I'm trying to make a one way tilemap with platform efector, there is a problem though, because the tilemap collider makes each tile have a collider, the player sticks mid way through the platform if he tries to move because of the colliders, like here OneWayTiles, the player can get through but can't go left or right because he gets stuck, I did figure out that if I take the sprites and make them a prefab they work, I put the box collider and the platform effector on the parent and it works with no problems,
like here, so I do have a solution but it will just take too long drag and drop and change the size if I have to, is there a way I can keep it as a tilemap while not having this problem? thanks in advance.
Related
the question is quite simple. I have this platform and I do not want the player to collide with it when it jumps on the side or under it. In my Tilemap I have already added a composite collider 2D to the collider, so it doesn't separate each tile into a different collider.
As you can see, there are 2 tilesets but 1 collider thanks to the composite collider 2D. I have also changed the physics of this tileset, which is why the collider is so small (which is intended) so that the player can walk under it with no issues: Ej
However, when I jump to try to reach it by side, it does collide, ignoring the side arc function. I have never used a side arc, so I'm not sure if it should be done like this.
This is what happens instead of going through the platform it collides with it ... I thought Side Arc would let me go through the platform if I go by the sides, which is what the logic of the statement of a side arc would do but I guess I was wrong.
it gets stuck instead of going through, so what am I missing or doing wrong ?
I know I could simply hardcode it by making it trigger and when the "ground" collider attached to my pj touch it remove the trigger but I wanted to know if it was possible without that.
click here for gif show of what I want
I want to remove mesh of object when user click on object and also remove its collider to make another object fall from that removed mesh area...
I am using unity since last month so I don't have much experience and knowledge, please help me...
Creating the destructable ground particles
One way to achieve whats shown in the gif is by creating a prefab of e.g. a circle collider that is instantiated in the area of where the dirt is in your gif. It acts as a "ground particle" and keeps the objects above itself.
You instantiate a lot of them in the area so it acts as a big collider although it is actually a whole array of smaller colliders.
Implementing the interaction logic and deactivating the ground particles
Ater that you implement the functionality of dragging the mouse over the ground particles, removing them. That is also not difficult. Shoot raycasts into the screen at the postition of the mouse (remember to use Camera.ScreenToWorldPoint) and get the collision information (confer to https://docs.unity3d.com/ScriptReference/Collider2D.Raycast.html). With the collision information you can get the reference to the instance of your ground particle(raycasthit.other.gameobject) which is then disabled through script(gameobject.setActive(false)).
I am currently following a tutorial to make Pacman in Unity. I was told to use 2d colliders around the little blocks that Pacman goes around. I've accidentally put the colliders on the main camera and not the maze sprite.
Will this affect my game in any way? Or do I need to put the colliders on the sprite? If I do is there any quick way to redo my colliders?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Here is the link to the tutorial: https://noobtuts.com/unity/2d-pacman-game
I am happy to provide screenshots if necessary.
You will still need to add a collider to the maze sprite so the player can collide with it.
If you accidentally put a collider on your camera, you can right-click on the top of the component and click remove.
I am trying to hit a ball using a golf club. My golf club has three components (three game objects: handle, shaft and head as shown in the first attached image). Head gameobject's inspector can be seen in the another attached image.
To hit the golf ball, we need a collider. So I put a Capsule Collider at head game object. But I don't see any collider at head gameobject.
The head is shown in the last image.
Why I can't put Capsule Collider at the object?
EDIT:
Thanks for the reply.
I increased the radius but still the same.
I placed a Quad in the scene and put Mesh collider onto it (called AW52Collider). Please see in the
first image. We can see the collider clearly.
But I did the same thing to Club head, as it is also a game object I should be able to put a Mesh collider. But I don't see anything. Why?
Please see in the second image.
One more thing I don't understand is when I put AW52Collider inside Club Head object, I don't see AW52Collider also. Why? Please see in the third image.
Increase the size of your collider, those values do not look like you should see the gizmos at all. Best would be to reset the collider to its default values and then play with them until you are happy.
It is best practice to create a child object with colliders on it. The reason is the placement of the collider. The collider is always centered around the pivot point of a GameObject. But you probably want to move your collider freely or disable a group of colliders manually for testing (or optimization) purposes. Also consider that an object with multiple small colliders as child objects is considered one big collider (rigidbody wise). Source (Compound Colliders)
Just enable Gizmos button and you'll find your capsule collider.
See this picture to know exactly where to find it:
(It's in the toolbar below the Scene tab)
I would like to move a tile with drag and drop in Unity 2D. The tile is a sprite. The scene is an 'Unblock me' or 'Blocked in' like gameplay.
Because the tiles in real life correspond to physical objects it seemed be to a good idea to model them with colliders and rigidbody. The border of the table surrunded with invisible colliders. I hoped these will constrain the moves of the tiles realistic, when the player moves them.
Then I implemented a simple (mouse based) drag and drop behavior which is worked perfectly except the moved tile penetrates to other tiles and the border, and sometimes jumps over them. Then I learned if I am overriding physics by explicitly setting transforms position (which I do exactly in my drag and drop implementation), this will happen. OK I accept, I should set only forces, ect. on rigidbody never directly the position.
Now the question:
I am stuck here. I still want to drag and drop like user experience, and some realistic visual result. When in the real life a player moves a tile, it seems it is "glued" to its finger. How can I achieve this (ot at least similar) with just applying forces? Any suggestions or point similar existing sample/blog code?
(I know as a backup plan I can omit all the physics and constrain the tile positions by code, and create some tweens to move the tiles. Is the real solution (what I am asking for) so complicated I should vote on this backup plan?)
Edit
According to comments I've added a video:
There is nothing wrong with the way you are manipulating your dragging. The beauty of developing is being able to do things in your own way. If it works for your game, then don't fret.
Now, i recommend:
Create a new physic material. Assets > Create > Physic Material
Set your new physic material inspector settings both to 0
Attach the physic material to all your wall object colliders. This should allow for your object being dragged to move smoothly against the walls without chopping.
Do a check to see if your mouse is over another collider. If so, then stop the movement in that direction.
Since your movements seem to always be on a single axis, on collision, tell your object to snap to the edge of the wall object. You know the Wall position and scales, also you have the position and scales of the object being dragged. with that you can write a function that will offset it to the correct position when the collision occurs.
Let me know if any of that works out :P