In Visual Studio Code with Markdown validation enabled (markdown.validate.enabled: true), I can ignore links to specific files that may not exist in the current context via the markdown.validate.ignoredLinks setting. However, that setting does not seem to apply to reference links (e.g. [link]: some-reference), nor can I find a corresponding setting specific to reference links.
Why do I want this? My specific use-case involves an extension the "standard" (CommonMark) markdown format to auto-generate a table-of-contents using the following syntax (and no, I don't expect VSCode to generate a preview of that TOC):
[[_TOC_]]
<!-- or -->
[TOC]
VScode happily generates a warning for such links, namely:
No link definition found: 'TOC' (link.no-such-reference)
Somewhat obviously, I can make the warning disappear I define a (bogus) TOC reference, such as:
[toc]: bogus
I can also disable validation of all reference links ("markdown.validate.referenceLinks.enabled": false), but I don't want to do that. I want to ignore the error for a specific reference, much like one can ignore a GLOB pattern for file links (markdown.validate.ignoredLinks).
Does anyone know of a such a setting before I submit a bug/missing-feature report?
Related
When I export the xml file of a multiple choice question, it contains the following lines:
<idnumber>arbitrary_id_set_by_user</idnumber>
<answernumbering>ABCD</answernumbering>
<tag></tag>
Is there a way to add idnumber, answernumbering and tag to the metainformation section of the question so that r-exams can export to moodle XML as <idnumber>idnumber</idnumber>,<answernumbering>ABCD</answernumbering>, <tag>tag1</tag>, and <tag>tag2</tag> etc?
The <answernumbering> tag can be set in exams2moodle() via the answernumbering= argument, see ?exams2moodle. The reason for this is that this is set in the same way for all exercises in a quiz. This is more consistent than setting it individually and potentially inconsistently in the meta-information of the different exercises.
The <idnumber> tag appears to be used by Moodle only for internal purposes. It is also not mentioned in the official Moodle XML documentation at https://docs.moodle.org/311/en/Moodle_XML_format. Hence we did not implement it in exams2moodle().
The <tag> is currently not supported in exams2moodle() because we felt that it would be more important to have tags in the Rmd (or Rnw) exercise itself and not the Moodle version of the exercise. For structuring the content on the Moodle side the exsection meta-information can be used, see boxhist for a worked example.
Finally, you can add arbitrary metainformation by using the exextra tag. This is used, for example, in the essayreg exercise template. However, there is no general way of using this extra metainformation to insert additional XML code in the exams2moodle() output. To do that, the source code underlying exams2moodle() would have to be adapted correspondingly.
I have been using the excellent python-docx package to read, modify, and write Microsoft Word files. The package supports extracting the text from each paragraph. It also allows accessing a paragraph a "run" at a time, where the run is a set of characters that have the same font information. Unfortunately, when you access a paragraph by runs, you lose the links, because the package does not support links. The package also does not support accessing change tracking information.
My problem is that I need to access change tracking information. Or, more specifically, I need to copy paragraphs that have change tracking indicated from one document to another.
I've tried doing this at the XML level. For example, this code snippet appends the contents of file1.docx to file2.docx:
from docx import Document
doc1 = Document("file1.docx")
doc2 = Document("file2.docx")
doc2.element.body.append(doc1.element.body)
doc2.save("file2-appended.docx")
When I try to open the file on my Mac for complicated files, I get this error:
But if I click OK, the contents are there. The manipulation also works without problem for very simple files.
What am I missing?
The .element attribute is really an "internal" interface and should be named ._element. In most other places I have named it that. What you're getting there is the root element of the document part. You can see what it is by calling:
print(doc2.element.xml)
That element has one and only one w:body element below it, which is what you get when with doc2.element.body (.xml will work on that too, btw, if you want to inspect that element).
What your code is doing is appending one body element at the end of another w:body element and thereby forming invalid XML. The WordprocessingML vocabulary is quite strict about what element can follow another and how many and so forth. The only surprise for me is that it actually sometimes works for you, I take it :)
If you want to manipulate the XML directly, which is what the ._element attribute is there for, you need to do it carefully, in view of the (complex) WordprocessingML XML Schema.
Unlike when you stick to the published API, there's no safety net once ._element (or .element) appears in your code.
Inside the body XML can be relationships to external document parts, like images and hyperlinks. These will only be valid within the document in which they appear. This might explain why some files can be repaired.
I'm building a website using brython and I came by a problem that has nothign to do with it.
My problem is with Mezzanine or TinyMCE editor (I'm not sure which). To make brython work I need the script tag to be "text/python". But the editor filters it automatically to "text/javascript".
I disabled the filtering already, both in the admin panel and in the actual source code, I tried adding "text/python" to the RICHTEXT_ALLOWED defaults in the mezzanine configuration too.
Just to be clear, security is not an issue, this particular feature won't go online in the final version of the website.
Although the HTML specification does allow one to put any value other than "text/javascript" in script's type attribute, few projects do that, and Brython is one of those few. It is likely the "text/javascript" value is simply hardcoded in the editor and it won't allow you to change that.
(There is probably a big chance of having an issue closed as "won't fix/not a bug" or equivalent if you try to report this to the editor's issue tracker).
I think the workaround in this case is to write some javascript to change the text on the attribute on the relevant script tags to "text/python" prior to calling Brython. i.e., instead of triggering Brython on your page with
<body onload="brython()" >
Do something along
<body onload="function (){var x = document.getElementsByName("python"); for(var i=0; i < x.length; x++){x.type="text/python"};brython()}()" >
(and of course, add the attribute name='python' to all your python script tags)
I really like how Visual Studio html editor updates the matching tag. Example:
<h2>Header</h2>
If we replace <h2> opening tag with <h3>, then the closing tag should change automatically to </h3>. This should happen as we type.
I'm trying to implement this on my own, but no luck so far. I thought that matchtags addon would be a good starting point, but it stops working if tag names do not match.
Also, I noticed that xml mode marks closing tag as error on tag name mismatch, but I'm not sure how to use this to update the closing tags.
I would appreciate any help from more experienced CodeMirror users.
Thanks
So once the edit has been done, you no longer have the information needed to find the matching tag (which is why the matchtag addon can't help anymore). A good solution might be to track the current matching tag when editing starts (when the cursor is in a tag name) by using the CodeMirror.findMatchingTag function exported by the addon/fold/xml-fold.js file. Then, on "change" events that look like local editing inside the tag name (i.e. their start and end are inside the tag name), immediately follow up by modifying the matching tag.
add matchtags.js, xml-fold.js
config : matchTags: {bothTags: true}
I found in typo3 admin side(/typo3), you can have two ways to set up TS,
you can set up through template->root, I think TS here will affect the whole site.
you can set up through template->certain page, it will only affect this page.
So my question is:
If I want to find where(which page) has TS setting such as : code = LIST, how could I do?
Use Web > Template module it has tools, you can for an example use Template Analyzer for the search
Try querying the database in phpMyAdmin or similar. The following looks in Template Setup:
SELECT pid, config, constants
FROM sys_template
WHERE config LIKE '%code = LIST%'
Replace config with constants to look in Template Constants. pid is the page ID.
If it is not set in the TypoScript, it perhaps has been set in the plugin itself. Just check the plugin content element itself.
In the Template module, go to the page where the setting is in effect.
Use the TSOB (Typo Script Object Browser) to search for "list":
This must show you all TS for this page that contains "list".
If you don't see the setting you can run a cmd/ctrl-F Search over the entire results.
You would have to search for "[code] = LIST".
Which will lead you to the following entry:
Hovering over the label will produce the above tooltip. Copy the line number.
Now change to the Template Analyzer. Here, you can click through all cascading templates and search for the line number:
This is definitely the line that sets that value.
From the "Template hierarchy" tree you will easily find the template that contains the setting.