I have my settings in my ADF Sink to Clear the folder but Partitioned via an ID
But this sink already has other partitions in that exists that I do not want to remove.
If an ID comes in, I just want to clear that specific folder/partition but it is actually clearing the full folder versus just partition. Am I missing a setting?
To overwrite only the partitions that appear in new data and keep the rest of the old partition data, you can make use of the pre commands present in the settings tab of the dataflow sink. Look at the following demonstration.
The following is my initial data which I have partitioned based on id.
Now let's say the following is the new data that you are going to write. Here, according to the requirement, you want to overwrite the partitions that are present and keep the rest as it is.
First, we need to get the distinct key column values (id in my case). Then use them in the pre commands of sink settings to remove files only from these partitions.
Take the above data (the 2nd image data) as dataflow1 source. Apply derived column transformation to add a new column with constant value say 'xxx' (to group based on this column and apply collect() aggregate function).
Group by this new column and use the aggregate as distinct(collect(id)).
Now for sink, choose as Cache, check write to activity output. When you run this dataflow in the pipeline, the debug output would be:
Send this array value to a parameter created in another dataflow where you make necessary changes and overwrite partitions. Give the following dynamic content
#activity('Data flow1').output.runStatus.output.sink1.value[0].val
Now in this second dataflow, the source is the same data used in first dataflow. For sink, instead of selecting clear the folder option, scroll down where you can find pre/post commands sections where you give the following dynamic content:
concat('rm /output/id=',toString($parts),'/*')
Now when you run this pipeline, it successfully executes and runs the overwrites only the required partitions, whereas keeps the other partitions.
The following is a sample partition data (id=2) to show that the data is overwritten (only one part file with required data will be available).
Why do not you specify the filename and write it to 1 single file.
Related
We are using Azure Data Factory and are exploring if we could use Flowlets for transformations that occur in most Data flows.
Our first attempt was to create a flowlets that only add some columns (using a "Derived Column" step) to a stream. So in the "Input" step we don't require any column to be present in the received stream. Then the "Derived Column" followed by the "Output" step. And done... we thought.
When using this flowlet in a data flow we go from 25 columns back to only the column we added, all our original columns are no longer available.
Is it possible to use a flowlet to work on only a selection of all available columns but that all columns in the stream are "passed through" and thus will be available in the sink of the original data flow?
Be sure to select the Allow Schema Drift option on your Flowlet input settings
I need to export some database of arround 180k objects to JSON files so I can retain data structure in certain way that suits me for later import to other database. However because of amount of data, I wanto to separate and group data based on some atribute value from database records itself. So all records that have attribute1=value1, I want to go to value1.json, value2.json and so on.
However I still haven't figured out how to do this kind of job. I am using RepositoryItemReader and JsonFileWriter.
I started by filtering data on that attribute and running separate exports, just to verify that works, however I need to do this so I can automate whole process and let it work.
Can this be done?
There are several ways to do that. Here are a couple of options:
Option 1: parallel steps
You start by creating a tasklet that calculates the distinct values of the attribute you want to group items by, and you put this information in the job execution context.
After that, you create a flow with a chunk-oriented step for each value. Each chunk-oriented step would process a distinct value and generate an output file. The item reader and writer would be step-scoped bean and dynamically configured with the information from the job execution context.
Option 2: partitioned step
Here, you would implement a Partitioner that creates a partition for each distinct value. Each worker step would then process a distinct value and generate an output file.
Both options should perform equally in your use-case. However, option 2 is easier to implement and configure in my opinion.
I am trying to build a generic Mapping Data Flow for some basic cleansing on tables in my Data Lake. I need it to be able to work both on an ongoing basis after data already exists in my cleansed tables as well as when new tables are added (it would detect them automatically and create and populate the destination). Both the Source and Destination tables with be Delta tables.
The approach I have taken is to have Sources configured to both my actual source and to the target and use either JOIN transformations or EXISTS transformations to identify the new, updated and removed rows.
This works fine for INSERTS and UPDATES, however my issues is dealing with DELETES when there is no data currently in the destination. Obviously there will be nothing to DELETE - that is as expected. However, because I reference the key column that will exist once data is loaded to the table I get an error on an initial run that states:
ERROR Dataflow AppManager: name=BatchJobListener.failed, opId=xxx, message=Job 'xxx failed due to reason: DF-SINK-007 at Sink 'cleansedTableWithDeletes': Sink results in 0 output columns. Please ensure at least one column is mapped.
The overall process looks as follows:
Has anyone developed a pattern that works for a generic flow (this one is parameter driven and ensures schema drift is accommodated) or a way for the Data Flow to think that there IS a column in the destination that it can refer to and get past this issue?
In Source options check Allow no files found.
You can also provide date dynamically in Filter by last modified option.
Refer - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-factory/data-flow-sink#sink-settings
I want to perform some file level, field level validation checks on the dataset I receive.
Given below some checks which I want to perform and capture any issues into audit tables.
File Level Checks: File present, size of the file, Count of records matches to count present in control file
Field Level checks: Content in right format, Duplicate key checks, range in important fields.
I want to make this as a template so that all the project can adopt it, Is it good to perform these checks in ADF or in Databricks. If it is ADF any reference to example dataflow/pipeline would be very helpful.
Thanks,
Kumar
You can accomplish these tasks by using various Activities in Azure data factory pipeline.
To check the file existence, you can use Validation Activity.
In the validation activity, you specify several things. The dataset you want to validate the existence of, sleep how long you want to wait between retries, and timeout how long it should try before giving up and timing out. The minimum size is optional.
Be sure to set the timeout value properly. The default is 7 days, much too long for most jobs.
If the file is found, the activity reports success.
If the file is not found, or is smaller than minimum size, then it can timeout, which is treated like a failure by dependencies.
To count of matching records and assuming that you are using CSV, you could create a generic dataset (one column) and run a copy activity over whatever folders you want to count to a temp folder. Get the rowcount of the copy activity and save it.
At the end, delete everything in your temp folder.
Something like this:
Lookup Activity (Get's your list of base folders - Just for easy rerunning)
For Each (Base Folder)
Copy Recursively to temp folder
Stored procedure activity which stores the Copy Activity.output.rowsCopied
Delete temp files recursively.
To use the same pipeline repeatedly for multiple datasets, you can make your pipeline dynamic. Refer: https://sqlitybi.com/how-to-build-dynamic-azure-data-factory-pipelines/
I am trying to solve the below problem where I am getting data from different sources and trying to copy that data at single destination based on the metadata stored in SQL table. below are the steps i followed-
I have 3 REST API call and the output of those calls going as input to lookup activity.
The lookup activity is queried on SQL DB which has 3 records and pulling 2 columns only, file_name and table_name.
Then for each activity is iterating on the lookup array output and from each item, I am getting the item().file_name.
Now for each item I am trying to use Switch case to decide based on the file name what should be the destination of the data.
I am not sure how I can use the file_name coming in step 3 to use as a case in of switch activity. Can anyone please guide me on that?
You need to create a variable and save the value of file_name. Then you can use that variable in of switch activity. If you do this, please make sure your Sequential setting of For Each activity is checked.