Build failed", "FAILURE");
}
}
}
Just change "https://github.com/my-user/my-repo" to meet your GitHub repository.
Reference: How to set GitHub commit status with Jenkinsfile NOT using a pull request builder
I am adding to this answer, and also to this one. They have answered the question, but they didn't give us a proper intuition about the problem
So, here are my intuitions:
We need to add status to our GitHub commit. This status is based upon the results of our Jenkins build.
To do this, we need to give Jenkins access to the GitHub API, not to the repo. We do this through OAuth, and we can create the token going to the GitHub settings → Developer settings → Personal access tokens. Then for a public GitHub repository just check repo:status, and for a private repository, check the whole repository section
After creating your access token you need to add it to your Jenkins server:
Copy and paste the access token to the GitHub plugin section settings, under your Jenkins configurations
Create a GitHub server. It defaults to api.github.com. And add the access token as a secret text credentials.
The last step is to add a post build settings when you create your pipeline.
Resources:
Here is a section of a YouTube video in which he goes over the above steps.
Read about OAuth