I wish to select only columns with fewer than 3 unique values. I can generate a boolean mask via pl.all().n_unique() < 3, but I don't know if I can use that mask via the polars API for this.
Currently, I am solving it via python. Is there a more idiomatic way?
import polars as pl, pandas as pd
df = pl.DataFrame({"col1":[1,1,2], "col2":[1,2,3], "col3":[3,3,3]})
# target is:
# df_few_unique = pl.DataFrame({"col1":[1,1,2], "col3":[3,3,3]})
# my attempt:
mask = df.select(pl.all().n_unique() < 3).to_numpy()[0]
cols = [col for col, m in zip(df.columns, mask) if m]
df_few_unique = df.select(cols)
df_few_unique
Equivalent in pandas:
df_pandas = df.to_pandas()
mask = (df_pandas.nunique() < 3)
df_pandas.loc[:, mask]
Edit: after some thinking, I discovered an even easier way to do this, one that doesn't rely on boolean masking at all.
pl.select(
[s for s in df
if s.n_unique() < 3]
)
shape: (3, 2)
┌──────┬──────┐
│ col1 ┆ col3 │
│ --- ┆ --- │
│ i64 ┆ i64 │
╞══════╪══════╡
│ 1 ┆ 3 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ 1 ┆ 3 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ 2 ┆ 3 │
└──────┴──────┘
Previous answer
One easy way is to use the compress function from Python's itertools.
from itertools import compress
df.select(compress(df.columns, df.select(pl.all().n_unique() < 3).row(0)))
>>> df.select(compress(df.columns, df.select(pl.all().n_unique() < 3).row(0)))
shape: (3, 2)
┌──────┬──────┐
│ col1 ┆ col3 │
│ --- ┆ --- │
│ i64 ┆ i64 │
╞══════╪══════╡
│ 1 ┆ 3 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ 1 ┆ 3 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ 2 ┆ 3 │
└──────┴──────┘
compress allows us to apply a boolean mask to a list, which in this case is a list of column names.
list(compress(df.columns, df.select(pl.all().n_unique() < 3).row(0)))
>>> list(compress(df.columns, df.select(pl.all().n_unique() < 3).row(0)))
['col1', 'col3']
Related
in pandas the following creates a new column in dataframe by dividing by two existing columns. How do I do this in polars? Bonus if done in the fastest way using polars.LazyFrame
df = pd.DataFrame({"col1":[10,20,30,40,50], "col2":[5,2,10,10,25]})
df["ans"] = df["col1"]/df["col2"]
print(df)
You want to avoid Pandas-style coding and use Polars Expressions API. Expressions are the heart of Polars and yield the best performance.
Here's how we would code this using Expressions, including using Lazy mode:
(
df
.lazy()
.with_column(
(pl.col('col1') / pl.col('col2')).alias('result')
)
.collect()
)
shape: (5, 3)
┌──────┬──────┬────────┐
│ col1 ┆ col2 ┆ result │
│ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
│ i64 ┆ i64 ┆ f64 │
╞══════╪══════╪════════╡
│ 10 ┆ 5 ┆ 2.0 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ 20 ┆ 2 ┆ 10.0 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ 30 ┆ 10 ┆ 3.0 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ 40 ┆ 10 ┆ 4.0 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ 50 ┆ 25 ┆ 2.0 │
└──────┴──────┴────────┘
Here's a section of the User Guide that may help transitioning from Pandas-style coding to using Polars Expressions.
I have a Polars dataframe like below:
df_cat = pl.DataFrame(
[
pl.Series("a_cat", ["c", "a", "b", "c", "b"], dtype=pl.Categorical),
pl.Series("b_cat", ["F", "G", "E", "G", "G"], dtype=pl.Categorical)
])
print(df_cat)
shape: (5, 2)
┌───────┬───────┐
│ a_cat ┆ b_cat │
│ --- ┆ --- │
│ cat ┆ cat │
╞═══════╪═══════╡
│ c ┆ F │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ a ┆ G │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ b ┆ E │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ c ┆ G │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ b ┆ G │
└───────┴───────┘
The following filter runs perfectly fine:
print(df_cat.filter(pl.col('a_cat') == 'c'))
shape: (2, 2)
┌───────┬───────┐
│ a_cat ┆ b_cat │
│ --- ┆ --- │
│ cat ┆ cat │
╞═══════╪═══════╡
│ c ┆ F │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ c ┆ G │
└───────┴───────┘
What I want is to use a list of string to run the filter more efficiently. So I tried and ended up with the following error message:
print(df_cat.filter(pl.col('a_cat').is_in(['a', 'c'])))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ComputeError Traceback (most recent call last)
d:\GitRepo\Test2\stockEMD3.ipynb Cell 9 in <cell line: 1>()
----> 1 print(df_cat.filter(pl.col('a_cat').is_in(['c'])))
File c:\ProgramData\Anaconda3\envs\charm3.9\lib\site-packages\polars\internals\dataframe\frame.py:2185, in DataFrame.filter(self, predicate)
2181 if _NUMPY_AVAILABLE and isinstance(predicate, np.ndarray):
2182 predicate = pli.Series(predicate)
2184 return (
-> 2185 self.lazy()
2186 .filter(predicate) # type: ignore[arg-type]
2187 .collect(no_optimization=True, string_cache=False)
2188 )
File c:\ProgramData\Anaconda3\envs\charm3.9\lib\site-packages\polars\internals\lazyframe\frame.py:660, in LazyFrame.collect(self, type_coercion, predicate_pushdown, projection_pushdown, simplify_expression, string_cache, no_optimization, slice_pushdown)
650 projection_pushdown = False
652 ldf = self._ldf.optimization_toggle(
653 type_coercion,
654 predicate_pushdown,
(...)
658 slice_pushdown,
659 )
--> 660 return pli.wrap_df(ldf.collect())
ComputeError: joins/or comparisons on categorical dtypes can only happen if they are created under the same global string cache
From this Stackoverflow link I understand "You need to set a global string cache to compare categoricals created in different columns/lists." but my question is
Why the == one single string filter case works?
What is the proper way to filter a categorical column with a list of string?
Thanks!
Actually, you don't need to set a global string cache to compare strings to Categorical variables. You can use cast to accomplish this.
Let's use this data. I've included the integer values that underlie the Categorical variables to demonstrate something later.
import polars as pl
df_cat = (
pl.DataFrame(
[
pl.Series("a_cat", ["c", "a", "b", "c", "X"], dtype=pl.Categorical),
pl.Series("b_cat", ["F", "G", "E", "S", "X"], dtype=pl.Categorical),
]
)
.with_column(
pl.all().to_physical().suffix('_phys')
)
)
df_cat
shape: (5, 4)
┌───────┬───────┬────────────┬────────────┐
│ a_cat ┆ b_cat ┆ a_cat_phys ┆ b_cat_phys │
│ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
│ cat ┆ cat ┆ u32 ┆ u32 │
╞═══════╪═══════╪════════════╪════════════╡
│ c ┆ F ┆ 0 ┆ 0 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ a ┆ G ┆ 1 ┆ 1 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ b ┆ E ┆ 2 ┆ 2 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ c ┆ S ┆ 0 ┆ 3 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ X ┆ X ┆ 3 ┆ 4 │
└───────┴───────┴────────────┴────────────┘
Comparing a categorical variable to a string
If we cast a Categorical variable back to its string values, we can make any comparison we need. For example:
df_cat.filter(pl.col('a_cat').cast(pl.Utf8).is_in(['a', 'c']))
shape: (3, 4)
┌───────┬───────┬────────────┬────────────┐
│ a_cat ┆ b_cat ┆ a_cat_phys ┆ b_cat_phys │
│ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
│ cat ┆ cat ┆ u32 ┆ u32 │
╞═══════╪═══════╪════════════╪════════════╡
│ c ┆ F ┆ 0 ┆ 0 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ a ┆ G ┆ 1 ┆ 1 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ c ┆ S ┆ 0 ┆ 3 │
└───────┴───────┴────────────┴────────────┘
Or in a filter step comparing the string values of two Categorical variables that do not share the same string cache.
df_cat.filter(pl.col('a_cat').cast(pl.Utf8) == pl.col('b_cat').cast(pl.Utf8))
shape: (1, 4)
┌───────┬───────┬────────────┬────────────┐
│ a_cat ┆ b_cat ┆ a_cat_phys ┆ b_cat_phys │
│ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
│ cat ┆ cat ┆ u32 ┆ u32 │
╞═══════╪═══════╪════════════╪════════════╡
│ X ┆ X ┆ 3 ┆ 4 │
└───────┴───────┴────────────┴────────────┘
Notice that it is the string values being compared (not the integers underlying the two Categorical variables).
The equality operator on Categorical variables
The following statements are equivalent:
df_cat.filter((pl.col('a_cat') == 'a'))
df_cat.filter((pl.col('a_cat').cast(pl.Utf8) == 'a'))
The former is syntactic sugar for the latter, as the former is a common use case.
As the error states: ComputeError: joins/or comparisons on categorical dtypes can only happen if they are created under the same global string cache.
Comparisons of categorical values are only allowed under a global string cache. You really want to set this in such a case as it speeds up comparisons and prevents expensive casts to strings.
Setting this on the start of your query will ensure it runs:
import polars as pl
pl.Config.set_global_string_cache()
This is a new answer based on the one from #ritchie46.
Polar 0.15.15 it now is
import polars as pl
pl.toggle_string_cache(True)
Also a StringCache() Context manager can be used, see polars documentation:
with pl.StringCache():
print(df_cat.filter(pl.col('a_cat').is_in(['a', 'c'])))
I frequently need to calculate the percentage counts of a variable. For example for the dataframe below
df = pl.DataFrame({"person": ["a", "a", "b"],
"value": [1, 2, 3]})
I want to return a dataframe like this:
person
percent
a
0.667
b
0.333
What I have been doing is the following, but I can't help but think there must be a more efficient / polars way to do this
n_rows = len(df)
(
df
.with_column(pl.lit(1)
.alias('percent'))
.groupby('person')
.agg([pl.sum('percent') / n_rows])
)
polars.count will help here. When called without arguments, polars.count returns the number of rows in a particular context.
(
df
.groupby("person")
.agg([pl.count().alias("count")])
.with_column((pl.col("count") / pl.sum("count")).alias("percent_count"))
)
shape: (2, 3)
┌────────┬───────┬───────────────┐
│ person ┆ count ┆ percent_count │
│ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
│ str ┆ u32 ┆ f64 │
╞════════╪═══════╪═══════════════╡
│ a ┆ 2 ┆ 0.666667 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ b ┆ 1 ┆ 0.333333 │
└────────┴───────┴───────────────┘
So in python Polars
I can add one or more columns to make a new column by using an expression something like
frame.with_column((pl.col('colname1') + pl.col('colname2').alias('new_colname')))
However, if I have all the column names in a list is there a way to sum all the columns in that list and create a new column based on the result ?
Thanks
sum expr supports horizontal summing. From the docs,
List[Expr] -> aggregate the sum value horizontally.
Sample code for ref,
import polars as pl
df = pl.DataFrame({"a": [1, 2, 3], "b": [1, 2, None]})
print(df)
This results in something like,
shape: (3, 2)
┌─────┬──────┐
│ a ┆ b │
│ --- ┆ --- │
│ i64 ┆ i64 │
╞═════╪══════╡
│ 1 ┆ 1 │
├╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ 2 ┆ 2 │
├╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ 3 ┆ null │
└─────┴──────┘
On this you can do something like,
cols = ["a", "b"]
df2 = df.select(pl.sum([pl.col(i) for i in cols]).alias('new_colname'))
print(df2)
Which will result in,
shape: (3, 1)
┌──────┐
│ sum │
│ --- │
│ i64 │
╞══════╡
│ 2 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ 4 │
├╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ null │
└──────┘
The usage might seems like the code below
out_df = df.select([
pl.col("*"),
pl.col("md5").row_count().over("md5").alias("row_count"),
])
print(out_df)
The data should be like this:
before:
md5
a
a
b
after:
md5 row_count
a 1
a 2
b 1
Maybe Im misunderstanding, as your output has both values 1 and 2 for a. Assuming you meant 2 for both:
You are very close, Polars has .count():
import polars as pl
df = pl.DataFrame({"md5": ["a", "a", "b"]})
out_df = df.select([
pl.col("*"),
pl.col("md5").count().over("md5").alias("row_count"),
])
print(out_df)
Which prints out this:
shape: (3, 2)
┌─────┬───────────┐
│ md5 ┆ row_count │
│ --- ┆ --- │
│ str ┆ u32 │
╞═════╪═══════════╡
│ a ┆ 2 │
├╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ a ┆ 2 │
├╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ b ┆ 1 │
└─────┴───────────┘
If I think I understand correctly, you want to have a count per seen value in the group.
You can do this:
df = pl.DataFrame({"md5": ["a", "a", "b"]})
(df
.with_column(pl.lit(1).alias("ones"))
.select([
pl.all().exclude("ones"),
pl.col("ones").cumsum().over("md5").flatten().alias("row_count")
]))
shape: (3, 2)
┌─────┬───────────┐
│ md5 ┆ row_count │
│ --- ┆ --- │
│ str ┆ i32 │
╞═════╪═══════════╡
│ a ┆ 1 │
├╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ a ┆ 2 │
├╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┤
│ b ┆ 1 │
└─────┴───────────┘
We still have to add a dummy column "ones", because (as of polars==0.10.23` we cannot apply a window function over literals. We will add this functionality.