In case my Vagrantfile runs second (or subsequent) times the VirtualBox machine exists.
I do know how to customize the configuration with vb.customize. I am wondering is there a way to query somehow this customized configuration using Ruby, when I run Vagrantfile second or subsequent times?
Related
I'm busy writing a script as a project to Audit Windows Servers for PCI compliance, One of the things my project lead has asked me to attempt to get to try to get a list of all hosts that are connected to a domain, however this script needs to be able to be run on any windows server without being able to import any modules, so I'm stuck with whatever tool already exists on a bare machine.
Ive already written parts of the script that can rely on the 'active directory' modules but I also need to find a way to get information without any DNS or Domain roles installed.
The closest I can get to achieving this is by using the 'netdom' command however this relies on usernames and passwords that I cannot query for in the auditing script.
Ive tried tools like nslookup and a few other things I've come across while looking for answers online, but most of it seems to rely on modules that I cannot install on the machines that the script will need to run on.
Does anyone know if this can actually be done? and if so how can I achieve this?
Edit: for a bit more clarity, I need a way to get a list of all machines in the domain from machines that are NOT a domain controller and I cannot alter these machines at all.
As per boxdog's comment "([adsisearcher]"objectcategory=computer").findall()" command works just fine
We're currently using chef to provision our servers and we want our recipe/cookbook to automatically add some data to the mongo database once its installed and running.
This is where we start to run into problems. We were using an execute resource to run the mongo script like this:
execute "install-mongodb-config" do
command "mongo #{node[:mongodb][:mongo_db_host]}/#{node[:mongodb][:mongo_db]} \"#{node[:mongodb][:mongo_add_config_script]}\""
action :run
end
This part of the recipe always failed no matter what we tried! I won't get into the details of everything we tried here (unless i need to) but lets just say that i've exhausted all possibilities of subscribes and notifies (i think).
The problem originates from the fact that we are using the mongodb::10gen_repo to install mongodb. The recipe exits when apt-get installs the package and then chef continues on to execute more resourses.
We have tried executing the above resource directly after mongodb::10gen_repo but it doesn't seem like mongodb is available and the mongo shell cannot connect and run the script. The error we see is somewhat like this:
MongoDB shell version: 2.0.2
Thu Sep 6 18:40:45 ReferenceError: setTimeout is not defined mongotest.js:2
failed to load: mongoAddConfig.js
Nothing we have tried has been able to get around this in a nice chef way. The thing that we resorted to was to replace the execute resource with the following:
execute "install-mongodb-config" do
command "sleep 60; mongo #{node[:mongodb][:mongo_db_host]}/#{node[:mongodb][:mongo_db]} \"#{node[:mongodb][:mongo_add_config_script]}\""
action :run
end
Which just makes the command sleep for 60 seconds before the mongo script is run. I know this isn't the Right way to do this but it works for now.
Can anyone suggest the Right way to do this? I have a feeling that I will need to talk to the guys that created the mongodb chef script and request a feature!
First of all. Remove this "sleep 60". This can be done by chef: All resources have common attributes and "retries" and "retry_delay" are part of them. So the easiest way would be:
execute "install-mongodb-config" do
command "mongo some_command"
action :run
retries 6
retry_delay 10
end
If you have more than 2-3 places, where you have to run some command on mongo database, consider creating LWRP, similar to one created in this mongodb cookbook. (Particularly check the libraries/mongodb.rb file). You can hide the logic that waits for the server to respond there.
Is it important that the same Chef run that installs the software also injects the initial configuration? The 'chefly' method to constructing cookbooks and recipes is to guard against idempotency in order to ensure that they can be run over and over again without producing unintended results.
In this particular case, I would limit the first recipe to only just installing and starting up mongodb. This recipe would do nothing if it saw that mongodb was already running on the host. Then, I'd have another recipe that would run only if it saw that mongo had been setup and was running. It would query the mongodb to see if the initial configuration had been done. If so, it would simply return. If not, it would run your configuration routine.
In this way, these recipes could run all the time, anytime, on your machine. Even if someone uninstalled mongodb, chef would get around to ensuring that it was set back up again and pristine.
So, I don't know much at all about chef. But your problem seems to be that you try to immediately connect after bringing the server up.
Server's are not immediately available when you bring them up since there is a bit of overhead that goes into electing a primary, getting all the server status's etc.
You can recreate this without chef by trying to bring up a replica set and immediately trying to connect to it in a simple script. So it's not chef specific.
Not sure if there is a way around the server startup lag since bringing up a primary is expected to be a relatively infrequent occurrence compared to just adding nodes to a set.
The only potential solution I see that is cleaner is adding a longer Timeout for the connection to be formed in the configuration. You can find how to do this in the mongodb documentation here: http://www.mongodb.org/display/DOCS/Connections
The flag of interest for you is likely connectTimeoutMS
I am working on a simple Perl app that copies another Perl app and builds all the required Apache config files.
The thing I can't seem to figure out is how to reload the apache config on the fly. I know I could do a system call and reload apache there, but that would mean I would have to get root access to this app, and that is a little scary.
Is there a way to ask apache to reload its config files from within the CGI container?
-------------------------Additional info------------------------------
I have done some more research and the problem is that Apache must be run with elevated privileges to bind to port 80. So one solution would be to set Apache to run on another port and forward that port to 80 via iptables. (This may be a last resort but a very messy solution).
Here is what gets me, Apache should be able to maintain its current port bindings and recheck its config files, all I am doing is adding another script alias.
Is there any way to add a new script alias with out a reload?
you also have the options to reload the config:
/etc/init.d/httpd reload
or
apachectl -k graceful
But unfortunately, those need root also. This differs from a normal restart in that currently open connections are not aborted. A side effect is that old log files will not be closed immediately. This means that if used in a log rotation script, a substantial delay may be necessary to ensure that the old log files are closed before processing them.
Also, if running Apache with daemontools you can do this by:
svc -h /service/apache
Sorry to ask a question then not give some one else the opportunity to answer but I figured out a solution and I hope it may help some one else.
What I had to do was leave the config alone it is not possible to reload in the manner that I required with out root privileges or some fancy port forwarding (That would make this application less portable than I would like).
So the only thing that Apache appears to load dynamically is the file system.
What I have done is used mod_rewrite to redirect the script requests and simply put them in /var/www/appname/copyname/cgi-bin/
In my installer i need a number of launchers, to install them as services, based on the user input. Those Launchers are all the same except for an index in their name.
I dont want to create all those launchers manually because that would be impossible to maintain.
Is there a way to copy and modify launchers at installer runtime and then install them as a service?
There is no reason to duplicate a service launcher at runtime. You can use an "Install service" action to install several services with different service names. To do that select "Other service executable" in the "Service" property of that action, then you can select and executable and a (variable) service name as well as variable arguments.
I have a Usecase too, where i want to have this Possibility of Renaming the Launcher an Runtime.
Assume you want to have a Testinfrastructure, where you want not only to test one Instance of your Programm, but several. And you want to use the Launchers from Install4J to start your Application.
Assume you have 5 Services that need to be started to provide the desired Functionality. Now think of having 10 Instances for 10 Customers, you want to test. Further you want to test it not on 10 different Machines, Docker, VM's, or what ever but on one single Machine.
This isn't possible, since you can't rename the Services at Runtime.
Wolfgang, i understand your Problem. Mine is similar.
I played a bit around with the Launcher.exe.
Perhaps there's a Solution for your Case.
Assuming your desired Launchernames are all off the same Length, like:
- Launcher_01.exe
- Launcher_02.exe
- Launcher_03.exe
- Launcher_04.exe
- Launcher_05.exe
You can then generate a Launcher once, with the Name "Launcher_xy.exe".
It's now possible to open up your favorite Hex-Editor an search for "Launcher_xy", rename it to "Launcher_01" and save the Data back to the exe-File. But be aware of not changing the Length of the Name. It won't work, if you'll change the Length.
So if you've changed the Name and afterwards execute
Launcher_xy.exe -install non-interactive
you will get a new Service called "Launcher_01.exe" under Windows-Services.
I found couple of tutorials how to run multiple instances of JBoss on the same machine.
All of them mention uncommenting Service Binder and having separate service-binding.xml files for each server.
The question is why it's done like that? Is there any reason except adding additional layer of indirection?
It looks the same could be done by modification of ports in jboss-service.xml for each server. The only restriction would be that there won't be easy way to switch which instance of JBoss uses which set of ports.
You are right with modifying the ports in jboss-service.xml. This is the straightforward and genuine way to change the ports.
Unfortunately, ports are not only defined in that file, but also in other places like jboss-web's configuration etc.
Catching all those places can be error prone.
So the idea was to have a central file (service-binding.xml) that lives in the root of a server installation. You basically copy the 'default' config to server1, server2 etc and then via command line pass in the server name when starting so that the correct port-offset for all of the services is taken from service-bindings.xml and applied to the resulting runtime configuration.
JBossAS 7 takes this concept one step further to the ServiceBindingGroups, where the base ports are defined on a domain level and then per server you pick a basic group + just a port offset by name, so that there is even less work needed than in as4