How to remove padding between ZStacks in SwiftUI - swift

Question

today I implemented the new UI what you can see here in the red circle on the #Fix image. Before that the screen looked like the #Old Screen without Feature. But with the new UI element I have now a padding from the map to the name of the store. I have tried many things and researched many things, but in the meantime I have been working on it for a week without success.
#FIX Image
#Old Screen (Result should be like this)
The Code
var body: some View {
VStack(spacing: 0) {
shopModel.logo
.resizable()
.aspectRatio(contentMode: .fit)
.frame(maxWidth: 200, maxHeight: 100)
.padding([.top, .leading, .trailing])
Text(shopModel.name)
.fontWeight(.bold)
.padding()
CustomerCardPoints()
ZStack(alignment: .bottomTrailing) {
MapView()
.frame(height: isMapInFront ? 250 : 100)
.frame(maxWidth: isMapInFront ? .infinity : 100 )
.zIndex(isMapInFront ? 0 : 1)
.cornerRadius(isMapInFront ? 0 : 10)
.padding(isMapInFront ? 0 : 10)
.onTapGesture {
if !isMapInFront {
withAnimation {
isMapInFront.toggle()
}
} else {
let url = URL(string: "maps://?saddr=&daddr=\(shopModel.pinLocation.latitude),\(shopModel.pinLocation.longitude)")
if UIApplication.shared.canOpenURL(url!) {
UIApplication.shared.open(url!, options: [:], completionHandler: nil)
}
}
}
The Struct:
struct CustomerCardPoints: View {
var body: some View {
// Responsiv on iPhone + Pro
// iPhone Max is not implemented
VStack(spacing: 0){
ZStack() {
Image("Slice")
.resizable()
.aspectRatio(contentMode: .fit)
.frame(maxWidth: 180, maxHeight: 60)
.offset(x: 160, y: -127)
HStack(alignment: .firstTextBaseline) {
Text("22")
.font(.system(size: 18))
.fontWeight(.bold)
.foregroundColor(.white)
.offset(x: 233, y: -126)
Image("favoriten")
.resizable()
.aspectRatio(contentMode: .fit)
.frame(width: 110, height: 25)
.contentShape(Rectangle())
.offset(x: 132, y: -120)
}
}
.onTapGesture {
print("Hier kommt die Navigation zur Customer Card")
}
}
}
}
I tried to unwrap / wrap the Struct in the view so the alignment would be different, but I rather destroyed the code as being closer to the result.