I have two tables
The first table contains three text fields(username, email, num) the second have only one column with random birth_date DATE.
I need to merge tables without condition
For example
first table:
+----------+--------------+-----------+
| username | email | num |
+----------+--------------+-----------+
| 'user1' | 'user1#mail' | '+794949' |
| 'user2' | 'user2#mail' | '+799999' |
+----------+--------------+-----------+
second table:
+--------------+
| birth_date |
+--------------+
| '2001-01-01' |
| '2002-02-02' |
+--------------+
And I need result like
+----------+------------+-------------+--------------+
| username | email | num | birth_date |
+----------+------------+-------------+--------------+
| 'user1' | 'us1#mail' | '+7979797' | '2001-01-01' |
| 'user2' | 'us2#mail' | '+79898998' | '2002-02-02' |
+----------+------------+-------------+--------------+
I need to get in result table with 100 rows too
Tried different JOIN but there is no condition here
Sure there is a join condition, about the simplest there is: Join on true or cross join. Either is the basic merge tables without condition. However this does not result in what you want as it generates a result set of 10k rows. But you an then use limit:
select *
from table1
join table2 on true
order by random()
limit 100;
select *
from table1
cross join table2
order by random()
limit 100;
There is other option, witch I think may be closer to what you want. Assign a value to each row of each table. Then join on this assigned value:
select <column list>
from (select *, row_number() over() rn from table1) t1
join (select *, row_number() over() rn from table2) t2
on (t1.rn = t2.rn);
To eliminate the assigned value you must specifically list each column desired in the result. But that is the way it should be done anyway.
See demo here. (demo user just 3 rows instead of 100)
Related
This is db query .
select users.Id,jsonb_object_keys(orders.metadata::jsonb) from users left join orders on users.userId=orders.userId where users.userId=2;
users table orders table
------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
|userId| name | | userId|orderId|metadata |
| 1 | john | | 1 | 1 | {"orderName":"chess","quantity":1}|
| 2 | doe | | 1 | 2 | {"orderName":"cube" ,"quantity":1}|
------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
Why there are no rows returned by the query ?
Very Nice and tricky question. to achieve what you want you should try below query:
select
t1.userid,
t2.keys
from
users t1
left join (select userid, orderid, jsonb_object_keys(metadata) as keys from orders) t2
on t1.userid=t2.userid
Your Query seems correct but there is catch. When you are left joining both tables without jsonb_object_keys(metadata), it will work as you are expecting. But when you use with this function then this function will return a set of records for each rows of select statement and perform simple join with rest of the columns internally. That's why it will remove the rows having NULL value in second column.
You should left join to the result of the jsonb_each() call:
select users.userid, meta.*
from users
left join orders on users.userid = orders.userid
left join jsonb_object_keys(orders.metadata::jsonb) as meta on true
where users.userid = 2;
I'm Nubie.
I want to create a postgresql table by drawing data from several tables
Table1
| partner_id | **project_id** | partner_fund | partner_date |
| 12345 | 099 | 12345.70 | 2003-02-02 |
Table2
| partner_id | partner_name
| 12345 | monster.inc
Table3
| **package_id** | **project_id** |
| 099a | 099 |
Table4
| **package_id** | project_name
| 099a | kill some one
*package_id is corresponding to project_id
I want to make a table like this :
| (if)partner_id | (get)partner_name | (if)project_id (corresponding to package_id)| (get)project_name | partner_fund | partner_date
So, if first row shows partner_id, next column shows partner_name, etc. Please help. Thanks.
You can create a new table from a SELECT query using CREATE TABLE ... AS syntax:
CREATE TABLE new_table AS
SELECT
table1.partner_id,
table2.partner_name,
table3.project_id,
table3.project_name,
table1.partner_fund
FROM table1
INNER JOIN table2 ON (table1.partner_id = table2.partner_id)
INNER JOIN table3 ON (table1.project_id = table3.project_id)
;
...and then you can also add a primary key to the new table, e.g.:
ALTER TABLE new_table ADD PRIMARY KEY (partner_id, project_id);
Query after updated question:
CREATE TABLE new_table AS
SELECT
table1.partner_id,
table2.partner_name,
table1.project_id,
table4.project_name,
table1.partner_fund,
table1.partner_date
FROM table1
INNER JOIN table2 ON (table1.partner_id = table2.partner_id)
INNER JOIN table3 ON (table1.project_id = table3.project_id)
INNER JOIN table4 ON (table3.package_id = table4.package_id)
;
I have a simple postgresql table that I'm tying to query. Imaging a table like this...
| ID | Account_ID | Iteration |
|----|------------|-----------|
| 1 | 100 | 1 |
| 2 | 101 | 1 |
| 3 | 100 | 2 |
I need to get the ID column for each Account_ID where Iteration is at its maximum value. So, you'd think something like this would work
SELECT "ID", "Account_ID", MAX("Iteration")
FROM "Table_Name"
GROUP BY "Account_ID"
And I expect to get:
| ID | Account_ID | MAX(Iteration) |
|----|------------|----------------|
| 2 | 101 | 1 |
| 3 | 100 | 2 |
But when I do this, Postgres complains:
ERROR: column "ID" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function
Which, when I do that it just destroys the grouping altogether and gives me the whole table!
Is the best way to approach this using the following?
SELECT DISTINCT ON ("Account_ID") "ID", "Account_ID", "Iteration"
FROM "Marketing_Sparks"
ORDER BY "Account_ID" ASC, "Iteration" DESC;
The GROUP BY statement aggregates rows with the same values in the columns included in the group by into a single row. Because this row isn't the same as the original row, you can't have a column that is not in the group by or in an aggregate function. To get what you want, you will probably have to select without the ID column, then join the result to the original table. I don't know PostgreSQL syntax, but I assume it would be something like the following.
SELECT Table_Name.ID, aggregate.Account_ID, aggregate.MIteration
(SELECT Account_ID, MAX(Iteration) AS MIteration
FROM Table_Name
GROUP BY Account_ID) aggregate
LEFT JOIN Table_Name ON aggregate.Account_ID = Table_Name.Account_ID AND
aggregate.MIteration = Tabel_Name.Iteration
I have a single table laid out as such:
id | name | count
1 | John |
2 | Jim |
3 | John |
4 | Tim |
I need to fill out the count column such that the result is the number of times the specific name shows up in the column name.
The result should be:
id | name | count
1 | John | 2
2 | Jim | 1
3 | John | 2
4 | Tim | 1
I can get the count of occurrences of unique names easily using:
SELECT COUNT(name)
FROM table
GROUP BY name
But that doesn't fit into an UPDATE statement due to it returning multiple rows.
I can also get it narrowed down to a single row by doing this:
SELECT COUNT(name)
FROM table
WHERE name = 'John'
GROUP BY name
But that doesn't allow me to fill out the entire column, just the 'John' rows.
you can do that with a common table expression:
with counted as (
select name, count(*) as name_count
from the_table
group by name
)
update the_table
set "count" = c.name_count
from counted c
where c.name = the_table.name;
Another (slower) option would be to use a co-related sub-query:
update the_table
set "count" = (select count(*)
from the_table t2
where t2.name = the_table.name);
But in general it is a bad idea to store values that can easily be calculated on the fly:
select id,
name,
count(*) over (partition by name) as name_count
from the_table;
Another method : Using a derived table
UPDATE tb
SET count = t.count
FROM (
SELECT count(NAME)
,NAME
FROM tb
GROUP BY 2
) t
WHERE t.NAME = tb.NAME
I have a group by query which fetches me some records. What if I wish to find other column details representing those records.
Suppose I have a query as follows .Select id,max(date) from records group by id;
to fetch the most recent entry in the table.
I wish to fetch another column representing those records .
I want to do something like this (This incorrect query is just for example) :
Select type from (Select id,max(date) from records group by id) but here type doesnt exist in the inner query.
I am not able to define the question in a simpler manner.I Apologise for that.
Any help is appreciated.
EDIT :
Column | Type | Modifiers
--------+-----------------------+-----------
id | integer |
rdate | date |
type | character varying(20) |
Sample Data :
id | rdate | type
----+------------+------
1 | 2013-11-03 | E1
1 | 2013-12-12 | E1
2 | 2013-12-12 | A3
3 | 2014-01-11 | B2
1 | 2014-01-15 | A1
4 | 2013-12-23 | C1
5 | 2014-01-05 | C
7 | 2013-12-20 | D
8 | 2013-12-20 | D
9 | 2013-12-23 | A1
While I was trying something like this (I'm no good at sql) : select type from records as r1 inner join (Select id,max(rdate) from records group by id) r2 on r1.rdate = r2.rdate ;
or
select type from records as r1 ,(Select id,max(rdate) from records group by id) r2 inner join r1 on r1.rdate = r2.rdate ;
You can easily do this with a window function:
SELECT id, rdate, type
FROM (
SELECT id, rdate, type, rank() OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY rdate DESC) rnk
FROM records
WHERE rnk = 1
) foo
ORDER BY id;
The window definition OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY rdate DESC) takes all records with the same id value, then sorts then from most recent to least recent rdate and assigns a rank to each row. The rank of 1 is the most recent, so equivalent to max(rdate).
If I've understood the question right, then this should work (or at least get you something you can work with):
SELECT
b.id, b.maxdate, a.type
FROM
records a -- this is the records table, where you'll get the type
INNER JOIN -- now join it to the group by query
(select id, max(rdate) as maxdate FROM records GROUP BY id) b
ON -- join on both rdate and id, otherwise you'll get lots of duplicates
b.id = a.id
AND b.maxdate = a.rdate
Note that if you have records with different types for the same id and rdate combination you'll get duplicates.