Delete duplicate rows with different values in columns - tsql

I didn't find my case on the Internet. Tell me how i can delete duplicates if the values are in different columns.
I have a table with a lot of values, for example:
|Id1|Id2|
|89417980|89417978|
|89417980|89417979|
|89417978|89417980|
|89417979|89417980|
I need to exclude duplicates and leave in the answer only:
|Id1|Id2|
|89417980|89417978|
|89417980|89417979|
min/max does not work here, as the values may be different.
I tried to union/join tables on a table/exclude results with temporary tables, but in the end I come to the beginning.

Assuming id1 and id2 are primary keys columns you could try this
DECLARE #tbl table (id1 int, id2 int )
INSERT INTO #tbl
SELECT 89417980, 89417978
UNION SELECT 89417980, 89417979
UNION SELECT 89417978, 89417980
UNION SELECT 89417979, 89417980
SELECT * FROM #tbl
;WITH CTE AS (--Get comparable value as "cs"
SELECT
IIF(id1 > id2, CHECKSUM(id1, id2), CHECKSUM(id2,id1)) as cs
, id1
, id2
, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (order by id1, id2) as rn
FROM #tbl
)
, CTE2 AS ( --Get rows to keep
SELECT MAX (rn) as rn
FROM CTE
GROUP BY cs
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1
)
DELETE tbl -- Delete all except the rows to keep
FROM #tbl tbl
WHERE NOT EXISTS(SELECT 1
FROM CTE2
JOIN CTE ON CTE.rn = CTE2.rn
WHERE CTE.id1 = tbl.id1
AND CTE.id2 = tbl.id2
)
SELECT * FROM #tbl

Related

Sort two csv fields by removing duplicates and without row-by-row processing

I am trying to combine two csv fields, eliminate duplicates, sort and store it in a new field.
I was able to achieve this. However, I encountered a scenario where the values are like abc and abc*. I need to keep the one with abc* and remove the other.
Could this be achieved without row by row processing?
Here is what I have.
CREATE TABLE csv_test
(
Col1 VARCHAR(100),
Col2 VARCHAR(100),
Col3 VARCHAR(500)
);
INSERT dbo.csv_test (Col1, Col2)
VALUES ('xyz,def,abc', 'abc*,tuv,def,xyz*,abc'), ('qwe,bca,a23', 'qwe,bca,a23*,abc')
--It is assumed that there are no spaces around commas
SELECT Col1, Col2, Col1 + ',' + Col2 AS Combined_NonUnique_Unsorted,
STUFF((
SELECT ',' + Item
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT Item FROM dbo.DelimitedSplit8K(Col1 + ',' + Col2,',')) t
ORDER BY Item
FOR XML PATH('')
),1,1,'') Combined_Unique_Sorted
, ExpectedResult = 'Keep the one with * and make it unique'
FROM dbo.csv_test;
--Expected Results; if there are values like abc and abc* ; I need to keep abc* and remove abc ;
--How can I achieve this without looping or using temp tables?
abc,abc*,def,tuv,xyz,xyz* -> abc*,def,tuv,xyz*
a23,a23*,abc,bca,qwe -> a23*,abc,bca,qwe
Well, since you agree that normalizing the database is the correct thing to do, I decided to try to come up with a solution for you.
I ended up with quite a cumbersome solution involving 4(!) common table expressions - cumbersome, but it works.
The first cte is to add a row identifier missing from your table - I've used ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY Col1, Col2) for that.
The second cte is to get a unique set of values from combining both csv columns. Note that this does not handle the * part yet.
The third cte is handling the * issue.
And finally, the fourth cte is putting all the unique items back into a single csv. (I could do it in the third cte but I wanted to have each cte responsible of a single part of the solution - it's much more readable.)
Now all that's left is to update the first cte's Col3 with the fourth cte's Combined_Unique_Sorted:
;WITH cte1 as
(
SELECT Col1,
Col2,
Col3,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY Col1, Col2) As rn
FROM dbo.csv_test
), cte2 as
(
SELECT rn, Item
FROM cte1
CROSS APPLY
(
SELECT DISTINCT Item
FROM dbo.DelimitedSplit8K(Col1 +','+ Col2, ',')
) x
), cte3 AS
(
SELECT rn, Item
FROM cte2 t0
WHERE NOT EXISTS
(
SELECT 1
FROM cte2 t1
WHERE t0.Item + '*' = t1.Item
AND t0.rn = t1.rn
)
), cte4 AS
(
SELECT rn,
STUFF
((
SELECT ',' + Item
FROM cte3 t1
WHERE t1.rn = t0.rn
ORDER BY Item
FOR XML PATH('')
), 1, 1, '') Combined_Unique_Sorted
FROM cte3 t0
)
UPDATE t0
SET Col3 = Combined_Unique_Sorted
FROM cte1 t0
INNER JOIN cte4 t1 ON t0.rn = t1.rn
To verify the results:
SELECT *
FROM csv_test
ORDER BY Col1, Col2
Results:
Col1 Col2 Col3
qwe,bca,a23 qwe,bca,a23*,abc a23*,abc,bca,qwe
xyz,def,abc abc*,tuv,def,xyz*,abc abc*,def,tuv,xyz*
You can see a live demo on rextester.

sql recursion: find tree given middle node

I need to get a tree of related nodes given a certain node, but not necessary top node. I've got a solution using two CTEs, since I am struggling to squeeze it all into one CTE :). Might somebody have a sleek solution to avoid using two CTEs? Here is some code that I was playing with:
DECLARE #temp AS TABLE (ID INT, ParentID INT)
INSERT INTO #temp
SELECT 1 ID, NULL AS ParentID
UNION ALL
SELECT 2, 1
UNION ALL
SELECT 3, 2
UNION ALL
SELECT 4, 3
UNION ALL
SELECT 5, 4
UNION ALL
SELECT 6, NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT 7, 6
UNION ALL
SELECT 8, 7
DECLARE #startNode INT = 4
;WITH TheTree (ID,ParentID)
AS (
SELECT ID, ParentID
FROM #temp
WHERE ID = #startNode
UNION ALL
SELECT t.id, t.ParentID
FROM #temp t
JOIN TheTree tr ON t.ParentID = tr.ID
)
SELECT * FROM TheTree
;WITH Up(ID,ParentID)
AS (
SELECT t.id, t.ParentID
FROM #temp t
WHERE t.ID = #startNode
UNION ALL
SELECT t.id, t.ParentID
FROM #temp t
JOIN Up c ON t.id = c.ParentID
)
--SELECT * FROM Up
,TheTree (ID,ParentID)
AS (
SELECT ID, ParentID
FROM Up
WHERE ParentID is null
UNION ALL
SELECT t.id, t.ParentID
FROM #temp t
JOIN TheTree tr ON t.ParentID = tr.ID
)
SELECT * FROM TheTree
thanks
Meh. This avoids using two CTEs, but the result is a brute force kludge that hardly qualifies as "sleek" as it won’t be efficient if your table is at all sizeable. It will:
Recursively build all possible hierarchies
As you build them, flag the target NodeId as you find it
Return only the targeted tree
I threw in column “TreeNumber” on the off-chance the TargetId appears in multiple hierarchies, or if you’d ever have multiple values to check in one pass. “Depth” was added to make the output a bit more legible.
A more complex solution like #John’s might do, and more and subtler tricks could be done with more detailed table sturctures.
DECLARE #startNode INT = 4
;WITH cteAllTrees (TreeNumber, Depth, ID, ParentID, ContainsTarget)
AS (
SELECT
row_number() over (order by ID) TreeNumber
,1
,ID
,ParentID
,case
when ID = #startNode then 1
else 0
end ContainsTarget
FROM #temp
WHERE ParentId is null
UNION ALL
SELECT
tr.TreeNumber
,tr.Depth + 1
,t.id
,t.ParentID
,case
when tr.ContainsTarget = 1 then 1
when t.ID = #startNode then 1
else 0
end ContainsTarget
FROM #temp t
INNER JOIN cteAllTrees tr
ON t.ParentID = tr.ID
)
SELECT
TreeNumber
,Depth
,ID
,ParentId
from cteAllTrees
where TreeNumber in (select TreeNumber from cteAllTrees where ContainsTarget = 1)
order by
TreeNumber
,Depth
,ID
Here is a technique where you can select the entire hierarchy, a specific node with all its children, and even a filtered list and how they roll.
Note: See the comments next to the DECLAREs
Declare #YourTable table (id int,pt int,name varchar(50))
Insert into #YourTable values
(1,null,'1'),(2,1,'2'),(3,1,'3'),(4,2,'4'),(5,2,'5'),(6,3,'6'),(7,null,'7'),(8,7,'8')
Declare #Top int = null --<< Sets top of Hier Try 2
Declare #Nest varchar(25) = '|-----' --<< Optional: Added for readability
Declare #Filter varchar(25) = '' --<< Empty for All or try 4,6
;with cteP as (
Select Seq = cast(1000+Row_Number() over (Order by name) as varchar(500))
,ID
,pt
,Lvl=1
,name
From #YourTable
Where IsNull(#Top,-1) = case when #Top is null then isnull(pt,-1) else ID end
Union All
Select Seq = cast(concat(p.Seq,'.',1000+Row_Number() over (Order by r.name)) as varchar(500))
,r.ID
,r.pt
,p.Lvl+1
,r.name
From #YourTable r
Join cteP p on r.pt = p.ID)
,cteR1 as (Select *,R1=Row_Number() over (Order By Seq) From cteP)
,cteR2 as (Select A.Seq,A.ID,R2=Max(B.R1) From cteR1 A Join cteR1 B on (B.Seq like A.Seq+'%') Group By A.Seq,A.ID )
Select Distinct
A.R1
,B.R2
,A.ID
,A.pt
,A.Lvl
,name = Replicate(#Nest,A.Lvl-1) + A.name
From cteR1 A
Join cteR2 B on A.ID=B.ID
Join (Select R1 From cteR1 where IIF(#Filter='',1,0)+CharIndex(concat(',',ID,','),concat(',',#Filter+','))>0) F on F.R1 between A.R1 and B.R2
Order By A.R1

SQL Server : group by with corresponding row values

I need to write a T-SQL group by query for a table with multiple dates and seq columns:
DROP TABLE #temp
CREATE TABLE #temp(
id char(1),
dt DateTime,
seq int)
Insert into #temp values('A','2015-03-31 10:00:00',1)
Insert into #temp values('A','2015-08-31 10:00:00',2)
Insert into #temp values('A','2015-03-31 10:00:00',5)
Insert into #temp values('B','2015-09-01 10:00:00',1)
Insert into #temp values('B','2015-09-01 10:00:00',2)
I want the results to contains only the items A,B with their latest date and the corresponding seq number, like:
id MaxDate CorrespondentSeq
A 2015-08-31 10:00:00.000 2
B 2015-09-01 10:00:00.000 2
I am trying with (the obviously wrong!):
select id, max(dt) as MaxDate, max(seq) as CorrespondentSeq
from #temp
group by id
which returns:
id MaxDate CorrespondentSeq
A 2015-08-31 10:00:00.000 5 <-- 5 is wrong
B 2015-09-01 10:00:00.000 2
How can I achieve that?
EDIT
The dt datetime column has duplicated values (exactly same date!)
I am using SQL Server 2005
You can use a ranking subselect to get only the highest ranked entries for an id:
select id, dt, seq
from (
select id, dt, seq, rank() over (partition by id order by dt desc, seq desc) as r
from #temp
) ranked
where r=1;
SELECT ID, DT, SEQ
FROM (
SELECT ID, DT, SEQ, Row_Number()
OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY dt DESC, seq DESC) AS row_number
FROM temp
) cte
WHERE row_number = 1;
Demo : http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!3/3e3d5/5
With trial and errors maybe I have found a solution, but I'm not completely sure this is correct:
select A.id, B.dt, max(B.seq)
from (select id, max(dt) as maxDt
from #temp
group by id) as A
inner join #temp as B on A.id = B.id AND A.maxDt = B.dt
group by A.id, B.dt
Select id, dt, seq
From #temp t
where dt = (Select Max(dt) from #temp
Where id = t.Id)
If there are duplicate rows, then you also need to specify what the query processor should use to determine which of the duplicates to return. Say you want the lowest value of seq,
Then you could write:
Select id, dt, seq
From #temp t
where dt = (Select Max(dt) from #temp
Where id = t.Id)
and seq = (Select Min(Seq) from #temp
where id = t.Id
and dt = t.dt)

Remove Duplicates

I have a table like below:
SuppID AreaID SuppNo SupName SupPrice
------------------------------------------------
1 3 526 ANC 100
1 3 985 JTT 200
3 4 100 HIK 300
In the above table, for same SuppID(1) and same AreaID(3), different SuppNo are there (526 & 985) in two different rows.
In this scenario , I'd like to make those two rows into a single row with SuppNo field as blank.
Also my output result should display rows with all the columns.
Any Help?
This should get you started:
DECLARE #TABLE TABLE (SuppID INT, AreaID INT, SuppNo VARCHAR(5), SupName VARCHAR(5), SupPrice INT)
INSERT INTO #TABLE
SELECT 1,3,'526','ANC',100 UNION
SELECT 1,3,'985','JTT',200 UNION
SELECT 3,4,'100','HIK',300
-- select data before updates
SELECT * FROM #TABLE
-- add a row count by AreaID/SuppID
;WITH T1 AS
(
SELECT *
,SUM(1) OVER(PARTITION BY AREAID,SUPPID) AS ROWCNT
FROM #TABLE
)
-- set the SuppNo blank on rows that have more than 1 match
UPDATE T1 SET SuppNo='' WHERE ROWCNT>1
-- add a row # by AreaID/SuppID
;WITH T2 AS
(
SELECT *
,ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY AREAID,SUPPID ORDER BY AREAID,SUPPID) AS ROWID
FROM #TABLE
)
-- delete duplicate rows
DELETE
FROM T2
WHERE ROWID>1
-- select data after updates
SELECT * FROM #TABLE

postgresql where clause behavior

I made two queries that I thought should have the same result:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (
SELECT DISTINCT ON (id1) id1, value
FROM (
SELECT table1.id1, table2.value
FROM table1
JOIN table2 ON table1.id1=table2.id
WHERE table2.value = '1')
AS result1 ORDER BY id1)
AS result2;
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (
SELECT DISTINCT ON (id1) id1, value
FROM (
SELECT table1.id1, table2.value
FROM table1
JOIN table2 ON table1.id1=table2.id
)
AS result1 ORDER BY id1)
AS result2
WHERE value = '1';
The only difference being that one had the WHERE clause inside SELECT DISTINCT ON, and the other outside that, but inside SELECT COUNT. But the results were not the same. I don't understand why the position of the WHERE clause should make a difference in this case. Can anyone explain? Or is there a better way to phrase this question?
here's a good way to look at this:
SELECT DISTINCT ON (id) id, value
FROM (select 1 as id, 1 as value
union
select 1 as id, 2 as value) a;
SELECT DISTINCT ON (id) id, value
FROM (select 1 as id, 1 as value
union
select 1 as id, 2 as value) a
WHERE value = 2;
The problem has to do with the unique conditions and what is visible where. It is behavior by design.