I have created an website in Castle Monorails and the users that are using the site are complaining that it is very slow so I have done some investigations with fiddler and I discovered that the requests (from the same user) are not simultaneous.
I have tried to use but it is not working and it seams that Castle monorail does not support this.
Do you have any suggestions/solutions/workaround for this problem?
Wild guess: you're loading all the javascript files included in MonoRail ($Ajax.InstallScripts(), $Scriptaculous.InstallScripts(), etc) at the top of your main layout. Javascript blocks and these scripts in particular are pretty big so the slowdown gets very noticeable.
If this is not the case, post more information, like fiddler screenshots, MonoRail version.
In any case, it's very unlikely that the problem is caused by MonoRail.
Related
I need to develop REST server strictly accrding to jsonapi.org specification and I'm not sure if there is some complex solution or even if it's easy to develop such thing.
I've found sails-hook-jsonapi, but it looks unmaintained for some time.
I'm new to Sails and not aware of all it's features and would appreciate any help, I may missed something obvious.
I have needed this too. There is not anything that works yet with Sails. sails-hook-jsonapi does not work correctly. I Forked that code and am maintaining my own version of it but there are still significant attribute serialization issues with multiple records. However, it does work at a basic level. I am also working on a new project sails-generate-jsonapi-blueprints but it is not nearly ready yet.
Sails is great but can ba a royal PIA. The guys maintaining Sails have had many requests for jsoanapi.org support but I do not believe that will happen anytime in the near future. If you REALLY must have JSONapi.org format I would suggest Loopback or some other API that already has support for it out of the box.
Actually, I take part of that back. sails-hook-jsonapi is working. I made a little change in the fork I maintain. https://github.com/NikkiDreams/sails-hook-jsonapi. Ian is maintaining the original project fork too I believe. https://github.com/IanVS/sails-hook-jsonapi
So the catch about the hook is that it hijacks every single request sent to responses/ok.js If you need something like an Authorizer that does not need jsonapi create a variant of ok.js that simply does a res.json(data) without the jsonapi-serializer being called when serializing the response.
sails-hook-jsonapi will serialize most of your data to your needs. But it still has a few limitations. Depending on the complexity of your queries these may not be an issue.
TODOs: Included request parameter handling (400 response if present)
Links
Top-level "self" links
Top-level "related" links
Resource-level "self" links
Related resource relationship links
Metadata links
Pagination
Formatting
Non-dasherized attributes
Sparse fieldsets
Long story short - there is no way to do it out of the box with little time investment. At least for now.
But sails-hook-jsonapi looks like good starting point, repository seems to be active now.
I've done project prototype on loopback.io framework, because I was in hurry and loopback had better jsonapi support.
We are looking at building a b2b application for the iPhone. A major concern is the possible delay in publishing updates to the applications. I would like to believe that all updates will be orderly, but the reality of a newly found bug for a client or an upcoming trade show could mean that updating the application NOW is critical. Even an "expedited" day wait would not be acceptable.
One option I have thought of is having a flag for each page that we send down when the user logs into our server. If the flag is set, then instead of the native screen for a given page, there would be a page with a UIWebView that would get the latest HTML from the web or stored HTML loaded at the time of login.
I would prefer storing the HTML and using it "offline" because a data connection cannot be guaranteed.
The questions are:
1) Does this violate any of Apple's licensing?
2) Is this feasible or is there a hole I am not thinking of?
It doesnt violate Apple's guidelines and as far as I know you are not missing anything here...in fact, we have the exact same problem in my company (which on top of the issue that you have, we have customers that would like to "brand" the app for their users, and thats how we accomplish that) and there are no issues with apple (for now...:)). Obviously, you need to think of user experience implications...hope that helps.
Just looking for some help/suggestions with this. I require my own server for an upcoming project that will be hosting users websites. I want to build a control panel the user can log into and modify their website which will be stored elsewhere on the server. This all seems easy enough, It's just managing domains and emails that confuse me.
What should I look for to manage domain names and point them to the correct website and also what would be the best way to manage email accounts/set up new ones etc. I want to avoid cPanel/WHM if possible, I'm looking to control most things through the control panel I will be building. So any suggestions on this would be useful as well, as I will be wanting to add email accounts through php (Can be done using a shell I assume?).
I will also be wanting to measure bandwidth used on the websites contained in each users directory, any suggestions on making this possible?
I'm really looking for some suggestions on what software to use to set this up, any advice would be really helpful!
Thanks,
Graeme
It sounds like you've got a lot of creative room. May I suggest a web framework? Django. With it you can build out a nice control panel, it's template system is clean and concise. It's also based on Python and thats why I suggest it. If there is a python module for it, you can use it in Django... so things like altering, creating, etc. local data/files is a breeze. you simply us Python (you can even forget it's "django"), crunch your data and then spit it out (into django... out to templates.. to display to the user).
You'll likely want AJAXY biznazz, their is a nice Django App for that, Dajax. Django has a rich and helpful community and tons of resources. Just hop on GitHub.com and search for Django, You'll find tons of stuff.
Im building a DNS Control Panel with it. Which sounds like a minimal version of what you're doing.
I am administrating a small, private website with 100% trusted users (about 60 people, i know them all personally).
I am having many problems with the PHP based upload system i have in place currently, mainly with users encountering timeout errors and other varying issues due to the way the upload is handled (not to mention the complete deadzone in the UI created by making the user stare blindly at the page until the upload finishes
Anyways, i have been tossing around alternative forms of file uploading i could offer. FTP accounts were nixed due to the level of tech savvy required. Flash/Java uploaders were nixed because i don't really want proprietary third party applets running on my site.
The other idea i came up with that i think would be perfect would be to offer the ability to EMAIL the files to the server. Emailing attachments is a simple enough task, and better yet it provides the user with some tangible feedback to the uploading process.
My question is, how could i go about implementing such a system?
The server is running Gentoo Linux with Apache and i have full root access. Mail dameons can be installed to my needs.
If you have a better way to upload files, perhaps you could offer that instead?
Stick with PHP. It's certainly not perfect but the problems you're describing can probably be handled. max-execution-time and upload_max_filesize are configurable values. I would at least try tweaking those numbers (no php code changes required) before trying to implement an email based solution.
There are several file upload libraries with progress bars using pure javascript. Keep it in PHP.
Is there a way I can make a request to a different server than the one that's being used for development using a RequestBuilder?
I keep getting
com.google.gwt.http.client.RequestPermissionException: The URL
http://127.0.0.1:4321/getSellers is invalid or violates the same-origin
security restriction
while I am sending request from 127.0.0.1:8888
GWT currently doesnt support cross domain ajax calls - but it can be worked around if you are willing to do a bit of jsni. And I heard a rumour some time ago that there is a gwt patch with the solution, but its not perfect. see this http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors/browse_thread/thread/94c18c4ec158070c/
to work around using jsni, you can use whats called the windows.name transport - see this blog http://www.sitepen.com/blog/2008/07/22/windowname-transport/ . i havent been able to locate a library for gwt to automate this, but i dont think its too hard to do yourself in jsni (and dont me misled by the blog being about dojo, its a general technique).
There is a detailed explanation on the topic of the Same Origin Policy and its consequences for developing with GWT here:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-doc-1-5/wiki/FAQ_SOP
The simple answer is: No, that's something that is disallowed for security reasons.
However, it should be possible to work around this limitation with all kinds of techniques (proxy servers, Yahoo Pipes, etc). As I'm no AJAX expert, I will leave the explanation of those to others.