On Yocto, I have a recipe (application_1.0.0.bb) with a dependency to Poco package (poco_1.11.2.bb):
DEPENDS = "poco"
In the configure step of application_1.0.0.bb, I need to use arc.
This is an executable that the Poco recipe generates. In the poco/1.11.2-r0 workdir, I can see it under poco/1.11.2-r0/package/usr/bin/arc. However, it is not transfered to the application workdir.
I need a bbappend recipe but I cannot seem to make it work, poco_%.bbappend:
do_install:append() {
install -d ${D}${bindir}
install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/package/usr/bin/arc ${D}${bindir}
This gives an already stripped error, so I added INSANE_SKIP:${PN}:append = "already-stripped" but arc is still not present in application_1.0.0 WORKDIR.
do_install is a task where files are copied from build system to build target. Hence, it is mandatory to use variable FILES_PN to install files in your target.
Then, I advice you to add in your .bbappend:
FILES_PN += "/usr/bin/arc"
Note that do_install:append is a deprecated method. Use do_install_append instead. Also, you can remove this task if arc executable is already inside your workdir. You need to read documentation https://docs.yoctoproject.org/
Related
What changes should make to enable dlt-system.
In build folder dlt-system application is not generating.
Manually by using command: cmake -D with dlt-system=ON it will generate but I need to generate while building please look at recipie image
Your recipe supports dlt-system via PACKAGECONFIG.
In order to activate that flags in the compilation process, you just need to add dlt-system to PACKAGECONFIG in .bb or .bbappend file to the recipe:
PACKAGECONFIG_append = " dlt-system"
If you want to add it from local.conf:
PACKAGECONFIG_pn-name_append = " dlt-system"
Just change name with your recipe name.
This will add -DWITH_DLT_SYSTEM=ON to EXTRA_OECMAKE which is used in do_configure of the cmake class.
So as the title indicates, I am trying install a shim library with Yocto. There are several recipes that are dependent on a base library (we'll call it libA.so), so the base recipe installs it in /usr/lib64. To satisfy a system requirement, the shim library allows for reading/writing an "enable" bitmask that allows or denies access to a single API call, and otherwise uses dlopen() to provide runtime access to the rest of the base library APIs.
My current attempt at doing this is to add a .bbappend for the recipe that installs the "base" libA.so, moving it to a directory outside default linker paths (we'll call it arb_path). A separate recipe then puts the shim in it's place.
The applicable excerpt from base_lib.bbappend for the base library recipe:
...
FILES_${PN} += "{arb_path}libA.so"
FILES_${PN}_remove = "${libdir}libA.so"
do_install_append() {
install -d ${D}${arb_path}
install -m 0755 ${S}/libA.so ${D}${arb_path}
#rm ${D}${libdir}/libA.so
}
And an excerpt from the shim.bb
DEPENDS = "base_lib"
RDEPENDS_${PN} = "base_lib"
FILES_${PN} = "${libdir}/libA.so"
#Compiles shim library to ${WORKDIR}/bin
do_install () {
install -d ${D}${libdir}
install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/bin/libA.so ${D}${libdir}
}
With the rm line commented in the .bbappend I get an error stating that "shim is trying to install to a shared area when the files already exist. With that line uncommented, I get a bunch of "Undefined references to" functions in the base libA.so because my shim doesn't expose them at compile time, but at runtime by dlopen()ing the base library.
So my question is, how in yocto would I go about making the base library available to dependencies during compilation, but having them go through the shim at runtime (without having to provide compile time definitions for 100s of APIs the base library declares)?
I new to Yocto so there are probably some mistakes and misunderstanding that I've had, I appreciate if you can help.
So, I want to add a new package (tar file) to my custom image.
I have followed steps and steps in manual and some online instructions. While running: "bitbake mylayer", the layer is built fine but I got this error while building the image, here is the log file:
DEBUG: Executing python function rootfs_deb_bad_recommendations
DEBUG: Python function rootfs_deb_bad_recommendations finished
DEBUG: Executing python function extend_recipe_sysroot
NOTE: Installed into sysroot: []
NOTE: Skipping as already exists in sysroot: ['depmodwrapper-cross', 'apt-native', 'dpkg-native', 'pseudo-native', 'update-rc.d-native', 'prelink-native', 'makedevs-native', 'ldconfig-native', 'opkg-util$
DEBUG: Python function extend_recipe_sysroot finished
DEBUG: Executing python function do_rootfs
NOTE: ###### Generate rootfs #######
NOTE: Installing the following packages: apt busybox copy-uefiimg-to-sda coreutils dpkg e2fsprogs-resize2fs libfontconfig1 libfreetype6 libglib-2.0-0 gptfdisk libjemalloc2 kernel-module-axi-dma-sensor ku$
ERROR: Unable to install packages.
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Package mypackage is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package 'mylayer' has no installation candidate
DEBUG: Python function do_rootfs finished
ERROR: Function failed: do_rootfs
And here is mylayer.bb:
SUMMARY = ""
LICENSE = "CLOSE"
FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:"
SRC_URI += "file://mypackage.tar"
Also, I have included the package in conf/local.conf:
IMAGE_INSTALL_append += " mylayer"
So beside trying to figure out how to solve this problem, I also have some questions:
I have read some example of .bb, and they mentioned about LIC_FILES_CHKSUM. The mypackage.tar.gz is a package to install a platform for the device and I don't know much about the source code, so I don't know if it is necessary to include the license? Or how to know that this package need license to install?
In some answer I found online, there is one saying that I need to include PACKAGE_CLASSES ?= "package_deb" (they want to install the .deb file), so probably in my case I will need PACKAGE_CLASSES ?= "package.tar" right? I have tried to change variable, but it still not successful.
The mypackage.tar includes some deb files. If I could not install mypackage.tar, can I instead install these .deb files? Can I put it all in mylayer.bb?
Thank you in advanced, I have tried to study much documents as I could but I get so confused and there is huge amount of information to digest.
First, before answering your questions
Let me mention some best practices advice for you:
Rename the recipe to some significant name related to you compressed package.
Naming the recipe to mylayer confuses Yocto users, because there is the term layer also.
Regarding you recipe:
There is no need for FILESEXTRAPATHS because the recipe path is added automatically to Yocto paths.
FILESEXTRAPATHS it is required for .bbappend files.
You need to override the do_install task function, it does nothing by default.
do_install is the first essential task to make sure that your sources are included in the final image.
Beside that, when specifying a compressed source file into SRC_URI, yocto automatically decompresses it.
This is mentioned here.
So, here what your recipe should look like:
SUMMARY = ""
LICENSE = "CLOSED"
# Prevent Yocto from decompressing the file
SRC_URI = "file://mypackage.tar;unpack=0"
do_install(){
# Create the opt folder into the final image, ${D} is ${WORKDIR}/image
install -d ${D}/opt
# Copy the compressed file there; You can change permissions as you want
install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/mypackage.tar ${D}/opt
}
# Very important to specify what you installed in (do_install)
FILES_${PN} = "/opt/*"
Now, when you run IMAGE_INSTALL_append += " mylayer" your file will be installed.
Regarding your questions:
You mentioned that your compressed file contains .deb files, I assume that no license checksum is needed. Also, I understand that you may wanted to point to SRC_URI[md5sum] or other checksums for the full package. That is also not needed for local files, it is used to check for the integrity of online sources.
PACKAGE_CLASSES as mentioned here, is used by the system to know in what type the data should be packaged. By the data I mean the data that you installed with do_install. That data get packaged for according to your PACKAGE_CLASSES variable, for example, to deb file. And that is used, along side with all other recipes packages, to build the final rootfs.
Yes, if you are installing the tar file into the image and then unpack it to install all deb files, for example, with dpkg. You can use the bin_package class to do that, now the recipe must be changed for that reason:
Decompress the tar file and provide the deb files in the local files folder.
Add all deb files to SRC_URI
Inherit the bin_package class
Specify the files to be packaged.
Your recipe should look like this:
SUMMARY = ""
LICENSE = "CLOSED"
SRC_URI = "file://deb_file1.deb \
file://deb_file2.deb"
# No need to `do_install` , it is invoked by the (bin_package) class
FILES_${PN} = ""
Important:
About FILES_${PN}, you need to add all what the deb installed into the image folder
Example, if your deb file installs this:
/usr/bin/hello
/etc/hello.cfg
Specify them:
FILES_${PN} = "/usr/bin/*"
FILES_${PN} += "/etc/*"
Use * so if other deb files install files into the same folder as others it will include all.
This follows on from
How do I strip and objcopy a built .so file in the Yocto bitbake compile step?
This leads back to considerable background information.
As mentioned in the previous question, I am seeking to build OCA, which I have
as a non-Yocto makefile-based project, in Yocto. The project, which builds
fine outside of Yocto, and even in Yocto, is quite complex. The issue is that it
is not cross-compiling for my target, which is aarch64 armv8-a. It is building
successfully, but for my host machine, which is x86-64. Then Yocto sensibly
refuses to package it, saying "Unable to recognise the format of the input
file".
I changed the compile flags in my makefile to -march=armv8-a, but got the error
"cc1plus: error: bad value ('armv8-a') for '-march=' switch" which seems to
mean that I can't use the host's installed gcc for cross-compiling, but rather a
cross-compiler is needed. I previously custom-added two additional layers, a
sample helloworld and mDNS (see previous questions for lots of background), and
they all cross-compiled fine, so I know that Yocto is basically set up to do it.
What is the method to get the cross-compilation to happen? Do I need to do a lot
of pervasive changes to my project's makefile system? It may not ever have been
designed with Yocto in mind.
I am looking into this: "cross-compile library recipe in yocto":
cross-compile library recipe in yocto
which seems to have some relevant information. Edit: it was only standard stuff that I had seen before; nothing about how cross-compilation gets invoked instead of the host machine's gcc.
Edit: My updated recipe, with the FILES_${PN} added and make changed to
oe_runmake.
DESCRIPTION = "OCA"
PRIORITY = "optional"
SECTION = "protocols"
LICENSE = "MIT"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${COMMON_LICENSE_DIR}/MIT;md5=0835ade698e0bcf8506ecda2f7b4f302"
SRC_URI = "file://oca-1.2.7"
S = "${WORKDIR}/oca-1.2.7/Src"
# Need to override S because BitBake expects the source to be in a dir called
# oca-1.2.7 in the work dir, but it's actually additionally under Src/.
# Need a do_compile, since OCA has a makefile with a non-standard name,
# makefileOCA. Also needs non-standard flags, -f and linuxRelease.
do_compile() {
export CAP_HOME="${WORKDIR}/oca-1.2.7"
oe_runmake -f makefileOCA linuxRelease
}
do_install() {
install -d ${D}${libdir}
cp ../Obj/linuxApp/Release/OcaProtoController.so ${D}${libdir}/OcaProtoController.so
chmod 0755 ${D}${libdir}/OcaProtoController.so
}
FILES_${PN} += "${libdir}/OcaProtoController.so"
Edit: I found some info:
https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.8.1/adt-manual/adt-manual.html
https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.8.1/adt-manual/adt-manual.html#setting-up-the-cross-development-environment
I commented-out the setting of CC and LD in makeOCA.inc.
I did the cleaning actions of deleting the tmp folder from my build-wayland
build dir, and did "bitbake -c cleansstate oca". Then I did "time bitbake oca".
Now it looks like it is using the cross compiler.
The first error I got now is:
~/Yocto/imx-yocto-bsp/build-wayland/tmp/work/aarch64-poky-linux/oca/1.2.7-r0/oca-1.2.7/Obj/linuxApp/Release/OcaAgentProxies.a
aarch64-poky-linux-ld: cannot find crus: No such file or directory
So this is the next question: Can you tell me what "crus" means in "LDFLAGS = crus $#"?
I have created a Yocto autotools project in Eclipse (based on a Hello World project).
I wanted to separate my code into a number of libs and then link them in a form of static libs (.a) to my project.
Now I have one app and a number of static libs. However, no matter what I try I can't get my code to compile. Each separate lib compiles and produces a .a file, but my app doesn't.
After searching the web I have a possible solution - add a direct link to my static libs:
MyApp_CPPFLAGS="-I$LOCATION"
MyApp_LDADD="/home/xxx/workspace/MyApp/Encoding2/Debug/libEncoding2.a"
This is my Makefile.am file, where libEncoding2.a exist in that path.
The error I get is:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `"/home/xxx/workspace/MyApp/Encoding2/Debug/libEncoding2.a"', needed by `MyApp'. Stop.
I already built the lib so I am not sure why a make try is even needed.
Any help will be appreciated.
Because you use static library in your recipes, you can make a soft link to the library in your project source folder, i.e., hello-world-0.1, using following command to link to your static library
ln -s /home/xxx/workspace/MyApp/Encoding2/Debug/libEncoding2.a
and then edit your bb file, hello-world_0.1.bb, adding the source path to your URL
SRC_URI = " \
file://libEncoding2.a \
file://hello-world.c \
"
and in the do_compile block, using follow command to compile your project
do_compile() {
${CC} hello-world.c libEncoding.a -o hello-world
}
do_install() {
install -d ${D}${bindir}/Hello
install -m 0755 enet ${D}${bindir}/Hello
}
After you bitbake your project
bitbake hello-world
and run mkefidisk.sh, you can find the hello-world in /usr/bin/Hello/hello-world. Hope this hint can help you.
BTW, I am not familiar with autotools, I just use make to bitbake the recipes. And your static library should also be created in Yocto not in Eclipse I think. So I think your path for the static library maybe not correct, it should locate in ~/yocto/build/tmp/... or some where like this. In my case, it was located in ln -s ~/yocto/build/tmp/sysroots/intel-corei7-64/usr/lib/libEncoding.a depends on your target environment.
Depending on whether you're using libtool or not, you should have either a noinst_LTLIBRARIES or noinst_LIBRARIES list of targets, respectively. This should only include the name of your library (libEncoding2.la or libEncoding2.a.)
You should never use a full path for this, and you should not quote Make variables, so what you were looking for is
MyApp_CPPFLAGS = -I$LOCATION
MyApp_LDADD = libEncoding2.la # or .a
And that would work.
But on the other hand it seems like you should take some time to understand how autotools work, as it might not be what you're looking for. With a grain of salt you can take my Autotools Mythbuster as a starting point.