I am new to Simulink Test, and I need some help.
I have a model that I am trying to test with a test assessment block. The model is meant to do the following:
When a button is pressed for >= 70ms, the model will assert a 62.5 pulse on the output.
If the button is pressed for < 70ms, the model will not do anything (output remains 0).
The model works fine. I have 2 test sequences. The first presses the button for < 70ms, and we get no output. I can write the assessment for that test case without issue.
However, detecting the output pulse, with a conditional of >= 70ms is proving difficult. I am trying to do all of this in the test manager, so I can run a report at the end showing the switch debounce model works.
Does anyone have any ideas?
enter image description here
I have tried many different verify statement mixed with time (haschanged, elapsed, if, else, etc.).
Related
In my Stateflow model the after() function is not working. If i put for examle after(10,sec) there is no delay in the states, it switches directly from on to the next. I use a Pulse Generator as an eternal clock for Stateflow with following values:
Could this be a reason for that behavior? Are there other related setting?
The after condition says to do something after you have been in a given state for the specified period of time (in your case 10 seconds). The pulse generator you show is set to have rising and falling signals every 1 second. So, without seeing more information about your model, the suspicion would be that you are never in a state long enough for the after condition to become true.
It would help if you showed more of your model.
As a student I am currently working on a Matlab Simulink project. I am quite new to using Matlab/Simulink (few weeks).
I want to implement and run a Matlab “.m” file with which I can open Simulink and start the simulation. The aim is to do a 24h Test with a load cell cut into 1h “pieces” and to save the data to different sheets of an excel file each hour. So my simulation runs for 1h, stops and starts again, and so on. Through Matlab and a “for” loop I do the measures 24 times.
Between measuring steps I have to wait for simulink to finish its measures and saving the file in order for the Simulink window to be able to get closed by close_system('Thesis_SerDatTransm_Simulink').
So I tried to implement the delay with a while loop and by checking if the measures I get fit into an array of the size bigger than 449 (I measure 449 values):
for k=0:1:24
% Load Simulink
load_system('Thesis_SerDatTransm_Simulink.slx')
% Open Simulink
open_system('Thesis_SerDatTransm_Simulink.slx')
% Start Simulation
set_param('Thesis_SerDatTransm_Simulink', 'SimulationCommand', 'Start');
% Save Data
my_cell = sprintf('A%d',k);
xlswrite('file.xlsx',y,my_cell)
% Wait for Simulation
while 1
test=size(y)>=449;
if (test)
close_system('Thesis_SerDatTransm_Simulink')
break
end
end
end
The Problem now is, that program gets stuck at the while loop. Simulink is started, but no simulation or data gathering is done.
So I wondered if anyone could check if something is wrong with my While loop, since the rest of the programm works all fine without the loop (but receiving an error message, that during the simulation, Simulink window can't be closed).
I know there is a way to create a delay with waitforin matlab and create another function which I could call, but I couldn't figure out how to do this yet.
thanks
Regards
hohmchri
The right way to do this is to use the sim function to run your model (not the sequence of load_system, open_system and set_param that you have).
sim will block the execution of m-code until the model completes executing. Data can either be returned into the workspace (when used with no output arguments) or returned as an output from the call to sim. (And then you can write it to Excel as you've done.)
The only reason not to use sim, and perhaps use the commands you have, is if the model takes a long time to initialize, and you don't want to to open and close it every time through the loop. However, even in this case your code isn't correct. The load_system would be outside the loop; the open_system is not required; in your while loop you would poll the model's SimulationStatus property to see if it is still running (not the size of the y variable); and the close_system would be after the loop (as indicated by #m_power in one of the comments).
As written you should use the matlab pause command. This stops your execution for X seconds.
You should also look to optimize your code as m_power states
I have written a matlab program for a simulink model and taking control through it programmatically, but I am facing one problem while using set_param('testmodel11', 'SimulationCommand', 'start');.
It gives all the values at once, that is gives the entire scope and workplace values all at the same time, but I don't want this. I would like to run the program and execute at that point, seeing only rest of the values should be zero. How can I stop the simulation at that point and fetch plots and values from that point only, the rest should be zero. And ideally have this same behavior for the next break points too?
There is a way to pause the simulation at certain breakpoints (simulation points), plot the output or do whatever is desired of it, and then continue the simulation until the next breakpoint.
However, at any breakpoint, you will get output data from all the time samples till the breakpoint is reached. To isolate data from a certain timestamp, you can calculate its index based on the sample time and extract it from the workspace (output data is stored as an array)
Here is the link to my answer which will be helpful, pls go through it:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/38348315/6580313
Now, in the m-file which you will run when the simulation is paused, you can change the value of the constant block which specifies the next simulation time at which simulation needs to be paused. In the m-file, you can also write a code snippet to access the output data.
Once the simulation continues, it will be paused at the new simulation time specified in the constant block.
Let me know in case you have any queries.
It sounds like you want to use the Simulink Debugger. Check out the documentation for more details on how to use it. The main command-line interface to it is sldebug.
I have a 3 simulink models: the first is used as multiple-instance component inside the second; the second is a component inside the third (the third one is just used for testing purpuse and inkect test stimuli on the second).
If I simulate my model in "Normal" way all works fine.
If I set my HW configuration (ARM Cortex) and try to run it in "SIL" mode it doesn't work because "The component has an unsupported continuous sample time. Input and output ports with continuous sample times are not supported. To avoid this error you should update the component so that there are no continuous sample times crossing its boundary."
Same error also trying to simulate the first model (the inner one).
Do you have an idea to solve my problem?
Thank you.
Yes. Use discrete sample times, not continuous ones. You can display the sample times in your model to see which ones are continuous and you need to change, see the documentation for more details.
I am trying to control a simulink from a M-file.
What I want to do in the M-file is give the simulink model some input, run the simulink model, change one input value at 0.6 seconds, continue running the simulink model with the new input.
I already know that by using set_param, I can start, pause and continue the simulink, but the problem is I don't know how to pause the simulink model at a certain time(0.6s), is it possible to get the current time from simulink model and read it in the M-file?
Another way I already know is using sim to run simulink model from 0 to 0.6s, and use SimState to save the information at 0.6s, then load these information to resume the simulation. I am trying to change the input before the simulation resumed, but it seems that the model will load the input values from the information it saved, it won't take the new input value.
I stuck in this problem for a very long time, could someone help me with this please?
Thank you very much.
You can get the current time of a running simulation with:
get_param('simulink_model_name', 'SimulationTime');
So for instance by checking this value from your M-file during simulation by using
timer(...)
you can detect when the simulation is at 0.6 seconds.
I used a combination of simulink and m-script to achieve a similar goal.
In your model, add one 'assert' block. Double click it, and uncheck 'Stop Simulation when assertion fails'. In the 'Simulation Callback when assertion fails' field, add three commands:
set_param(bdroot,'SimulationCommand','pause');
run('myscript.m'); %insert the script name
set_param(bdroot,'SimulationCommand','continue');
Now connect the inport of this block to a 'not equal to' relational operator. Connect the first inport of the relational operator to a clock (pls set the decimation for analog clock or the sample time [usually -1 for inherited] for the digital clock).
The second inport is connected to constant block with a value of 0.6
On simulating the model, the simulation will pause at 0.6 sec, execute the m-file to change the input parameter (considering that it's tunable) and then continue with the simulation.
The assertion block is called when its input signal becomes 0. At 0.6 sec, the output of the relational operator will be 0.
Let me know if it worked.
This is not currently possible from an M-file. If you want to dynamically change the input at a given time externally, it will require an S-Function. Even this solution is difficult and wrought with flakey-ness since the Mathworks does not want to support this functionality in that it defeats one of the features of another toolbox they sell. In time, I believe they will grant this privledge, but it does not exist today. Also, why not use a dynamic input block to change the input value, like a map, signal builder, etc. ?