I'm new to Modelica, and I'm wondering, what would be the evaluation of rA within model B.
Is the value 5 or 11 ?
model A
Real rA = 1 + rB;
Real rB = 4;
model B
Real rB = 10;
// Case A : Evaluation of rA = 1 + 4 = 5
// Case B : Evaluation of rA = 1 + 10 = 11
end B;
end A;
Edit : what would be the evaluation of rD in model A using the code below ?
Is the value 5 or 11 ?
model A
Real rA = 1 + rB;
Real rB = 4;
model B
Real rB = 10;
Real rC = rA;
end B;
B myB;
Real rD = myB.rC;
// What is the result of the evaluation of rD ?
// Case A : Evaluation of rD = 1 + 4 = 5
// Case B : Evaluation of rD = 1 + 10 = 11
end A;
The rD = 1 + 4. The rB in model B is not involved in the calculation of rC (or rA). The expression is not like a C macro that is evaluated in that context again.
If you want to have the behavior that myB.rB influences the calculation of myB.rC then you need to change your code.
model A
Real rA = 1 + rB;
Real rB = 4;
model B
Real rB = 10;
Real rC = 1 + rB;
end B;
B myB;
Real rD = myB.rC;
// What is the result of the evaluation of rD?
// Case B : Evaluation of rD = 1 + 10 = 11
end A;
or make a function if that expression is complicated:
model A
function f
input Real x;
output Real y;
algorithm
y := 1 + x;
end f;
Real rA = f(rB);
Real rB = 4;
model B
Real rB = 10;
Real rC = f(rB);
end B;
B myB;
Real rD = myB.rC;
// What is the result of the evaluation of rD?
// Case B : Evaluation of rD = 1 + 10 = 11
end A;
Model B is not instantiated so B.rB=10 is not "known" by model A. Thus, rA = 5
If you want the result to be 11 then the code should be something like:
model A
B b;
Real rA = 1 + rB;
Real rB = b.rB;
model B
Real rB = 10;
// Case A : Evaluation of rA = 1 + 4 = 5
// Case B : Evaluation of rA = 1 + 10 = 11
end B;
end A;
Related
This question already has answers here:
Modelica evaluation of an expression
(2 answers)
Closed 4 days ago.
I'm new to modelica.
What is the evaluated value of rD in the following modelica Code ?
model A
Real rA = 1 + rB;
Real rB = 4;
model B
Real rB = 10;
Real rC = rA;
end B;
B myB;
Real rD = myB.rC;
// What is the result of the evaluation of rD ?
// Case A : Evaluation of rD = 1 + 4 = 5
// Case B : Evaluation of rD = 1 + 10 = 11
end A;
You can use inner/outer references to propagate the value of rA from top-level model A to component model B.
Based on this, for case A the code looks like:
model A
inner Real rA=1 + rB;
Real rB=4;
model B
outer Real rA;
Real rB=10;
Real rC=rA;
end B;
B myB;
Real rD=myB.rC;
// What is the result of the evaluation of rD ?
// Case A : Evaluation of rD = 1 + 4 = 5
// Case B : Evaluation of rD = 1 + 10 = 11
end A;
For case B:
model A
inner Real rA = 1 + rB;
Real rB = myB.rB;
model B
outer Real rA;
Real rB = 10;
Real rC = rA;
end B;
B myB;
Real rD = myB.rC;
// What is the result of the evaluation of rD ?
// Case A : Evaluation of rD = 1 + 4 = 5
// Case B : Evaluation of rD = 1 + 10 = 11
end A;
Hope this works!
Need a little help understanding what is happening in this function particularly line 7 [Fnm1,Fnm2] = fibrecurmemo(N-1); I don't understand how a new variable can be declared here with in the array. an example of what is happening would be appreciated.
function [Fn,Fnm1] = fibrecurmemo(N)
% Computes the Fibonacci number, F(N), using a memoized recursion
if N <= 2
Fn = 1;
Fnm1 = 1;
else
[Fnm1,Fnm2] = fibrecurmemo(N-1);
Fn = Fnm1 + Fnm2;
end
end
Say we start with:
fibrecurmemo(3) %// N is 3
The else statements run (since N > 2):
[Fnm1,Fnm2] = fibrecurmemo(2); %//statement 1
Fn = Fnm1 + Fnm2; %//statement 2
Before statement 2 can run, fibrecurmemo(2) must first run.
The if statements in fibrecurmemo(2) run (since N <= 2):
Fn = 1;
Fnm1 = 1;
As a result, fibrecurmemo(2) returns 1, 1.
Contininuing from statement 1 above,
[1,1] = fibrecurmemo(2); %//statement 1
Fn = 1 + 1; %//statement 2
Finally,
[2, 1] = fibrecurmemo(3);
The function returns two values.
function [xFive,yFive] = addFive(x,y)
xFive = x + 5;
yFive = y + 5;
end
xx = (addFive(3,4))
xx will be equal to 8 in this example
the syntax for assignment for multiple return values is
[a,b,c,...] = someFunc();
where someFunc() has output of [a,b,c,...]
[aa,bb] = addFive(3,4);
cc = addFive(3,4);
if you do it this way you would get
aa == 8
bb == 9
cc == 8
in the case of cc instead of [aa,bb] Then you will just get the first return value.
i.e. you could do
x = fibrecurmemo(5)
[y,z] = fibrecurmemo(5)
in this case x == y
Given that I have a model that can be expressed as:
y = a + b*st + c*d2
where st is a smoothed version of some data, and a, b and c are model coffieicients that are unknown. An iterative process should be used to find the best values for a, b, and c and also an additional value alpha, shown below.
Here, I show an example using some data that I have. I'll only show a small fraction of the data here to get an idea of what I have:
17.1003710350253 16.7250000000000 681.521316544969
17.0325989276234 18.0540000000000 676.656460644882
17.0113862864815 16.2460000000000 671.738125420192
16.8744356336601 15.1580000000000 666.767363772145
16.5537077980594 12.8830000000000 661.739644621949
16.0646524243248 10.4710000000000 656.656219934146
15.5904357723302 9.35000000000000 651.523986525985
15.2894427136087 12.4580000000000 646.344231349275
15.1181450512182 9.68700000000000 641.118300709434
15.0074128442766 10.4080000000000 635.847600747838
14.9330905954828 11.5330000000000 630.533597865332
14.8201069920058 10.6830000000000 625.177819082427
16.3126863409751 15.9610000000000 619.781852331734
16.2700386755872 16.3580000000000 614.347346678083
15.8072873786912 10.8300000000000 608.876012461843
15.3788908036751 7.55000000000000 603.369621360944
15.0694302370038 13.1960000000000 597.830006367160
14.6313314652840 8.36200000000000 592.259061672302
14.2479738025295 9.03000000000000 586.658742460043
13.8147156115234 5.29100000000000 581.031064599264
13.5384821473624 7.22100000000000 575.378104234926
13.3603543306796 8.22900000000000 569.701997272687
13.2469020140965 9.07300000000000 564.004938753678
13.2064193251406 12.0920000000000 558.289182116093
13.1513460035983 12.2040000000000 552.557038340513
12.8747853506079 4.46200000000000 546.810874976187
12.5948999131388 4.61200000000000 541.053115045791
12.3969691298003 6.83300000000000 535.286235826545
12.1145822760120 2.43800000000000 529.512767505944
11.9541188991626 2.46700000000000 523.735291710730
11.7457790927936 4.15000000000000 517.956439908176
11.5202981254529 4.47000000000000 512.178891679167
11.2824263926694 2.62100000000000 506.405372863054
11.0981930749608 2.50000000000000 500.638653574697
10.8686514170776 1.66300000000000 494.881546094641
10.7122053911554 1.68800000000000 489.136902633882
10.6255883267131 2.48800000000000 483.407612975178
10.4979083986908 4.65800000000000 477.696601993434
10.3598092538338 4.81700000000000 472.006827058220
10.1929490084608 2.46700000000000 466.341275322034
10.1367069580204 2.36700000000000 460.702960898512
10.0194072271384 4.87800000000000 455.094921935306
9.88627023967911 3.53700000000000 449.520217586971
9.69091601129389 0.417000000000000 443.981924893704
9.48684595125235 -0.567000000000000 438.483135572389
9.30742664359900 0.892000000000000 433.026952726910
9.18283037670750 1.50000000000000 427.616487485241
9.02385722622626 1.75800000000000 422.254855571341
8.90355705229410 2.46700000000000 416.945173820367
8.76138912769045 1.99200000000000 411.690556646207
8.61299614111510 0.463000000000000 406.494112470755
8.56293606861698 6.55000000000000 401.358940124780
8.47831879772002 4.65000000000000 396.288125230599
8.42736865902327 6.45000000000000 391.284736577104
8.26325535934842 -1.37900000000000 386.351822497948
8.14547793724500 1.37900000000000 381.492407263967
8.00075641792910 -1.03700000000000 376.709487501030
7.83932517791044 -1.66700000000000 372.006028644665
7.68389447250257 -4.12900000000000 367.384961442799
7.63402151555169 -2.57900000000000 362.849178517935
The results that follow probably won't be meaningful as the full data would be needed (but this is an example). Using this data I have tried to solve iteratively by
y = d(:,1);
d1 = d(:,2);
d2 = d(:,3);
alpha_o = linspace(0.01,1,10);
a = linspace(0.01,1,10);
b = linspace(0.01,1,10);
c = linspace(0.01,1,10);
defining different values for a, b, and c as well as another term alpha, which is used in the model, and am now going to find every possible combination of these parameters and see which combination provides the best fit to the data:
% every possible combination of values
xx = combvec(alpha_o,a,b,c);
% loop through each possible combination of values
for j = 1:size(xx,2);
alpha_o = xx(1,j);
a_o = xx(2,j);
b_o = xx(3,j);
c_o = xx(4,j);
st = d1(1);
for i = 2:length(d1);
st(i) = alpha_o.*d1(i) + (1-alpha_o).*st(i-1);
end
st = st(:);
y_pred = a_o + (b_o*st) + (c_o*d2);
mae(j) = nanmean(abs(y - y_pred));
end
I can then re-run the model using these optimum values:
[id1,id2] = min(mae);
alpha_opt = xx(:,id2);
st = d1(1);
for i = 2:length(d1);
st(i) = alpha_opt(1).*d1(i) + (1-alpha_opt(1)).*st(i-1);
end
st = st(:);
y_pred = alpha_opt(2) + (alpha_opt(3)*st) + (alpha_opt(4)*d2);
mae_final = nanmean(abs(y - y_pred));
However, to reach a final answer I would need to increase the number of initial guesses to more than 10 for each variable. This will take a long time to run. Thereofre, I am wondering if there is a better method for what I am trying to do here? Any advice is appreciated.
Here's some thoughts: If you could decrease the amount of computation within each for loop, you could possibly speed it up. One possible way is to look for common factors between each loop and move it outside for loop:
If you look at the iteration, you'll see
st(1) = d1(1)
st(2) = a * d1(2) + (1-a) * st(1) = a *d1(2) + (1-a)*d1(1)
st(3) = a * d1(3) + (1-a) * st(2) = a * d1(3) + a *(1-a)*d1(2) +(1-a)^2 * d1(1)
st(n) = a * d1(n) + a *(1-a)*d1(n-1) + a *(1-a)^2 * d1(n-2) + ... +(1-a)^(n-1)*d1(1)
Which means st can be calculated by multiplying these two matrices (here I use n=4 for example to illustrate the concept) and sum along the first dimension:
temp1 = [ 0 0 0 a ;
0 0 a a(1-a) ;
0 a a(1-a) a(1-a)^2 ;
1 (1-a) (1-a)^2 (1-a)^3 ;]
temp2 = [ 0 0 0 d1(4) ;
0 0 d1(3) d1(3) ;
0 d1(2) d1(2) d1(2) ;
d1(1) d1(1) d1(1) d1(1) ;]
st = sum(temp1.*temp2,1)
Here's codes that utilize this concept: Computation has been moved out of the inner for loop and only assignment is left.
alpha_o = linspace(0.01,1,10);
xx = nchoosek(alpha_o, 4);
n = size(d1,1);
matrix_d1 = zeros(n, n);
d2 = d2'; % To make the dimension of d2 and st the same.
for ii = 1:n
matrix_d1(n-ii+1:n, ii) = d1(1:ii);
end
st = zeros(size(d1)'); % Pre-allocation of matrix will improve speed.
mae = zeros(1,size(xx,1));
matrix_alpha = zeros(n, n);
for j = 1 : size(xx,1)
alpha_o = xx(j,1);
temp = (power(1-alpha_o, [0:n-1])*alpha_o)';
matrix_alpha(n,:) = power(1-alpha_o, [0:n-1]);
for ii = 2:n
matrix_alpha(n-ii+1:n-1, ii) = temp(1:ii-1);
end
st = sum(matrix_d1.*matrix_alpha, 1);
y_pred = xx(j,2) + xx(j,3)*st + xx(j,4)*d2;
mae(j) = nanmean(abs(y - y_pred));
end
Then :
idx = find(min(mae));
alpha_opt = xx(idx,:);
st = zeros(size(d1)');
temp = (power(1-alpha_opt(1), [0:n-1])*alpha_opt(1))';
matrix_alpha = zeros(n, n);
matrix_alpha(n,:) = power(1-alpha_opt(1), [0:n-1]);;
for ii = 2:n
matrix_alpha(n-ii+1:n-1, ii) = temp(1:ii-1);
end
st = sum(matrix_d1.*matrix_alpha, 1);
y_pred = alpha_opt(2) + (alpha_opt(3)*st) + (alpha_opt(4)*d2);
mae_final = nanmean(abs(y - y_pred));
Let me know if this helps !
In the following code, I want a and b to increase by 1 each time the calculations are done. Can someone please have a look:
for t = 1:20
a = 2;
b = 2;
r = a + b;
if r<5
display('reaching target')
elseif r>5
disp('job done')
end
a = a+1;
b = b+1;
end
If I run this, it'll show me reaching target 20 times on screen, meaning for t = 1, a = 2, b = 2, and r = 4 which is less than 5 so displaying reaching target is true. Next step, t = 2, I want a to increase to 3 from 2 and b = 3 as well (increment by 1), and then r = 6 which is greater than 5 so it should display 'job done', but it's not doing that. What is wrong?
You are reassigning the value 2 to both a and b at every start of the loop, r is always going to be equal to 4. Take the initialization of a and b out of the loop.
a = 2;
b = 2;
for t = 1:20
r = a + b;
if r<5
display('reaching target')
elseif r>5
disp('job done')
end
a = a+1;
b = b+1;
end
I'm trying to solve this system:
x = a + e(c - e*x/((x^2+y^2)^(3/2)))
y = b + c(d - e*y/((x^2+y^2)^(3/2)))
I'm using fsolve, but not matter what I put in as the starting points for the iteration, I get the answer that the starting points are the roots of the equation.
close all, clear all, clc
a = 1;
b = 2;
c = 3;
d = 4;
e = 5;
fsolve(#u1FsolveFUNC, [1,2])
Function:
function outvar = u1FsolveFUNC(invar)
global a b c d e
outvar = [...
-invar(1) + a + e*(c - e*(invar(1) / ((invar(1)^2 + invar(2)^2)^(3/2)))) ;
-invar(2) + b + e*(d - e*(invar(2) / ((invar(1)^2 + invar(2)^2)^(3/2))))]
end
I could try with [1,2] as invariables, and it will say that that is a root to the equation, alltough the correct answer for [1,2] is [12.76,15.52]
Ideas?
If you write your script like this
a = 1;
b = 2;
c = 3;
d = 4;
e = 5;
f = #(XY) [...
-XY(1) + a + e*(c - e*(XY(1) ./ (XY(1).^2 + XY(2).^2).^(3/2)))
-XY(2) + b + e*(d - e*(XY(2) ./ (XY(1).^2 + XY(2).^2).^(3/2)))];
fsolve(f, [1,2])
it is a lot clearer and cleaner. Moreover, it works :)
It works because you haven't declared a,b,c,d and e to be global before you assigned values to them. You then try to import them in your function, but at that time, they are still not defined as being global, so MATLAB thinks you just initialized a bunch of globals, setting their initial values to empty ([]).
And the solution to an empty equation is the initial value (I immediately admit, this is a bit counter-intuitive).
So this equation involves some inverse-square law...Gravity? Electrodynamics?
Note that, depending on the values of a-e, there may be multiple solutions; see this figure:
Solutions are those points [X,Y] where Z is simultaneously zero for both equations. for the values you give, there is a point like that at
[X,Y] = [15.958213798693690 13.978039302961506]
but also at
[X,Y] = [0.553696225634946 0.789264790080377]
(there's possibly even more...)
When you are using global command you have to use the command with all the variables in each function (and main workspace).
eg.
Main script
global a b c d e % Note
a = 1; b = 2; c = 3; d = 4; e = 5;
fsolve(#u1FsolveFUNC,[1,2])
Function
function outvar = u1FsolveFUNC(invar)
global a b c d e % Note
outvar = [-invar(1) + a + e*(c - e*(invar(1) / ((invar(1)^2 + invar(2)^2)^(3/2)))) ; -invar(2) + b + e*(d - e*(invar(2) / ((invar(1)^2 + invar(2)^2)^(3/2))))]