I have this code in Vagrantfile:
begin
...
vb.customize ... my Ruby code goes here
...
rescue
puts "my error message goes here in case of Ruby error"
end
# Ruby code below should be executed even in case of error, however instead it exits
... never executed in case of error
I was hoping that standard Ruby error handling block will work here.
What am I missing?
Related
I use Anonymous Python Functions in BitBake recipes to set variables during parsing.
Now I wonder if I can check if a specific variable is set or not. If not, then I want to generate a BitBake Error, which stops the build process.
Pseudo code, that I want to create:
python __anonymous () {
if d.getVar('MY_VARIABLE', True) == "":
<BITBAKE ERROR with custom message "MY_VARIABLE not found">
}
You can call bb.fatal("MY_VARIABLE not set") which will print that error and abort the build by throwing an exception.
Beware that d.getVar() returns None when the variable is unset. You only get the empty string if that's your default value.
Outputs are possible on different loglevels and with python as well as shell script code
For usage in python there are:
bb.fatal
bb.error
bb.warn
bb.note
bb.plain
bb.debug
For usage in shell script there are:
bbfatal
bberror
bbwarn
bbnote
bbplain
bbdebug
for example if you want to throw an error in your recipe's do_install_append function:
bbfatal "something went terribly wrong!"
I'm migrating some shell scripts to Chef recipes. Some of these scripts are fairly involved, so just to make life easier in the short term and to avoid introducing bugs in rewriting everything in Chef/Ruby, I'd like to just run some of them as-is. They're all well-written and idempotent, so honestly there's no rush, but of course, the eventual goal is to rewrite them.
One cool feature of Ruby is its __END__ keyword/method: Lines below __END__ will not be executed. Those lines will be available via the special filehandle DATA.
It would be cool to ship the shell scripts as-is inside the the recipe after __END__, maybe something like the following, which I placed in chef-repo/cookbooks/ruby-data-test/recipes/default.rb:
file = Tempfile.new(File.basename(__FILE__))
file << DATA.read
bash file.path
file.unlink
__END__
echo "Hello, world"
However when I run this (with chef-solo -c solo.rb --override-runlist 'recipe[ruby-data-test]'), I get the following error:
[2014-10-03T17:14:56+00:00] ERROR: uninitialized constant Chef::Recipe::DATA
I'm pretty new to Chef, but I'm guessing the above is something about Chef wrapping my recipe in a class, and there's something simple preventing me from accessing DATA. Since it's "global" (?) I tried putting a dollar sign ($DATA) in front of it but that failed with:
NoMethodError
-------------
undefined method `read' for nil:NilClass
So the question is: How do I access DATA in my Chef recipe? Thanks!
It appears you don't have access to DATA, but you can fake it by reading in the current file yourself and splitting on __END__, like Sinatra does.
I ended up making a Chef LWRP for reuse. I don't know if I'll actually end up using this, but I wanted to figure it out. Like I said, I'm a Chef/Ruby noob, so any better ideas or suggestions welcome!
ruby_data_test/recipes/default.rb:
ruby_data_test_execute_ruby_data __FILE__
__END__
#!/bin/bash
set -o errexit
date
echo "Hello, world"
ruby_data_test/resources/execute_ruby_data.rb:
actions :execute_ruby_data
default_action :execute_ruby_data
attribute :source, :name_attribute => true, :required => true
attribute :args, :kind_of => Array
attribute :ignore_errors, :kind_of => [TrueClass, FalseClass], :default => false
ruby_data_test/providers/execute_ruby_data.rb:
def whyrun_supported?
true
end
use_inline_resources
action :execute_ruby_data do
converge_by("Executing #{#new_resource}") do
Chef::Log.info("Executing #{#new_resource}")
file_who_called_me = #new_resource.source
io = ::IO.respond_to?(:binread) ? ::IO.binread(file_who_called_me) : ::IO.read(file_who_called_me)
app, data = io.gsub("\r\n", "\n").split(/^__END__$/, 2)
data.lstrip!
file = Tempfile.new('execute_ruby_data')
file << data
file.chmod(0755)
file.close
exit_status = ::Open3.popen2e(file.path, *#new_resource.args) do |stdin, stdout_and_stderr, wait_thr|
stdout_and_stderr.each { |line| puts line }
wait_thr.value # exit status
end
if exit_status != 0 && !#new_resource.ignore_errors
throw RuntimeError
end
end
end
Here's the output:
$ chef-solo -c solo.rb --override-runlist 'recipe[ruby_data_test]'
Starting Chef Client, version 11.12.4
[2014-10-03T21:50:29+00:00] WARN: Run List override has been provided.
[2014-10-03T21:50:29+00:00] WARN: Original Run List: []
[2014-10-03T21:50:29+00:00] WARN: Overridden Run List: [recipe[ruby_data_test]]
Compiling Cookbooks...
Converging 1 resources
Recipe: ruby_data_test::default
* ruby_data_test_execute_ruby_data[/root/chef/chef-repo/cookbooks/ruby_data_test/recipes/default.rb] action execute_ruby_dataFri Oct 3 21:50:29 UTC 2014
Hello, world
- Executing ruby_data_test_execute_ruby_data[/root/chef/chef-repo/cookbooks/ruby_data_test/recipes/default.rb]
Running handlers:
Running handlers complete
Chef Client finished, 1/1 resources updated in 1.387608 seconds
Title says it all. How can I handle or catch a SIGINT in julia? From the docs I assumed I just wanted to catch InterruptException using a try/catch block like the following
try
while true
println("go go go")
end
catch ex
println("caught something")
if isa(ex, InterruptException)
println("it was an interrupt")
end
end
But I never enter the catch block when I kill the program with ^C.
edit: The code above works as expected from the julia REPL, just not in a script.
I see the same behavior as alto, namely that SIGINT kills the entire process when my code is run as a script but that it is caught as an error when run in the REPL. My version is quite up to date and looks rather similar to that of tholy:
julia> versioninfo()
Julia Version 0.3.7
Commit cb9bcae* (2015-03-23 21:36 UTC)
Platform Info:
System: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3610QM CPU # 2.30GHz
WORD_SIZE: 64
BLAS: libopenblas (DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY Sandybridge)
LAPACK: libopenblas
LIBM: libopenlibm
LLVM: libLLVM-3.3
Digging through the source, I found hints that Julia's interrupt behavior is determined by an jl_exit_on_sigint option, which can be set via a ccall. jl_exit_on_sigint is 0 for the REPL, but it looks as if init.c sets it to 1 when running a Julia program file from the command line.
Adding the appropriate ccall makes alto's code works regardless of the calling environment:
ccall(:jl_exit_on_sigint, Void, (Cint,), 0)
try
while true
println("go go go")
end
catch ex
println("caught something")
if isa(ex, InterruptException)
println("it was an interrupt")
end
end
This does seem to be a bit of a hack. Is there a more elegant way of selecting the interrupt behavior of the environment? The default seems quite sensible, but perhaps there should be a command line option to override it.
For julia >= 1.5, there is Base.exit_on_sigint. From the docs (retrieved on 20220419)
Set exit_on_sigint flag of the julia runtime. If false, Ctrl-C (SIGINT) is capturable as InterruptException in try block. This is the default behavior in REPL, any code run via -e and -E and in Julia script run with -i option.
Works for me. I'm running
julia> versioninfo()
Julia Version 0.3.0-prerelease+695
Commit 47915f3* (2013-12-27 05:27 UTC)
DEBUG build
Platform Info:
System: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU L 640 # 2.13GHz
WORD_SIZE: 64
BLAS: libopenblas (USE64BITINT DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY)
LAPACK: libopenblas
LIBM: libopenlibm
but I expect it's not necessary to be fully up-to-date for this to work (I'd guess 0.2 should be fine too).
I'm having somewhat weird problem with DBD::Informix. If I run a simple script like that:
use DBI;
my $dbh = DBI->connect_cached('dbi:Informix:database', '', '');
my $sth = $dbh->prepare('select foo from bar');
...
It works all right. But if I try to do exactly the same from a test script it fails with the following message:
SQL: -25588: The appl process cannot connect to the database server cms_ol.
ISAM: 22: Invalid argument
The only difference I see is that test script is quite heavy on module usage; it is based on Test::More and loads a lot of submodules that are to be tested.
Turning on DBI trace does not provide anything useful (for me, at least). Simple script runs along just fine:
DBI 1.616-nothread default trace level set to 0x0/1 (pid 9685 pi 0) at test_ifx.pl line 6
Note: perl is running without the recommended perl -w option
-> DBI->connect(dbi:Informix:cms#cms_ol, , ****, HASH(0x13fad0))
-> DBI->install_driver(Informix) for solaris perl=5.008009 pid=9685 ruid=106 euid=106
install_driver: DBD::Informix version 2011.0612 loaded from /cms/webdash/lib/arch/DBD/Informix.pm
<- install_driver= DBI::dr=HASH(0x1c8070)
!! warn: 0 CLEARED by call to connect method
-->> DBD::Informix::dbd_ix_db_connect()
CONNECT TO 'cms#cms_ol' - no user info
-->> DBD::Informix::dbd_ix_db_check_for_autocommit()
... and the only difference in trace of the problematic script I see is that it just fails:
DBI 1.616-nothread default trace level set to 0x0/1 (pid 9687 pi 0) at 22_report.t line 5 via 22_report.t line 6
Note: perl is running without the recommended perl -w option
-> DBI->connect_cached(dbi:Informix:cms, , ****)
-> DBI->install_driver(Informix) for solaris perl=5.008009 pid=9687 ruid=106 euid=106
install_driver: DBD::Informix version 2011.0612 loaded from /cms/webdash/lib/arch/DBD/Informix.pm
<- install_driver= DBI::dr=HASH(0xb619bc)
!! warn: 0 CLEARED by call to connect_cached method
-->> DBD::Informix::dbd_ix_db_connect()
CONNECT TO 'cms' - no user info
***ERROR***
SQL: -25588: The appl process cannot connect to the database server cms_ol.
ISAM: 22: Invalid argument
<<-- dbd_ix_db_connect (**ERROR-1**)
<<-- DBD::Informix::dbd_ix_db_connect()
I'm running custom Perl 5.8.9 build in Solaris 9, with latest DBI and DBD::Informix versions, against Informix IDS 9.40UC.
Update: If I try to be a smartass and put a block like that at the top of the heavy test script:
use DBI;
BEGIN { my $dbh = DBI->connect_cached( ... ); print "Connected!\n" if $dbh; }
... it prints like this:
Connected!
Out of memory!
Callback called exit.
END failed--call queue aborted at t/22_report.t line 20.
Callback called exit at t/22_report.t line 20.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/22_report.t line 24.
My guess is that DBD::Informix conflicts with some of the modules loaded after the connection is made. But which one? That's the question...
Another update: It appears that the above trick does something unwieldy. I tried to load all the modules explicitly by replacing 'use Module' with 'require Module; Module->import'. Pure Perl modules are OK but whenever XS module using XSLoader appears, Perl goes boom with friendly 'Out of memory' message. And if I move Informix connection below module initialization, it works all right - except DBD::Informix fails with the same -25588 error. Boomer. I'm at loss. :(
Another another update: I tried to run the same script with standard Perl 5.6.1 shipped with Solaris 9, using DBI 1.601 (the latest that would compile with Perl 5.6) and DBD::Informix 2011.0612. Same thing, so it's not custom Perl giving me trouble.
I can also add that the test module in question was prototyped using DBD::SQLite and fully works. It is the final test with DBD::Informix that is failing... As usual. :/
Workaround: following e-mail discussion with Jonathan, a workaround was found: addition of streams-based 'onipcstr' connection to Informix server allowed DBD::Informix to connect. Apparently, some XS modules interfere with default shmem-based connection method, although the culprit is unknown at the moment.
Further discussion
Custom-built Perl is, in my experience, easier than the system Perl. I never modify the system's Perl installation (I don't want to break it) so I always build my own.
You appear to have:
Solaris 9 (SPARC?)
Perl 5.8.9
DBI 1.616
DBD::Informix 2011.0612
ESQL/C (CSDK) 2.81
Informix Dynamic Server 9.40
We don't have the detailed sub-version of ESQL/C and IDS (2.81.UC2, 9.40.UC5, or whatever). There's a hint that you are using a 32-bit version of IDS, so probably everything is 32-bit. You are probably aware that 9.40 is no longer supported by IBM (and, indeed, its successor version 10.00 is also out of support). However, superficially, none of that should matter very much. The failing t91lvarchar.t is not a big issue.
Can you run the connect in working and non-working modes with DBI_TRACE=9 set in the environment.
If the trace for the connect operation is too voluminous to go into an update to the question, we'd better take this off-line to the DBD::Informix support channels (that's me, but by email).
The 'ISAM' error of 22 (Invalid argument) is puzzling. I'm curious about what is in your sqlhosts file for this server - the entry for cms_ol specifically. I'm not sure it will reveal anything, not least because you say the sample ESQL/C below (in the 'First hypothesis' section) works OK, and sometimes the Perl connects and sometimes it does not.
I wonder if there is a name conflict somewhere between functions in the shared libraries? That sort of thing will be hell to track.
First hypothesis
Further information received shows that this was not the crucial distinction.
The difference appears to be:
Works: CONNECT TO 'cms#cms_ol' - no user info
Fails: CONNECT TO 'cms' - no user info
The tricky part to explain is why the second fails, especially as the error goes on to mention cms_ol.
The workaround is to specify the server name in the connect string:
DBI->connect(dbi:Informix:cms#cms_ol, , ****, HASH(0x13fad0))
DBI->connect_cached(dbi:Informix:cms, , ****)
The underlying problem is more likely at the ESQL/C level than anything to do with other Perl modules. That is, if you compiled and executed this ESQL/C program, it would fail on cms and work on cms#cms_ol:
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
$ char *dbs = "cms";
if (argc > 1)
dbs = argv[1];
$ whenever error stop;
$ connect to :dbs;
return 0;
}
You could run it without an explicit database name (or with an explicit 'cms'), and I would expect it to fail. You could run it with 'cms#cms_ol' and I would expect it to pass. The program will say nothing if it passes; it will be obvious when it fails (though the messages will not be beautiful).
There is an outside chance it is something to do with connect_cached; that is a service provided by the DBI module and not by the DBD::Informix module. On the whole though, it is more likely something happening at the ESQL/C level.
I'm having a problem with PHP Exceptions. Even if I try to execute this code:
try {
$some->knownMethodWithError();
} catch(Zend_Exception $exp){
echo 'Error!: ' . $exp->getMessage();
}
My apache/php served web page always display a 500 Error. I mean,
echo 'Error!: ' . $exp->getMessage();
never is executed. I've tested with a redirection instead of that echo, but it doesn't work. Is there some php.ini directive that cause this behavior, or could it be something else?.
This happens in my Zend Framework based project.
Also, your code will only catch Zend_Exception.
If you have custom Exceptions maybe catch(Exception $e) will get more chances to catch all of them
maybe you could run the script with full logs. Change your php.ini on the server on the line :
error_reporting=E_ALL | E_STRICT
or better run it on an IDE environment with a debugger.
A 500 error isn't a PHP exception, it's happening above the code level. A 500 error means that there was an error while PHP was trying to parse your script (probably). Possibly your code has a syntax error.