Is there any ways to merge row group values.suppose Department rowgroup display 3 values Accounts,IT and Finance,both Finance and Account has the same constant values falls within.My problems when run the reports both a divided into different row cells but have same values.want both to combine into 1 row, so matrix table can have only 2 rows
Instead of grouping on Department, i.e.
=Fields!Department.Value,
group on a expression that will return the same value for Finance and Account, e.g.
=IIf(Fields!Department.Value = "Accounts" or Fields!Department.Value = "Finance", "Accounts-Finance", Fields!Department.Value).
In the above example this will give two groups, Accounts-Finance and IT, instead of the three original groups.
Similarly, you could add this expression as a calculated field to the Dataset being used, then group on the calculated field. This is the same approach but will move the logic out of the matrix so it can be used elsewhere in the report.
Related
I am trying to show the highest values in column B which is related to each uniqe reference.I've tried this formula but didn't work.
The Data
Output 01.03.2019
This is out put from the below formula
Blockquote
01.03.2019_1
Blockquote
enter[01.03.2019_2]5 image description here
Expected Output
whileprintingrecords;
stringvar dept;
if {baseevent1.Column B} = Maximum({baseevent1.Column B},{baseevent1.Referance}) then
dept:={baseevent1.Referance}
There is an easier way to achieve your goal with less formula usage and more grouping and sorting.
You will need 2 grouping levels. The top-most group will be Referance, and then below that group on Column B. Ensure that Column B is sorted from lowest to highest. By sorting this way, the very last detail record will always contain the highest value of Column B.
Then suppress both group header section, suppress the details section, and suppress the Column B group footer section.
Place data fields for Referance, Column B, and Formula in the Referance Group Footer Section.
By grouping and sorting in this manner, when you reach the footer section for your top most grouping, the values each field contains will always be the record that had the maximum value of Column B.
No need for any formula fields at all with this approach. :)
Just do be aware, that if you ever have a duplicate value in Column B within a Referance Group, then you are going to run into issues, as this approach will print only the values of the last record in the grouped data. However, even with a formulaic approach like you began with, you were still going to run into this issue should there be any duplicates in the composite key value created by concatenating Referance and Column B.
I am trying to create calculated fields for a workflow that I will export to an excel pivot table. I am doing this by creating a view and selecting columns from another table while creating extra necessary columns.
I am faced with the task of populating rows within a column based on a calculation only when rows of another column equal a certain value. I have tried different variations of the below formula to no avail.
CREAT MATERIALIZED VIEW adwords_calculated AS
SELECT SUM("Impressions" * 1 ) WHERE AD Relevance =
"Positive Ad Relevance" AS Positive Ad Impressions
Please let me know if anything within this formula is unclear.
I have a crystal report - showing some financial data. As normal with financial data we have several general ledger accounts - which are grouped hierarchically. We are using grouping in Crystal report with some totals on hierarchical groups.
There are some rows where the values are zero. The groups also have total of zero as a result of this. We need to hide these rows. If we try to check the sum of the field - on the group level - it hides all the parent rows (since they themselves do not have any value - only values are derived from the child rows).
Need some way to do this in crystal?
You can suppress rows base on a condition.
In the menu go to Report->Suppress Expert...
Select the details line then select the formula button next to Suppress
You only need to put the condition that will be true to suppress the line
{[Your value field]} = 0
For groups, you will need to find the sum of your total for that particular group
SUM({[Your value field]}, {[field you are using to grouped by]}) = 0
I have a query with 3 parameters that a user should be able to define:
AND (ORION_SCHED.TRIP.DATE_TIME = '09/11/2012')
AND (ORION.CUST.COUNTRY = 'BE')
AND (ORION_SCHED.TRIP.ID_SHIFT ='1')
DATE_TIME should be a datepicker
COUNTRY dropdown with defined values
ID_SHIFT dropdown with defined values
I guess this isn't an issue?
The result of this query will return the dataset
My actual question: I want the result to be presented in this way
So always 3 blocks of data next to each other, the data of every block is the result of the query filtered down on the column TRUCK_ID (a sub-select of the returned dataset)
The empty cells per block are a nice to have, these are non-unique values per TRUCK_ID that I don't wish to be repeated on every line, but like I said a nice to have.
I would add a new column to the query that returned 1,2 or 3 (for each different TRUCK_ID. Then I would use 3 Tablix (one per column on your report) and filter the data by the new column you added on the query.
Then you just group on the TruckID on each tablix and play around with the format. It should work.
I want to create multiple groups in ireport, and the data should display in a group-wise manner.For Eg:
First the Group1 data should be printed completely, then,
Group1:
Module Data
After this i want to print the Group2 data completely
Group2:
Category data
I am using the Result Set datasource.
Can Someone help me in this?
Jasper reports will work exactly in this manner as long as your query results are ordered properly.
For example, let's say you are grouping by a field called "MY_GROUP" and it has values "GROUP A" and "GROUP B". In your report you will create a group for field "MY_GROUP". In your query, make sure you have MY_GROUP as the first field in your ORDER BY clause. You can also accomplish this in iReports by adding the "MY_GROUP" field as your the first field in the Sort Options section of the Report query.
Now that you have added your group and are ordering properly your results will come out like this:
Header - GROUP A
Detail - GROUP A
Footer - GROUP A
Header - GROUP B
Detail - GROUP B
Footer - GROUP B
Exactly as you wish. My guess is that you were not properly ordering your query results. This could result in having multiple groupings for GROUP A, GROUP B, etc. all interspersed.
If groups in iReport don't keep all the data together, use subreports. When Jasper gets to a subreport, it runs the whole subreport and puts the whole thing into the report. You could have something like:
Subreport 1 - Group 1
Group 1 first record
Group 1 second record
Group 1 third record
...
Group 1 last record
Subreport 2 - Group 2
Group 2 first record
Group 2 second record
Group 2 third record
...
Group 2 third record
It's exactly as Tom said. Jasper Reports Groups do not order the data retrieved from the query, they just take it in the order it comes.
In order to display the information in a group-wise manner, you have to add an ORDER BY to the query so the rows the report receives are already ordered.
So there is an issue that happens when you use multiple group headers. The first header behaves like expected ordered by Column Value A only on unique values. The 2nd header using Column Value B will print on every row despite being non-unique values.
In theory you should be able to use ORDER BY:
ORDER BY ValueA, ValueB
to properly display the report assuming you are using sql, plsql, etc... However, in my case that did not happen, though for others it seems to work.
Use subreports to attach the minor differences via unique reports. You create a root report with empty details. Then you create Unique reports to serve as sub reprots. Finally, you use the subreport element to link the values into the root report. Though that is a good bit of work and may cause repeat code.
A hacky way I used was: A mixture of "Print When Expressions" with logical boolean expressions with 2 group headers and a column header.
Boolean Expressions:
$F{QUERY}.equals(Query1) && ($P{P_Typequery}.equalsIgnoreCase("QueryA") && $P{P_parameter} == null)
and
$F{QUERY}.equals(Query1) && ($P{P_Typequery}.equalsIgnoreCase("P_QueryA") && $P{P_parameter} != null)
with two group headers and a column header. The column header will not repeat for every row so you assign one of the booleans expressions to it's "print when" so it does not always print. The first group header will not repeat for every row and works. The 2nd group header is used for the times you DO want it to repeat for every unique value since it always prints for every row, and you use the other boolean on it's "print when". Hope it helps