I am trying to automate my project boards. I would like an action to trigger when someone opens a Pull Request and links it to a issue on the board, then the issue would be moved to "In Review".
I imagine once I trigger by a pull_request, this information would be seen on the given environment variables. But I dumped all of them and I could not find any reference to the issue I am linking and would like to move on the project board.
Can someone give me some light on what I could do to achieve this result?
First you can reference an issue in your commit message described in the documentation. Then you can set up built-in automations for the project board. If you then push something to your repository and create a merge request, the issue should be automatically linked and moved to the column "In Review".
Related
I am currently attempting to build a small program, that, using the Github API would make a small change to a file in a repository, add a tag to the commit that change belongs to, then points the HEAD of the branch to said commit, which would then trigger Actions, after the entire operation has completed. I noticed, however, that when I tested my code, the commit would show up, but there would not be a tag visible anywhere. I made note of the fact that the API was, in fact, receiving the request to set the tag, and there it seems to have gone through, but not on the repo itself it seems.
For reference, I was following this tutorial, and then adding this call after step 4.
Any help would be very much appreciated!
We have had two stories moved from "In Progress" to "Done" status by Azure Boards automatically. From what I can tell we don't have any rules set for it and can't seem to find out why the system is automatically moving stories. Any suggestions or help would be appreciated, I am afraid we are going to miss items that actually need to be worked.
If the story on the Azure DevOps board is linked to some code branch or pull request in the code repository, changes to the repository can update the status of the story. For example, if you link the story to some Pull Request* (as stated by #Daniel Mann), and then you complete that Pull Request, the story will automatically be moved to "Done" state.
You can check the Development and Related Work sections of the story (usually on the right) to see if it has some link to the code.
I am not by any means a sophisticated github user. I have learned the minimum handful of commands needed to add, commit, and push my project code to the public github.com repository. So far it's been working fairly well... until today when I tried to create a new release (my third).
For some reason, when I try to publish my new release, I get the message
Tag could not be created. Pre-receive hooks failed.
I have never seen this message before.
I have tried various different tag names; I have tried logging out and back in again; I have tried pre-tagging on my local disk copy of the repo; I have pushed and pulled (both ends are up to date). This about exhausts my repertoire of things to try :-(
As a relative n00b I find this message incredibly opaque (sigh). I have tried googling for it, but quickly got in over my head -- most of the hits I found were discussions about people setting up their own networked repos and installing or tweaking their own custom "pre-receive hooks", whereas I am just a dumb user of github.com apparently struggling with whatever "pre-receive hooks" they have installed (?). If anyone can at least point me in the right direction I'd be most grateful.
Make sure you select the tag version in the dropdown. The GitHub form will let you submit when this field is blank, but it will always display the mentioned error message. (You do not need a 'v' prefix.).
The latest Github form makes this more cryptic by having a dropdown titled 'Tag:Choose or Create" that hides the fact that this field is both required but not set.
Latest Github Form
Older Github Form
In a GitHub context, I have seen that error message in this issue
It could be a tag naming convention issue.
The GitHub release documentation recommends (enforces?) a tag following the semantic versioning naming scheme: vX.Y.Z.
As shown here, try vx.y.z.
Is it possible to create new branch directly from Issue which is posted on Github? We have project hosted on Github with many issues, it would be easy for us just to click one button in Issue web interface and create new branch for it to start developing.
This is not possible directly from the issue interface. I can try to provide you some workarounds and maybe start a debate why one would want this feature:
Creating branches directly on the web interface
After you've noticed that you need to start working on an issue you can just go to the repository main page (keyboard shortcut gc) and create a branch with the name you want:
Chrome extensions
If this is a must for you, you can create a chrome extension that augments the UI and creates a branch directly from the Issues WebUI using the GitHub API. There's a lot of open source extensions that augment the default WebUI.
Is it the most efficient way to start a new feature?
I think this changes from developer to developer, but having worked with GitHub for 7 years using Issues I've never felt the need for this feature because unless it's a one line change that doesn't require local testing or compilation, I still want to get down to my command line and IDE. If I have to do that, I still have to at least git fetch to get the branch I just created directly through the issue interface. If that's the case I've always preferred to just look at the issue and run git checkout -b branch-name, optionally with git push if my team needs to see the branch.
Then the issue name wouldn't normally translate to a branch name, at least I wouldn't want that. So that option to create a branch from an issue would probably need to spin out a prompt to allow me to name the branch what I wanted.
This is just my personal opinion and nothing else, hope it helps :)
GitHub finally added this feature request to their roadmap.
Summary
The branch is the first thing a developer creates when the start
working on a new issue. Creating that association makes it really easy
for someone to then follow the work happening and keep everything
connected as they take their idea to code.
Intended Outcome
We want to help developers get started on work faster and signal to
their team where to find the code changes related to an issue. It
should also be really easy to then follow development to the pull
request without the user needing to do additional work to link
everything together.
How will it work?
From the issue page, a user can quickly create a branch with an
auto-generated or custom name that becomes associated with the issue.
They can then fetch the branch and switch to it in their development
environment and further development changes (such as commits and pull
requests) are automatically associated with the issue.
https://github.com/isaacs/github/issues/1125
Nope. You can subscribe this issue.
You could accomplish this by creating a small script.
I'd start by leveraging the Issues Event webhook. This will fire a JSON payload every time an issue is opened. When the webhook fires, your script can then create a new branch using the Create a Reference API endpoint. Note: URL must be formatted as heads/branch, not just branch.
There is an app that automatically creates branches for issues. You can install it here for free: https://github.com/marketplace/actions/create-issue-branch
If you want to create the branches manually instead of automatically:
It does not enable you (directly) to click on create branch from the issue. Instead you would have to write a comment in the issue consisting of: /cib. If you do that, it automatically creates the branch from the issue.
Please note I have no affiliation with the app.
Recently I saw that Github finally added this feature to its Issues Panel.
All you have to do is navigate to an Issue on Github and scroll down to the following section:
It would be really great to have a Github issue be in an intermediary "Resolved" state before I close the issue.
Right now, I have a "Resolved" label and I manually select the issue and change it's label on the web after I commit. Is there a way I can do this from the commit message?
I am sure this is a common problem. How do you guys solve this?
I have never used Github API but can this be done using the API If I were to do this myself?
Since September 14, 2016 you could manage your states with projects. See image below:
Reference and source: GitHub - A whole new GitHub Universe: announcing new tools, forums, and features.
I know it's not like a new state like "needs verification" because you can't like #NevikRehnel said in his answer. But you could make a column named "open", "needs verification" and "closed" and all the issues can you list in correct column.
No, Github issues only support two states (open and closed). Any other "states" must be realized via labels, as you are already doing right now.
And as of right now, there is no way to apply labels from commit messages.
You can always request such features from Github support of course, and they might be implemented at some point.
You can manage this problem using this method : Adding and reassigning github issues via commit message.
A simple ruby script will run on each commit, and check the commit message looking for ~myLabel and =assignedMember to update correctly the issue.