Flutter BlocProvider consumption - flutter

I'm implementing a BLoC pattern for state management in my Fluter application. As I'm new in Flutter and BLoC particularly I'm evolving its usage gradually.
For new I use BLoC to communicate between two pages. One page sends an asset to the BLoC and navigates to details page. The details page uses StreamBuilder to read from the BLoC and build page with according data:
AppWidget:
Widget build(BuildContext context) => MultiProvider(
providers: [
BlocProvider(create: (context) => AssetBloc())
...
Requesting page
_onAssetMenuAction(BuildContext context, AssetMenu value, Asset asset) {
switch (value) {
case AssetMenu.validate:
var bloc = BlocProvider.of<AssetBloc>(context);
bloc.validate(asset);
Navigator.push(context,
MaterialPageRoute(builder: (context) => ValidateAssetPage()));
break;
}
Validation page
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
var bloc = BlocProvider.of<AssetBloc>(context);
Logger.root.info("Building validation page");
return StreamBuilder<AssetValidation>(
stream: bloc.outValidation,
builder: (context, snapshot) => snapshot.hasData
? QrImage.withQr(qr: snapshot.data!.qr)
: Text("No QR"));
}
BLoC
class AssetBloc extends BlocBase {
//
// Stream to handle the validation request outcome
//
StreamController<AssetValidation> _validationController =
StreamController<AssetValidation>.broadcast();
StreamSink<AssetValidation> get _inValidation => _validationController.sink;
Stream<AssetValidation> get outValidation => _validationController.stream;
//
// Stream to handle the validation request
//
StreamController<Asset> _validateController = StreamController<Asset>();
void Function(Asset) get validate => _validateController.sink.add;
//
// Constructor
//
AssetBloc([state]) : super(state) {
_validateController.stream.listen(_handleLogic);
}
void _handleLogic(Asset asset) {
_inValidation.add(AssetValidation.create(asset));
Logger.root.finest("AssetValidation instance is sent to stream");
}
void dispose() {
_validateController.close();
_validationController.close();
}
}
The problem I have is I'm getting "No QR". According to logs I see following sequence of actions:
new AssetValidation.create(): Validating asset Instance of 'Asset'
AssetBloc._handleLogic(): AssetValidation instance is sent to stream
ValidateAssetPage.build(): Building validation page
So at the moment of validation page building the validation result data should be in the stream but it seems they are not.
Unit tests of AssetBloc work as expected. So I suspect it should be related to StreamBuilder in validation page.

The StreamBuilder just shows you the last value of the stream whether the StreamBuilder was present on the current deployed widget when the stream was updated. So, if you add a new value to the stream, but the StreamBuilder is not on the current deployed widget, and, after that, you deploy the widget with the StreamBuilder, it's very likely that it won't show the updated data (in fact it shows empty data). I know, it's weird, i have the same problem when i like to use streams in that way. So, instead, i recommend you to use ValueListenable on the bloc and ValueListenableBuilder on the widget. It's very useful for that cases.
Another thing to point out is that if you're going to use just streams for the state management, it's better to use another state manager type such as provider or singleton. The reason is that, the right way to use bloc (the way you take advantage of the power of bloc) is using just the method add() for the events and logic, and using the established bloc State classes to show and update the data with the BlocBuilder on the widget.

Related

Flutter + Bloc 6.0.6. BlocBuilder's "builder" callback isn't provided with the same state as the "buildWhen" callback

I'm building a tic-tak-toe app and I decided to learn BLoC for Flutter along. I hava a problem with the BlocBuilder widget.
As I think about it. Every time Cubit/Bloc that the bloc builder widget listens to emits new state the bloc builder goes through this routine:
Call buildWhen callback passing previous state as the previous parameter and the newly emitted state as the current parameter.
If the buildWhen callback returned true then rebuild.
During rebuilding call the builder callback passing given context as context parameter and the newly emitted state as state parameter. This callback returns the widget that we return.
So the conclusion is that the current parameter of the buildWhen call is always equal to the state parameter of the builder call. But in practice it's different:
BlocBuilder<GameCubit, GameState>(
buildWhen: (previous, current) => current is SetSlotSignGameState && (current as SetSlotSignGameState).slotPosition == widget.pos,
builder: (context, state) {
var sign = (state as SetSlotSignGameState).sign;
// Widget creation goes here...
},
);
In the builder callback, it throws:
The following _CastError was thrown building BlocBuilder<GameCubit, GameState>(dirty, state:
_BlocBuilderBaseState<GameCubit, GameState>#dc100):
type 'GameState' is not a subtype of type 'SetSlotSignGameState' in type cast
The relevant error-causing widget was:
BlocBuilder<GameCubit, GameState>
The method where I emit the states that is in the GameCubit class:
// [pos] is the position of the slot clicked
void setSlotSign(Vec2<int> pos) {
// Some code
emit(SetSlotSignGameState(/* Parameter representing the sign that is being placed in the slot*/, pos));
// Some code
emit(TurnChangeGameState());
}
Briefly about types of states. SetSlotSignGameState is emitted when a user taps on a slot in the tic-tac-toe grid and the slot is empty. So this state means that we need to change sign in some slot. TurnChangeGameState is emitted when we need to give the turn to the next player.
Temporary solution. For now I fixed it by saving the state from buildWhen callback in a private field of the widget's state and then using it from the builder. BlocListener also has this problem but there I can just move the check from listenWhen callback into listen callback. The disadvantage of this solution is that it's very inelegant and inconvenient.
buildWhen is bypassed (not even called) on initial state OR when Flutter requests a rebuild.
I have created a small "test" to emphasize that:
import 'package:bloc/bloc.dart';
import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
import 'package:flutter_bloc/flutter_bloc.dart';
void main() {
runApp(BlocTestApp());
}
class BlocTestApp extends StatelessWidget {
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return MaterialApp(
home: BlocProvider<TestCubit>(
// Create the TestCubit and call test() event right away
create: (context) => TestCubit()..test(),
child: BlocBuilder<TestCubit, String>(
buildWhen: (previous, current) {
print("Call buildWhen(previous: $previous, current: $current)");
return false;
},
builder: (context, state) {
print("Build $state");
return Text(state);
},
),
),
);
}
}
class TestCubit extends Cubit<String> {
TestCubit() : super("Initial State");
void test() {
Future.delayed(Duration(seconds: 2), () {
emit("Test State");
});
}
}
OUTPUT:
I/flutter (13854): Build Initial State
I/flutter (13854): Call buildWhen(previous: Initial State, current: Test State)
As can be seen from output the initial state is built right away without calling buildWhen. Only when the state changes buildWhen is examined.
Other References
This behavior is also outlined here by the creator of Flutter Bloc library (#felangel):
This is expected behavior because there are two reasons for a
BlocBuilder to rebuild:
The bloc state changed
Flutter marked the widget as needing to be rebuilt.
buildWhen will prevent builds triggered by 1 but not by 2. In
this case, when the language changes, the whole widget tree is likely
being rebuilt which is why the BlocBuilder is rebuilt despite
buildWhen.
Possible solution
In your situation, based on the little code you revealed, is better to store the entire Tic-Tac-Toe configuration in the state and use BLOC events to alter it. In this way you do not need that buildWhen condition.
OR make the check inside the builder function if the logic let you do that (this is the most common used solutions with BLOC).
To respond to you question (if not clear so far :D): Sadly, you can not rely on buildWhen to filter the state types sent to builder function.
Could you please check if SetSlotSignGameState extends the abstract class GameState

Flutter/Dart - Edit Page in PageView, then Refresh and Scroll back to Same Place?

Currently, I can submit edits to a single page in a PageView and then either Navigator.push to a newly created single edited page or Navigator.pop back to the original Pageview containing the unedited page.
But I'd prefer to pop back to the the same place in an updated/refreshed Pageview. I was thinking I could do this on the original PageView page:
Navigator.pushReplacement(context,new MaterialPageRoute(
builder: (BuildContext context) => EditPage()),);
But after editing, how can I pop back to a refreshed PageView which is scrolled to the now updated original page? Or is there a better way? Someone mentioned keys, but I've not yet learned to use them.
The question deals with the concept of Reactive App-State. The correct way to handle this is through having an app state management solution like Bloc or Redux.
Explanation: The app state takes care of the data which you are editing. the EditPage just tells the store(App-State container) to edit that data and the framework takes care of the data that should be updated in the PageView.
as a temporary solution you can use an async call to Navigation.push() and refresh the PageView State once the EditPage comes back. you can also use an overloaded version of pop() to return a success condition which aids for a conditional setState().
Do you know that Navigator.pushReplacement(...) returns a Future<T> which completes when you finally return to original context ?
So how are you going to utilize this fact ?
Lets say you want to update a String of the original page :
String itWillBeUpdated="old value";
#override
Widget build(BuildContext ctx)
{
.
.
.
onPressesed:() async {
itWillBeUpdated= await Navigator.pushReplacement(context,new MaterialPageRoute(
builder: (BuildContext context) => EditPage()),);
setState((){});
},
}
On your editing page , you can define Navigator.pop(...) like this :
Navigator.pop<String>(context, "new string");
by doing this , you can provide any data back to the original page and by calling setState((){}) , your page will reflect the changes
This isn't ideal, but works somewhat. First I created a provider class and added the following;
class AudioWidgetProvider with ChangeNotifier {
int refreshIndex;
setRefreshIndex (ri) {
refreshIndex = ri;
return refreshIndex;
}
}
Then in my PageView Builder on the first page, I did this;
Widget build(context) {
var audioWidgetProvider = Provider.of<AudioWidgetProvider>(context);
return
PreloadPageView.builder(
controller: PreloadPageController(initialPage: audioWidgetProvider.refreshIndex?? 0),
Then to get to the EditPage (2nd screen) I did this;
onPressed: () async {
audioWidgetProvider.setRefreshIndex(currentIndex);
Navigator.pushReplacement(context,new MaterialPageRoute(builder: (BuildContext context) => EditPage()),); }
And finally I did this to return to a reloaded PageView scrolled to the edited page;
Navigator.pushReplacement(context, MaterialPageRoute(builder: (context) =>HomePage()));
The only problem now is that the PageView list comes from a PHP/Mysql query and I'm not sure what to do if new items are added to the list from the Mysql database. This means the currentIndex will be wrong. But I guess that's the topic of another question.

How can I use Provider to provide a bloc to a PageView() without the child resubscribing everytime I switch page?

I am using Provider to provide my bloc to a widget called TheGroupPage via a static create method
static Widget create(BuildContext context, GroupModel group) {
final database = Provider.of<DatabaseService>(context);
return Provider(
create: (_) => GroupMembersBloc(database, group),
child: TheGroupPage(group),
dispose: (BuildContext context, GroupMembersBloc bloc) => bloc.dispose(),
);
}
That widget has a PageView() with 3 pages
PageView(children: [
TheGroupNotificationsView(),
TheGroupMembersView(group),
TheGroupSettingsView(group),
])
The group members view looks for the GroupMembersBloc
GroupMembersBloc bloc = Provider.of<GroupMembersBloc>(context);
I also tried to put listen to false but this did not work. And I want the widget to listen for any changes. The page uses that bloc's stream to draw a list of group members
class GroupMembersBloc{
StreamController<List<UserModel>> _controller = StreamController<List<UserModel>>();
Stream<List<UserModel>> get stream => _controller.stream;
GroupMembersBloc(DatabaseService database, GroupModel group)
{
_controller.addStream(database.groupMembersStream(group));
}
void dispose(){
_controller.close();
}
}
The problem is when I switch page inside the PageView() I get an error on the page after the first time it has been shown. The error says Bad state: Stream has already been listened to. how can I solve this?
That's because stream controllers allow only 1 Subscription (or 1 listener) , you could use the [StreamController<List<UserModel>>.broadcast()][1] constructor instead of StreamController>().
I ended up moving the StreamBuilder to the parent widget above the PageView() which fixed the problem.

BLoCs and multiple streams - Is there a better solution?

Currently I'm working with BLoCs in Flutter and I've got a question about multiple streams within a Bloc.
For example when a screen has got multiple widgets which should depend on the Bloc. I could wrap the whole screen in the StreamBuilder, but then every time all widgets would be rebuilt.
The example bloc:
class TestBloc {
final StreamController _dataController = StreamController<String>();
final StreamController _appBarTitleController = StreamController<String>();
TestBloc();
Stream<String> get appBarTitle => _appBarTitleController.stream;
Stream<DataState> get data => _dataController.stream;
void fetchData(String path) async {
_dataController.sink.add(PokemonDataLoading());
Data data = await _getData();
_dataController.sink.add(Loaded(data));
_appBarTitleController.sink.add(data.name);
}
Future<Data> _getData(String path) async {
return await _dataRepository.fetchData(path);
}
void dispose() {
_dataController.close();
_appBarTitleController.close();
}
}
On the example build method you can see two different StreamBuilders, one for the app bar title and one for the content. Of course I could wrap them in this example into one StreamBuilder, but sometimes this isn't easily possible. They may depend on other data or user interactions.
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
_testBloc.fetchData();
return ScaffoldWithSafeArea(
title: StreamBuilder(
stream: _testBloc.appBarTitle,
builder: (context, AsyncSnapshot<String> snapshot) {
if (snapshot.hasData) {
return Text(snapshot.data);
}
return Text("Test");
},
),
child: StreamBuilder<DataState>(
stream: _testBloc.data,
builder: (context, AsyncSnapshot<DataState> snapshot) {
DataState state = snapshot.data;
if (state is DataInitial) {
return _buildLoading();
} else if (state is DataLoaded) {
return _buildContent(state.data);
}
return _buildLoading();
},
),
);
}
Is there maybe a better solution for multiple Streams on one screen? I use a lot of boilerplate code here and would like to avoid this.
In order to manage multiple streams in one screen, the best solution is to have multiple widgets that listen the corresponding stream.
This way, you increase the performance of your app by optimizing the total number of builds of your widgets.
By doing this, you can create widgets that listen an output (stream) of your BLoC and reuse them in different parts of your app, but in order to make the widget reusable you need to inject the BLoC into the widget.
If you see the BLoC UI design guidelines
Each "complex enough" component has a corresponding BLoC
This way your screen will now be composed of different components, and this component is a widget that listens to an output (stream) of your BLoC.
So you are doing things right.
If you want to reduce the repetitive code a bit in your widgets, you can:
Create your own widget that listens to the stream and directly returns the output of the BLoC (in your case you call state), this way you don't need to use snapshot.data like in the StreamBuilder. The example of this widget is the BlocBuilder of flutter bloc library.
Use the flutter bloc library that has widgets that reduce the boilerplate code when use BLoC pattern, but if you use this library, you now need to create your BLoCs using bloc library, but if you do this, now you reduce the boilerplate code of creating StreamControllers in your BLoC, and other interesting features, so you should take a look the power of bloc and flutter bloc libraries.

I am losing stream data when navigating to another screen

I am new to Dart/Flutter and after "attending" a Udemy course,
everything has been going well.
Until now ;-)
As in the sample application in the Udemy course i am using the BLOC pattern.
Like this:
class App extends StatelessWidget {
Widget build(context) {
return AppBlocProvider(
child: MaterialApp(
(See "AppBlocProvider" which I later on use to get the "AppBloc")
The App as well as all the screens are StatelessWidget's.
The AppBlocProvider extends the InheritedWidget.
Like this:
class AppBlocProvider extends InheritedWidget {
final AppBloc bloc;
AppBlocProvider({Key key, Widget child})
: bloc = AppBloc(),
super(key: key, child: child);
bool updateShouldNotify(_) => true;
static AppBloc of(BuildContext context) {
return (context.inheritFromWidgetOfExactType(AppBlocProvider) as AppBlocProvider).bloc;
}
}
The AppBlocProvider provides an "AppBloc" containing two further bloc's to separate the different data a bit.
Like this:
class AppBloc {
//Variables holding the continuous state
Locale appLocale;
final UserBloc userBloc;
final GroupsBloc groupsBlock;
In my application I have a "GroupSearchScreen" with just one entry field, where you can enter a fragment of a group name. When clicking a button, a REST API call is done and list of group names is returned.
As in the sample application, I put the data in a stream too.
In the sample application the data fetching and putting it in the stream is done in the bloc itself.
On the next line, the screen that uses the data, is created.
Like this:
//Collecting data and putting it in the stream
storiesBloc.fetchTopIds();
//Creating a screen ths shows a list
return NewsList();
In my case however, there are two major differences:
After collecting the data in the GroupSearchScreen, I call/create the GroupsListScreen, where the list of groups shall be shown, using regular routing.
Like this:
//Add data to stream ("changeGroupList" privides the add function of the stream!)
appBloc.groupsBlock.changeGroupList(groups);
//Call/create screen to show list of groups
Navigator.pushNamed(context, '/groups_list');
In the GroupsListScreen, that is created, I fetch the bloc.
Like this:
Widget build(context) {
final AppBloc appBloc = AppBlocProvider.of(context);
These are the routes:
Route routes(RouteSettings settings) {
switch (settings.name) {
case '/':
return createLoginScreen();
case '/search_group':
return createSearchGroupScreen();
case '/groups_list':
return createGroupsListScreen();
default:
return null;
}
}//routes
And "/groups_list" points to this function:
Route createSearchGroupScreen() {
return MaterialPageRoute(
builder: (context) {
//Do we need a DashboardScreen BLOC?
//final storiesBloc = StoriesProvider.of(context);
//storiesBloc.fetchTopIds();
return GroupSearchScreen();
}
);
}
As you can see, the "AppBlocProvider" is only used once.
(I ran into that problem too ;-)
Now to the problem:
When the GroupsListScreen starts rendering the list, the stream/snapshot has no data!
(See "if (!snapshot.hasData)" )
Widget buildList(AppBloc appBloc) {
return StreamBuilder(
stream: appBloc.groupsBlock.groups,
builder: (context, AsyncSnapshot<List<Map<String, dynamic>>>snapshot) {
if (!snapshot.hasData) {
In order to test if all data in the bloc gets lost, I tried not to put the data in the stream directly, but in a member variable (in the bloc!).
In GroupSearchScreen I put the json data in a member variable in the bloc.
Now, just before the GroupsListScreen starts rendering the list, I take the data (json) out of the bloc, put it in the stream, which still resides in the bloc, and everything works fine!
The snapshot has data...
Like this (in the GroupsListScreen):
//Add data to Stream
appBloc.groupsBlock.changeGroupList(appBloc.groupsBlock.groupSearchResult);
Why on earth is the stream "losing" its data on the way from "GroupSearchScreen" to "GroupsListScreen" when the ordinary member variable is not? Both reside in the same bloc!
At the start of the build method of the GroupsListScreen, I have a print statement.
Hence I can see that GroupsListScreen is built twice.
That should be normal, but could that be the reason for not finding data in the stream?
Is the Stream listened on twice?
Widget buildList(AppBloc appBloc) {
return StreamBuilder(
stream: appBloc.groupsBlock.groups,
I tried to explain my problem this way, not providing tons of code.
But I don't know if it's enough to give a hint where I can continue to search...
Update 16.04.2019 - SOLUTION:
I built up my first app using another app seen in a Udemy course...
The most important difference between "his" app and mine is that he creates the Widget that listens to the stream and then adds data to the stream.
I add data to the stream and then navigate to the Widget that shows the data.
Unfortunately I used an RX-Dart "PublishSubject." If you listen to that one you will get all the data put in the stream starting at that time you started listening!
An RX-Dart "BehaviorSubject" however, will also give you the last data, just before you started listening.
And that's the behavior I needed here:
Put data on stream
Create Widget and start listening
I can encourage all Flutter newbies to read both of these very good tutorials:
https://medium.com/flutter-community/reactive-programming-streams-bloc-6f0d2bd2d248
https://www.didierboelens.com/2018/12/reactive-programming---streams---bloc---practical-use-cases/
In the first one, both of the streams mentioned, are explained very well.